Mathematical Theories and Applications for Nonlinear Control Systems
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Xia Zhao, Hongyan Ji, Yu Shi, "Optimization Problem of Insurance Investment Based on Spectral Risk Measure and RAROC Criterion", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 9838437, 7 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9838437
Optimization Problem of Insurance Investment Based on Spectral Risk Measure and RAROC Criterion
Abstract
This paper introduces spectral risk measure (SRM) into optimization problem of insurance investment. Spectral risk measure could describe the degree of risk aversion, so the underlying strategy might take the investor's risk attitude into account. We establish an optimization model aiming at maximizing riskadjusted return of capital (RAROC) involved with spectral risk measure. The theoretical result is derived and empirical study is displayed under different risk measures and different confidence levels comparatively. The result shows that risk attitude has a significant impact on investment strategy. With the increase of risk aversion factor, the investment ratio of risk asset correspondingly reduces. When the aversive level increases to a certain extent, the impact on investment strategies disappears because of the marginal effect of risk aversion. In the case of VaR and CVaR without regard for risk aversion, the investment ratio of risk asset is increasing significantly.
1. Introduction
Underwriting business and investment business are two main fund sources of an insurance company. In recent years, more and more insurers have paid attention to the efficiency of investment business because of increasing competition among insurance companies, continuing decline in underwriting profits and gradual relaxation of insurance investment policies.
The relationship between return and risk needs to be fully balanced in insurance investment, in which meanrisk optimization is the most commonly used criterion. For the measurement of risk, variance is a common choice. Early studies, for example, Lambert and Hofflander [1], Kahane and Nye [2], and Briys [3], established optimal portfolio model for property insurance under meanvariance criterion. Later, due to the limitation of variance, new risk measures were proposed constantly and meanrisk models were also extended in various backgrounds; see [4–9]. In particular, ruin probability and some downside risk measures such as VaR and CaR were introduced into insurance business to find the optimal investment strategy. Guo and Li [10] used meanVaR model to analyze the choice of optimal portfolios for insurers. Chen et al. [11] investigated an investmentreinsurance problem under dynamic ValueatRisk (VaR) constraint. Zeng et al. [12] established two meanCaR models to study reinsuranceinvestment problem of insurers and obtained the explicit expressions of the optimal deterministic rebalance reinsuranceinvestment strategies and meanCaR efficient frontiers.
Risk measures used in the above literatures indeed describe different risk characteristics of the assets, but they do not take investors’ risk attitude into account. Spectral risk measures (SRM) proposed by Acerbi et al. [13] characterize investors' risk aversion and have been applied to fields of banks and securities, for example, Adam et al. [14] and Diao et al. [15] and the references therein. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no literature which studied optimal investment problem in insurance business based on SRM. On the other hand, mean is generally used to describe the return, but the insurer needs to determine the amount of capital based on entire risk situation of company. The riskadjusted return on capital (RAROC) takes into account the capital return adjusted by risk, which makes up for the shortcomings from averagereturn principle; see [16–18] and the references therein.
This paper will introduce spectral risk measure into optimal investment model with RAROC as optimization target, construct optimization model, and give its theoretical and empirical study. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 illustrates spectral risk measure and insurance return model used here. Section 3 finds the solution of the optimization problem. The empirical application is displayed in Section 4. Section 5 concludes the paper.
2. Spectral Risk Measure and Insurance Return Model
2.1. Spectral Risk Measure
Definition 1 (see [19]). Suppose that random variable X represents the loss of assets, and its distribution function can be denoted as . Spectral risk measure with confidence level ( is defined as follows:where is a weight function or risk spectral function and is quantile of distribution function. SRM is a coherent risk measure when satisfies nonnegativity, normalization, and increasingness.
Specially, is Value at Risk (VaR) if . corresponds to Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) if . If is exponential spectral risk measure; if , is power spectral risk measure, where is the coefficient of absolute risk aversion and is the coefficient of relative risk aversion.
Proposition 2 (see [20]). Suppose that denotes income variable, and then denotes the loss variable. If follows normal distribution assumption, we can getwhere is quantile of standard normal distribution and is probability density function of standard normal distribution.
2.2. Insurance Return Model
Suppose that insurers invest in assets, one of which is riskfree asset, and others are risk assets. Therefore, the total profit is given aswhere , , denote premium charged by insurers, the rate of underwriting profit, and investment ratio, respectively. Constant denotes the rate of riskfree asset return. And random variable denotes the rate of risk asset return with assumption. is the investment weight of theth risk asset and we assume that .
Let and with mean and covariance matrix . Then we have , and . is the upper limit of risk the insurer can bear, that is, .
3. Optimal Investment Strategy for Insurers Based on SRMRAROC Criterion
In this section, we establish SRMRAROC optimization model and derive the optimal solution under normal distribution assumption.
3.1. Optimization Model
Here the investment performance evaluation is measured by riskadjusted return on capital (RAROC) instead of the absolute amount of income as follows:
Thus, the optimization model can be formulated as
3.2. Solution of Optimization Model
Step 1 (simplifying optimization model). Define as ndimension vector, , where . And then can be rewritten as , where is ndimension vector, .
Let , then . With confidence level, SRM. Then we have
So RAROC can be rewritten as
And model (7) can be transformed as
Step 2 (effective frontier curve equation of meanSRM space). Effective frontier in meanrisk space refers to the portfolio that maximizes the return at a certain level of risk or minimizes the risk at a certain level of return. Therefore, mathematical expression of curve equation of effective frontier can be given asSolving model (12) by Lagrange multiplier method yieldswhere .
So then, .
Therefore the effective frontier curve equation is
Assume that be the optimal return for a given risk based on formula (14); the corresponding optimal portfolio weights on effective frontier curve can be solved as
Step 3 (RAROC maximized portfolio under SRM constraints). Let ; that is, the slope of line will be maximized in the processing of optimization. From portfolio theory in finance, we know that maximum value is obtained when the line is tangent to the effective leading edge. The tangent point is the optimal portfolio when the tangent point is on the left of the constraint line while the intersection of the constraint line and the effective frontier is the optimal portfolio when the tangent point is on the right of the constraint line.
Let denote the intersection portfolio. It is obvious that at the intersection point. From effective frontier curve equation, we can find that
Let denote tangent portfolio. The formula is true for tangent point when the line is tangent to the effective frontier. So it follows thatwhich results in the following tangent point portfolio:
Summarily, the optimal solution of optimization model can be expressed asand the optimal portfolio weight isTherefore, the optimal investment ratio of each risk asset isand the corresponding proportion of investment in riskfree assets is
4. Data Analysis
4.1. Data Selection
In this section, we assume that insurers invest in one riskfree asset and three security risk assets. Bank deposit is regarded as riskfree asset and the selected risk assets are JoinTo Energy (000600), Chang’an Vehicle (000625), and Yili (600887). Yearly data is chosen from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016. The data for China Life Insurance Company Ltd is calculated from the company's annual report and semiannual report. Data of risk assets is obtained from Guotai An CSMAR series of research databases.
4.2. Descriptive Statistics of Risk Asset Data
We conduct descriptive statistical analysis of risk assets; see Table 1 and Figure 1.

It can be found from Table 1 that the distribution of return for three risk assets presents a certain degree of skewness and flatter peak than normal distribution. From QQ chart and the fact that JB statistic of each risky asset return rate is less than 5.99, which is 95% quantile of , we can conclude that the return of each risky asset is subject to a normal distribution approximately.
4.3. Calculation of Related Variables
(1) Investment Ratio and Rate of Underwriting Profit. The investment ratio is an important indicator to measure the level of capital utilization of an insurance company, which can be calculated by investment assets divided by total assets. The rate of underwriting profit can be calculated by the difference between total profit and investment profit divided by underwriting income. Based on investment data and underwriting data of China Life Insurance Company Ltd, we obtain that and here.
(2) Rate of Return for RiskFree Asset and Risky Asset. From China Life Insurance Company Ltd’s data of the amount of bank deposit and bank deposit return in 2006–2016, we can calculate the mean of the return rate as riskfree return rate. Each risky asset return is calculated by , where and denote th asset’s price at time t and t1, respectively. So it can be calculated from Guotai An CSMAR Series Research Database that the average return of JoinTo Energy (000600), Chang’an Vehicle (000625), and Yili (600887) are , respectively.
4.4. Optimal Insurance Investment Strategy Based on SRMRAROC Criterion
In this section, we conduct empirical analysis for optimal insurance investment strategy. The confidence level is set to 90% and 95% and the upper limit of risk is assumed to be 0.02. Based on formulas in Section 2, we calculate the optimal weights of the assets under different confidence levels. The results are displayed in Table 2.
 
Remark: the negative value means shortselling. 
From Table 2, we can obtain the following conclusion.
Generally, the optimal investment proportion in risk asset is decreasing as the factor of risk aversion increases, which reflects the effect of risk attitude on investment strategy. When the factor of risk aversion reaches some fix value, the optimal investment proportion stays in a roughly identical level, which shows the existence of marginal effect from risk aversion extent.
Compared with the results under different risk measures, risk aversion attitude shows a significant effect on the choice and assignment among risk assets and riskfree asset; and hence the risk attitude should not be ignored.
As confidence level becomes bigger, the optimal investment proportion in risky asset increases and the one in riskfree asset decreases. This is a natural conclusion since bigger confidence level will make the value of risk be smaller, which results in the increasing trend of investing in risk assets.
5. Conclusions
This paper constructed an insurance optimization model including spectral risk measure and riskadjusted return of capital and conducted theoretical and empirical analysis. The main innovation of this paper is introduction of spectral risk measure in insurance business, which makes the risk attitude of the investor be considered in decisionmaking. The result tells us that more risk aversion will decrease the investment ratio in risk asset and increase the interest of investing in riskfree asset. However, the impact on investment strategies will disappear when the level of risk aversion increases to a certain extent. Furthermore, both confidence level and the threshold of risk play a significant role on optimal strategy. For convenience, here we suppose that the underwriting insurance return follows a deterministic process and the policy constraints for insurance investment are not involved. It may be also of interest to extend the research to the case with stochastic insurance surplus process and/or the government policy constraint. We will explore these problems in the following studies.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by NSFC (71671104), Project of Humanities Social Sciences of MOE, China (16YJA910003, 18YJC630220), Key Project of National Social Science of China (16AZD019), Special Funds of Taishan Scholar Project (tsqn20161041) and SUIBE Postgraduate Innovative Talents Training Project.
References
 E. W. Lambert and A. E. Hofflander, “Impact of New Multiple Line Underwriting on Investment Portfolios of PropertyLiability Insurers,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 209, 1966. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Kahane and D. Nye, “A Portfolio Approach to the PropertyLiability Insurance Industry,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 42, no. 4, p. 579, 1975. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. P. Briys, “Investment portfolio behavior of nonlife insurers: a utility analysis,” Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 93–98, 1985. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 A. J. Frost, “Implications of modern portfolio theory for life assurance companies [J],” Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, vol. 26, pp. 47–68, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Guo, “Optimal portfolio choice for an insurer with loss aversion,” Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, vol. 58, pp. 217–222, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Y. Zeng, Z. Li, and Y. Lai, “Timeconsistent investment and reinsurance strategies for meanvariance insurers with jumps,” Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 498–507, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 C. Weng, “Constant proportion portfolio insurance under a regime switching exponential LEvy process,” Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 508–521, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, and J.M. Eber, “Coherent measures of risk,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 203–228, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 R. G. Emanuela, “Risk measures via gexpectations [J],” Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, vol. 39, pp. 19–34, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Guo and X. Li, “Optimal insurance investment strategy under VaR restriction [J],” Journal of Systems & Management, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 118–124, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Chen, Z. Li, and K. Li, “Optimal investmentreinsurance policy for an insurance company with VaR constraint,” Insurance: Mathematics & Economics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 144–153, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Y. Zeng and Z. Li, “Optimal reinsuranceinvestment strategies for insurers under meanCaR criteria,” Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 673–690, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 C. Acerbi, “Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1505–1518, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Adam, M. Houkari, and J.P. Laurent, “Spectral risk measures and portfolio selection,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1870–1882, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Diao, B. Tong, and C. Wu, “Spectral risk measurement based on EVT and its application in risk management [J],” Journal of Systems Engineering, vol. 6, no. 30, pp. 354–405, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Milne and M. Onorato, “RiskAdjusted Measures of Value Creation in Financial Institutions,” European Financial Management, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 578–601, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Wang and J. Li, “Research on Insurance Investment Strategy Based on RiskAdjusted Return Rate under Policy Constraints [J],” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 20, pp. 16–22, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Chen, Z. Han, and K. Tang, “Research on the Optimization Model of Insurance Investment Based on VaR and RAROC [J],” The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, vol. 4, pp. 111–117, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Dowd and D. Blake, “After VaR: The theory, estimation, and insurance applications of quantilebased risk measures,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 193–229, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Li and X. Liu, “The meanspectral measures of risk efficient frontier of portfolio and its empirical test [J],” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 5, no. 13, pp. 6–11, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Xia Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.