Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 2157937, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2157937
Research Article

Robustness Analysis of an Outranking Model Parameters’ Elicitation Method in the Presence of Noisy Examples

1Postgraduate and Research Division, National Mexican Institute of Technology/Madero Institute of Technology, 89440 Ciudad Madero, TAMPS, Mexico
2Faculty of Civil Engineering, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, 80040 Culiacan, SIN, Mexico
3National Lab of Information Technology, Autonomous University of Juarez City, 32310 Ciudad Juárez, CHIH, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to Nelson Rangel-Valdez; xm.tycanoc@avlegnarn

Received 20 June 2017; Revised 19 November 2017; Accepted 10 December 2017; Published 3 January 2018

Academic Editor: Danielle Morais

Copyright © 2018 Nelson Rangel-Valdez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Aissi and B. Roy, “Robustness in multi-criteria decision aiding,” in Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, M. Ehrgott, Ed., vol. 142 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, pp. 87–121, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. E. Fernandez, C. Gomez, G. Rivera, and L. Cruz-Reyes, “Hybrid metaheuristic approach for handling many objectives and decisions on partial support in project portfolio optimisation,” Information Sciences, vol. 315, pp. 102–122, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. E. Fernandez, E. Lopez, F. Lopez, and C. A. Coello Coello, “Increasing selective pressure towards the best compromise in evolutionary multiobjective optimization: the extended {NOSGA} method,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. T. Marchant, How to assign numerical values to parameters aiming at differentiating the role of criteria in a comprehensive preference model? Round Table debate at the 71st Meeting of the Euro Working Group on Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, Italy, Torino, 2010.
  5. M. Pirlot, “Weights of criteria [in French],” in Proceedings of the Round Table debate at the 71st Meeting of the Euro Working Group on Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, Torino, Italy, 25-27 March.
  6. E. Covantes, E. Fernandez, and J. Navarro, “Handling the multiplicity of solutions in a MOEA-based PDA-THESEUS framework for multi-criteria sorting,” Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 213–235, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. M. Doumpos, Y. Marinakis, M. Marinaki, and C. Zopounidis, “An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of the ELECTRE TRI method,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 496–505, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Mousseau and R. Slowinski, “Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Model from Assignment Examples,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 157–174, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Mousseau, J. Figueira, and J.-P. Naux, “Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: some experimental results,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 263–275, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Ngo The and V. Mousseau, “Using assignment examples to infer category limits for the ELECTRE TRI method,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–43, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  11. V. Mousseau, J. Figueira, L. C. Dias, C. G. da Silva, and J. Climaco, “Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 72–93, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. V. Mousseau, L. C. Dias, and J. Figueira, “Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models,” 4OR, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. L. Dias, V. Mousseau, J. Figueira, and J. Clímaco, “An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 332–348, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Fernandez, J. Navarro, and S. Bernal, “Multicriteria sorting using a valued indifference relation under a preference disaggregation paradigm,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 602–609, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. A. Coello, G. B. Lamont, and D. A. Van Veldhuizen, Algorithms for SolvingMulti_Objective Problems, Second Edition, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2007.
  16. P. A. Álvarez, D. C. Morais, J. C. Leyva, and A. T. Almeida, “A multi-objective genetic algorithm for inferring inter-criteria parameters for water supply consensus,” in Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, A. Gaspar-Cunha, C. Henggeler Antunes, and C. Coello, Eds., vol. 9019 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 218–233, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Fernandez, J. Navarro, and G. Mazcorro, “Evolutionary multi-objective optimization for inferring outranking model's parameters under scarce reference information and effects of reinforced preference,” Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 163–197, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Roy and R. Słowiński, “Handling effects of reinforced preference and counter-veto in credibility of outranking,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 185–190, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Cruz-Reyes, E. Fernandez, and N. Rangel-Valdez, “A metaheuristic optimization-based indirect elicitation of preference parameters for solving many-objective problems,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 10, pp. 56–77, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  20. B. Roy, Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands, 1996.
  21. J. Branke, S. Corrente, S. Greco, R. Slowiński, and P. Zielniewicz, “Using Choquet integral as preference model in interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 250, no. 3, pp. 884–901, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. L. Cruz, E. Fernandez, C. Gomez, G. Rivera, and F. Perez, “Many-objective portfolio optimization of interdependent projects with a priori incorporation of decision maker preferences,” Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1517–1531, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Bechikh, Incorporating Decision Makers Preference Information in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization [Ph.D. thesis], High Institute of Management of Tunis, University of Tunis, Tunisia, 2013, http://delta.cs.cinvestav.mx/~ccoello/EMOO/thesis-bechikh.pdf.gz.
  24. J. Branke, “MCDA and multiobjective evolutionary algorithms,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of The Art Surveys, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, and J. Figueira, Eds., pp. 10–1007, Springer, New York, NY. USA, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  25. V. Mousseau and L. Dias, “Valued outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 467–482, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Angluin and P. Laird, “Learning From Noisy Examples,” Machine Learning, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 343–370, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. García, D. Molina, M. Lozano, and F. Herrera, “A study on the use of non-parametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms' behaviour: a case study on the CEC'2005 Special Session on Real Parameter Optimization,” Journal of Heuristics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 617–644, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. Veček, M. Črepinšek, and M. Mernik, “On the influence of the number of algorithms, problems, and independent runs in the comparison of evolutionary algorithms,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 54, pp. 23–45, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Bartz-Beielstein, M. Chiarandini, L. Paquete, and M. Preuss, Eds., Experimental Methods for the Analysis of Optimization Algorithms, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at MathSciNet
  30. S. Garcia, A. Fernandez, J. Luengo, and F. Herrera, “Advanced nonparametric tests for multiple comparisons in the design of experiments in computational intelligence and data mining: experimental analysis of power,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 10, pp. 2044–2064, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus