Research Article
Optimization of a Two-Echelon Location Lot-Sizing Routing Problem with Deterministic Demand
Table 2
Comparison of HGA results on each LLSRP instance size.
| | | | |
| | Ins tan ces size | Average cost | Average
Gap (%) | Average
CPU (s) | Average cost | Average
Gap (%) | Average
CPU (s) |
| | 1st set | 75538.73 | 0 | 34.03 | 75585.67 | 0.06 | 46.53 |
| | 2nd set | 86793.73 | 0.71 | 68.28 | 86205.52 | 0.02 | 92.55 |
| | 3rd set | 112077.97 | 0.17 | 218.28 | 112116.4 | 0.25 | 253.47 |
|
|
