Finding Optimal Load Dispatch Solutions by Using a Proposed Cuckoo Search Algorithm

Table 12

Comparisons of found results for Subcase 6.2.

Approach	Best cost	Average cost	Worst cost	Std. dev.	CPU time	Computer
	($/h)	($/h)	($/h)	($/h)	(s)	(Processor-Ram)
CGA-MU [15]	-	10,143.7263	-	-	621.30	0.7 GHz
IGA-MU [15]	-	10,042.4742	-	-	174.62	0.7 GHz
CCSA [23]	9,990.6548	9,996.6390	10,014.0183	4.9268	75.42	2.1 GHz-2 GB
SOS [34]	10,121.20529	10,179.03436	10,241.07846	24.960	-	2.2 GHz-4 GB
MSOS [34]	9,981.3114	9,981.9798	9,983.6394	0.477	25.72	2.2 GHz-4 GB
TLBO [35]	10,006.0117	10,006.2821	10,005.994	0.069	48.216	2 GHz-1 GB
CRBA [36]	9,989.9444	99,92.050362	9,996.8317	-	67.50	-
CBA [44]	10,002.8596	10,006.3251	10,045.2265	9.5811	5.71	3.3 GHz -4 GB
OSE-CSA [59]	9,989.9444	9,992.0503	9,996.8317	1.4138	67.50	2 GHz- 2 GB
Proposed method	9,981.556	9,982.76	10,018.16	5.0904	11.19	2.4 GHz-4 GB