Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 6349510 | 13 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6349510

Robust Adaptive Sliding Mode Fault Tolerant Control for Nonlinear System with Actuator Fault and External Disturbance

Academic Editor: Leonardo Acho
Received11 Oct 2018
Revised07 Jan 2019
Accepted21 Jan 2019
Published06 Feb 2019

Abstract

In this paper, an adaptive sliding mode fault tolerant control (ASMFTC) approach is proposed for a class of nonlinear systems with actuator fault, uncertainty, and external disturbance. Specifically, first, a novel observer is proposed to estimate the state, actuator fault, and external disturbance. Then, by utilising the observed information, a novel output sliding mode observer is constructed. In the control method, an adaptive law and two compensators are designed to attenuate the unknown estimation errors, actuator fault, and disturbance. Furthermore, the reaching ability of the sliding motion is analysed and the H-infinite performance is introduced to ensure the robustness of the system. Finally, a flexible single joint manipulator system and a two-cart system are used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

1. Introduction

Industrial control system is inevitable to suffer from faults caused by the actuators, sensors, and other components of the system because of long time operation or unexpected operation. When fault occurs, the system performance will be certainly reduced and even the stability of the system cannot be guaranteed [1, 2]. With the growing requirement of the reliability and maintainability of the system, fault tolerant control (FTC) becomes an import and indispensable way when designing the controller [3, 4]. Generally, fault tolerant control (FTC) can be divided into two parts, i.e., passive FTC and active FTC. For passive FTC, the controller is designed based on the prior knowledge. On the contrary, the active FTC is constructed and integrated with the fault diagnosis, and the fault is detected online. Many literatures have been achieved about the FTC for the manipulator system; see [57] and the references therein.

It is worth noting that disturbance exists widely in many industry processes [8], which will directly lead to the instability of the control system. There are many reasons for disturbance for mechanical systems, such as load fluctuation, noise in the working environment, and parameters vibration. Disturbance rejection control is also of great importance when designing the controller. Many control methods have been proposed in the last decades to attenuate, such as control [8], robust control [9], and sliding mode control [4]. In [8], the problem of reliable control is investigated for discrete-time T-S fuzzy systems with infinite distributed delay disturbance and actuator faults; the stability of the system and the performance index were guaranteed. In [9], the disturbance rejection control strategy for attitude tracking of an aircraft with both internal uncertainties and external disturbances was investigated; a robust feedback controller was designed to achieve the desired tracking performance. In [4], an adaptive sliding controller was proposed for a class of single-link flexible-joint robot with mismatched disturbance; a back stepping method was used to deal with the disturbance such that the tracking performance can be guaranteed.

In most practical industry control systems, fault and external disturbance are unknown or are too expensive to measure, which drives people regard the fault or disturbance signal as an unknown input of the system. Aiming at this problem, the observer based method is of great importance in order for the accommodate fault and disturbance. Actually, the observer based methods have achieved abundant research results since the last 1970s. For example, in [10], a class of linear time-invariant systems with unknown inputs was discussed, and the design procedure of the observer to estimate the maximum subspace of the state was presented. In [11], a class of Lipschitz system was considered; an asymptotic observer with respect to estimate both the state and input with the features of considering additive disturbance and uncertainty was designed. In [12], an adaptive unknown input observer was constructed and the robustness performance was analysed. Reference [13] addressed the problem of the disturbances observer constructing; the disturbance rejection was considered simultaneously; and the method was applied to a robot manipulator regulation.

Sliding mode control (SMC), which has potential advantages of robustness to uncertainties and disturbances and low sensitivity to the system parameter variations, has been widely investigated in nonlinear system [14]. However, the inherent robustness properties of conventional sliding mode control approaches are guaranteed only after the occurrence of a sliding mode [15]. In order to circumvent this problem, the idea of integral sliding mode control (ISM) control was introduced. In the ISMC scheme, the reaching phase is eliminated; i.e., the sliding motion occurs from the initial time. In [16], an adaptive robust controller for robot manipulators system with parameter variations and disturbances was developed. By using adaptive integral sliding mode control and time-delay estimation, the robustness and stability of the system were achieved. In addition, the observer based sliding mode control has an advantage of the disturbance attenuation control, because the estimated information is concluded in the controller scheme. In [17], the disturbance observer based SMC was considered for a special second order system with mismatched uncertainties. In [18], a disturbance observer based integral sliding mode control approach for continuous system was investigated; by incorporating the estimated information in the controller to counteract the disturbance, the chattering problem was eased and the stability was guaranteed.

Motived by [16, 17], this paper focuses on the robust fault tolerant control for a class of nonlinear system with actuator fault, uncertainty, and external disturbance. The main works and contributions are as follows: a novel observer is presented to estimate the states, fault signal, and disturbance simultaneously; a new sliding mode robust control scheme is constructed, in which two compensators are included to accommodate the fault signal and to attenuate the disturbance; the reaching ability of the sliding motion is proved. Finally, the proposed method is applied to the flexible single joint manipulator system; the simulation results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

The remaining parts of this paper are organized as follows. In Section 2, the system description and some assumptions are given. In Section 3, the construction of observer and the design of the controller are presented. In Section 4, a flexible single joint manipulator system and a two-cart system are presented and some conclusions are given in Section 5.

2. System Descriptions

The following nonlinear system with actuator fault and mismatched disturbance iswhere is the state vector, is the control input of the system, and is the output. is the external disturbance of the system and satisfies , , where and are known constants. is the actuator fault signal, which satisfies , where is known constant. represents the system uncertainty with . is a nonlinear Lipschitz function representing the unmodeled dynamics, i.e., , where is the Lipschitz constant. , , , , , and are known as system parameter matrices with proper dimensions.

3. Main Results

3.1. Observer Design

Motived by [12, 13], in this part, a novel composite observer is designed as follows:where , , , , and are estimates of , , , , and ; and are the observer gains. is an intermediate variable of the observer, is a compensator, and is the estimation of . and are designed as follows:where , , , and is a positive scalar; and are two positive definite symmetric matrices. From (2), one can deduce thatThrough further simplification, one can obtain thatwhere .

Then, the error dynamic systems can be obtained as follows:Define , then the augmented system can be written aswhere is the equivalent disturbance, and the performance index is defined as

Theorem 1. The dynamic error systems (7) and (8) are stable and satisfy the performance index, if there exist two positive definite symmetry matrices and , such that the following (12) holds:where , , , and .

Proof. The Lyapunov candidate function is chosen aswhere .
From (13), the following (14) can be obtainedAccording to (7) and (8), it can be deduced thatFrom (4), one can check thatThen (15) can be written aswhere .
For any two positive scalars and , the following inequalities are satisfied:From (3), one can check thatCombining (18) and (19), (17) can be written aswhere , ,Then the performance index (11) is changed to the following (21):where , , .
Thus, according to (12) and the Schur complement, the dynamic error system is stable and the performance index is satisfied. This completes the proof.

From Theorem 1, the estimation errors , , and will converge to zero asymptotically; i.e., there exist two positive scalars , , such that , . In the following part, we will reconstruct the fault signal.

Define the following sliding mode surface

Theorem 2. With the observer (2) and the condition (24), if (12) has a feasible solution, then the state of the system will be driven to the sliding surface in finite time, if the following condition is satisfiedand the fault signal can be approximated by

Proof. The Lyapunov candidate function is defined as follows:The derivation of (27) can be obtained as From Theorem 1, if (12) holds, then ; one can check that ; then (28) can be rewritten as follows (29):Thus, we can conclude that the state of the system will reach the sliding mode surface in finite time. When the state of the system reaches the sliding surface, one can obtain thatFrom (30), it can be obtained thatFrom Theorem 1, there exist a normal scalar which satisfies ; it can be obtained by (31) thatwhere andIt can be seen from (33) that if is small enough, (26) is established. It can be seen that (26) is a discontinuous functions; (34) formula can be used to replace (26)where is a positive constant.

3.2. Controller Design

The main purpose of this part is to design a controller to guarantee the stability of the system. In this paper, a novel integral sliding mode method based on the observer is presented, and the reaching ability is proved; the controller is designed as follows:The sliding mode surface is designed aswhere is a parameter matrix, which need to be chosen to satisfy that is inevitable.

From (36), (37) can be obtainedFrom Theorems 1 and 2, the estimation errors , , , and are bounded; in accordance with (1), one can define the following equivalent uncertain term:Then, one can check that is bounded.

Then the controller is given bywhere . is a positive scalar and is the estimation of with the following adaptive rules:where and are two positive scalars.

Lemma 3 (see [19]). With the sliding mode surface (40) and controller (39), is bounded; i.e., there exist a positive constant such that the following inequality is satisfied:

Theorem 4. With the controller (39), the system trajectory will converge to the sliding mode surface s in finite time.

Proof. The Lyapunov function is given asThe derivation of (42) can be obtained as Then the trajectory of the system will reach the sliding mode surface in finite time. This completes the proof.

When the system reaches the sliding surface, i.e., , then the equivalent control of the system can be obtainedIn this paper, the idea of equivalent control is applied to design the controller. In the next part, the design of and the stability analysis of the system are given. is designed as where is given as follows:where and is a positive symmetric matrix.

Substituting (45) and (46) into (1), the closed loop system can be obtained aswhere , , , and .

Take ; ; then the upper (48) can be written as (49)The following theorem gives the stability analysis of the system.

Theorem 5. With (44)-(46), system (48) is asymptotically stable and the performance
is satisfied, if there exist a positive symmetric matrix , such that the following conditions holds:

Proof. The Lyapunov function is designed as The derivation of (51) can be obtained asFrom (46), one can obtain thatThen, (51) can be rewritten asThen, on can obtain thatwhere , .
According to (49), , which implies that the system is stable and the performance is satisfied. The proof is completed.

4. Simulation

In this part, two examples are used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Example 1. In this part, the flexible single joint manipulator system borrowed from [7] is used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, the diagram for the flexible single joint is shown as Figure 1 [5], the joint is driven by a DC motor, and its dynamic system can be represented as where is the inertia of the DC motor, is the inertia of the link, and and are the angle positions of the motor and the link, respectively. and represent the angular velocities of the motor and link. is the torsional spring constant, is the amplifier gain, is the mass, is the viscosity coefficient, is the gravitational constant, and is the distance between the rotor center and the center of gravity of the link; is the control input delivered by the motor. Taking the system state as , the system can be rewritten in the form of (1), whereAssuming , the system nonlinear term . The actuator fault and disturbance signal are assumed asIn addition, we assume that system uncertainty has the following forms: , in which , , are known parameters.
By solving inequalities (12) and (49), we can obtain thatThe simulation results are as given in Figures 28
Figures 25 show the states of the system and their estimated response curves, respectively. Figure 6 shows the external disturbance and the estimation curve of the system. Figure 7 expresses the fault and its estimation curves. Figure 8 illustrates the control input signal. From Figures 25, it can be observed that the states of the system are stable in a limited time in the presence of and fault signals and external disturbance. These results also show that the system has better convergence with the controller, which means the proposed control method can effectively deal with the above problems.
Seen from Figure 6, the accuracy of the observer in this paper is good, which can effectively detect the disturbance signals of the system, thus helping the subsequent controller design. From Figure 7, it can be seen that the fault signal of the system can be reconstructed effectively by adjusting the parameters of the sliding mode observer, which indicates that the observed signal can be used in the design of the controller, and the effectiveness of the method is verified. From Figure 8, one can observe that the controller works when fault occurs and in the presence of disturbance. The simulation results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Example 2. In this section, the two-cart system which borrowed form [20] is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The geometric of the system is shown as in Figure 9 [20].
As shown in Figure 9, the first cart is connected to a rigid wall via a damper, and is connected to a second cart by a spring. The external force is applied to a second cart via an actuator. Both carts have a nominal mass of , the damper have a constant of and the spring constant . The time constant of the actuator is . The states are the force, velocities and positions of the two carts. The actuator fault and unmatched disturbance are considered. The system parameters are given as follows:The nonlinear unmodeled uncertainty and unmatched nonlinearity are assumed to be , . The actuator fault and external disturbance are supposed to be as follows:Choosing the matrix , and one can check that is invertible. By solving (52), one can obtain thatThe results of the simulation are as in Figures 1014.
Figures 10 and 11 characterize the trajectories of the system; from Figures 10-11, it can be seen that the stability of the positions and velocities of the first and second cart can be guaranteed. Figure 12 shows the estimation of the actuator fault; one can clearly check that the proposed method performance better than the intermediate method proposed in [20], precisely, the method proposed response faster than the method in [20], and the proposed method has less chattering.
To verify the proposed method, the responses of the system are shown in Figures 13-14 without controller. From the two figures, one can conduct that the closed loop system becomes unstable when removing the observer and compensator. The simulation results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

5. Conclusion

In this paper, a class of nonlinear systems with disturbance, fault, and uncertainty is studied. The state and disturbance estimation of the system are realized by designing an observer first, while the sliding mode observer technology is introduced to reconstruct the fault signal. Then, by using the observed information, a novel robust integral sliding mode controller is presented. Furthermore, the reaching ability is proved and the stability of the closed loop system is analysed. Finally, the method is applied to a class of single joint manipulator system and a two-cart system. The simulation results show that the observer has good response characteristics, and the controller has good fault tolerant ability.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Education Programs of Sichuan Province of China under Grant 182494 and the Key Project of Xihua University (Z17222).

References

  1. J. C. Cambera and V. Feliu-Batlle, “Input-state feedback linearization control of a single-link flexible robot arm moving under gravity and joint friction,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 88, pp. 24–36, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. A. Lightcap and S. A. Banks, “An extended kalman filter for real-time estimation and control of a rigid-link flexible-joint manipulator,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 91–103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. K. Dong and H. O. Won, “Robust control design for flexible joint manipulators: theory and experimental verification,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 495–505, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  4. A.-C. Huang and Y.-C. Chen, “Adaptive sliding control for single-link flexible-joint robot with mismatched uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 770–775, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y.-C. Chang and H.-M. Yen, “Design of a robust position feedback tracking controller for flexible-joint robots,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 351–363, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  6. M. Van, S. S. Ge, and H. Ren, “Finite time fault tolerant control for robot manipulators using time delay estimation and continuous nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1681–1693, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. Zhao and Y. Li, “Local joint information based active fault tolerant control for reconfigurable manipulator,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 859–876, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  8. M. Moradi and A. Fekih, “A stability guaranteed robust fault tolerant control design for vehicle suspension systems subject to actuator faults and disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1164–1171, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Wang and J. Su, “Robust disturbance rejection control for attitude tracking of an aircraft,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2361–2368, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. Kobayashi and T. Nakamizo, “An observer design for linear systems with unknown inputs,” International Journal of Control, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 605–619, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  11. Q. P. Ha and H. Trinh, “State and input simultaneous estimation for a class of nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1779–1785, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  12. X. Li, F. Zhu, and J. Zhang, “State estimation and simultaneous unknown input and measurement noise reconstruction based on adaptive observer,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 647–654, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W.-H. Chen, D. J. Ballance, P. J. Gawthrop, and J. O'Reilly, “A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 932–938, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Bustan, S. K. H. Sani, and N. Pariz, “Adaptive fault-tolerant spacecraft attitude control design with transient response control,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1404–1411, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. T. Hamayun, C. Edwards, and H. Alwi, “Augmentation scheme for fault-tolerant control using integral sliding modes,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 307–313, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Lee, P. H. Chang, and M. Jin, “Adaptive integral sliding mode control with time-delay estimation for robot manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 6796–6804, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Yang, S. Li, and X. Yu, “Sliding-mode control for systems with mismatched uncertainties via a disturbance observer,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 3062–3068, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Xia, Z. Zuo, and Y. Wang, “Disturbance observer-based integral sliding-mode control for systems with mismatched disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 7040–7048, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. Plestan, Y. Shtessel, V. Brégeault, and A. Poznyak, “New methodologies for adaptive sliding mode control,” International Journal of Control, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 1907–1919, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  20. J.-W. Zhu and G.-H. Yang, “Fault-tolerant control for linear systems with multiple faults and disturbances based on augmented intermediate estimator,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 164–172, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet

Copyright © 2019 Liang Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

428 Views | 298 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles