Rolling Supply Chain Scheduling considering Suppliers, Production, and Delivery Lot-Size

Table 10

Effectiveness test result (Type I).

	Approach
	DS		FS		ED		PI
Type of cost structure	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)
A	1,501,221	0.570	1,406,873.3	0.534	1,437,226.7	0.5.39	1,394,220
	(92.33%)		(99.00%)		(96.91%)
B	1,653,823.37	0.581	1,523,820.00	0.603	1,553,620.00	0.443	1,513,820
	(90.75%)		(99.34%)		(97.37%)
C	1,747,723.33	0.497	1,401,175.57	0.432	1,557,0423.7	0.667	1,394,220
	(74.65%)		(99.50%)		(88.32%)
D	1,594,111.12	0.315	1,509,756.67	0.542	1,425,403.33	0.589	1,394,220
	(85.66%)		(91.71%)		(97.76%)
E	1,828,290.00	0.667	1,523,822.24	0.812	1,672,230.37	0.978	1,513,820
	(79.23%)		(99.34%)		(89.54%)
F	1,731,940.58	0.776	1,647,666.67	0.530	1,555,225.76	0.721	1,543,500
	(87.79%)		(93.25%)		(99.24%)
G	1,885,060.39	0.738	1,509,754.31	0.886	1,557,042.07	0.519	1,485,600
	(73.11%)		(98.37%)		(95.19%)
H	2,560,828.18	0.812	2,558,620.67	0.788	2,631,531.30	0.528	2,483,220
	(96.88%)		(96.96%)		(94.03%)
I	2,705,854.78	0.738	2,676,412.07	0.897	2,741,425.54	0.657	2,635,820
	(97.34%)		(98.46%)		(95.99%)
J	2,761,420.32	0.698	2,558,620.33	0.437	2,719,949.56	0.554	2,483,220
	(88.80%)		(96.96%)		(90.47%)
K	2,632,160.12	0.733	2,656,241.97	0.689	2,631,534.43	0.536	2,550,140
	(96.78%)		(95.84%)		(96.81%)