Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 1058982 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1058982

Na Qu, Jianhui Wang, Jinhai Liu, Zhi Wang, "An Arc Fault Detection Method Based on Multidictionary Learning", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 1058982, 8 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1058982

# An Arc Fault Detection Method Based on Multidictionary Learning

Revised23 Oct 2018
Accepted19 Nov 2018
Published03 Dec 2018

#### Abstract

This paper uses the dictionary learning of sparse representation algorithm to detect the arc fault. Six kinds of characteristics, that is, the normalized amplitudes of 0Hz, 50Hz, 100Hz, 150Hz, 200Hz, and 250Hz in the current amplitude spectrum, are used as inputs. The output is normal work or arc fault. Increasing the number of training samples can improve the accuracy of the tests. But if the training samples are too many, it is difficult to be expressed by single dictionary. This paper designs a multidictionary learning method to solve the problem. Firstly, n training samples are selected to form s overcomplete dictionaries. Then a dictionary library consisting of s dictionaries is constructed. Secondly, t (ts) dictionaries are randomly selected from the dictionary library to judge the test results, respectively. Finally, the final detest result is obtained through the maximum number of votes, that is, the modality with the most votes is the detest result. Simulation results show that the accuracy of detection can be improved.

#### 1. Introduction

Electrical fire generally refers to high temperature, arc, and spark ignition because of the fault of electrical wiring, electrical equipment, and power supply equipment. Statistical analysis shows that the proportion of electric fires caused by arc fault is up to 50%. Therefore, the detection of arc fault is meaningful to ensure electrical safety.

UL1699 standard for arc fault protection is proposed in 1999. A new apparatus named Arc Fault Circuit Interrupter (AFCI) is introduced. AFCI is a circuit breaker to detect arc fault and cut off the circuit so as to reduce the damage. In recent years, many scholars have begun to study the arc fault. Generally, current is selected as the detection signal of arc fault. Most of the researches on arc fault current detection are based on the zero rest. The wavelet transform method is always used to detect arc fault . In addition to wavelet transform, a few other methods have been studied to detect the arc fault. The ABCD method is to establish the relationship between input and output current through a transfer matrix. The coefficients of ABCD matrix depend on conductor parameters, arc fault, and load types. It is mainly applied to aircraft arc fault detection . The arc fault current detection algorithm based on the theory of quantum probability model is mainly applied to the photovoltaic power system . The method of Chirp-zeta transform is used to analyze the low frequency harmonic of the current signal .

Sparse representation classification has recently attracted the interests of many researchers and has been successfully applied to several problems such as robust face recognition, visual tracking, and transient acoustic signal classification. In , a tracking model of bidirectional sparse representation is established. The model achieves uniform convergence through L2 norm constraint and the sparse correlation coefficient matrix. In , the models and the algorithms of comprehensive dictionary, analytic dictionary, and blind dictionary are introduced. The typical applications of dictionary learning methods are illustrated. In , a new SAR target recognition method, which is based on the discriminative dictionary learning and joint dynamic sparse representation model, is proposed. In , the method of nonnegative matrix decomposition (NMF) concretely embodies the concept of sparse representation and provides a complete Matlab code and extension method. In , a discriminative dictionary, which is learned by K-SVD and LC-KSVD algorithm, is presented. In , two dictionary learning methods based on Fisher discrimination dictionary learning (FDDL) are proposed. In , a multimodal task-driven dictionary learning algorithm under the joint sparsity constraint (prior) to enforce collaborations among multiple homogeneous/heterogeneous sources of information is proposed. In , a sparse representation model based on joint kernel is proposed to complete key-frame extraction for human motion capture data. In , the problem of transmit beam pattern matching design for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar is addressed within a sparse representation framework.

In this paper, the multidictionary learning method of sparse representation is studied and applied to arc fault detection to improve the accuracy.

#### 2. Multidictionary Learning Method

Sufficient training samples of the modality are given . The test sample y from the same modality will approximately lie in the linear span of the training samples associated with object. We define a new matrix D=[D1 D2 D3 Dn] for the entire training set as the concatenation of all n object modalities. Then, the linear representation of y can be rewritten in terms of all training samples as follows:

is a coefficient vector whose entries are zero except those associated with the modality. As the entries of the vector x0 encode the identity of the test sample y, it is tempting to attempt to obtain it by solving the linear system of equation Dx=y. There may be an infinite number of solutions to the underdetermined linear equations. In order to reduce the range of selection to a satisfactory solution, it is necessary to increase condition. A function J(x) is introduced to rationally evaluate the candidate solution of x, and its value is expected to be as small as possible , usually in the form of norm, as follows:

When , sparse solution   can be obtained. Then, a sparse representation model is formed, and D is the learning dictionary. In practical applications, formula (2) is usually written in the form of formula (3) due to the existence of errors.

ε is the error threshold; is a test vector.

The overcomplete dictionary is composed of training samples. Increasing the number of training samples can improve the accuracy of the tests. But if the number of training samples is too much, it is difficult to be expressed by single dictionary. This paper designs a multidictionary learning method to solve the problem. The multidictionary learning scheme is shown in Figure 1. Firstly, n training samples are selected to form s overcomplete dictionaries. Then a dictionary library consisting of s dictionaries is constructed. Secondly, t (ts) dictionaries are randomly selected from the dictionary library to judge the test results, respectively. Finally, the final detest result is obtained through the maximum number of votes; that is, the modality with the most votes is the detest result.

The minimum residual classification is used to determine the detest result of single-dictionary learning. is the projection coefficient of the test sample y on the dictionary D of the modality. When y belongs to the modality, approximates y. The smaller distance between and y (i.e., residual) is, the greater possibility that belongs to modality is, as shown in the following formula:

#### 3. Sample Data Acquisition

In the current waveform of arc fault, there is zero rest (i.e., nearly flat zero current segments around the normal zero crossing of the waveform) under the resistive load, the DC motor load, and series motor load conditions. When the load is the computer, the normal current waveform also appears to be zero rest. The zero rest of current waveform is not obvious when the arc fault occurs under the resistive and inductive load condition. Therefore, the arc fault cannot be detected accurately by the zero rest.

The current amplitude spectrum is obtained by Fourier transform. The current signal is decomposed into the Fourier series of trigonometric functions, which is shown in the following formula:

In formula (5), , , and , .

Formula (6) can be obtained by formula (5).

In formula (5), , , and . The x-coordinate of the amplitude spectrum is made up of . The y-coordinate of the amplitude spectrum is made up of .

One set of current amplitude spectrums and standardized values is shown in the appendix for Table 1. Compared with the spectrum of normal work, that of arc fault has different distribution characteristics.

#### 4. Arc Fault Detection

##### 4.1. Single-Dictionary Learning

The dictionary matrix consists of n modalities of training samples, that is, D=[D1 D2 D3 Dn]. The number of rows in the matrix D is the number of sample characteristics . In this paper, six kinds of characteristics, that is, the normalized amplitudes of 0Hz, 50Hz, 100Hz, 150Hz, 200Hz, and 250Hz in the current amplitude spectrum, are used. The values are between 0 and 1. The two modalities of training samples are normal work and arc fault; that is, n=2. The number of columns is the total number of two modalities of training samples; that is, D= [D1 D2].

##### 4.2. Multidictionary Selection

Ten sets of dictionaries are selected to form the dictionary library. In order to give consideration to accuracy and instantaneity, five sets of dictionaries are selected randomly from the dictionary library. L3/4 norm regularization algorithm with good sparsity and accuracy is selected to identify the classification , as shown in the following formula:

Formula (8) can be obtained by formula (7).

yi represents the ith modality test sample; is the regularization parameter. P is the number of samples of each modality. In the later application, P=18. is the ith training sample of each modality.

##### 4.3. Test and Simulation

Five sets of dictionaries are selected randomly from the dictionary library, that is, D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5. The test sample comes from the arc fault spectrum of resistive and inductive load;  y=[0.02;1;0.016;0.27;0.081;0.158]. The detection result is shown in Figure 8 when the single dictionary is D1. In Figure 8(a), the horizontal axis 1-18 is the training samples number of normal work. The horizontal axis 19-36 is the training samples number of the arc fault. The training samples come from current amplitude spectrum under the condition of resistive load, resistive and inductive load, DC motor load, series motor load, eddy current load, and switching power load. The fault detection result is determined by the residual comparison and projected coefficients comparison of two modalities. When the residual is smaller and projected coefficients are larger, the corresponding modality is the detection result. The projection coefficients of the horizontal axis 19-36 are larger than those of the horizontal axis 1-18. In Figure 8(b), the residual of the second modality is smaller, so that it is judged to be arc fault and the result is correct. The detection result is shown in Figures 9, 10, 11, and 12, when the single dictionary is D2, D3, D4, and D5. All the test results of the five sets are arc fault, so the result of final judgment is arc fault, which is consistent with the known result, and the result is correct.

Seventy-two sets of normal work and arc fault data (including resistive load, resistive and inductive load, DC motor load, series motor load, eddy current load, and switching power load) are selected as the test sample. Arc fault is detected by single-dictionary and multidictionary learning, respectively. When single-dictionary learning method is used, seventy sets of results are correct and two sets of results are error. When multidictionary learning method is used, seventy-two sets of results are all correct. Therefore, the arc fault detection based on multidictionary learning method can improve the accuracy.

Neural network algorithm is the most common method in arc fault detection. Probabilistic neural network (PNN) is a parallel algorithm based on Bayes minimum risk criterion. The proposed algorithm is compared with the PNN by using 72 groups of data. The accuracy of the algorithm is 100%, and that of PNN algorithm is 95.83% . The accuracy of proposed algorithm is higher than that of PNN algorithm.

#### 5. Conclusion

In this paper, we have proposed a new model, which was tailored to detect the arc fault. The proposed model uses the multidictionary learning of sparse representation algorithm. Compared with the algorithm such as neural networks, sparse representation algorithm does not need a lot of repeated trainings. The test data are classified by sparse solution, which can improve the real-time performance and application of arc fault detection. Compared with the single-dictionary learning of sparse representation algorithm, multidictionary learning can improve the accuracy of arc fault detection by increasing training samples.

See Table 1.

#### Data Availability

The simulation data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

#### Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

#### Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61733003 and 61473069) and Department of Education Project of Liaoning Province (L201742).

1. P. Sun, Z. C. Zheng, and R. G. Yan, “Detection method of arc fault in series with wavelet entropy,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 30, pp. 232–236, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
2. Q. F. Yu, Research on Electrical Fire Forecast System and Its Application Based on Wavelet Analysis and Data Fusion [PhD Thesis], Yanshan University, 2013.
3. K. Koziy, B. Gou, and J. Aslakson, “A low-cost power-quality meter with series arc-fault detection capability for smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1584–1591, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
4. L. Kumpulainen, G. A. Hussain, M. Lehtonen, and J. A. Kay, “Preemptive arc fault detection techniques in switchgear and controlgear,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1911–1919, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
5. R. Grassetti, R. Ottoboni, M. Rossi, and S. Toscani, “Low cost arc fault detection in aerospace applications,” IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 37–42, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
6. S. H. Ma, J. Q. Bao, and Z. Y. Cai, “A novel arc fault identification method based on information dimension and current zero,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 2572–2579, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
7. J. K. Zhang, Q. L. Deng, and J. C. Tang, “Characteristic analysis and modeling of series arc fault,” Electrical Engineering Technology, vol. 1, pp. 30–32, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
8. S. Li, “Study of low cost arc fault circuit interrupter based on MCU,” International Journal of Control and Automation, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 25–34, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
9. A. Yaramasu, Y. Cao, G. Liu, and B. Wu, “Aircraft electric system intermittent arc fault detection and location,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
10. N. L. Georgijevic, M. V. Jankovic, S. Srdic, and Z. Radakovic, “The detection of series arc fault in photovoltaic systems based on the arc current entropy,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 5917–5930, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
11. G. Artale, A. Cataliotti, V. Cosentino, D. Di Cara, S. Nuccio, and G. Tine, “Arc fault detection method based on CZT low-frequency harmonic current analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 888–896, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
12. B.-X. Wang, B.-J. Zhao, L.-B. Tang, S.-G. Wang, and J.-H. Wu, “Robust visual tracking algorithm based on bidirectional sparse representation,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 63, no. 23, pp. 234201-1–234201-11, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
13. Q.-S. Lian, B.-S. Shi, and S.-Z. Chen, “Research advances on dictionary learning models, algorithms and applications,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 240–260, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
14. H. J. Qi, Y. G. Wang, J. Ding, and H. G. Liu, “SAR target recognition based on multiinformation dictionary learning and sparse representation,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1280–1287, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
15. P. O. Hoyer, “Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1457–1469, 2004. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
16. Z. Jiang, Z. Lin, and L. S. Davis, “Label consistent K-SVD: learning a discriminative dictionary for recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2651–2664, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
17. S. B. Chen, L. Zhao, and B. Luo, “Kernel fisher discrimination dictionary learning for sparse representation classificatin,” Journal of Optoelectronics Laser, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 89–93, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
18. S. Bahrampour, N. M. Nasrabadi, A. Ray, and W. K. Jenkins, “Multimodal task-driven dictionary learning for image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 24–38, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
19. G. Xia, H. Sun, X. Niu, G. Zhang, and L. Feng, “Keyframe Extraction for Human Motion Capture Data Based on Joint Kernel Sparse Representation,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1589–1599, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
20. Z.-F. Cheng, Y.-B. Zhao, H. Li, and P.-L. Shui, “Sparse representation framework for MIMO radar transmit beampattern matching design,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 520–529, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
21. J. Wright, A. Y. Yang, A. Ganesh, S. S. Sastry, and Y. Ma, “Robust face recognition via sparse representation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 210–227, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
22. E. Michael, Sparse and Redundant Representations: From Theory to Applications in Signal and Image Processing, Springer, 2010.
23. N. Qu, J. H. Wang, and L. Jinhai, “An arc fault detection method based on current amplitude spectrum and sparse representation,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
24. N. Qu, J. Wang, J. Liu, and Z. Li, “Composite fire detection system using sparse representation method,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 6784764, 8 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
25. F. C. Wu, N. Qu, and X. H. Ren, “Detection of series arc fault based on probabilistic neural network,” Application of Electronic Technology, vol. 42, 2018. View at: Google Scholar

#### More related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.