Complementary Judgment Matrix Method with Imprecise Information for Multicriteria Decision-Making

Table 1

Verbal preference statements and comparison values in CJM (), AHP (), and transformed scales between AHP and CJM.

	CJM	AHP	AHP→CJM	CJM→AHP
Verbal statement	(%)		(%)
is equally important/good as	50	1	50.0	1
	55	2	66.7	1.22
is a little more important/better than	60	3	75.0	1.5
	65	4	80.0	1.86
is moderately more important/better than	70	5	83.3	2.33
	75	6	85.7	3
is much more important/better than	80	7	87.5	4
	85	8	88.9	5.67
is extremely more important/better than	90	9	90.0	9