Research Article
Analysis of Household Consumption Behavior and Indebted Self-Selection Effects: Case Study of Thailand
Table 4
Estimates of treatment effects of consumption.
| Copulas | First case | Second case | I–I | G–G | D–F–J | I–I | G–G | D–RJ–J |
| ATE of bootstrap | −838.72 | −893.27 | −952.82 | −17969.03 | −17657.06 | −17778.58 | Standard deviation | 95.68 | 97.60 | 119.61 | 6208.20 | 6660.44 | 6158.43 | 95% CI | | | | | | | Lower | −1048.85 | −1113.9 | −1235.01 | −31676.20 | −32769.72 | −31891.25 | Upper | −679.55 | −729.11 | −754.16 | −7661.82 | −6709.04 | −7620.15 | TT of bootstrap | 1732.74 | 928.95 | −4935.51 | 4349.06 | 4385.26 | −8134.32 | Standard deviation | 75.94 | 53.67 | 56.57 | 157.55 | 139.63 | 353.97 | 95% CI | | | | | | | Lower | 1568.31 | 811.36 | −4827.68 | 4032.47 | 4146.40 | −8835.55 | Upper | 1865.79 | 1013.42 | −5041.70 | 4663.36 | 4681.45 | −7457.26 |
|
|