Optimal Urban Logistics Facility Location with Consideration of Truck-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of Shenzhen City

<table class="fixed-width table-group" id="tab5"><tr><td><table class="table"><colgroup><col style="width:10.63em"/><col style="width:3.40em"/><col style="width:3.11em"/><col style="width:2.92em"/><col style="width:2.91em"/><col style="width:2.97em"/><col style="width:2.86em"/></colgroup><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="7"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left"><span style="width: 18.4181ptpx;"><svg height="16.8254pt" id="M143" style="vertical-align:-4.0179pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -12.8075 18.4181 16.8254" width="18.4181pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M536 404C536 423 520 448 491 448C445 448 398 404 308 283L286 338C255 416 242 448 217 448C182 448 138 402 92 341L111 321C149 368 169 378 178 378C188 378 198 363 214 320L254 212C185 117 138 65 107 65C98 65 85 69 82 75C79 82 73 86 65 86C44 86 23 60 23 39C23 7 44 -12 71 -12C119 -12 168 33 265 177L306 61C321 17 347 -12 373 -12C413 -12 465 33 507 96L491 119C459 84 432 60 413 60C395 60 378 92 358 148L321 250C341 279 369 310 389 332C417 363 439 382 456 382C466 382 475 376 481 368C486 361 492 358 496 358C513 358 536 381 536 404Z" id="g113-121"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,7.267,-6.711)"><path d="M700 305H441V272C542 264 548 258 548 186V107C548 64 536 53 516 42C493 30 462 24 429 24C237 24 151 189 151 333C151 517 264 626 415 626C507 626 585 594 609 470L642 476C634 544 629 601 626 636C594 644 513 665 429 665C234 665 46 554 46 321C46 123 194 -15 415 -15C495 -15 578 7 642 22C635 50 635 81 635 116V201C635 259 639 264 700 272V305Z" id="g58-69"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0065,0,0,-0.0065,13.865,-4.61)"><path d="M513 91L497 125C461 87 438 71 424 71C416 71 410 77 419 106C440 174 459 243 472 310C497 441 467 454 445 454C419 454 393 443 360 424C319 400 237 344 180 265H178L196 336C217 421 207 454 182 454C146 454 84 416 25 354L42 318C66 342 103 368 113 368C119 368 124 362 117 333L31 -2L41 -12C59 -3 91 5 119 11C133 76 146 123 162 180C214 262 337 384 383 384C404 384 411 371 391 304C370 233 350 165 333 90C318 24 328 -12 359 -12C385 -12 449 23 513 91Z" id="g176-111"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,7.202,3.858)"><path d="M290 377C321 398 342 415 358 430C378 450 389 473 389 502C389 578 329 635 238 635H237C184 635 137 610 109 578L64 515L88 493C112 529 154 573 208 573S303 542 303 482C303 409 233 370 141 341L149 308C165 313 190 319 215 319C272 319 341 283 341 193C342 98 292 43 222 43C163 43 122 72 96 94C88 101 79 100 70 94C61 87 47 73 46 60C44 47 48 37 62 23C76 10 118 -12 165 -12C238 -12 430 62 430 223C430 297 379 359 290 375V377Z" id="g50-52"></path></g></svg></span></td><td class="align_center">1</td><td class="align_center">2</td><td class="align_center">3</td><td class="align_center">4</td><td class="align_center">5</td><td class="align_center">6</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="7"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Average kerb weight</td><td class="align_center">3.988</td><td class="align_center">11.23</td><td class="align_center">8.95</td><td class="align_center">9.29</td><td class="align_center">9.88</td><td class="align_center">7.55</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><span style="width: 20.4145ptpx;"><svg height="14.5641pt" id="M144" style="vertical-align:-5.341041pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.22306 20.4145 14.5641" width="20.4145pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><rect height="0.65243" width="9.29071" x="0" y="-8.52081"></rect><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M689 332C689 394 670 448 646 448C620 448 597 421 597 396C597 386 600 381 608 372C619 359 620 334 620 315C620 150 538 45 454 45C414 45 386 67 386 122C386 138 388 158 394 180L457 426L452 432L377 416L315 156C302 100 259 45 216 45C176 45 148 67 148 122C148 133 152 158 156 180C162 212 173 259 194 332C201 357 206 384 206 405C206 430 198 448 174 448C125 448 66 406 23 342L43 319C84 368 110 383 121 383C126 383 128 382 128 377C128 370 127 359 122 343C99 268 84 204 77 156C74 137 70 111 70 104C70 25 125 -12 180 -12C228 -12 276 12 319 50C338 8 378 -12 418 -12C549 -12 689 166 689 332Z" id="g113-120"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.291,3.132)"><path d="M700 305H441V272C542 264 548 258 548 186V107C548 64 536 53 516 42C493 30 462 24 429 24C237 24 151 189 151 333C151 517 264 626 415 626C507 626 585 594 609 470L642 476C634 544 629 601 626 636C594 644 513 665 429 665C234 665 46 554 46 321C46 123 194 -15 415 -15C495 -15 578 7 642 22C635 50 635 81 635 116V201C635 259 639 264 700 272V305Z" id="g58-69"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0065,0,0,-0.0065,15.888,5.233)"><path d="M513 91L497 125C461 87 438 71 424 71C416 71 410 77 419 106C440 174 459 243 472 310C497 441 467 454 445 454C419 454 393 443 360 424C319 400 237 344 180 265H178L196 336C217 421 207 454 182 454C146 454 84 416 25 354L42 318C66 342 103 368 113 368C119 368 124 362 117 333L31 -2L41 -12C59 -3 91 5 119 11C133 76 146 123 162 180C214 262 337 384 383 384C404 384 411 371 391 304C370 233 350 165 333 90C318 24 328 -12 359 -12C385 -12 449 23 513 91Z" id="g176-111"></path></g></svg></span></td><td class="align_center">1</td><td class="align_center">2</td><td class="align_center">3</td><td class="align_center">4</td><td class="align_center">5</td><td class="align_center">6</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Average loading weight</td><td class="align_center">1.85</td><td class="align_center">5.17</td><td class="align_center">4.12</td><td class="align_center">4.21</td><td class="align_center">4.42</td><td class="align_center">3.55</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="7"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

tab5

Table 5

Table 5: Optimal Urban Logistics Facility Location with Consideration of Truck-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of Shenzhen City 