Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture of Concrete Gravity Dams by Stress-Seepage-Damage Coupling Model

<div>Stress versus crack width curve and fracture energy <svg height="11.8174pt" id="M25" style="vertical-align:-3.1815pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 15.0753 11.8174" width="15.0753pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M673 297H417L411 270C517 261 522 258 506 183L487 92C476 38 428 19 360 19C207 19 123 132 123 287C123 472 243 631 441 631C557 631 617 583 617 469L647 472C650 545 655 604 658 632C625 643 554 666 467 666C201 666 23 502 23 278C23 90 156 -16 339 -16C410 -16 501 6 569 24C566 43 567 70 573 101L589 183C604 259 607 262 667 271L673 297Z" id="g113-72"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="684" vert-adv-y="684"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.827,3.132)"><path d="M606 650H137L129 618C217 609 221 609 203 518L129 129C115 46 106 40 26 32L18 0H300L307 32C210 40 203 45 218 129L249 305H358C454 305 455 296 457 219H491L531 425H497C465 353 463 350 366 350H259L300 569C306 605 310 611 346 611H444C522 611 535 598 541 578C550 557 553 519 552 485L588 489L606 650Z" id="g50-71"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="630" vert-adv-y="630"></glyph.data></g></svg>.</div>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture of Concrete Gravity Dams by Stress-Seepage-Damage Coupling Model 