Research Article
Finding Optimal Load Dispatch Solutions by Using a Proposed Cuckoo Search Algorithm
Table 19
Optimal solutions for
ase 2.
| | (MW) | | (MW) | | (MW) | | (MW) | | (MW) |
| 1 | 2.4 | 23 | 68.9 | 45 | 659.9972 | 67 | 70 | 89 | 82.1667 | 2 | 2.4002 | 24 | 349.991 | 46 | 617.3078 | 68 | 70 | 90 | 88.1748 | 3 | 2.4009 | 25 | 399.9924 | 47 | 5.4001 | 69 | 70 | 91 | 56.4408 | 4 | 2.4003 | 26 | 400 | 48 | 5.4015 | 70 | 359.9917 | 92 | 100 | 5 | 2.4003 | 27 | 499.9948 | 49 | 8.4001 | 71 | 399.9986 | 93 | 440 | 6 | 4.0003 | 28 | 499.9999 | 50 | 8.401 | 72 | 400 | 94 | 499.9999 | 7 | 4.0001 | 29 | 199.9718 | 51 | 8.4024 | 73 | 104.4979 | 95 | 600 | 8 | 4 | 30 | 100 | 52 | 12.0011 | 74 | 191.601 | 96 | 473.4828 | 9 | 4.0001 | 31 | 10.0018 | 53 | 12.0001 | 75 | 90 | 97 | 3.6004 | 10 | 64.0006 | 32 | 19.9875 | 54 | 12.0005 | 76 | 49.9996 | 98 | 3.6 | 11 | 62.9079 | 33 | 80 | 55 | 12 | 77 | 160.0246 | 99 | 4.4007 | 12 | 36.8567 | 34 | 250 | 56 | 25.2 | 78 | 296.6528 | 100 | 4.4006 | 13 | 57.1595 | 35 | 359.9919 | 57 | 25.2083 | 79 | 175.6282 | 101 | 10.001 | 14 | 25.001 | 36 | 399.9946 | 58 | 35.0001 | 80 | 96.7143 | 102 | 10.0013 | 15 | 25.0004 | 37 | 39.9782 | 59 | 35.0388 | 81 | 10.0008 | 103 | 20.0013 | 16 | 25 | 38 | 69.9974 | 60 | 45.0023 | 82 | 12 | 104 | 20.0018 | 17 | 154.9936 | 39 | 99.994 | 61 | 45.0005 | 83 | 20.2773 | 105 | 40.0035 | 18 | 154.9968 | 40 | 119.9999 | 62 | 45.0002 | 84 | 199.8833 | 106 | 40 | 19 | 154.9954 | 41 | 157.6538 | 63 | 184.9144 | 85 | 324.744 | 107 | 50.0008 | 20 | 154.9989 | 42 | 219.9983 | 64 | 184.9969 | 86 | 439.9977 | 108 | 30.0005 | 21 | 68.9 | 43 | 439.9987 | 65 | 184.98 | 87 | 14.3477 | 109 | 40.0008 | 22 | 68.9004 | 44 | 559.9991 | 66 | 184.9961 | 88 | 22.5542 | 110 | 20.0006 |
|
|