Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 6875090 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6875090

Li-Jun Jia, Yu-Cheng He, Dong-Hua Chen, Lin Zhou, "Lagrangian Dual Decomposition for Joint Resource Allocation Optimization Problem in OFDMA Downlink Networks", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 6875090, 10 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6875090

Lagrangian Dual Decomposition for Joint Resource Allocation Optimization Problem in OFDMA Downlink Networks

Academic Editor: Dragan Poljak
Received26 Jul 2018
Accepted19 Oct 2018
Published30 Oct 2018

Abstract

This paper proposes an efficient method for joint power and subcarrier allocation in a multicell multiuser OFDMA downlink network. The joint optimization problem is formulated with the objective of maximizing the energy efficiency subject to the constraints on the quality of service in sum transmission rates for each cell and the total transmit power for the network. Due to intercell cochannel interferences and multiple variable coupling, the problem is intractable in its original form. To relax the difficulties in coordinating cochannel interferences, we introduce the tolerable interferences constraints for interference channels. To cope with the multiple variable coupling, we decompose the joint optimization problem into two iterative processes of user scheduling and a parametric convex optimization problem, where the energy efficiency is treated as the parameter and approached by bisection search. Then, by double dual decomposition, the parametric convex problem is transformed into Lagrangian dual problems at two levels of cells and subcarriers, and a decentralized solution is obtained in closed form. Based on the reformulations, an iterative subgradient algorithm is presented for approaching the joint optimization problem with acceptable complexity. Computer simulations are conducted to validate the proposed algorithm and examine the effects of various system parameters.

1. Introduction

As millions of base stations and billions of user terminals are expected to operate simultaneously and consume huge amounts of energy, energy efficiency is becoming an increasingly important issue in wireless communications in order to reduce operational expenditure and carbon dioxide emissions [1, 2]. In [3, 4], power allocation strategies were investigated for both single-cell and multicell systems under the assumption of perfect channel state information (CSI). In [5], a resource allocation scheme was proposed for improving energy efficiency under imperfect CSI conditions.

The optimization of energy-efficient resource allocation usually appears as a nonconvex problem. The key issue in solving such a nonconvex problem is how to transform it into its convex alternative that can be solved with an acceptable complexity. For example, in [6], the energy-efficient power allocation problem for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) cognitive radio networks was transformed into a fractional programming problem [7]. Then, based on the fractional programming method, the energy-efficient power and subcarrier allocation scheme was proposed in [8] for multiuser OFDMA networks, where the requirements for quality of service (QoS) were not taken into account. However, simply improving the energy efficiency of the system may often degrade the QoS for users.

It is worth mentioning that, in practical cellular systems, the QoS requirements usually provide an important specification to justify the resource allocation schemes. To ensure necessary QoS for users, the minimum transmission rate constraint was incorporated into the energy-efficient resource allocation problem in [9] for single-cell OFDMA systems. On the other hand, for multicell OFDMA systems, the optimal resource allocation problem presents an NP-hard problem [10] due to the existence of intercell interferences [11]. To relax the difficulty caused by intercell interferences, a tolerable interference (TI) constraint was introduced in [11, 12], whereas intercell interference coordination was investigated in [13]. Meanwhile, an interference-aware scheme was proposed in [14], and an iterative method was proposed in [15], both in a noncooperative way. An heuristic scheduling approach was also investigated in [16] in order to achieve trade-offs between QoS and throughout under the total power constraint.

Motivated by the works above, we have also investigated the resource allocation problems for multicell multiuser systems. First, by using a universal multiuser interference channel model [17], we investigated the power minimization and sum rate maximization problems under the constraints on system power budget and individual users’ QoS requirements, while taking into account wireless power transfer and physical layer security. Then, upon extending the multiuser interference channel model to a multicell multiuser massive MIMO system [18], we investigated the resource allocation problems for guaranteeing individual users’ QoS requirements with causal time-splitting wireless power transfer. The core part of our previous works was to reformulate the originally intractable nonconvex optimization problems by using the mathematical tools of semidefinite relaxation (SDR) and S-procedure for convex approximation, and thus to design iterative successive convex approximation (SCA) algorithms for efficiently solving these problems.

In this paper, we address an efficient iterative algorithm for solving the joint power and subcarrier allocation problem for multicell OFDMA downlink networks. Different from the works in [1116], the proposed optimization scheme is aimed to maximize the energy efficiency under the total power constraint of the system, while ensuring the QoS requirements in terms of different minimum sum rates for each cell. To solve the resource allocation problem which is originally nonlinear and nonconvex, the following problem solving methods are considered:(1)To circumvent the difficulties caused by intercell cochannel interferences, the maximum TI thresholds are introduced practically for each interference channel, which makes the original problem remarkably simplified.(2)To decouple the optimization variables, the simplified resource allocation problem is decomposed into two iterative updating processes:(a)Subcarrier allocation based on optimal user scheduling.(b)Power allocation based on a convex parametric problem using the energy efficiency as the parameter.Since the convex parametric problem is a strictly decreasing function of , the optimal is reached by converting the iterative updating processes into an efficient bisection search, during which the optimal solution to the resource allocation problem is accordingly obtained.(3)To solve the convex parametric problem for given , the convex parametric problem is converted into Lagrangian dual problems at two levels and solved in the way of distributive closed-form computations as follows:(a)The Lagrangian dual problem at the first level comprises a master problem and an inner problem, the latter being decomposed into independent inner subproblems with respect to cells.(b)Each inner subproblem from the first level is further rewritten as a master problem and an inner problem, the latter being decomposed into independent inner subproblems with respect to subcarriers. Then, each inner subproblem at the second level has an optimal solution that can be analytically determined.

According to the derivations and reformulations, the iterative algorithm, based on a bisection search in combination with the subgradient method, is presented for solving the joint resource allocation problem. Computer simulations are conducted to validate the proposed algorithm and examine its performance under various system settings.

In the remainder of the paper, Section 2 presents the system model together with the problem formulation, Section 3 presents the problem reformulations and the iterative algorithm, and Section 4 demonstrates simulation results to validate the iterative algorithm and examine its performances. Finally, the paper is concluded by Section 5.

2. System Model

Consider a multicell multiuser OFDMA downlink network composed of cells. Each cell consists of a base station (BS) and users . During each time interval, all the BS’s transmit signals to the users in respective cells simultaneously over the same set of orthogonal subcarriers .

Figure 1 shows the channel model, where is the transmission channel power gain from BS to user over subcarrier , and is the intercell interference channel power gain from BS to user over subcarrier . Note that denotes the subset of with the element excluded. Specifically, represents the user of cell that will be scheduled to work on subcarrier .

Let be the transmit power allocated to user working on subcarrier in cell . Then, the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at this user is given bywhere is the associated additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) power.

Let be the subcarrier allocation indicator, i.e., if user is scheduled for subcarrier , and otherwise. Then, the achievable transmission rate over the subcarrier is given byand the sum rate over all subcarriers in cell is given by .

For system design, denote the power allocation matrix by with column vectors , and denote the subcarrier allocation matrix by with submatrices , where . Let be the minimum sum rate in cell that measures the QoS requirement of the cell. Let be the total transmit power threshold, and let be the constant total circuit power consumption independent of the transmission power. With the objective of maximizing the energy efficiency, the joint resource allocation problem is formulated, under the constraints on the total transmit power of the system and the QoS requirements of all cells, aswhere is defined as the energy efficiency of the system in “bit/Hz/Joule” [19], and represent the transmit power constraints, represents the QoS constraints for each cell, and indicates that each subcarrier in a cell can either be allocated exclusively to a user or stay idle depending upon user scheduling. Due to the coupling of the optimization variables and in the objective function, the problem is nonlinear and nonconcave and thus is intractable in its original form.

Remark 1. In the QoS constraints , can be chosen distinctly for different cells. Furthermore, can also be defined as by using to measure the QoS requirements of individual users.

3. Problem Reformulations and Solving Algorithm

In this section, problem (3) is first relaxed by introducing TIs to cope with intercell cochannel interferences, and the resultant problem is then decomposed into a user scheduling problem and a conditional power allocation problem that can be solved in an iterative manner. By using the energy efficiency as the parameter, the conditional power allocation problem is converted into a convex parametric problem. This strategy makes the joint optimization problem solvable by a bisection search for the parameter in combination with two-level iterative updates derived from double dual decomposition.

3.1. Problem Relaxation by Introducing TIs

To relax the difficulties caused by intercell cochannel interferences [12], it is practical to introduce a set of preset thresholds for each pair , where represents the TI from cell to cell over subcarrier . Thus, under the constraints , we obtain from (2) a lower bound on aswhere becomes a constant for any triple .

Let . Then, we simplify problem (3) aswhere is defined as the lower bound on the energy efficiency , can be viewed as a constricted form of , and represents the newly added power constraints on because of TIs.

3.2. Iterative Processes of Subcarrier Allocation and Power Allocation

Consider now the subcarrier allocation by means of user scheduling. To maximize local energy efficiencies and hence the global one, the optimal user scheduling rule can be expressed as a function of power allocation belowwhere is the associated circuit power such that .

Therefore, given any power allocation , the optimal user scheduling rule reduces tothus yielding the optimal subcarrier allocation with , and for all .

Conversely, given a subcarrier allocation , the constraint in problem (6) is resolved, and hence we need to solve a conditional power allocation problemwhere is simplified from (5) as

Based on the reformulations above, the joint resource allocation in problem (6) is solvable by iteratively performing updates in (9) and (10). When converges to the optimal , must also converges to the optimal , while the maximized objective function in (10) yields the optimal energy efficiency .

Now that problem (10) remains nonconvex and difficult to directly solve. Fortunately, it is solvable by fraction programming [20]. To do this, we transform it into a convex parametric problem aswhere is treated as the positive parameter and is a strictly concave function of since it strictly holds that the second partial derivatives for all .

Let us discuss the equivalence between (10) and (13) as follows. It is observed that maximizing in (10) is essentially equivalent to maximizing the numerator therein while minimizing the denominator of the fraction. The optimal point just reaches the best tradeoff between the maximizing and minimizing operations under the convex constraints. In (13), the intention is reflected by maximizing which expresses the fraction of (10) in the difference form. Therefore, the optimal solutions and to problem (6) can be equivalently approached by iterations between (9) and (13), for which the optimal turns out to be the root of the nonlinear equation [6].

Clearly, is a strictly decreasing function of . There exists a feasible range such that . It follows that if , and if . These properties imply an efficient bisection search for the root , and the feasible range can be determined loosely from (10) as

3.3. Double Dual Decomposition for Solving the Convex Parametric Problem

In this subsection, we cope with the parametric convex problem (13) with the parameter by exploiting Lagrangian dualities at two levels with respect to cells and subcarriers, respectively.

3.3.1. Dual Decomposition at the First Level regarding Cells

To address the total power constraint , we introduce a nonnegative dual variable , define a Lagrangian function , and convert problem (13) into a Lagrangian dual problem as follows:where the master problem (16a) explores the optimal while seeking to minimize , whereas the inner problem (16b) explores the optimal so as to provide as a candidate upper bound of for given .

Since the item in (16c) is irrelevant to , it can be moved to the objective function of the master problem (16a). By decomposing the remaining summation item in (16c), we can reformulate the dual problem above into a master problem and independent inner subproblems as follows:where subproblem (17b) for each turns to explore while seeking to maximize under the related constraints.

The optimal value for that minimizes the objective function of (17a) can be approached by applying the heuristic subgradient method [20]where , denotes the iteration index, the expression enclosed in the parentheses is the derived subgradient, and is a positive constant specified as the searching step size. As grows, will reach the optimal point when converges to some fixed point conditioned on the given .

3.3.2. Dual Decomposition at the First Level regarding Subcarriers

To solve the subproblem (17b) given , we introduce a dual variable and a set of dual variables to resolve the constraints and , respectively. For notation convenience, let and . By defining a Lagrangian function , subproblem (17b) can be converted into a dual problem

Similarly, the item on the last line of (20c) is irrelevant to , whereas each bracketed summand in the first summation of (20c) is related to a unique for . Therefore, we can rewrite the dual problem expressed by (20a)–(20c) into the form of a master problem connected with independent inner subproblems as follows:where the master problem (21a) seeks to optimize while achieving the least upper bound with given and subproblem seeks to maximize by finding the optimal with given.

It is readily shown that is a strictly concave function of as it is differentiable with the strictly negative second derivative existing in the real domain. By taking the first derivative and letting it be zero, the maximum point for is derived asthus yielding the optimal solution to subproblem (21b) as

By substituting solution (23), the master problem (21a) for each can be solved by using the heuristic subgradient method in the following form:where indexes the iterations at the second level, and the expressions enclosed in the parentheses are the derived subgradients, and is the same searching step size as in (19). As grows, the dual variables in will reach their optimal values when updated by (22) converges to a fixed point for given .

3.4. Iterative Algorithm for Solving Problem

Figure 2 shows a framework for solving the concave parametric problem (13) based on the double dual decomposition above. Given a value of , in (17a) is minimized by exploring while demanding from (21a). Given any instance of , each in (21a) is minimized by exploring while demanding from (21b). Given an instance of , the optimal and hence are computed by (22) and (23), respectively. By using the heuristic subgradient methods based on (19) and (24a), (24b), the concave parametric problem (13) is gradually approached by two-level iterations running over (17a) and (21a).

The iterative algorithm for solving the joint resource allocation problem (6) is presented in Algorithm 1, which mainly comprises three loops of “repeat-until” as follows:(i) Loop 1, including lines 2–34, performs the bisection search for in the range given by (15a) and (15b), where the exiting condition is expressed as , and is the accuracy.(ii) Loop 2, including lines 6–27, performs the subgradient search for according to (19), while updating with the results of from Loop 3 below, where the exiting condition is expressed as , and is the mean squared error (MSE) metric defined as(iii) Loop 3, including lines 11–21, performs the subgradient search for and according to (24a) and (24b), while updating with the results of from (22) and (23), where the exiting condition is expressed as , and is the MSE metric defined as

Input:  
Output:  the subcarrier allocation , and the power allocation
1: for and
2: repeat the bisection search for
3: update by (9) with
4:
5:
6: repeat ∖ the search for
7:
8: for    to    do
9: , ,
10: for and
11:repeat   the search for
12:for    to    do
13:compute by (22) with
14:compute by (23) with
15:end for
16:update by (21a) with
17:
18:
19:update by (24a) with
20:update by (24b) with
21:until  
22:end for
23:update by (17a) with
24:
25:
26:update by (19) with
27:until  
28:if    then
29:
30:else if    then
31:
32:end if
33:
34: until  
35: return  

We briefly analyze the computational complexity of the algorithm. By (9), the subcarrier allocation yields a complexity of order . For power allocation, there are optimization variables in , one dual variable in (17a), and dual variables and in for each in (21a). Thus, the power allocation yields a complexity of order . To achieve the accuracy for the bisection search, the computational complexity is estimated of polynomial order in the network scale parameters and thus acceptable for practical applications.

4. Simulation Results

In this section, we use computer simulations to validate Algorithm 1 and examine its performance. For demonstration purpose, we consider a small scaled OFDMA downlink network with the number of cells , the number of users in each cell , and the number of subcarriers . Upon assuming that all the channels experience independent identically distributed (i.i.d) Rayleigh fading, the intracell and intercell average channel gains are given by and , respectively, for all and . Without loss of generality, we assume identically the circuit powers W and W, the noise powers , the minimum cell sum rates , and the TI thresholds for all and .

For performance comparison for different parameters and different schemes, we define the average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as per subcarrier. To determine the total transmit power threshold such that the QoS requirements can be satisfied for all cells, we define a satisfaction index (SI) metric in percentage aswhere is the sum rate of cell computed from (2), and represents the QoS requirements for all cells. Clearly, we have if and only if for all .

Figure 3 shows the tendencies of SI versus SNR for various values, where equal power allocation per carrier is considered, and the noise power is set to be W. For each value, it is seen that SI tends to reach the maximum of when SNR increases beyond some critical point. Meanwhile, it is in nature to observe that the critical SNR value increases with . Therefore, for simulations regarding a specific value, we can use the associated critical SNR value and the used value to estimate as the minimum required system power. For example, the critical SNR value associated with bps/Hz is approximately 12 dB by the figure, which corresponds to W when W.

Figure 4 shows the simulation results on energy efficiency performance of Algorithm 1 versus within the range from to bps/Hz, where dB, and under various channel conditions W. Accordingly, the total transmit power threshold is determined to be W. The simulation results are analyzed as follows: leftmargin=,labelsep=4.9mm.(1)The effects of the QoS requirements : for each given and hence , it is observed that the energy efficiency reaches the maximum over a lower region of and becomes decreasing as increases over the relatively higher region. This behavior is relevant to the effects of intercell interferences. To achieve a large value, each cell definitely needs to consume a high power, which can generate severer interferences to other cells. To overwhelm the interferences, an extra amount of power is in turn required, thus degrading the energy efficiency.(2)The effects of the channel conditions : for a fixed , it is seen that a worse channel condition results in an increased and hence a degraded energy efficiency. For the instance of bps/Hz, when is increased from to W such that is increased from to W, the energy efficiency is reduced from to bits/Hz/Joule at a reduction of approximately . This behavior can be similarly analyzed in that more power consumptions are required to overwhelm large noise powers and increased intercell interferences.

Next, we present a comprehensive comparison of the system performance in energy efficiency, total power, and throughput between the proposed scheme and the scheme in [16]. Note that the heuristic scheduling in [16] was designed to maximize the system throughout for multicell multiuser OFDMA networks under the total power constraint, which could result in large achievable rates for users with good channel conditions, but smaller achievable rates for users with worse channel conditions. However, in the proposed scheme, the throughout can be guaranteed by presetting for each cell.

Figure 5 compares the energy efficiency performance versus SNR between Algorithm 1 (noted “EE-opt”) and the algorithm proposed in [16] (noted “SE-opt”) for . To examine the effects of TI thresholds, two different settings of and are considered. It is observed that increasing SNR can improve the energy efficiency for both algorithms, while the proposed EE-opt algorithm outperforms the SE-opt one with an increasing performance gap. On the other hand, increasing the TI threshold from to reduces the energy efficiency for each algorithm. The performance loss tends to become larger as SNR increases. This observation can be explained by the fact that the increased TI threshold allows for severer intercell interferences, and thus more power is allocated to maintain the required .

Figure 6 compares the total power consumption and the achievable rate for the system under the settings bps/Hz, W, , and the appropriate values determined with respect to the range of SNR values considered. It is observed that the proposed EE-opt algorithm is more advantageous over the SE-opt algorithm in power efficiency, although it suffers from a loss in achievable rate. This can be explained by the different objectives of the two algorithms. With the objective of maximizing the energy efficiency, the EE-opt algorithm may allocate only a partial amount of to satisfy the QoS constraint of . However, the SE-opt algorithm is aimed to maximize the throughout by allocating fully the amount of . This also interprets the observation that the SE-opt algorithm yields a constant power consumption of . Therefore, from Figures 5 and 6, it is concluded that the proposed EE-opt algorithm can be employed to provide a good tradeoff between energy efficiency and system throughput while satisfying the QoS requirements for all cells. In particular, the proposed EE-opt algorithm is also suitable to guarantee the QoS requirements for each user by slightly adjusting the QoS constraints as mentioned in Remark 1.

5. Conclusions

An energy-efficient algorithm for joint power and subcarrier allocation has been derived for a multicell OFDMA downlink network. Based on double dual decomposition, the joint optimization problem can be approached efficiently by distributive computations in closed form. Simulation results have validated the proposed algorithm by examining the effects of various system parameters, showing that the proposed algorithm can provide a good tradeoff between the energy efficiency and the system throughput compared with the existing algorithm.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2018J01096) and the Open Fund of Chongqing Key Laboratory of Computer Network and Communication Technology (CY-CNCL-2017-05).

References

  1. D. Feng, C. Jiang, G. Lim, L. J. Cimini Jr., G. Feng, and G. Y. Li, “A survey of energy-efficient wireless communications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 167–178, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Buzzi, I. Chih-Lin, T. E. Klein, H. V. Poor, C. Yang, and A. Zappone, “A survey of energy-efficient techniques for 5G networks and challenges ahead,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 697–709, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Q. Zhang, S. Jin, M. McKay, D. Morales-Jimenez, and H. Zhu, “Power Allocation Schemes for Multicell Massive MIMO Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 5941–5955, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. Hamdi, E. Driouch, and W. Ajib, “Resource allocation in downlink large-scale MIMO systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 8303–8316, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Z. Chang, Z. Wang, X. Guo, Z. Han, and T. Ristaniemi, “Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for Wireless Powered Massive MIMO System With Imperfect CSI,” IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Wang, W. Xu, K. Yang, and J. Lin, “Optimal energy-efficient power allocation for OFDM-based cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1420–1423, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. I. M. Stancu-Minasian, Fractional Programming: Theory, Methods, and Applications, Springer, The Netherlands, 1997.
  8. Y. Wang, J. Zhang, and P. Zhang, “Energy-efficient power and subcarrier allocation in multiuser OFDMA networks,” in Proceedings of the 2014 1st IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2014, pp. 5492–5496, Australia, June 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  9. X. Xiao, X. Tao, and J. Lu, “QoS-aware energy-efficient radio resource scheduling in multi-user OFDMA systems,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1968. View at: MathSciNet
  11. Y. Huang, S. He, S. Jin, and W. Chen, “Decentralized energy-efficient coordinated beamforming for multicell systems,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 4302–4314, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y.-J. Kim, M.-G. Song, Y.-S. Cho, and G.-H. Im, “Decentralized beamformer design with limited multi-cell cooperation for interference channel of cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 4142–4152, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. Kosta, B. Hunt, A. U. Quddus, and R. Tafazolli, “Distributed Energy-Efficient Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (ICIC) in Multi-Cell HetNets,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp. 1–5, Dresden, Germany, June 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Bu, F. R. Yu, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Interference-aware energy-efficient resource allocation for OFDMA-based heterogeneous networks with incomplete channel state information,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1036–1050, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. Liu, W. Zheng, H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, and X. Wen, “An iterative two-step algorithm for energy efficient resource allocation in multi-cell ofdma networks,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC), pp. 608–613, April 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. H. Akbari and V. T. Vakili, “Resource Allocation for OFDMA systems with trade-off between throughout and quality of service,” in Proceedings of the 2012 6th International Symposium on Telecommunications, IST 2012, pp. 420–425, Iran, November 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  17. D.-H. Chen, Y.-C. He, X. Lin, and R. Zhao, “Both Worst-Case and Chance-Constrained Robust Secure SWIPT in MISO Interference Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 306–317, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J.-C. Zhu, D.-H. Chen, Y.-C. He, L. Zhou, and J.-J. Mu, “Resource allocation in multi-cell massive MIMO system with time-splitting wireless power transfer,” IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E101-B, no. 11, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  19. Q. Xu, X. Li, and H. Ji, “Multiple resource allocation in OFDMA downlink networks: End-to-end energy-efficient approach,” in Proceedings of the ICC 2014 - 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 3957–3962, Sydney, NSW, June 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004. View at: MathSciNet

Copyright © 2018 Li-Jun Jia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1240
Downloads702
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.