Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 3826096, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3826096
Research Article

Centralized Resource Allocation and Target Setting Based on Data Envelopment Analysis Model

1Department of Philosophy of Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province 230026, China
2School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province 230026, China
3School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Feng Li; nc.ude.ctsu.liam@09gnefl

Received 17 August 2017; Accepted 31 December 2017; Published 5 February 2018

Academic Editor: Josefa Mula

Copyright © 2018 Tiantan Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. A. Emrouznejad, B. R. Parker, and G. Tavares, “Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 151–157, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Li, L. Liang, Y. Li, and A. Emrouznejad, “An alternative approach to decompose the potential gains from mergers,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2018, In Press.
  4. F. Li, Q. Zhu, and J. Zhuang, “Analysis of fire protection efficiency in the United States: a two-stage DEA-based approach,” OR Spectrum, pp. 1–46, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. W. D. Cook and M. Kress, “Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: a DEA approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 652–661, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, N. Shoja, and M. Sanei, “An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using DEA,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 267–274, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and M. Moradi, “A DBA approach for fair allocation of common revenue,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 719–724, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. E. Beasley, “Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 198–216, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Fang and C.-Q. Zhang, “Resource allocation based on the DEA model,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1136–1141, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Lin and Z. Chen, “Fixed input allocation methods based on super CCR efficiency invariance and practical feasibility,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, no. 9-10, pp. 5377–5392, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M.-M. Yu, L.-H. Chen, and B. Hsiao, “A fixed cost allocation based on the two-stage network data envelopment approach,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1817–1822, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. Li, Q. Zhu, and L. Liang, “Allocating a fixed cost based on a DEA-game cross efficiency approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 96, pp. 196–207, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. B. Golany, “An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 725–734, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. D. Athanassopoulos, “Goal programming & data envelopment analysis (GoDEA) for target-based multi-level planning: allocating central grants to the Greek local authorities,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 535–550, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. D. Athanassopoulos, “Decision support for target-based resource allocation of public services in multiunit and multilevel systems,” Management Science, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 173–187, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. K. Matin and R. Azizi, “A two-phase approach for setting targets in DEA with negative data,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 5794–5803, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Dehnokhalaji, M. Ghiyasi, and P. Korhonen, “Resource allocation based on cost efficiency,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 1279–1289, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Amirteimoori and S. Kordrostami, “Allocating fixed costs and target setting: a DEA-based approach,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 136–151, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. A. Amirteimoori and M. M. Tabar, “Resource allocation and target setting in data envelopment analysis,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 3036–3039, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Bi, J. Ding, Y. Luo, and L. Liang, “Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 4270–4280, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Lin, “Allocating fixed costs or resources and setting targets via data envelopment analysis,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 13, pp. 6349–6358, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. F. H. Lotfi, A. Hatami-Marbini, P. J. Agrell, N. Aghayi, and K. Gholami, “Allocating fixed resources and setting targets using a common-weights DEA approach,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 631–640, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Hatami-Marbini, M. Tavana, P. J. Agrell, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and Z. Ghelej Beigi, “A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 79, pp. 195–203, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Li, J. Song, A. Dolgui, and L. Liang, “Using common weights and efficiency invariance principles for resource allocation and target setting,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 17, pp. 4982–4997, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Lozano and G. Villa, “Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 143–161, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Lozano and G. Villa, “Centralized DEA models with the possibility of downsizing,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 357–364, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. Lozano, G. Villa, and B. Adenso-Díaz, “Centralised target setting for regional recycling operations using DEA,” Omega , vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Asmild, J. C. Paradi, and J. T. Pastor, “Centralized resource allocation BCC models,” Omega , vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Korhonen and M. Syrjänen, “Resource allocation based on efficiency analysis,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1134–1144, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. V. Pachkova, “Restricted reallocation of resources,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 1049–1057, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Lozano, G. Villa, and R. Brännlund, “Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 752–760, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. S. Lozano, G. Villa, and D. Canca, “Application of centralised DEA approach to capital budgeting in Spanish ports,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 455–465, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Lozano, “Nonradial approach to allocating fixed-costs and common revenue using centralized dea,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. Fang, “Centralized resource allocation based on efficiency analysis for step-by-step improvement paths,” Omega, vol. 51, pp. 24–28, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Fang, “Centralized resource allocation DEA models based on revenue efficiency under limited information,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 945–952, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. W. D. Cook, D. Chai, J. Doyle, and R. Green, “Hierarchies and Groups in DEA,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 177–198, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. E. Steuer, Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1986. View at MathSciNet