Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9634725, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9634725
Research Article

A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multicriteria Decision-Making Method with Interactive Criteria and Its Application to Renewable Energy Projects Selection

School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Jianfeng Cai; nc.ude.upwn@fjiac

Received 27 March 2017; Revised 10 October 2017; Accepted 31 October 2017; Published 12 December 2017

Academic Editor: Ching-Ter Chang

Copyright © 2017 Jichang Xiao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Wang, Y. Jing, C. Zhang, and J. Zhao, “Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2263–2278, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  2. E. Loken, “Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1584–1595, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Polatidis, D. A. Haralambopoulos, G. Munda, and R. Vreeker, “Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning,” Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 181–193, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. D. Pohekar and M. Ramachandran, “Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 365–381, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. A. Haralambopoulos and H. Polatidis, “Renewable energy projects: Structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework,” Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 961–973, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Beccali, M. Cellura, and M. Mistretta, “Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology,” Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 2063–2087, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Strantzali and K. Aravossis, “Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 55, pp. 885–898, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Saeedpoor and A. Vafadarnikjoo, “Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy vikor & ahp methodology: the case of istanbul,” Energy, vol. 79, pp. 536-537, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Yazdani-Chamzini, M. M. Fouladgar, E. K. Zavadskas, and S. H. H. Moini, “Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision making,” Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 957–978, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Balezentiene, D. Streimikiene, and T. Balezentis, “Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 17, pp. 83–93, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Ertay, C. Kahraman, and I. Kaya, “Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: the case of Turkey,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 38–62, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, “Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 6577–6585, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. San Cristóbal, “Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: the Vikor method,” Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 498–502, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Kahraman, I. Kaya, and S. Cebi, “A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,” Energy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1603–1616, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. I. AbdelAzim, A. M. Ibrahim, and E. M. Aboul-Zahab, “Development of an energy efficiency rating system for existing buildings using Analytic Hierarchy Process—the case of Egypt,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 71, pp. 414–425, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Balin and H. Baraçli, “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology based upon the interval type-2 fuzzy sets for evaluating renewable energy alternatives in Turkey,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. M. Abaei, E. Arzaghi, R. Abbassi, V. Garaniya, and I. Penesis, “Developing a novel risk-based methodology for multi-criteria decision making in marine renewable energy applications,” Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 102, pp. 341–348, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Çelikbilek and F. Tüysüz, “An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources,” Energy, vol. 115, pp. 1246–1258, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Bhowmik, S. Bhowmik, A. Ray, and K. M. Pandey, “Optimal green energy planning for sustainable development: A review,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 71, pp. 796–813, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Wu, D. L. Xu, and J. B. Yang, “A review on multiple criteria performance analysis of renewable energy systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Automation, pp. 822–827, IEEE, 2017.
  21. A. Kumar, B. Sah, A. R. Singh et al., “A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 69, pp. 596–609, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. E. Arce, A. Saavedra, J. L. Míguez, and E. Granada, “The use of grey-based methods in multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems: a review,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 47, pp. 924–932, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. Dincer and C. Acar, “A review on clean energy solutions for better sustainability,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 585–606, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Zeng, D. Streimikiene, and T. Baležentis, “Review of and comparative assessment of energy security in Baltic States,” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, pp. 185–192, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Torra, “Hesitant fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 529–539, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 395–407, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. Z. Xu and M. Xia, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 2128–2138, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. Z. Xu and X. Zhang, “Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 52, pp. 53–64, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Xia, Z. Xu, and N. Chen, “Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 259–279, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Zhang and G. Wei, “Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 4938–4947, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Joshi and S. Kumar, “Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based {TOPSIS} method for multi-criteria group decision making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 248, no. 1, pp. 183–191, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. R. M. Rodriguez, L. Martinez, and F. Herrera, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez, and F. Herrera, “A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 241, pp. 28–42, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  34. I. Beg and T. Rashid, “TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1162–1171, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Wei, N. Zhao, and X. Tang, “Operators and comparisons of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 575–585, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Z. Zhang and C. Wu, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2185–2202, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. H. Liao, Z. Xu, and X. J. Zeng, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 271, pp. 125–142, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. H. Liu and R. M. Rodríguez, “A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 258, pp. 220–238, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  39. H. Liao, Z. Xu, and X.-J. Zeng, “Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR Method and Its Application in Qualitative Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1343–1355, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Farhadinia, “Multiple criteria decision-making methods with completely unknown weights in hesitant fuzzy linguistic term setting,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 93, pp. 135–144, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. X. Gou, Z. Xu, and H. Liao, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative queuing method for multiple criteria decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 388-389, pp. 225–246, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Yu, H. Zhang, and J. Wang, “Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators and their Applications to Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problem,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. G. Wei, “Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making,” Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1881–1893, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. Z. S. Xu, L. Pan, and H. C. Liao, “Multi-criteria decision making method of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set based on improved MACBETH method,” Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1266–1272, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  45. H. Liao, X. Gou, and Z. Xu, “A survey of decision making theory and methodologies of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set,” Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  46. Y. Xu, A. Xu, J. M. Merigó, and H. Wang, “Hesitant fuzzy linguistic ordered weighted distance operators for group decision making,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, vol. 49, no. 1-2, pp. 285–308, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  47. F. Meng and X. Chen, “A hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-granularity decision making model based on distance measures,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1519–1531, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. H. Liao and Z. Xu, “Approaches to manage hesitant fuzzy linguistic information based on the cosine distance and similarity measures for HFLTSs and their application in qualitative decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 5328–5336, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. Pang and W. Yang, “Some hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic distance measures,” International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1573–1586, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. H.-C. Huang and X. Yang, “Pairwise Comparison and Distance Measure of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 954040, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J.-Q. Wang, J.-T. Wu, J. Wang, H.-Y. Zhang, and X.-H. Chen, “Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on the Hausdorff distance of hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers,” Soft Computing, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. C. Wei, Z. Ren, and R. M. Rodríguez, “A hesitant fuzzy linguistic TODIM method based on a score function,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 701–712, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. P. Liu, S.-M. Chen, and J. Liu, “Multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy interaction partitioned Bonferroni mean operators,” Information Sciences, vol. 411, pp. 98–121, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  54. R. Lourenzutti, R. A. Krohling, and M. Z. Reformat, “Choquet based TOPSIS and TODIM for dynamic and heterogeneous decision making with criteria interaction,” Information Sciences, vol. 408, pp. 41–69, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. W. F. Liu, Y. X. Du, and J. Chang, “Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and applications in decision making,” Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1033–1040, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  56. Y. D. He, Z. He, and H. Huang, “Decision making with the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy power interaction averaging operators,” Soft Computing, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. G. Wei, “Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 2119–2132, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. H. Garg, “Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 101, pp. 53–69, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S.-M. Chen and J.-A. Hong, “Multicriteria linguistic decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and the aggregation of fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 286, pp. 63–74, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. Z. Xu and J. Chen, “Ordered weighted distance measure,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 432–445, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. Zeng, J. M. Merigó, D. Palacios-Marqués, H. Jin, and F. Gu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy induced ordered weighted averaging distance operator and its application to decision making,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. Z. Shouzhen, “An Extension of OWAD Operator and Its Application to Uncertain Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making,” Cybernetics and Systems, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 363–375, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “Decision-making with distance measures and induced aggregation operators,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 66–76, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. J. M. Merigó and M. Casanovas, “Induced aggregation operators in the Euclidean distance and its application in financial decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 7603–7608, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. Zeng and W. Su, “Intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted distance operator,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1224–1232, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. Murofushi and M. Sugeno, “An interpretation of fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral as an integral with respect to a fuzzy measure,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 201–227, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J.-L. Marichal, “An axiomatic approach of the discrete Choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 800–807, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. H. Liao, Z. Xu, and X. Zeng, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 271, pp. 125–142, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  69. N. B. Karayiannis, “Soft learning vector quantization and clustering algorithms based on ordered weighted aggregation operators,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1093–1105, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. X. U. Zeshui and J. Chen, “Ordered weighted distance measure,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 432–445, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  71. V. Torra, “On the construction of models based on fuzzy measures and integrals,” Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 220, pp. 89–97, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. M. Grabisch and C. Labreuche, “A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 175, pp. 247–286, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  73. A. Keikha and H. Mishmast Nehi, “Fuzzified Choquet Integral and its Applications in MADM: A Review and A New Method,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 337–352, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. F. Herrera and L. Martínez, “A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 746–752, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. Z. S. Xu, “Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making,” Omega , vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 249–254, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. M. Grabisch, “A new algorithm for identifying fuzzy measures and its application to pattern recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems & International fuzzy Engineering Symposium, vol. 1, pp. 145–150, 1995.
  77. M. Grabisch, “The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 445–456, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. W. Wang, Z. Wang, and G. J. Klir, “Genetic algorithms for determining fuzzy measures from data,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 171–183, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  79. M. Larbani, C.-Y. Huang, and G.-H. Tzeng, “A novel method for fuzzy measure identification,” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  80. W. Zhang, Y. Ju, and X. Liu, “Multiple criteria decision analysis based on Shapley fuzzy measures and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 105, pp. 28–38, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus