Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Mathematical Theories and Applications for Nonlinear Control Systems

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 5983679 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5983679

Consensus Control of Multiagent Systems with High-Order Nonlinear Inaccurate Dynamics and Dynamically Switching Undirected Topologies

Academic Editor: Xue-Jun Xie
Received18 Apr 2018
Accepted04 Jun 2018
Published27 Jun 2018

Abstract

This paper investigates the consensus control of a class of high-order nonlinear multiagent systems, whose topology is dynamically switching directed graph. First, the high-order nonlinear dynamics is transformed into the one-order dynamics by structuring a sliding mode plane; then, two consensus control protocols of the one-order dynamics are designed by feedback linearization, one of which is based on PD (proportion and derivative) and the other is based on PID (proportion, integral and derivative). Under these control protocols, it is proved that the consensus of new variable only requires a weaker topology condition; next, we prove that the consensus of the new variable is sufficient to the consensus of the states of multiagent systems, which implies that it only requires a weaker topology condition for the consensus of multiagent systems; finally, the study of an illustrative example with simulations shows that our results as well as designed control protocols work very well in studying the consensus of this class of multiagent systems.

1. Introduction

Nonlinear dynamics systems, inaccurate dynamics, and switching systems have been fascinating in the field of control and have attracted considerable attention worldwide. As is known to all, nonlinear dynamics [16] are more challenging than their linear peer. Inaccurate dynamics or noises increase the difficulty in analyzing the problem [710], and switching models, which some authors devote themselves to [1115], are intractable. In this paper, we will focus on a class of special nonlinear and switching systems, that is, multiagent systems with nonlinear inaccurate dynamics and dynamically switching undirected topologies, and investigate its consensus conditions. As an important and fundamental issue of the multiagent systems, consensus problem is especially fascinating [1619], and some specific scenarios on consensus problems are researched by scholars, such as time-delay [2023], leader following consensus [2427], and formation [2831].

The consensus of multiagent systems with a switching interaction topology has been attracting many scholars [3234]. In [32], the authors considered multiagent systems with first-order integrator dynamics under the switching topology and provided a control protocol under which the dynamics could achieve consensus with a rather weak topology conditions. However, they considered the second-order integrator dynamics in [33] and obtained a condition that needs the stronger topology requirement than the one in [32]; what is more, they pointed out that the condition in [32] was not sufficient to the second-order consensus algorithm with their control protocol. The authors in [34] compared the control protocol in [32] with the one in [33] and pointed out that the topology requirement was dependent on the control protocol. They transformed the high-order linear systems to first-order integrator dynamics by variable substitution and obtained the consensus conditions of high-order linear multiagent systems with a rather weak topology requirement.

The idea in [34] is interesting for high-order systems, which motivate us to consider a class of high-order nonlinear multiagent systems, whose topology is dynamically switching directed graph. We prove that the nonlinear dynamics can achieve consensus with a rather weak topology conditions similar to [32]. First, the high-order dynamics can realize dimensionality reduction by structuring a sliding mode plane; then, two consensus control protocols are designed by feedback linearization, one of which is based on PD (proportion and derivative), and the other is based on PID (proportion, integral, and derivative), such that the new model can achieve the consensus under a rather weak topology condition; next, we prove that the consensus of new control protocols is sufficient to the consensus of nonlinear multiagent systems. Thus, we give a rather weak consensus conditions of high-order nonlinear multiagent systems, in which the union graph has a spanning tree frequently enough. Finally, the study of an illustrative example with simulations shows that our results as well as designed control protocols work very well in studying this class of multiagent systems.

The main contribution of this paper contains: a rather weak topology condition is given for the consensus of nonlinear multiagent systems with switching structure; we present two control protocols for this class of systems, under which the consensus is proved; the reduce-order idea is used to transform the high-order dynamics into one-order dynamics, which simplify the difficulty of problem.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is the backgrounds and preliminaries. Section 3 is the main results of the paper. In this section, the high-order nonlinear dynamics is transformed into one-order linear dynamics, and two control protocols are designed. In Section 4, we give an illustrative example to support our new results followed by the conclusion in Section 5.

2. Backgrounds and Preliminaries

In [32], Ren and Beard considered a one-order linear system under the switching topology:and they designed the control protocol as follows: it was proved system (1) could achieve consensus under protocol (2) even if the switching topology satisfied a rather weak condition. Specifically to say, it could be formulated as the following lemma.

Lemma 1. Let be an infinite time sequence at which the interaction graph or weighting factors switch and . Here, is an infinite set generated from set , which is a finite set of arbitrary positive numbers. Let be a switching topology at time and all nonzero entries of the adjacency matrix are lower bounded by a positive constant and upper bounded by a positive constant . Then the distributed control protocols (2) achieve consensus asymptotically for the multiagent systems specified by (1) if there exists an infinite sequence of uniformly bounded, nonoverlapping time intervals , starting at , with the property that each interval is uniformly bounded and the union of the directed graphs across each interval has a spanning tree. Furthermore, the consensus value is a constant.

Furthermore, they considered the second-order integrator in [33]: where was the state of Agent , and was the control protocol. They designed the control protocol as where was a positive scalar at time . In that book, they provided a result which needed a more stronger connectivity assumption; that is, the interaction graph needed a directed spanning tree at each time instant. Moreover, they provided some simulation examples to illustrate that, under control protocol (4), the assumption of Lemma 1 could not ensure the consensus of second-order consensus generally.

Su and Lin compared the cases as above in [34] and presented a reduced-order idea. They considered the high-order linear multiagent dynamics as follows: where was the state vector of Agent , was the control input the Agent , and was controllable. By transforming the system (5) to one-order dynamics, they presented a control protocol under which the high-order linear multiagent systems could obtain consensus with a rather weak topology.

Inspired by [34], we will consider a class of multiagent systems with agents, which each has -order nonlinear dynamics described by where is the state of agent , is the control input of agent , and or is inaccurate.

Denoting , the dynamics (6) can be rewritten as

The objective of this study is to design a controller such that the agents described as the system (6) or (7) can achieve consensus under the dynamically switching directed interaction topologies.

In the following, we will provide some fundamental knowledge on algebraic graph theory, which will be used in the development of this research.

Suppose be a directed graph of -th order with the set of nodes , and the set of edges (i.e., ordered pairs of the agents) . The matrix is named the adjacency matrix of the graph , where is the weight of Agent to Agent . For any , if and only if , where . In this paper we just consider the case of simple graphs, that is, . The matrix is the valency matrix of the topology , where is defined as Moreover, the matrix is known as the graph’s Laplacian matrix.

3. Main Results

This section studies the consensus of the multiagent dynamics (6). We will consider the following scenarios: (I) the dynamics is inaccurate, but its estimate is known; (II) the gain is inaccurate, but we know its upper bound and its lower bound.

Before giving our main results, another lemma will be useful in our study.

Lemma 2 (see [34]). Let be a smooth function of and assume that are all bounded. Define where is a constant. If there exists a scalar such that for all , then there exists a finite , dependent on the values of , such that

3.1. Inaccurate Dynamics in the Systems

First, we consider the system (6) with undirected topology, assume that is the estimate of , and the error of estimate is subject to , that is, .

Denote where is a positive number.

Then design the control protocol as

and where under the protocol (13), and we have the following result.

Theorem 3. Consider the multiagent system of agents (6) under the control protocol specified by (13). If the conditions of Lemma 1 are satisfied, then the distributed control protocol (13) achieves consensus asymptotically for the multiagent systems specified by (6) and the consensus is reached at a constant state .

Proof. Take derivative for (11), and we have Choose a Lyapunov function candidate where ; then due to .
Letting , that is, , we have . According to LaSalle invariant set, the systems converge to the state .
On the other hand, (11) implies . Since achieves consensus asymptotically, then , , such that when , . According to Lemma 2, there exists a finite , dependent on the values of , such that which implies that where is an arbitrarily small positive number, which implies that achieves consensus asymptotically.
Consider the dynamics (7), since achieves consensus asymptotically, it is easy to obtain that which implies that and , thus, .

However, the terms have a strong flutter, which may need a strong control power. Next, we will consider the stable under any precision.

Definition 4. The system is said to any precision stable if for any designated , there exists , such that , when .

Consider the set , where is the precision of system state. Letting where is the same as (12), under the control protocol (21), we have the following theorem.

Theorem 5. Consider the multiagent system of agents (6), which is steered by the control protocol specified by (21). If the conditions of Lemma 1 are satisfied, then the protocol (21) achieves any precision stable for the multiagent systems specified by (6).

Proof. When , from the proof of Theorem 3, the dynamics are convergent to the invariant set ; that is, there exists a constant , when , . According to Lemma 2, Thus, for .

3.2. Inaccurate Gain in the Systems

Consider system (6) with the inaccurate gain, that is, is unknown, but we know its bounds, , where and are positive constant number.

Denoting , and designing then system (6) can be rewritten as

Letting , then . Since , then

The control protocol (12) with (11) is constructed by PD Control, which can bring in steady-state error. Thus, another control protocol is designed in order to overcome this deficiency.

Letting the control protocol is designed as follows: and we have the following conclusion.

Theorem 6. Consider the multiagent system of agents (6), which is steered by the control protocol specified by (28). If and the consensus is reached at a constant state . If the conditions of Lemma 1 are satisfied, then the distributed control protocol (28) achieves consensus asymptotically for the multiagent systems specified by (6).

Proof. Since according to Lemma 1, the dynamics (29) can achieve consensus asymptotically if there exist infinite sequence of uniformly bounded, nonoverlapping time intervals starting at , with the property that each interval is uniformly bounded and the union of the directed graphs across each interval has a spanning tree.
On the other hand, (27) implies . Since the dynamics (29) achieve consensus asymptotically, then , , such that when , . According to Lemma 2, there exists a finite , dependent on the values of , such that and According to the proof of Theorem 3, (31) implies where is an arbitrarily small positive number, which implies that achieves consensus asymptotically.
Consider the dynamics (7); since achieves consensus asymptotically, it is easy to obtain that which implies that and , thus, .

Remark 7. The method provided in this research is suitable for heterogeneous multiagent systems: only if the control protocol is designed as

4. Illustrative Examples

In this section, we provide an illustrative example to show how to use the method in this research to design control protocol for the consensus of this class of multiagent systems.

Example 1. Consider the following 5-agent system running on a circle: whose topology is shown as Figure 1, is the set of switching directed graph, it is easy to see that each of them does not obtain a spanning tree. To show the correctness of the above conclusion, we carry out the following numerical simulations. The dynamics start at and switch to the next one after , and the switching rules of network topology are as follows: . It is easy to see that the union graph of the dynamics system (36) has a spanning tree frequently enough.
Design the control protocol where . Herein, let and initial condition , .

The simulation results are shown in Figure 2, from which we can see that the states of the 5 agents eventually converge to the same value under the protocol (37) and the final result coincides with the theoretical analysis. Simulation shows that our method is very effective in analyzing the consensus of this kind of multiagent system (36).

In the following, we consider Example 1 with the same switching topology and the same switching rules and design a control protocol obtaining the integration as follows: Under the same initial conditions and , the simulation results are shown in Figure 3, from which we can see that the agents converge to each other under the control protocol (38).

5. Conclusion

In this paper, the consensus control of a class of high-order nonlinear multiagent systems was investigated, whose topology switched dynamically, and we obtained some consensus results on this class of multiagent systems. Herein, a rather weak topology condition was given for the consensus of nonlinear multiagent systems with switching structure, and two control protocols, one of which was based on PD and the other was based on PID, were presented for this class of systems, and the stabilization was proved; furthermore, a reduced-order method was used to handle the high-order dynamics system, which simplify the difficulty of problem. Simulations showed that our results as well as designed control protocols worked very well in studying the consensus of this class of multiagent systems. However, we just take a step for this class of systems, and some questions, such as how to obtain the estimate , will be considered in our subsequent research.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article (Figures 2 and 3).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China 61572298, 61602283, 61702310 and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong, China (no. ZR2016FB10).

References

  1. W. Sun, K. Wang, C. Nie, and X. Xie, “Energy-based controller design of stochastic magnetic levitation system,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Art. ID 7838431, 6 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  2. L. Wang and Q.-G. Wang, “A general approach for synchronisation of nonlinear networked systems with switching topology,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2199–2210, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  3. W. Sun, G. Pang, P. Wang, and L. Peng, “Robust adaptive control and L2 disturbance attenuation for uncertain Hamiltonian systems with time-delay,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Art. ID 183279, 10 pages, 2013. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  4. W. Sun and L. Peng, “Observer-based robust adaptive control for uncertain stochastic Hamiltonian systems with state and input delays,” Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 626–645, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  5. W. Sun and B. Fu, “Adapative control of time-varying uncertain non-linear systems with input delay: a Hamiltonian approach,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 10, no. 15, pp. 1844–1858, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  6. W. Sun and L. Peng, “Robust adaptive control of uncertain stochastic Hamiltonian systems with time varying delay,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 642–651, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  7. X. Song, J. H. Park, and X. Yan, “Linear estimation for measurement-delay systems with periodic coefficients and multiplicative noise,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 4124–4130, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  8. X. Song and J. H. Park, “Linear optimal estimation for discrete-time measurement delay systems with multichannel multiplicative noise,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 156–160, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Song and J. H. Park, “Linear minimum mean-square estimation for discrete-time measurement-delay systems with multiplicative noise and Markov jump,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1161–1169, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  10. X. Song and X. Yan, “Duality of linear estimation for multiplicative noise systems with measurement delay,” IET Signal Processing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 277–284, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  11. X. Liu, K. Zhang, S. Li, S. Fei, and H. Wei, “Optimal control of switching times in switched stochastic systems,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1580–1589, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  12. X. Liu, K. Zhang, S. Li, S. Fei, and H. Wei, “Optimal timing control of switched stochastic systems,” IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 659–674, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  13. X. Liu, S. Li, and K. Zhang, “Optimal control of switching time in switched stochastic systems with multi-switching times and different costs,” International Journal of Control, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 1604–1611, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  14. Y. Zhang and Y.-P. Tian, “Consentability and protocol design of multi-agent systems with stochastic switching topology,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1195–1201, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  15. Y. Hong, L. Gao, D. Cheng, and J. Hu, “Lyapunov-based approach to multiagent systems with switching jointly connected interconnection,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 943–948, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  16. F. Zhang, W. Wang, and H. Zhang, “Distributed design of approximately optimal controller for identical discrete-time multi-agent systems,” Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 629–641, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  17. F. Zhang, H. Zhang, C. Tan, W. Wang, and J. Gao, “A new approach to distributed control for multi-agent systems based on approximate upper and lower bounds,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2507–2515, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. Z. Cui, S. Y. Xu, Q. Ma, Y. M. Li, and Z. Q. Zhang, “Prescribed performance distributed consensus control for nonlinear multi-agent systems with unknown dead-zone input,” International Journal of Control, vol. 91, no. 5, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Liu, P. Zhang, B. Hu, and P. Moore, “A novel approach to task assignment in a cooperative multi-agent design system,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 162–175, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Z. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Song, and H. Zhang, “Consensus problems for discrete-time agents with communication delay,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1515–1523, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Z. Wang, J. Xu, X. Song, and H. Zhang, “Consensus Conditions for Multi-agent Systems Under Delayed Information,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, pp. 1–1. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Olfati-Saber and R. M. Murray, “Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1520–1533, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  23. H.-Y. Yang, G.-D. Zong, and S.-Y. Zhang, “Movement consensus of delayed multi-agent systems with directed weighted networks,” International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 265–277, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Michael, Z. Chen, X. Wang, and J. Lam, “Semi-global observer-based leader-following consensus with input saturation,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2842–2850, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. Liu, T. Chu, L. Wang, and G. Xie, “Controllability of a leader-follower dynamic network with switching topology,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1009–1013, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  26. P. Li, S. Xu, Q. Ma, W. Chen, and Z. Zhang, “Leader-following rendezvous for uncertain Euler–Lagrange multi-agent systems by output feedback,” Journal of The Franklin Institute, vol. 354, no. 10, pp. 4215–4230, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. Ma, T. Li, and J. Zhang, “Consensus control for leader-following multi-agent systems with measurement noises,” Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 35–49, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  28. Q. Wang, Y. Wang, and H. Zhang, “The formation control of multi-agent systems on a circle,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 148–154, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Q. Ma and J. F. Zhang, “On formability of linear continuous multi-agent systems,” Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 13–29, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Sun, Y. Tian, and X.-J. Xie, “Stabilization of positive switched linear systems and its application in consensus of multiagent systems,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 6608–6613, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  31. J. Wang, B. Gong, H. Liu, and S. Li, “Multidisciplinary approaches to artificial swarm intelligence for heterogeneous computing and cloud scheduling,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 662–675, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. W. Ren and R. W. Beard, “Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 655–661, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  33. W. Ren and R. W. Beard, Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control: theory and applications, Springer, London, U.K, 2008.
  34. S. Su and Z. Lin, “Distributed Consensus Control of Multi-Agent Systems with Higher Order Agent Dynamics and Dynamically Changing Directed Interaction Topologies,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 515–519, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Qiang Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

392 Views | 254 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.