Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 9646303, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9646303
Research Article

Risky Multicriteria Group Decision Making Based on Cloud Prospect Theory and Regret Feedback

1School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, No. 145, Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin 150001, China
2School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92, Xidazhi Street, Nangang District, Harbin 150001, China
3College of Science, Harbin Engineering University, No. 145, Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin 150001, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Shuang Yao; moc.361@mainolla

Received 29 December 2016; Revised 12 April 2017; Accepted 26 April 2017; Published 25 May 2017

Academic Editor: M. L. R. Varela

Copyright © 2017 Yan Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. E. Steuer and P. Na, “Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: a categorized bibliographic study,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 496–515, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Wallenius, J. S. Dyer, P. C. Fishburn, R. E. Steuer, S. Zionts, and K. Deb, “Multiple criteria decision making, multi-attribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead,” Management Science, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1336–1349, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Liu and W. Li, “Risky multiobjective decision making theory and its application,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 11, no. 6, article 1014, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Eskandari, P. Ffolliott, and F. Szidarovszky, “Uncertainty and method choice in discrete multiobjective programming problems,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 69, no. 2-3, pp. 335–351, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. H. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY, USA, 1921.
  6. J. S. H. Kornbluth, “Dynamic multi-criteria decision making,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 81–92, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. F. Meng, C. Tan, and X. Chen, “An approach to Atanassov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on prospect theory,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 591–605, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Z. P. Fan, X. Zhang, F. D. Chen, and Y. Liu, “Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels: a method based on prospect theory,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 65, pp. 341–350, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. H. Hansson and C. J. Lagerkvist, “Decision making for animal health and welfare: integrating risk-benefit analysis with prospect theory,” Risk Analysis, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1149–1159, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Dong, N. Luo, and H. Liang, “Consensus building in multiperson decision making with heterogeneous preference representation structures: a perspective based on prospect theory,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 35, pp. 898–910, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. X. H. Li and X. H. Chen, “Extension of the TOPSIS method based on prospect theory and trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for group decision making,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 231–247, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. N. Zhang, Z. Fang, and X. Liu, “Grey situation group decision-making method based on prospect theory,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 703597, 7 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  14. S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. Chiclana, F. Herrera, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. H. Behret, “Group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 70, pp. 33–43, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Liao, Z. Xu, X.-J. Zeng, and D.-L. Xu, “An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations,” Information Sciences, vol. 329, pp. 274–286, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. X. D. Peng and Y. Yang, “Algorithms for interval-valued fuzzy soft sets in stochastic multi-criteria decision making based on regret theory and prospect theory with combined weight,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 54, pp. 1–16, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  20. X. Yang, T. Y. Lin, J. Yang, Y. Li, and D. Yu, “Combination of interval-valued fuzzy set and soft set,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 521–527, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. D. F. Li, “Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Journal of Computer & System Sciences, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. F. Q. Wang, X. Li, and X. H. Chen, “Hesitant fuzzy soft set and its applications in multicriteria decision making,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2014, Article ID 643785, 10 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. L. I. De-Yi, C. Y. Liu, D. U. Yi, and X. Han, “Artificial intelligence with uncertainty,” Journal of Software, vol. 15, no. 11, article 2, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. L. Deyi, M. Haijun, and S. Xuemei, “Membership clouds and membership cloud generators,” Journal of Computer Research and Development, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 15–20, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  25. W. Shuliang, L. Deren, S. Wenzhong, L. Deyi, and W. Xinzhou, “Cloud model-based spatial data mining,” Geographical Information Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 67–78, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. Y. Weng and Z. Zhongying, “Pattern mining for time series based on cloud theory pan-concept-tree,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, 2004.
  27. Z. Yunfang, D. Chaohua, and C. Weirong, “Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms based on cloud generators,” Journal of Computational Information Systems, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 671–678, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. Lv, L. Yuan, and J. Zhang, “Cloud theory-based simulated annealing algorithm and application,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 4-5, pp. 742–749, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Li, C. Liu, and W. Gan, “A new cognitive model: cloud model,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 357–375, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Y. Zhang, T. Li, and X. H. Xu, “Consensus model for multiple criteria group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 57, pp. 127–135, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. F. Meng and X. Chen, “An approach to uncertain linguistic multi-attribute group decision making based on interactive index,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 319–344, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. P. Liu, F. Jin, X. Zhang, Y. Su, and M. Wang, “Research on the multi-attribute decision-making under risk with interval probability based on prospect theory and the uncertain linguistic variables,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 554–561, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. L. Wang, Spatial data mining and knowledge discovery based on data field and cloud model [dissertation], Wuhan University, 2002.
  34. Y. J. Wang and H. S. Lee, “Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1762–1772, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. J. Ren, “Linguistic-stochastic multi-criterion decision-making method based on cloud model,” Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2792–2797, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J.-Q. Wang, P. Lu, H.-Y. Zhang, and X.-H. Chen, “Method of multi-criteria group decision-making based on cloud aggregation operators with linguistic information,” Information Sciences, vol. 274, pp. 177–191, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. J.-Q. Wang, J.-J. Peng, H.-Y. Zhang, T. Liu, and X.-H. Chen, “An uncertain linguistic multi-criteria group decision-making method based on a cloud model,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 171–192, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. K. Zhao, J. W. Gao, Z. Q. Qi, and C. B. Li, “Multi-criteria risky-decision-making approach based on prospect theory and cloud model,” Control and Decision, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 395–402, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  39. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 297–323, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, “A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 316–325, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. X. Chen, H. Zhang, and Y. Dong, “The fusion process with heterogeneous preference structures in group decision making: a survey,” Information Fusion, vol. 24, pp. 72–83, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. E. Bell, “Regret in decision making under uncertainty,” Operations Research, vol. 30, pp. 961–981, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  43. G. Loomes and R. Sugden, “Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty,” The Economic Journal, vol. 92, no. 368, pp. 805–824, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. A. Muermann, O. S. Mitchell, and J. M. Volkman, “Regret, portfolio choice, and guarantees in defined contribution schemes,” Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 219–229, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. S. Michenaud and B. Solnik, “Applying regret theory to investment choices: currency hedging decisions,” Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 677–694, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar