Research Article
Economic and Environmental Effects of Public Transport Subsidy Policies: a Spatial CGE Model of Beijing
Table 3
Comparison of benchmark equilibrium results with empirical evidence.
| Parameter | SCGE value | Empirical value | Empirical source and explanation |
| Average hourly wage (¥/h) | 24.48 | 24.23 | Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2016, annual disposable income/2000 hrs | Average job–housing distance (km) | 6.77 | 6.4 | Reference [28] | Average commuting time (h) | 0.545 | 0.583 | Reference [28] | Public transport split rate | 50.1% | 50% | Beijing Traffic Development Annual Report 2016 | Cross-price elasticity of demand for public transport with respect to gasoline price | 0.2 | 0.1–0.8 | Reference [29] | Own-price elasticity of demand for private car with respect to gasoline price | -0.5 | -0.1– -0.5 | Reference [30] | Own-price elasticity of demand for public transport with respect to fare | -0.035 | -0.0171 (bus) -0.1538 (subway) | Reference [31] | Ratio of commuting travel to total travel | 50.50% | 51.96% | Beijing Traffic Development Annual Report 2016, including school commuting | Ratio of transport expense to total disposable income | 6.5% | 6.8% | Beijing Traffic Development Annual Report 2016, commuting expense/ disposable income |
|
|