Research Article  Open Access
Yi Lu, Yang Lu, Lijie Zhang, Nijia Ye, Bo Hu, Yang Liu, "Type Synthesis of 5DoF Parallel Mechanisms with Different Submechanisms", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 6021702, 13 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6021702
Type Synthesis of 5DoF Parallel Mechanisms with Different Submechanisms
Abstract
The type synthesis of the 5DoF (degree of freedom) parallel mechanisms with different submechanisms is studied by utilizing digital topology graphs (DTGs). The conditions for synthesizing the 5DoF parallel mechanisms with different submechanisms using DTGs are determined. Many valid DTGs are derived from 17 different 5DoF associated linkages, and the valid DTGs are transformed into revised DTGs. The subplanar and/or spatial parallel mechanisms in the 5DoF parallel mechanisms are transformed into some simple equivalent limbs, and their equivalent relations and merits are analyzed. Using the derived valid DTGs and revised DTGs, many 5DoF parallel mechanisms with different subserial or parallel mechanisms are synthesized, and they are simplified by replacing the complicated subparallel mechanisms with their simple equivalent limbs. Finally, their DoFs are calculated to verify the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed approach.
1. Introduction
Type synthesis of mechanisms is a wellknown technology for creating and designing novel mechanisms [1–5]. In this aspect, Gogu [1–3] studied the type synthesis of parallel mechanisms (PMs) and presented morphological and evolutionary approaches. Huang conducted the type synthesis of PM by utilizing Lie group and screwtheory [4]. Yang studied the topology structure design of mechanisms [6]. Johnson derived a planar associated linkage (ALs) by utilizing a determining tree and synthesized many planar mechanisms by AL [5]. Merlet proposed a design methodology for conception of PMs [7]. Ceccarelli studied design methodology for compliant binary actuated PM with flexure hinges and design and evaluation of a discretely actuated multimodule PM [8]. A TG (topology graph) has been applied widely for the type synthesis of closed mechanisms [5, 6]. A contracted graph (CG) without any binary link is applied for deriving TG. In this aspect, Vucina and Freudenstein [9] and Tsai and Norton [10] proposed TG and CG and used them to synthesize mechanisms. Yan and Kang [11] studied the configuration synthesis of mechanismsby changing types and/or motion orientations of joints. Hervé [12] studied type synthesis of mechanisms using Lie group. Pucheta and Cardona [13, 14] synthesized planar linkages based on constrained subgraph isomorphism detection and existing mechanisms. Saxena and Ananthasuresh [15] selected the best configuration based on design specifications. Lu et al. explained conditions for deriving the valid DTGs by utilizing submechanisms, discovered the relations between AL, redundant constraint, and DoFs of PMs [16], and conducted type synthesis of 3DoF PMs by utilizing revised DTGs [17].
Generally, the tool axis of a machine tool is required to be perpendicular to the 3D freeform surfaces during the machining of workpieces (the injection moulds, dies, models of automobile windshields, impeller blades of ships or airplanes, launches, and turbines) in order to improve the machining quality and reduce the machining forces. Therefore, the 5DoF PMs have more industrial applications and become the best option of developing the parallel machine tools for the following reasons [18–21]:
The tool axis of 5DoF parallel machine tool formed by the 5DoF PMs can be kept perpendicular to the 3D freeform surfaces during machining 3D freeform surfaces.
Comparing with the existing serialparallel 5DoF machine tool which is formed by a 3DoF PM connected with a 2DoF spindle actuator in series, the 5DoF parallel machine tool formed by the 5DoF PMs has higher rigid and precision because its actuators are close to the base and has more active limbs for supporting .
Comparing with the 6DoF PMs, the 5DoF PMs are simpler in structure and easier in control.
Let “, , , , and ” represent “revolute, prismatic, cylinder, universal, and spherical” pairs, respectively. In this aspect, Gao et al. developed a 5DoF parallel machine tool with 4 PSS limbs and a composite 3UU limb [18]. Liu et al. proposed a coupling 3PSR/PSU 5axis compensation mechanism [19]. Fang and Tsai synthesized a class of 5DoF overconstrained PMs with identical serial limbs [20]. Kong and Gosselin synthesized several 5DoF PMs based on screw theory and the concept of virtual chains [21]. These studies have their merits and different focuses and have laid a theoretical foundation for this study.
Up to now, several 3 and 4DoF PMs have been synthesized [1–6, 13]. When they are used as one submechanism of 5DoF PMs, many novel 5DoF PMs with high stiffness can be synthesized. Therefore, it is a significant and challenging issue to synthesize novel 5DoF PMs with special functions and/or better characteristics (large position and orientation workspace, large capability of load bearing, high stiffness, simple structure, and easy control). For this reason, this paper focuses on the type synthesis of the 5DoF PMs with subserial mechanisms, subplanar mechanisms, and subPMs or their combinations by utilizing valid DTGs (digital topology graph). The following problems are solved: constructing various DTGs of 5DoF PMs by utilizing 17 ALs; determining the relationship between the valid DTGs and the equivalent limbs of the subplanar mechanisms and subPMs; synthesizing the 5DoF PMs with the subplanar or subPMs by utilizing valid DTGs.
2. Concepts and Conditions
A parallel mechanism (PM) may be composed of various links connected by several kinds of kinematic pairs such as , , , , and (revolute, prismatic, cylinder, universal, and spherical) pairs. A KutzbachGrübler formula had been widely used to calculate DoF of the closed mechanisms [1–6]. By considering both the redundant constraints and the passive DoF in the PMs, Huang [4] revised the KutzbachGrübler formula as follows:Here, is the prescribed DoF of the moving platform (output link); is the number of the links including the fixed base ; is the number of kinematic pairs; is the local DoF of the th kinematic pair; is the number of all the redundant constraints; is the number of passive DoFs which does not influence the moving characteristics of ; “” are the numbers of “” pairs, respectively.
Let “” be a “binary, ternary, quaternary, pentagonal, hexagonal” link in a mechanism, respectively. Let be a point of connection with oneDoF. Let () be the number of “, , , , and ,” respectively. A topology graph (TG) is formed by some links connected by several [5]; see Figure 1(a). TG is a basic tool for type synthesis of mechanisms [1–3, 5]. An associated linkage (AL) may include the acceptable group of links “.” AL with given DoF is a basic tool for deriving various TGs with the same DoF [5].
(a)
(b)
The type synthesis of PMs using TG generally is quite complicated because TG includes many . When all links of “” in TG are replaced by the vertices connected by “” edges, respectively, and each of the edges in TG is marked by a digit which represents the number of connected in series by several on this edge, the representation of TG can be simplified greatly. Therefore, a digital topology graph (DTG) is used to simplify the representation of TG; see Figure 1(b).
An array is an aided tool for deriving and representing DTGs and is also used to identify the isometric DTGs and the invalid DTGs. Thus, the type synthesis of PMs and their isometric identification become quite easy. Generally, a DTG includes several vertices connected by several edges. “” in a DTG are represented by the vertices connected by “” edges, respectively. Each of the edges in DTG is marked by a digit. Each digit in the DTG represents the number of connected in series by several on this edge. For instance, a TG representing 5DoF PMs includes , , and which are connected by ; see Figure 1(a). The complicated representation of TG can be simplified by a DTG; see Figure 1(b). In this DTG, is represented by 1 vertex which are connected by 4 edges () marked by digits (), respectively. are represented by 2 vertices which are connected by 5 edges () marked by digits (), respectively. Here, “” represent “” connected in series by “” in (), respectively. An array is used for representing this DTG. In this array, represents the case that is connected with 3 edges (). Here, “, , and ” are formed by “” connected in series, respectively.
Let (; ) be the subplanar closed mechanisms with DoFs and actuators. Four typical are represented in [17]; see Figure 2. In fact, 5DoF PMs may include some other different (; ).
A 5DoF PM generally includes , , and several limbs. These limbs may include several links which are connected by several kinematic pairs (). The following 5 conditions must be satisfied in order to derive the valid DTGs and synthesize novel 5DoF PMs:
If “; ” are satisfied in a 5DoF PM, the number of the links in any closed loop chain must be 7 or more in order to avoid any local structure.
If “ and ” are satisfied in a 5DoF PM, the number of on any edge must be 6 or less in order to avoid any local structure.
The number of connected in series in each limb from to must be 5 or more.
The number of the links in a closed loop chain of DTG for constructing () must be 7 in order to avoid any local structure.
The number of the links in a closed loop chain of DTG for constructing must be 8 in order to avoid any local structure.
The number of the links in a closed loop chain of DTG for constructing must be 9 in order to avoid any local structure.
The theoretical bases of the above 6 conditions have been explained in the Appendix. Another three auxiliary conditions [17] should be satisfied as follows:
It is permissible to replace any one in the TG with or pair in the mechanism.
It is permissible to replace any 2 connected in series in the TG with or pair in the mechanism.
It is permissible to replace any 3 connected in series in the TG with pair in the mechanism.
In the light of the 5DoF PMs, 17 AL () with 5DoF and () links have been derived based on (1). in 17 ALs with 5DoF can be solved in [17] and listed in Table 1.

3. Valid DTGs and Revised DTGs
The valid DTG can be derived from the AL by distributing all into the contracted graph [16]. Based on conditions , some DTGs with different arrays for synthesizing the 5DoF PMs are derived and displayed in Figure 3.
The 4 DTGs with and different arrays , , , and are derived from AL1 in Table 1; see Figures 3(a1)–3(a4). The 2 DTGs with and different arrays and are derived from AL2 in Table 1; see Figures 3(b1) and 3(b2). The 2 DTGs with and different arrays and are derived from AL3 in Table 1; see Figures 3(c1) and 3(c2). The 2 DTGs with and different arrays and are derived from AL6 in Table 1; see Figures 3(d1) and 3(d2). The 18 DTGs are derived from AL5 and in Table 1; see Figures 3(e)–3(p).
If the 5DoF PMs include (; ), then the DTGs must be revised into rDTGs by utilizing approach in [17]. For instance, a DTG with in Figure 4(a1) is revised into an rDTG with in Figure 4(a2). Similarly, the other DTGs in Figures 4(b1)–4(i1) can be revised into the rDTGs in Figures 4(b2)–4(i2). Thus, all the rDTGs can be used to synthesize the 5DoF PMs with (; ).
4. Submechanisms and Their Equivalent Limbs
4.1. Characteristics and Functions of Submechanisms
Let () be a subserial mechanism with actuators. Let () be a subspatial DoF PM with actuators. The submechanisms of the 5DoF PMs may be , (; ), and . Each of them has different merits. These merits can bring benefits for the 5DoF PMs as follows.
Wh300en is taken as the limb for connecting with in the 5DoF PMs, and the total number of the required limbs must be reduced. Thus, the interference between the limbs and may be avoided easily, and the workspace of the 5DoF PMs can be enlarged. In addition, since the other active limbs of the 5DoF PMs can be transformed into the SPUtype linear active limbs which are not sensitive to manufacturing error, not only can the tiny selfmotion of the PMs be removed effectively, but also the capability of the load bearing can be increased. When a spatial PM includes one subplanar mechanism or more, it may have merits [17] such as simplicity in structure, ease in manufacturing compliant mechanism and increasing the mechanical advantage, and being larger in capability of the pulling force and rotation angle. When different (; ) and () are applied to constructing one limb of the 5DoF PM, its stiffness can be increased.
Generally, the abovementioned submechanisms can be built into different standard units with high precision by a special company. Therefore, many novel 5DoF PMs with high precision can be built and assembled easily by including these standard units.
4.2. Equivalent Limbs of Submechanisms
Similarly, each of () and () in the 5DoF PMs can be replaced by its equivalent limb and represented by a line marked with or .
The equivalent symbols of various kinematic pairs are represented in Figure 5. Generally, each of in the 5DoF PMs includes a lower link , an upper link , and actuators which are connected in series from to ; see Figure 5(a1). The equivalent limb of is represented by a line with ; see Figure 5(a2). can be selected from an edge with 4 or 5 in the DTG. The number of actuators can be 2 or more. The actuators may be translational ones or rotational ones. The number of can be one or more. For instance, a DTG with and an array is proposed to synthesize the 5DoF PMs; see Figure 4(a3). The 6 different 5DoF PMs with are synthesized using the proposed DTG; see Figure 5(b). Each of the 6 PMs has 3 limbs, the first 4 PMs include 2 , and the rest 2 PMs include 1 . Generally, if a DTG includes one closed loop which is formed by 4 links connected in series by , then this DTG can be revised into an rDTG. After that, the 5DoF PMs with can be synthesized by utilizing the rDTG.
For instance, a DTG with and an array is proposed for the type synthesis of the 5DoF PMs; see Figure 6(a). Since the proposed DTG includes a closed loop which is formed by 4 links connected in series by for constructing , the proposed DTG can be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 6(b). Thus, a novel 5DoF PM with 2 can be synthesized using the rDTG; see Figure 6(c).
Based on condition in Section 2, can be selected from a DTG with a closed loop which is formed by and , and the equivalent limb of is represented by a line with ; see Figure 7(b). In addition, the DTG for synthesizing the 5DoF PMs with must be transformed into a revised DTG (rDTG) by reducing from the number of in the closed chain for . For instance, a DTG with and an array is proposed for the type synthesis of 5DoF PMs; see Figure 7(a). Since the proposed DTG includes a closed loop which is formed by for constructing , the proposed DTG must be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 7(b). Thus, two novel 5DoF PMs with and are synthesized using the rDTG; see Figure 7(c).
Based on condition in Section 2, the equivalent limb of can be constructed by utilizing a DTG with a closed loop which is formed by . The DTG for synthesizing 5DoF PMs with must be revised into an rDTG by reducing from the number of in the closed loop for constructing . For example, a DTG with and an array is proposed for the type synthesis of 5DoF PMs; see Figure 8(a). Since the proposed DTG includes a closed loop formed by and , it must be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 8(b). Thus, 4 novel 5DoF hybrid PMs with and are synthesized by utilizing the rDTG; see Figures 8(c1)–8(c4). Here, and can be represented by the lines marked by and , respectively.
It is known that the number of the links in a spatial closed 3DoF PM must be 9 or more. Based on condition in Section 2, the equivalent limb of can be constructed by utilizing a DTG with a closed loop which is formed by and and is represented by a line marked by ; see Figure 8(g). In addition, the DTG for synthesizing 5DoF PMs with must be revised into an rDTG by reducing from the number of in the closed loop for constructing . For example, a DTG with and an array is proposed for the type synthesis of 5DoF PMs; see Figure 8(d). Since the proposed DTG includes a closed loop formed by and , it must be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 8(e). Thus, the 4 novel 5DoF hybrid PMs with and are synthesized by utilizing the rDTG with ; see Figures 8(f1)–8(f4).
A subspatial 3DoF PM generally includes an upper platform , a lower platform , and 3 active limbs. Since and are required to have 4 connection points: three connection points for connecting with three active limbs and 1 for connection point ( and ) at the two ends of for connecting with 5DoF PMs, both and must be quaternary links. Therefore, the equivalent limb of can be constructed using a DTG with 2 which are connected by 3 edges in parallel with 12. The 8 different DTGs for the type synthesis of various 3DoF PMs can be obtained; see Figure 9(a). Their equivalent limb is represented by a line with ; see Figure 9(b). If has symmetry in structure, the first DTG in Figure 9(a) can be used for synthesizing symmetry , and the 26 different symmetry kinematic chains [16] can be applied to the construction of the 26 different symmetry . When is asymmetry in structure, the other 7 DTGs in Figure 9(a) can be used for synthesizing asymmetry , and more asymmetry kinematic chains can be obtained. Thus, many novel 5DoF PMs can be synthesized.
A sub4DoF PM generally includes an upper platform , a lower platform , and 4 active limbs; see Figure 10. Since and are required to provide 5 connection points: 4 connection points are used for connecting with 4 active limbs and 1 is used as the connection point ( and ) at the 2 ends of for connecting with 5DoF PMs, both and must be pentagonal links. Therefore, the equivalent limb of can be constructed using a DTG with 2 which are connected by 4 edges in parallel with 18. The 14 different DTGs with for synthesizing various 4DoF spatial PMs can be obtained. Three different promised DTGs are proposed for synthesizing 7 different subspatial 4DoF PMs; see Figures 10(a)–10(c). Their equivalent limb is represented by a line with ; see Figure 10(d). Thus, many novel 5DoF PMs can be synthesized.
For instance, a DTG with and an array is proposed for the type synthesis of the 5DoF PMs with ; see Figure 11(a). Two equivalent mechanisms I and II with are derived from the proposed DTG; see Figures 11(b) and 11(d). Three novel 5DoF PMs with the type base are synthesized from the equivalent mechanism I; see Figures 11(c1)–11(c3). Three novel 5DoF PMs with the type moving platform are synthesized from the equivalent mechanism II; see Figures 11(e1)–11(e3). In fact, some novel 5DoF PMs with and or their combinations can be synthesized. Some examples are illustrated as follows.
Example 1. A DTG with and an array is proposed for the type synthesis of the 5DoF PMs with and ; see Figure 12(a). Since the proposed DTG includes both one parallel closed loop formed by and one closed loop formed by , it must be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 12(b). An equivalent mechanism with 1 and 1 is constructed from the rDTG; see Figure 12(c). Finally, two 5DoF PMs are synthesized from equivalent mechanism; see Figures 12(d1) and 12(d2).
Example 2. A DTG with and an array is proposed for synthesizing the 5DoF PMs with and ; see Figure 13(a). Since the proposed DTG includes both one closed loop chain formed by and and one closed loop chain formed by and , it must be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 13(b). Thus, the equivalent mechanism of a novel 5DoF PM with 1 and 1 (see Figure 13(c)) can be constructed from the rDTG in Figure 13(b). Similarly, a DTG with and an array is proposed for synthesizing the 5DoF PMs with and ; see Figure 13(d). It can be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 13(e). Thus, the equivalent mechanism of a novel 5DoF PM with 1 and 1 is constructed from the rDTG in Figure 13(e); see Figure 13(f) ( (e), equivalent mechanism with and (f)).
Example 3. A DTG with and an array is proposed for synthesizing the 5DoF PMs with 2 ; see Figure 14(a). Since the proposed DTG includes 2 closed loop chains formed by and , it must be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 14(b). Finally, the equivalent mechanism of a novel 5DoF PM with 2 is constructed from the rDTG in Figure 14(b); see Figure 14(c). Similarly, a DTG with and an array is proposed for synthesizing the 5DoF PMs with 2 ; see Figure 14(d). Since the proposed DTG includes 2 closed loop chains formed by and , it must be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 14(e). Finally, the equivalent mechanism of a novel 5DoF PM with 2 is constructed from the rDTG in Figure 14(e); see Figure 14(f).
Example 4. A DTG with and an array is proposed for the type synthesis of the 5DoF PMs with ; see Figure 15(a). Since the proposed DTG includes one closed loop formed by and one parallel closed loop formed by , it must be revised into an rDTG with and an array ; see Figure 15(b). An equivalent mechanism with 1 is constructed from the rDTG; see Figure 15(c). Finally, one 5DoF PM is synthesized from equivalent mechanism; see Figure 15(d).
A prototype of the novel 5DoF PM with is built up from an existing prototype of the PM with 5 SPS type limbs in Yanshan University; see Figures 15(e) and 15(f). Here, each pair can be transformed into pair or pair by adding constraint. Therefore, after an upper constraint and a lower constraint between two closed SPS limbs in the prototype of PM are added by utilizing four beamblocks, the upper pairs of the two closed SPS limbs are transformed into pairs, in which one is connected with and is crossed with another two parallel . Similarly, the lower pairs of the two closed SPS limbs are transformed into pairs, in which one is connected with and is crossed with other two parallel . It is verified by experiment that this novel 5DoF PM with can be moved well.
The DoFs of the 30 different 5DoF PMs with different submechanisms synthesized from the 10 valid DGTs in Figures 3(b)–15(c) are verified by utilizing (1) and listed in Table 2.
 
, : the numbers of links; : the numbers of pairs; : the numbers of redundant constraints; : passive DoF; : local DoF of kinematic pair; ; , , , , and : the numbers of , , , , and . 
5. Conclusions
The conditions for the type synthesis of 5DoF parallel mechanisms with subserial or subparallel mechanisms are determined. The 31 valid DTGs (digital topology graphs) and revised DTGs can be derived from 17 different spatial 5DoF associated linkages.
The subplanar mechanisms and/or parallel mechanisms in the 5DoF parallel mechanisms can be transformed into simple equivalent limbs, and their equivalent relations and merits are determined.
The 30 different 5DoF parallel mechanisms with different subserial or parallel mechanisms can be synthesized by utilizing the valid DTGs and revised DTGs. They can be simplified by replacing complicated subparallel mechanisms with their simple equivalent limbs.
The DoFs of all the synthesized parallel mechanisms are verified to be correct.
Many novel 5DoF parallel mechanisms with subserial or parallel mechanisms can be synthesized by utilizing different valid DTGs, or by varying the order of the kinematic pairs and the orientations of the kinematic pairs.
Appendix
Let (; ) be the subplanar closed mechanisms with DoFs and actuators; see Figure 2. Four are represented in Table 3. In fact, 5DoF PMs may include some other different (; ).
Let be the perpendicular constraint. Let “, , , , and ” be the binary link, the upper link, the lower link, the piston link, and the cylinder link, respectively.
is formed by 4 links “, , and ” in a planar loop chain connected in series by 4 mutually parallel pairs; see Figure 2(a1).
is formed by 4 links “, , , and ” in a planar loop chain connected in series by 1 pair, 1 active pair, and 2 pairs; here 3 pairs are parallel mutually and are satisfied; see Figure 2(b1).
is formed by 5 links “, , , and ” in a planar loop chain connected in series by 1 pairs, 1 active pair, 2 pairs, and 1 active pair; here 3 pairs are parallel mutually and are satisfied; see Figure 2(c1).
is formed by 6 links “, , , and ” in a planar loop chain connected in series by 2 pairs, 1 active pair, 2 pairs, and 1 active pair; here 4 pairs are parallel mutually and are satisfied; see Figure 3(d1). Since each of (; ) has no passive DoF, is satisfied. Thus, their redundant constraints are solved based on (1); see Table 1.
Since and in (; ) are required to provide 3 connection points: 2 for constructing and 1 for the connection point (, ) at the two ends of for connecting with the 5DoF PMs, both and must be the ternary link. In order to simplify the representation of the PMs, (; ) are represented by a line marked by and ( and ) at its two ends; see Figures 2(a2), 2(b2), 2(c2), and 2(d2).
Symbols
DoF:  Degree of freedom 
PM:  Parallel mechanism 
AL:  Associated linkage 
DTG:  Topology graph with digits 
TG:  Topology graph 
CG:  Contracted graph 
:  (revolute, prismatic, cylinder, universal, and spherical) kinematic pair 
:  Moving platform 
:  Fixed base 
:  Connection point with oneDoF 
:  DoF of (output link) 
:  The number of the links including 
:  The number of kinematic pairs 
:  The local DoF of the th kinematic pair 
:  The number of all the redundant constraints 