Evaluating University Reputation Based on Integral Linear Programming with Grey Possibility

Table 1

Summary of the universities ranking system.

No.	Rankings; index	Established dates	No. of countries	No. of universities	Methods	Indicator systems
1	ARWU	2003	46	1,200	WSM	Quality of Education, Quality of Faculty, Research Output, Per Capita Performance
2	CWTS Leiden	2007	54	903	Counting Method	Impact Indicators, Collaboration.
3	PRSPWUN	2012	68	800	Weighted Bibliometric	Research Productivity, Impact, and Excellence.
4	QS	1990	Arab Region, Emerging Europe, Central Asia and 5 Brics Countries	916	Peer Review Data	Engineering, Biomedicine, Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities
5	THE	2009	133	980	Standardize Total Scores	Teaching, Research, Citations, International Outlook, Industry Income.
6	U-MULTI; RANK	2011	99	1,500	Classification by Weighted Scores	“Very good” Through to “Weak”,; In the categories of General, Teaching & Learning, Research, International Orientation, Regional Engagement, Knowledge Transfer.
7	URAP	2010	108	2,500	Bibliometric Total Scores	No. of Articles, Citation, Documents, Article Impact Total, Citation Impact Total, and International Collaboration.