Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 9897153, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9897153
Research Article

MOQPSO-D/S for Air and Missile Defense WTA Problem under Uncertainty

School of Air and Missile Defense, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710051, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Hao Xu; moc.361@oahuxdgk

Received 16 December 2016; Revised 5 November 2017; Accepted 12 November 2017; Published 14 December 2017

Academic Editor: Erik Cuevas

Copyright © 2017 Hao Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. M. Teague, K. R. Dorner, and W. B. Hartman, Back to the future: integrated air and missile defense in the pacific, Air University, Air Force Research Institute USA, Maxwell, USA, 2015.
  2. M. Ni, Z. Yu, F. Ma, and X. Wu, “A lagrange relaxation method for solving weapon-target assignment problem,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2011, Article ID 873292, 10 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Q. Chang, J. W. Chen, N. Hao et al., “Terminating control of ant colony algorithm for armored unit,” System Engineering and Electronics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 336–342, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. Wang H and C. Wang, “Variable value control technology of genetic algorithm for wta of ground target attacking,” Acta Armamentraii, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1889–1895, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  5. H. Liang and F. Kang, “Adaptive chaos parallel clonal selection algorithm for objective optimization in WTA application,” Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 3459–3465, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. L. Fan, Q. H. Xing, M. F. Zheng et al., “Weapon-target allocation optimization algorithm based on IDPSO,” System Engineering and Electronics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 336–342, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  7. X. Liu, Z. Liu, W. S. Hou et al., “Improved MOPSO algorithm for multi-objective programming model of weapon-target assignment,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 326–330, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. Zhang, R. N. Yang, and J. L. Zuo, “Improved decomposition-based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization model of dynamic weapon-target assignment,” Acta Armamentraii, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1533–1540, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Zhang, R. N. Yang, J. L. Zuo et al., “Improved MOEA/D for dynamic weapon-target assignment problem,” Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 121–128, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Sun, B. Feng, and W. B. Xu, “Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 325–331, IEEE, Portland, OR, USA, 2004.
  11. J. Sun, W. B. Xu, and B. Feng, “A global search strategy of quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, pp. 111–116, IEEE, Singapore, Singapore, 2004.
  12. Y. J. Won, K. H. Lee, and J. H. Lee, “Performance improvement of space borne SAR using antenna pattern synthesis based on quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, pp. 1–12, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Xu, L. Zhang, B. Du et al., “A mutation operator accelerated quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm for hyperspectral endmember extraction,” Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 197, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  14. S.-H. Xu, X.-D. Mu, D. Chai, and P. Zhao, “Multi-objective quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm with double-potential well and share-learning,” Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 4921–4927, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Li, Y. Wang, and L. Jiao, “MOQPSO: A new quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization for nearest neighborhood classification,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference, TENCON 2016, pp. 3165–3168, Singapore, November 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. N. Omkar, R. Khandelwal, T. V. S. Ananth, G. Narayana Naik, and S. Gopalakrishnan, “Quantum behaved Particle Swarm Optimization (QPSO) for multi-objective design optimization of composite structures,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11312–11322, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Shi and Q. W. Chen, “Multi-objective quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm based on QPSO and crowding distance sorting,” Control and Decision, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 540–547, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. B. Heyam, A quantum behaved particle swarm approach to multi-objective optimization, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, 2015.
  19. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Mostaghim and J. Teich, “Strategies for finding good local guides in multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO),” in Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, pp. 26–33, IEEE, Indianapolis, IN, USA, April 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. B. D. Liu, “Uncertainty Theory,” (Fifth Edition), Uncertainty Theory Laboratory, 2016, http://orsc.edu.cn/liu/ut.pdf.
  22. S. Huband, P. Hingston, L. Barone, and L. While, “A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 477–506, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. R. Raquel and P. C. Naval Jr., “An effective use of crowding distance in multiobjective particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of the 7th Annual conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 257–264, ACM, New York, NY, USA, June 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. R. Schott, Fault tolerant design using single and multicriteria genetic algorithm optimization, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995.
  25. E. Zitzler, Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization Methods and Applications, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 1999.