Research Article  Open Access
Bi Liang, Fengmao Lv, "A Study on the Optimization of Chain Supermarkets’ Distribution Route Based on the QuantumInspired Evolutionary Algorithm", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 7964545, 11 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7964545
A Study on the Optimization of Chain Supermarkets’ Distribution Route Based on the QuantumInspired Evolutionary Algorithm
Abstract
The chain supermarket has become a major part of China’s retail industry, and the optimization of chain supermarkets’ distribution route is an important issue that needs to be considered for the distribution center, because for a chain supermarket it affects the logistics cost and the competition in the market directly. In this paper, analyzing the current distribution situation of chain supermarkets both at home and abroad and studying the quantuminspired evolutionary algorithm (QEA), we set up the mathematical model of chain supermarkets’ distribution route and solve the optimized distribution route throughout QEA. At last, we take Hongqi Chain Supermarket in Chengdu as an example to perform the experiment and compare QEA with the genetic algorithm (GA) in the fields of the convergence, the optimal solution, the search ability, and so on. The experiment results show that the distribution route optimized by QEA behaves better than that by GA, and QEA has stronger global search ability for both a smallscale chain supermarket and a largescale chain supermarket. Moreover, the success rate of QEA in searching routes is higher than that of GA.
1. Introduction
The chain operation originates from the United States. But according to the record in “Encyclopedia Americana,” in 200 BC (Before Christ), a Chinese businessman had many stores, which was to be called the earliest sprout of the chain operation [1]. In 1859, the world’s first chain store was born in the United States—the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. In 1969, the WalMart supermarket, ranking first in the world’s retail industry, built its first distribution center, which showed chain supermarkets began to pay attention to the management of logistics links [2]. At present, the United States, Japan, Germany, and other developed countries have conducted a lot of studies on the distribution mode of chain supermarkets, and their theories and practices are more mature. For example, for wholesalers, retailers, warehouses, transportation, and other main subjects, the United States constructs different sorts of distribution centers for different subjects to expand distribution business. Its goal is to reduce the logistics cost and increase the efficiency of supermarket operation. Selfsupporting distribution centers are built for largescale chain supermarkets in Japan, and also distribution centers that can be used commonly are built for distribution business of smallscale retailers, which play an effective role in improving the distribution mode of chain supermarkets [3].
Compared with foreign countries, China’s chain operation started later. In the late 1980s, the chain operation in our country just started quietly. In 1990s, the chain operation bloomed in medium or large cities as well as in coastal areas, such as Xifu in Beijing, Lianhua in Shanghai, Meijia in Dongguan, and Hongqi in Chengdu. In recent years, with the rapid development of the chain operation in China, our country’s chain supermarkets have implemented the “unified procurement, unified accounting, unified distribution, centralized management” business model [4]. Relying on the fine scale economy, low logistics cost, and other advantages, it has become the major retail format in current domestic circulation. The unified procurement and distribution of chain supermarkets are mainly achieved through the operation of distribution centers, and the speed of working efficiency directly reflects the core competitiveness of chain supermarkets.
However, the distribution system of chain supermarkets in our country is imperfect and there are still many problems, such as unreasonable transport phenomena (e.g., repeat transport, detour transport, convective transport, empty vehicles return, and backward transport), inappropriate truck arrangement and low distribution efficiency, and high transportation cost. The basic cause of these problems is unreasonable distribution routes. With the intensification of market competition, it is necessary that the chain supermarket operation should have a set of efficient logistics distribution system to carry out scientific and reasonable optimization design for distribution routes and transport the required distribution goods to the designated chain stores in the shortest time, at the fastest speed, and with the lowest cost. Therefore, the optimization design of distribution routes has been the focus of the distribution research of chain supermarkets.
At present, there are two kinds of algorithms for the optimization design of distribution routes, that is, the traditional heuristic algorithm and the modern heuristic algorithm [5]. The traditional heuristic algorithms are mainly the saving mileage algorithm, the nearest neighbor algorithm, the nearest insertion algorithm, the scanning algorithm, and so on. The modern heuristic algorithms are mainly GA, the ant colony algorithm, the simulated annealing algorithm, the taboo search algorithm, the neural network algorithm, and so on. QEA is a modern heuristic algorithm, which is based on the concept of quantum computing and absorbs the characteristics of quantum superposition, quantum entanglement, and quantum coherence [6]. Through the quantum bit encoding chromosome, it introduces the quantum rotation, the crossover, the mutation, and other operators to realize the evolution of the population. Meanwhile, it uses the latest information to update the quantum rotation gate in order to accelerate the convergence of the algorithm.
In recent years, QEA has attracted lots of attention. Han and Kim [7] carry out experiments on the knapsack problem, a classic combinatorial optimization problem, to demonstrate the effectiveness and the applicability of QEA. The results show that QEA performs well, even with a small population, without premature convergence as compared to the conventional GA. Feng et al. [8] solve the traveling salesman problem (TSP) based on QEA. It adopts quantum bit (Qbit) individual to encode the visited sequence of the cities and employs the quantum rotation gate to adjust the population dynamically. The experiment results of 14 cities show that the proposed approach is feasible and effective for the smallscale TSP. Lau et al. [9] apply QEA to handle the unitscheduling problem. Studies on the application demonstrate the superior performance and feasibility of QEA.
Unlike previous genetic algorithms based on crossovers, QEA adopts Qbit representation to codify the solution. Using observations to generate new solutions instead of crossovers, QEA can avoid permutation problems. In addition, QEA decreases the risk of throwing away potential solutions since it just modifies the Qbits rather than discarding the subsolutions when bad fitness values are found [10]. Additionally, in terms of loss of diversity, scalability, solution quality, and robustness to fitness noise, QEA performs better when compared with other evolutionary algorithms. Presently, QEA, with the advantages of good robustness, parallel processing, and high efficiency, has been widely used in various fields, especially in the combinatorial optimization problem, and good results have been obtained, so in this paper the algorithm is adopted to optimize the distribution routes of chain supermarkets.
2. The Background of QEA
2.1. QBit and QGate
QEA is a kind of new intelligent optimization algorithm, which is a combination of the quantum computing and the evolutionary algorithm. The smallest unit of information stored in a twostate quantum computer is called a quantum bit or Qbit. A Qbit may be in the “0” state, in the “1” state, or in any superposition of the two [11]. The state of a Qbit can be represented aswhere and are complex numbers that specify the probability amplitudes of the corresponding states. gives the probability that the Qbit will be found in the “0” state and gives the probability that the Qbit will be found in the “1” state. Normalization of the state to unity guarantees
And, a Qbit individual as a string of Qbits is defined as where . If there is a system of Qbits, the system can represent 2^{m} states at the same time. However, in the act of observing a quantum state, it collapses to a single state.
The state of a Qbit can be changed by the operation with a quantum rotation gate or Qgate, and the following rotation gate is used as a basic Qgate in QEA, such as and then where is a rotation angle of each Qbit toward either 0 or 1 state depending on its sign, and . Figure 1 depicts the polar plot of the rotation gate for Qbit individuals. At the same time, the angle parameters used for the rotation gate are shown in Table 1, where is the profit, is the sign of , and and are the th bits of the best solution and the binary solution , respectively. The value of has an effect on the speed of convergence, and the sign determines the direction of convergence to a global optimum [12].

2.2. The Procedure of QEA
QEA is a kind of evolutionary algorithm based on population, so it is similar to the traditional evolutionary algorithm. Its solution to the problem depends on the evolutionary population consisting of quantum chromosomes, mainly including population initialization, quantum chromosome observation, evaluation, update, and other operations. The basic procedure of QEA is described as follows [7, 13].
To initialize population , set evolutionary generation ; the size of population is , the number of Qbits is , and a population is containing individual chromosomes, in which is the Qbit individual in the population, and the value of in is initialized with .
To make by , according to the probability amplitudes of each Qbit individual in to construct the specific observation values of the quantum superposition state, is the observation value of each Qbit individual and is a binary string of length .
To repair , evaluate all Qbit individual by the fitness function, store the best solutions among into , and judge whether meets the greatest evolutionary generation. If true, the algorithm terminates. If false, perform Step .
To update , use Qgate to update the population and determine with lookup Table 1.
To use to iterate the evolutionary generation , the algorithm jumps to Step for execution until the termination condition is satisfied.
The last step is to output the optimal solution.
2.3. The Application of QEA in the Problem of Distribution Route
According to literatures, QEA, apart from its application to the knapsack problem, the traveling salesman problem, the flow shop scheduling problem, and other ordering problems [14], is also used to solve the vehicle routing problem (i.e., the problem of distribution route) [15].
Hu and Wu [16] present a novel QEA with computing the rotation gate using elite mean values based on chaos theory for the vehicle routing problem with simultaneous delivery and pickup. They develop a grey binary scheme for individual representation and propose an efficient population initialization based on nearest insertion algorithm (NIA) and chaos function to generate an initial population. At last, they apply a local search strategy based on the NIA and OrOpt et al. to the solution. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the QEA. Cui et al. [17] propose a new improved quantum evolution algorithm (IQEA) with a mixed local search procedure for solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem (CVRP). First, they construct an IQEA with a double chain quantum chromosome, new quantum rotation schemes, and selfadaptive quantum NOT gate to initialize and generate feasible solutions. Then, they adopt three local search procedures 11 exchange, 10 exchange, and 2OPT to further strengthen IQEA’s searching ability. The experiment results demonstrate the superiorities of the IQEA over the PSO, SR1, and SR2.
However, QEA is not applied to solve the chain supermarket distribution route optimization problem at present, whose general solutions are the Dynamic Planning Algorithm, the Saving Algorithm, the ant colony algorithm, and so on. Due to the fact that the chain supermarket distribution route optimization problem is similar to the vehicle routing problem, we take QEA in this paper to cope with it.
3. The Optimization of Distribution Routes Based on QEA
3.1. Problem Description
This paper adopts QEA to optimize the distribution routes of chain supermarkets. Its mathematical model is described as follows: given that a distribution center of a supermarket chain uses at most ( represents truck , ) trucks to distribute goods for ( represents chain store , ) chain stores in a certain geographical area, where represents the warehouse of the distribution center, and the load capacity of each truck is , the demand for the goods of each chain store is , the shortest distance from the chain store to the chain store is , the goal of optimization is to make all trucks transport goods with the shortest distance and spend least time.
First define two variables:
and the range of each variable is
The designed model is as follows: the target function: Each truck’s load capability: The truck must deliver goods for each chain store with orders. The goods of each chain store with orders are delivered by only one truck. To avoid the subloop of truck driving route,
Moreover, the chain store has certain requirements on the departure and arrival time of the truck to transport goods, so the time constraints (that is time window) need to be added to the model. Its specific details are as follows [18–20]. where indicates the earliest beginning time that the chain store allows, indicates the latest beginning time that the chain store permits, represents the beginning time of the distribution task of the chain store , and the chain store requires that the distribution task be started in the range of . represents the end time of the distribution task of the chain store , represents the time it takes from the chain store to the chain store , and represents the beginning time of the distribution task of the chain store .
The main parameters involved in the model and their meanings are listed in Parameters.
Only the weight of goods to be delivered is taken into account instead of their size and shapes, and they can be mixed up. Besides, traffic condition is good during the period of transporting goods (that is to say, there are no traffic jams, traffic accidents, or other undesirable conditions).
3.2. Solving the Optimization Distribution Route by QEA
According to the basic procedure of QEA, in this paper QEA is adopted to effectively solve the distribution route model of chain supermarkets and obtain the optimal distribution route. Before the optimization of distribution routes, there are several preconditions:(1)The location of the distribution center, the warehouse, and the chain store is determined.(2)The number of trucks, the truck speed, and its load capacity in the distribution center are known.(3)The demand for the goods of each chain store is known.(4)The time window of each chain store is known.(5)All distributed goods are shipped uniformly from the distribution center on time.(6)All distributed goods can be mixed together in the same truck.
In the process of distribution route optimization, in order to avoid the local optimum of the classical QEA, this paper introduces the cataclysm operator and sets the evolutionary step “distance.” If the generation of the continuous “distance” of the optimal value stays the same, the evolution falls into premature convergence. Then the current optimal individual needs to be stored, and other individuals are supposed to be reinitialized, so as to enter the next generation evolution as well as jump over the local optimum. The specific solution procedure is as follows [9, 21–23]:
: randomly initialize a Qbit population. For chain stores, this paper uses threedimensional Qbit matrix to represent a quantum chromosome.
Generate the order of the chain stores needing to distribute the goods and produce twodimensional 01 observed population matrix by generating a random number between 0 and 1. In addition, the row coordinate containing 1 represents the order of trucks to deliver goods; column coordinate represents the chain store number and randomly adjusts the matrix to ensure that each row and column is only one number 1 [3].
Use the greedy strategy to form the distribution route. When starting to use a truck every time, the truck distributes goods in turn according to the order of the chain store service. If the truck’s load capacity is unable to meet the needs of the next chain store, another truck will be used. Besides, if the required number of trucks exceeds the total number of trucks in the distribution center, the route is not feasible.
Evaluate each formed distribution route and save the current optimal individual.
Judge whether meets the termination condition. If true, output the optimal solution. If false, perform Step .
Judge whether meets the cataclysm condition. If true, save the current optimal individual and reinitialize a Qbit population and enter the next generation evolution. If false, directly perform next step.
Use Qgate to update the Qbit population and to iterate , and then jump to Step for execution.
Output the optimal solution that is the optimal distribution route of chain supermarkets.
In Step , the update procedure of the Qbit population is presented in the following [24]. Procedure Update begin while do begin determine with the lookup Table 1 obtain from the following: if ( is located in the first or third quadrant) then else end end
And, the flow chart for solving optimization distribution route is shown in Figure 2.
4. Experiments
4.1. Related Algorithms
This study adopts QEA and GA to make a comparative experiment for the same case (Hongqi Chain Supermarket in Chengdu). QEA is a kind of improved evolutionary algorithm, which has been mentioned in detail in Section 2, including some of its parameters. And GA is a kind of classical evolutionary algorithm, which mimics the natural biological evolution of species [25], for the purpose of solving high computational complexity problems such as VRP. Its main procedure for the distribution route optimization problem is presented in Figure 3 [26]. And the initial population is created randomly. Fitness function represents the method for the evaluation of individuals, and the simplest way to calculate the fitness is to sum up the lengths of all routes. Selection phase is the process where the individuals are selected on the basis of their fitness to mate and produce offspring, while the most widely used selection method is the tournament method. Crossover is the process that mimics mating between two individuals with the goal of producing children, and route exchange crossover (REX) is a crossover operation. Mutation is an operator that serves as the mean to widen the search space for a small degree, and the simple method is the insertion mutation [27].
4.2. Experimental Case
Hongqi Chain Supermarket in Chengdu was founded on June 22, 2000, which was renamed Chengdu Hongqi Chain Joint Stock Limited Company on June 9, 2010. At present, the company has developed into a largest commercial chain enterprise in the western region of China with chain operation, logistics distribution, and ecommerce as a whole. There are four logistics distribution centers and more than 8600 chain stores in Sichuan Province. It has established a good winwin business cooperation relationship with thousands of suppliers and has become a key connection enterprise for essential life necessities of Sichuan Province. In order to bring to consumers a more relaxing and convenient life and make them enjoy it, this enterprise makes full use of the company’s huge market network and information technology resources and other advantages, following the “commodity + service” business strategy to be the pioneer in constructing a convenient and multifunctional service platform for the consumer. As a result the unanimous praise from consumers is won.
4.3. A SmallScale Case
We take Hongqi Chain Supermarket in a Town of Chengdu city as an example. There are 1 distribution center, 10 trucks (the load capacity of each truck is 5 t, the maximum travel distance is 150 km, and the average distribution speed is 50 km/h), and 12 chain stores. The average speed of loading or unloading is 0.3 h/t, the demanding for goods of every chain store is , its service time is , and its service time window is . On one day, the demanding of every chain store and the service time constraint are shown in Table 2.

The distance between the distribution center and the chain store and the distance between one chain store and another chain store is , its unit is kilometer, and the detailed information is shown in Figure 4. So the distribution time between chain stores is calculated by the formula .
According to the distribution route model of chain supermarkets constructed above, we take the corresponding data into the model and get the distribution route model of Hongqi Chain Supermarket in the Town; for example, the target function is . Other formulas are introduced by analogy. Then we solve the optimization route of the smallscale Hongqi Chain Supermarket according to the above already designed solution procedure of distribution route optimization through QEA and make a comparison with that by GA to solve the optimization route.
The population size of QEA is equal to 10, a Qbit chromosome is updated by the rotation gate of (4), and the ith Qbit value is updated as (5). The angle value is set to pi and the angle parameters used for the rotation gate are shown in Table 1. The convergence is fixed as 0.005, the global migration period in generation is 30, and the maximum number of generations is set to 100. The population size of GA is equal to 10, the probabilities of crossover and mutation are fixed as 0.01 and 0.01, and the generation is set to 100. The experiment results obtained are as follows.
Using QEA to solve the problem of route optimization requires at least 5 trucks, the shortest total distance for traveling is 142.9 kilometers, and the minimum total time is 2.86 hours. Its optimization routes are as follows. Truck 1: the center→4→5→the center Truck 2: the center→7→6→the center Truck 3: the center→3→2→1→the center Truck 4: the center→9→10→11→the center Truck 5: the center→8→12→the center.
But using GA to solve the problem of route optimization requires at least 6 trucks, the shortest total distance for traveling is 168.2 kilometers, and the minimum total time is 3.37 hours. Its optimization routes are as follows. Truck 1: the center→10→9→8→7→the center Truck 2: the center→4→the center→11→the center Truck 3: the center→3→the center→1→2→the center Truck 4: the center→5→the center Truck 5: the center→6→the center Truck 6: the center→12→the center
The results show that, in solving the optimization route of the smallscale Hongqi Chain Supermarket, the number of trucks taken by QEA is less than that of trucks taken by GA by one. Besides, the total traveling distance of QEA is 25.3 kilometers, less than that of GA. Moreover, the solution made by QEA helps to save the time of 0.50 hours when compared with that made by GA. And the convergence of two algorithms is shown in Figure 5.
From Figure 4, we can see that the convergence rate of QEA is faster than that of GA, so the optimal distribution route can be found quickly by QEA. And we compare the two algorithms on the best value, the worst value, the average value, the search success rate, and so on, as shown in Table 3.

From Table 3, we can see that the average value of QEA is smaller than GA, the success rate in searching is higher than that of GA, and the convergence generation of average successful search is smaller than that of GA, so the effect of the distribution route optimization through QEA is better than that through GA.
4.4. A LargeScale Case
We take Hongqi Supermarket Chain in Chengdu, China, as an example. There are 4 distribution centers, 684 trucks (most of the load capacity of trucks is 5 t), and 8607 chain stores. Other conditions are similar to the smallscale Hongqi Chain Supermarket, and the data of distance among chain stores and that of demanding of every chain store come from the data management center of Hongqi Supermarket Chain. We still adopt QEA and GA to solve it and their parameters are defined like the smallscale case above. Among them, the population size of QEA is equal to 10; the angle value is set to pi. The convergence is set to 0.005, the global migration period is 30, and the maximum number of generations is 1000. The population size of GA is equal to 10, the probability of crossover is set to 0.01, the probability of mutation is set to 0.05, and the generation is 1000.
At last, we obtain the optimal distribution route for a certain distribution center of Hongqi Supermarket Chain on the day as shown in Figures 6 and 7, as well as the convergence of two algorithms as shown in Figures 8 and 9. In addition, all results are averaged over 30 runs.
And, we get the results of the experiments as shown in Table 4, where BE represents the best solution; DE indicates the error of the best solution and the known best solution.

From Table 4, we can learn that QEA searches a better distribution route than GA, and DE is smaller.
4.5. The Analysis of the Experiment Results
It can be seen from the distribution route optimization experimental results of the smallscale and the largescale Hongqi Chain Supermarket in Chengdu, for smallscale chain supermarkets, QEA and GA are not caught in local convergence and the success rate of QEA search is higher than that of GA [28]. Moreover, for largescale chain supermarkets, the allowance between the optimal solution obtained by QEA and the known optimal solution remains rather less, and QEA has much stronger global optimization search ability than GA. This is mainly due to the fact that QEA uses a quantum bit coding, which has the character of superposition. And, as a result, a single code can represent the superposition of multiple individuals, which can make the search space larger in the process of evolution and maintain individual diversity, and it is not easy to fall into local optimum and so on [29]. Thus, the global search capability of QEA is strong and its computation efficiency is high. But it needs much computation, its computation speed is slow, and its performance is not very good, which need improving in the future.
5. Conclusions
At present, the business competition of domestic chain supermarkets is further intensified, and the logistics distribution of chain supermarkets has become the focus of competition. Whether the distribution route is scientific or reasonable will directly affect the logistics cost and market competition of chain supermarkets. This paper takes Hongqi Chain Supermarket in Chengdu as an example and adopts QEA to optimize the distribution route of the chain supermarket. First of all, we set up a mathematical model of the distribution route of the chain supermarket. Then we design the process of solving the model according to QEA idea and adopt the 01 matrix encoding method and the decoding scheme in which we firstly arrange the route and then group the route. At the same time, we use the quantum rotation gate to realize the evolution and introduce the cataclysm operator to ensure the diversity of solution space. Finally, we compare QEA with GA in the fields of the convergence, the optimal solution, the search ability, and so on.
The experiment results show that the optimization distribution route of chain supermarkets by QEA is better than that of GA. It makes the number of trucks rather smaller and the total traveling distance of trucks much shorter. It not only shortens the time to transport the goods and decreases the cost of truck’s transportation, but also effectively improves the economic benefits of chain supermarkets, enhances the quality of their service, strengthens the core competitive ability of the market, and boosts the healthy and stable development of chain supermarkets. However, in this paper, we do not take the uncertainty of parameters into consideration like the actual freight volume of every chain store, transport time, and so on caused by the economic fluctuations, holidays, traffic restrictions, competitors, and other uncertain factors. And these uncertainties also affect the distribution route optimization, which is the focus of upcoming research.
To sum up, the logistics distribution of chain supermarkets is a systematic project and the distribution route optimization needs combination of the distribution center location of chain supermarkets, the network layout of chain supermarkets, the reasonable scheduling of drivers, and the current road conditions as well as other constraint factors to achieve greater efficiency.
Parameters
The total number of trucks  
The total number of chain stores  
The truck  
The chain store  
The warehouse of the distribution center  
:  The load capacity of the truck 
:  The demand for the goods of the chain store 
:  The shortest distance from the chain store to the chain store 
:  The time it takes from the chain store to the chain store 
:  The truck distributing goods for the chain store 
:  The truck transporting goods from the chain store to the chain store 
The target function  
:  The earliest beginning time that the chain store allows 
:  The latest beginning time that the chain store permits 
:  The beginning time of the distribution task of the chain store 
:  The end time of the distribution task of the chain store . 
Conflicts of Interest
Bi Liang and Fengmao Lv declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2014 (61375029) and the General Project of Education Department of Sichuan Province in 2016 (16ZB0362).
References
 G. Edwin Rines, Encyclopedia Americana, Scholastic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
 L. Yan, Transport & Distribution Management, Science Press, Beijing, China, 2010.
 D. Peng, Quantum evolutionary algorithm for vehicle routing problem [M.S. thesis], Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China, 2009.
 L. Ren, Scheme design on distribution route optimization of Jingxiang chain supermarket [M.S. thesis], Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2012.
 H. Jiang, J. Yang, and L.F. Jia, “The optimization of chain supermarket distribution route based on the saving algorithm,” Logistics SciTech, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Zhang, Model and hybrid QEA for logistics distribution vehicle routing problem with dynamic demand [Ph.D. dissertation], Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China, 2010.
 K. H. Han and J. H. Kim, “Quantuminspired evolutionary algorithm for a class of combinatorial optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 580–593, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Y. Feng, Y. Wang, H. W. Ge, C. G. Zhou, and Y. C. Liang, “Quantuminspired evolutionary algorithm for travelling salesman problem,” in Computational Methods, G. Liu, V. Tan, and X. Han, Eds., pp. 1363–1367, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 T. W. Lau, C. Y. Chung, K. P. Wong, T. S. Chung, and S. L. Ho, “Quantuminspired evolutionary algorithm approach for unit commitment,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1503–1512, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Lv, G. Yang, W. Yang, X. Zhang, and K. Li, “The convergence and termination criterion of quantuminspired evolutionary neural networks,” Neurocomputing, vol. 238, pp. 157–167, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Wang, “Advances in quantuminspired evolutionary algorithms,” Control and Decision, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1321–1325, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Qian, J. Zheng, and C. Zhang, “Reviews of current studying progress on quantum evolutionary algorithms,” Control and Decision, vol. 26, no. 03, pp. 321–325, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Liang, Research on optimization problems based on evolutionary algorithms and quantum computing [Ph.D. dissertation], University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, 2012.
 L. R. da Silveira, R. Tanscheit, and M. M. B. R. Vellasco, “Quantum inspired evolutionary algorithm for ordering problems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 67, pp. 71–83, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Wang, S. K. Kowk, and W. H. Ip, “Design of an improved quantuminspired evolutionary algorithm for a transportation problem in logistics systems,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2227–2236, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. J. Hu and B. Wu, “Quantum evolutionary algorithm for vehicle routing problem with simultaneous delivery and pickup,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, pp. 5097–5101, IEEE, Shanghai, China, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Cui, L. Wang, J. Deng, and J. Zhang, “A new improved quantum evolution algorithm with local search procedure for capacitated vehicle routing problem,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 159495, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H.P. Chiang, Y.H. Chou, C.H. Chiu, S.Y. Kuo, and Y.M. Huang, “A quantuminspired Tabu search algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems,” Soft Computing, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1771–1781, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Jiang, Research on distribution route optimization of Jiabaijia Chain Supermarket [M.S. thesis], Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2013.
 Y. Zheng, T.H. Ma, and W. Liu, “Quantuminspired evolutionary algorithm for course timetabling,” Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 19–22, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Hey, “Quantum computing: an introduction,” Computing & Control Engineering Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 105–112, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 K.H. Han and J.H. Kim, “Quantuminspired evolutionary algorithms with a new termination criterion, Hl gate, and twophase scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 156–168, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Xie, B. Li, and Z. Zhang, “A new hybrid quantum evolutionary algorithm,” Computer Science, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 166–170, 2008 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
 T. Zheng and M. Yamashiro, “Solving flow shop scheduling problems by quantum differential evolutionary algorithm,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 643–662, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Darwin, On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for Life, 1859.
 S. Karakatic and V. Podgorelec, “A survey of genetic algorithms for solving multi depot vehicle routing problem,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 27, pp. 519–532, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. Mohammed, M. K. Abd Ghani, R. I. Hamed, S. A. Mostafa et al., “Solving vehicle routing problem by using improved genetic algorithm for optimal solution,” Journal of Computational Science, vol. 21, pp. 255–262, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Jia, Research on distribution route optimization of lowcarbon logistics based on genetic algorithm [M.S. thesis], Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China, 2014.
 D. Bao, Y. Li, and Q. Hua, “An improved quantum evolution algorithm and its application in village postman problem,” Computer Application and Software, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 103–105, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Bi Liang and Fengmao Lv. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.