An LMI-Based Simple Robust Control for Load Sway Rejection of Rotary Cranes with Double-Pendulum Effect
In the double-pendulum rotary crane case, the load sway properties become more complicated so that the difficulty of design and analysis of crane control system is increased. Moreover, the change of rope length not only affects the stability of the system, but also leads to the decline of control performance. In order to solve the foregoing problems, a simple model for controller design is obtained by linearizing and decoupling the complex nonlinear model of rotary crane. Then, a linear feedback controller which can furnish robust performance is presented. Finally, numerical simulations verify the effectiveness of the proposed method by comparing with a traditional approach.
As a kind of handling robot, the crane systems have the advantages of less executive mechanism and simple structure; therefore, they have been widely used in various production departments . However, load sways caused by the cart or boom motion not only damage goods, reduce production efficiency, but also cause accidents, even casualties. Hence, how to design a control method that can effectively suppress the load sways has been a hot and difficult point in both academic and industrial circles.
Until now, various approaches were applied to crane systems [2–26]. Nonetheless, when the hook mass or load shape cannot be ignored, the load swing presents two-stage swing. For this problem, open-loop methods such as input shaping technology [27–32], motion planning method [33, 34], were presented. On the other hand, closed-loop methods were also reported in [35, 36]. Furthermore, an input-shaping-based SIRMs fuzzy approach was reported in . Ouyang et al. reported two novel sliding-mode based approaches and a simple LMI-based robust method [38–40]. A nonlinear quasi-PID scheme and an adaptive nonlinear controller were applied to overhead cranes in [41, 42].
In conclusion, although open-loop approaches were introduced in [27–34], accurate crane models were always needed. On the other hand, too complicated algorithms were adopted in [35–42] to achieve good robust or adaptive performance. Moreover, different from the load sways of double-pendulum overhead cranes which were dealt with in the most existing literatures [27–42], the double pendulums in the rotary crane system are both conical pendulums, and the system characteristics are more complex. Hence, even if the similar algorithm shown in  is adopted, the method for calculating the controller gain is different. Moreover, as far as we know, there are few related reports on the load sway suppression control of rotary cranes with double-pendulum effect.
In order to solve the foregoing problems, a simple model for controller design is obtained by linearizing and decoupling the complex nonlinear model of rotary crane. Next, a linear feedback controller which can furnish robust performance is presented. The controller gains are obtained by using synthesizing a pole placement and a optimal regulator problems . Finally, numerical simulations verify the effectiveness of the proposed method by comparing with a traditional approach.
2. Rotary Crane Dynamics
Figure 1 shows the model of a rotary crane with double-pendulum effect : where , , , and are the masses of the boom, the ballast, the hook, and the load, respectively. , , , and are the lengths of the boom, the ballast, the rope, and the rigging, respectively. , , , and are the components of hook angle and load angle in the vertical and horizontal direction of the boom, respectively. and are the vertical and horizontal angles of the boom, respectively. In addition, , , , and (=1,2) are the acceleration of gravity, the moment of inertia for boom motion, the system gains, the boom-driven torque, the viscous friction coefficients, and the static friction or Coulomb friction term. In addition, and () denote and , respectively. The detailed derivation procedure for (1)-(6) is included in Appendix.
In order to compensate for the above disturbance, the disturbance observer as shown in Figure 2 is designed [43–48]. Then, we have where is the control input for vertical and horizontal subsystem, respectively.
Then, we have where .
From the above equations, the crane system can be divided into two subsystems (i.e., vertical boom motion and horizontal boom motion subsystems). Therefore, we can design feasible and effective controllers for each subsystem, respectively.
3. Controller Design Process
3.1. Closed-Loop System Representation
The closed-loop control system for rotary crane is where , , , , , and are feedback gains. These gains will be calculated via the LMI-based method in this study.
3.2. Pole Placement Problem by LMI
In linear control theory, if all eigenvalues of matrix lie in the left-half of a region shown in Figure 3, the system is stable. Inspired by the literature , the following formulations were suggested to solve the pole placement problem in this study: where and .
3.3. Optimal Regulator Problem by LMI
This subsection proposes an LQR method to achieve the optimal control problem. Hence, the following cost function is considered : where and .
Then, inspired by the method presented in , the above problem can be converted into the problem of finding , , and such that Trace is minimal with the following constraints: where .
3.4. Controller Design
In this study, we synthesize the above two problems to obtain the controller by setting and :
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Simulation Conditions
In order to evaluate the control performance of the proposed controller, a cycloid-like motion trajectory was applied to the crane system : where , , , and are the desired boom angle, the initial boom angle, the reaching time, and the finish time. These parameters were selected as [deg], [deg], [deg], [deg], [s], and [s].
Parameters as shown in Figure 3 were selected as , , and , respectively. We also set , , and in (16). The controller gains for the decoupled linear system were obtained as follows by the method proposed in Section 3 with the rotary crane parameters shown in Table 1, when the rope length varies from [m] to from [m]. Using the relationship shown in (10), the gains for the original rotary crane are
4.2. Stability Analysis
We conducted several numerical to explain the robust stability of the proposed control system when the rope length varies from [m] to from [m]. The initial poles of the vertical boom motion subsystem were set to [1/s], [1/s], [1/s], [1/s], [1/s], and [1/s], and the initial poles of the horizontal boom motion subsystem were set to [1/s], [1/s], [1/s], [1/s], [1/s], and [1/s]. It is confirmed that the crane system can be stabilized by the controller from the simulation results in Figure 4.
(a) Original figure for vertical boom motion subsystem
(b) Enlarged view for vertical boom motion subsystem
(c) Original figure for horizontal boom motion subsystem
(d) Enlarged view for horizontal boom motion subsystem
4.3. Simulation Results
We conducted several simulations based on the linear model under different rope length, firstly. The results for the vertical subsystem are shown in Figure 5. Although there are transient errors and slight overshoot in these figures, the vertical boom motion converges to the desired position rapidly. Meanwhile, there is almost no residual modal swaying vibration. On the other hand, the results for the horizontal subsystem are shown in Figure 6. Almost the same results were obtained as those in Figure 5. The results based on the original crane system for the terms of the load sways , , , , the tracking error for vertical boom angle , the tracking errors for horizontal boom angle , the vertical boom angle , the horizontal boom angle , and the control inputs and are shown in Figure 7. Because of the effect of the ignored nonlinearity of the crane model, the residual swaying angles are bigger than those in Figures 5 and 6.
For verifying that the presented controller also has robustness to the rigging length variation, we conducted simulations with the gains in (20) and (21) by set the as [m] and [m]. By comparing the results in Figures 7 and 8, it is found that although the second sway angle of the horizontal direction increases with the increase of the rigging length, it still remains in a reasonable range.
4.4. Comparative Simulation
In order to confirm the proposed method can provide superior robust performance, some comparative simulations were conducted by a conventional state feedback controller. A dominant poles placement method was applied to calculate the controller gains which are as follows: The results are shown in Figure 9. Although the load sway angles reduced completely under condition [m] or [m], the load sway angles cannot be reduced by using gains in (22) and (23) under condition [m]. Meanwhile, the quantitative analyses between the proposed method and the existing one are in Tables 2–4. It is indicated that the presented method can furnish preferable robust performance than the traditional one from these figures and tables.
In order to achieve the robust control for a rotary crane with double-pendulum effect, a simple model for controller design is obtained by linearizing and decoupling the complex nonlinear model of rotary crane. Then, a linear feedback controller which can furnish robust performance was presented. Finally, numerical simulations verified the effectiveness of the proposed method by comparing with a traditional approach.
This section presents the derivation of the crane dynamics in (1)-(6). From Figure 1, the position of the hook with respect to the origin of coordinates is presented as follows: Then, the position of the load with respect to the origin of coordinates is Taking the time derivation of (A.1) and (A.2), we have andHence, the kinetic energy of the hook and the load is as follows: Next, the kinetic energy of the boom and the ballast can be presented as follows: where , , and are the moment inertia of the boom in 3D space; is the moment inertia of the ballast. The total kinetic energy of the crane system is The potential energy of the hook and load , the boom , and the ballast can be presented as follows, respectively: Hence, the total potential energy of the rotary crane is where is the gravitational acceleration.
Lagrange’s function is presented as the difference between the kinetic energy and the potential energy . Then, the double-pendulum rotary crane model can be derived by using Lagrange’s equations of motion.
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61703202 and in part by the Key Research Development Project of Jiangsu Province under Grant BE2017164.
D. Qian, S. Tong, J. Guo, and S. Lee, “Leader-follower-based formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots with mismatched uncertainties via integral sliding mode,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 229, no. 6, pp. 559–569, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Sun, Y. Fang, H. Chen, Y. Fu, and B. Lu, “Nonlinear stabilizing control for ship-mounted cranes with ship roll and heave movements: design, analysis, and experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1781–1793, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Sun, T. Yang, H. Chen, Y. Fang, and Y. Qian, “Adaptive anti-swing and positioning control for 4-DOF rotary cranes subject to uncertain/unknown parameters with hardware experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, pp. 1–13, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ouyang, G. Zhang, L. Mei, X. Deng, and D. Wang, “Load vibration reduction in rotary cranes using robust two-degree-of-freedom control approach,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
L. A. Tuan, S.-G. Lee, L. C. Nho, and H. M. Cuong, “Robust controls for ship-mounted container cranes with viscoelastic foundation and flexible hoisting cable,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 229, no. 7, pp. 662–674, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
W. Singhose, D. Kim, and M. Kenison, “Input shaping control of double-pendulum bridge crane oscillations,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 130, no. 3, Article ID 034504, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
J. Vaughan, D. Kim, and W. Singhose, “Control of tower cranes with double-pendulum payload dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1345–1358, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
E. Maleki and W. Singhose, “Swing dynamics and input-shaping control of human-operated double-pendulum boom cranes,” Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID 031006, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
H. Ouyang, G. Zhang, L. Mei, X. Deng, H. Xi, and D. Wang, “Residual load sway reduction for double-pendulum overhead cranes using simple motion trajectory,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Real-Time Computing and Robotics, RCAR 2017, pp. 327–332, Japan, July 2017.View at: Google Scholar
H. Ouyang, J. Hu, G. Zhang, L. Mei, and X. Deng, “Decoupled linear model and S-shaped curve motion trajectory for load sway reduction control in overhead cranes with double-pendulum effect,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, pp. 1–12, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhang, X. Ma, X. Rong, R. Song, X. Tian, and Y. Li, “A novel energy-coupling-based control method for double-pendulum overhead cranes with initial control force constraint,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
H. Ouyang, X. Deng, H. Xi, J. Hu, G. Zhang, and L. Mei, “Novel robust controller design for load sway reduction in double-pendulum overhead cranes,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, pp. 1–13, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Sun, Y. Wu, Y. Fang, and H. Chen, “Nonlinear antiswing control for crane systems with double-pendulum swing effects and uncertain parameters: design and experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1413–1422, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Uchiyama, “Robust control for overhead cranes by partial state feedback,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 223, no. 4, pp. 575–580, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
Y. Maeta and M. Iwasaki, “Initial friction compensation by disturbance observer based on rolling friction model,” IEEJ Transactions on Sensors and Micromachines, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 3124–3129, 2009.View at: Google Scholar