Rolling Supply Chain Scheduling considering Suppliers, Production, and Delivery Lot-Size

Table 11

Effectiveness test result (Type II).

	Approach
	DS		FS		ED		PI
Type of cost structure	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)	Average; (PIP)	CPU; time(s)
A	1,431,711.20	0.633	1,408,010.77	0.577	1,441,013.30	0.661	1,397,010
	(97.52%)		(99.21%)		(96.85%)
B	1,661,410.40	0.734	1,516,010.20	0.612	1,536,810.67	0.663	1,505,810
	(89.67%)		(99.32%)		(97.94%)
C	1,812,015.18	0.734	1,408,104.59	0.425	1,540,626.67	0.318	1,397,010
	(70.29%)		(99.21%)		(89.72%)
D	1,603,374.59	0.601	1,517,576.67	0.512	1,441,013.74	0.467	1,397,010
	(85.23%)		(91.37%)		(96.85%)
E	1,895,306.78	0.855	1,516,010.11	0.537	1,650,137.09	0.399	1,386,260
	(63.28%)		(90.64%)		(80.97%)
F	1,771,825.94	0.589	1,666,026.97	0.576	1,536,815.18	0.572	1,501,280
	(81.98%)		(89.03%)		(97.63%)
G	1,890,027.67	0.879	1,517,573.55	0.568	1,540,621.96	0.354	1,472,360
	(71.63%)		(96.93%)		(95.36%)
H	2,541,518.82	0.468	2,569,560.08	0.568	2,614,010.68	0.388	2,463,010
	(96.81%)		(95.67%)		(93.87%)
I	2,678,965.18	0.587	2,642,463.40	0.564	2,724,510.18	0.235	2,538,700
	(94.48%)		(95.91%)		(92.68%)
J	2,787,013.33	0.878	2,569,561.20	0.268	2,720,340.23	0.349	2,489,120
	(88.03%)		(96.77%)		(90.71%)
K	2,637,124.67	0.489	2,663,420.33	0.687	2,614,012.98	0.385	2,591,200
	(98.23%)		(97.21%)		(99.12%)