Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 9480675 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9480675

Manuel Ruiz, Luis Ramírez, Fermín Navarrina, Mario Aymerich, David López-Navarrete, "A Mathematical Model to Evaluate the Impact of the Maintenance Strategy on the Service Life of Flexible Pavements", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2019, Article ID 9480675, 10 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9480675

# A Mathematical Model to Evaluate the Impact of the Maintenance Strategy on the Service Life of Flexible Pavements

Revised26 Apr 2019
Accepted08 May 2019
Published30 May 2019

#### 1. Introduction

It is commonly accepted that heavy vehicles are the main causal agent of the fatigue damage on flexible pavements. As early as in the 1820s, McAdam proposed specific tolls for heavy vehicles due to the road damage they produced [1]. The problem in those times was the lack of a common unit for measuring the road damage caused by each class of vehicle, which at that time depended on the number of horses.

In 1958-60, right after the World War II, the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) together with the US Army Corps conducted a very large number of road test in Ottawa, Illinois ([2, 3]). A result of those tests is probably the most relevant concept in terms of pavement design and fatigue analysis: the “fourth power law.” This “law” refers to the relationship between the deterioration of the pavement service conditions and the static load carried by each axle. In accordance to this law, the service life of a flexible pavement section, that is, the number of load cycles until failure, could be estimated in terms of the load carried by each vehicle. The term “fourth power” means that the damage caused by a particular load is roughly related to the load by a power of four. The standard unit for measuring the loads applied, Equivalent Standard Axle Loads (ESALs), was established at that time and has remained unchanged since then [4]. The modern methods for pavement design are based on the concepts established at that time [5].

Road transport is a key element for the economic growth and development in modern societies. For example, in the European Union, road infrastructures are a fundamental element of social cohesion and prosperity, representing about 45% of the transported goods and over 80% of the passengers in the EU. However, due to the economic crisis of 2008, the maintenance expenditure of the European countries had suffered, according to the OECD [6], a reduction of over 30% between 2008 and 2011.

Basically, all national highway agencies recognize the importance of an adequate preventive maintenance during the road pavement life-cycle. It is believed that if preventive maintenance is programmed to be applied too infrequently, the maintenance and user costs will increase. On the other hand, if it is applied too frequently, the maintenance program cost will be reduced, but due to the traffic interruption, there are costs in terms of user delay and inconvenience. Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in studying the interaction between pavement roughness and dynamic axle loads generated by heavy vehicles. The progressive deterioration of the road surface accelerates the fatigue damage accumulations [7]. In order to reduce it, a preventive maintenance program could be performed. A reduction of the road roughness would reduce the dynamic load and therefore the expected service life of the road would be increased, but also other factors, such as comfort and safety, would be improved.

The aim of this paper is to study the increase of the fatigue damage of a pavement section along its lifetime. The study includes the dynamic effects generated by heavy vehicles. Finally, different conservation strategies will be analyzed in order to extend the road service life.

In order to carry out the study, a new software financed by the European Investment Bank Institute, named “Dynamic & Maintenance Simulation App (DMSA)" has been developed. The heavy vehicle dynamics are included in DMSA by means of a coupled mathematical model that takes into account the pavement deterioration over time. In this paper, the process and its subprocesses are presented, explaining their respective role in the model. In order to show the potential of this software, the results of the DMSA app for a sample case are presented. Finally, an example is presented, in which different maintenance strategies are applied to a given flexible paved road.

#### 2. Schematic Process

In this work, the effect of preventive maintenance on flexible pavement lifetime considering dynamic axle loads is analyzed. All the essential factors (traffic, weather conditions, the specific fatigue law under consideration, the structural characteristics of the pavement, the project lifetime, etc.) are included in the proposed formulation.

The schematic process is divided into three different subprocesses, each one intended for the computation of a specific function (Pavement Deterioration Model, Dynamic Load Amplification Factor, and Accumulated Fatigue Damage Indicator).

Pavement Deterioration Model (PDM). International Roughness Index (IRI) is a worldwide accepted index used for calculating the roughness of a road. Its variation over time is chosen as the representative variable for the progressive deterioration of a road profile. The model used for computing the evolution of the IRI over time takes into account multiple effects, such as the vehicles’ characteristics, the initial road profile, the structural specifications of the pavement, and the project lifetime, among others.

Dynamic Load Amplification Factor (DLA ). The DLA factor quantifies the ratio between the effective dynamic loading and the static loading. For the calculation of the DLA, the so-called Quarter Heavy Vehicle (QHV) model is used. This model was developed by Navarrina et al. in 2015 [7] as a variant of the Quarter Car (QC) model [8], which is routinely used to calculate the IRI.

Accumulated Fatigue Damage Indicator Including Dynamic Effects (). This indicator quantifies the dynamic counterpart of the accumulated fatigue damage suffered by the pavement along its lifetime. The accumulation of the fatigue damage decreases the structural integrity of the firm. One of the required parameters for the computation of this indicator is the so-called reference strain (). In this work, we have used a Multilayer Elastic Model based on Burmister’s theory [9] to calculate this reference strain.

The computational models used in this work for the different phenomena involved in pavement deterioration are the bases on which the software DMSA relies.

#### 3. Pavement Deterioration Model

The main objective of the PDM is to simulate the time evolution of the superficial roughness for a given flexible paved road. This evolution is needed for the study of different maintenance scenarios and their effects onto the lifetime of the firm. Also, this time evolution is used to estimate the variation of the DLA factor along time.

Several deterioration models can be found in the literature, each one with its own advantages and disadvantages. IRI is worldwide employed for surface roughness measurement of flexible pavements. The IRI was developed by the World Bank in 1986 [10, 11] with the intention of establishing the overall use of an index to measure surface roughness on roads worldwide and define a standard roughness measurement technique for the quality control of the projects financed by this institution. The IRI is obtained from measured longitudinal profiles [12], where a quarter-car (QC) model [13] rides along a 100 m profile interval at constant speed (80 km/h). In this work, we generate the road profiles using the Road Profile Simulation Model, where the ride of the QC is analyzed. The IRI is also being widely used to other purposes, such as a user’s comfort indicator and in economic studies concerning fuel consumption cost per kilometer in roads.

The PDM selected for this project simulates time evolution of the IRI. This evolution is produced by the deterioration of the upper bituminous layer of a flexible paved road. The PDM selected is based on HDM-III (Highway Design and Maintenance standards model III) and was named the “D.0” model by Paterson in 1992 [14]. It takes into account the weather conditions of the region where the analyzed road is located, the initial conditions of the road (roughness and structural properties), traffic, and also previous rehabilitation or maintenance actions. The equation of this PDM readswhere is roughness at pavement age T (m/km), is initial roughness (m/km), is cumulative ESALs at age T (million ESAL/lane), is pavement age since rehabilitation or reconstruction (years), is an environmental coefficient, and is the Structural Number modified Coefficient for subgrade strength.

#### 4. Dynamic Load Amplification Factor

For a complete description of the DLA factor and its computation, we refer to [7]. The DLA factor can be calculated using the following equation:where is the time that takes the heavy vehicle to reach the end of the interval studied, is a constant coefficient depending on the hot-mix asphalt type, and is the length of the road profile.

Since the model needs the road profile to compute the ride, to calculate the DLA factor and in order to achieve acceptable and realistic results, it would be necessary to provide frequent measures of the profile for each road being analyzed. In order to avoid these measures, which it is not practical, we make use of a virtual ride, where artificial road profiles are generated for a given value of IRI. The fundamentals of this model are presented below.

##### 4.1. Road Profile Simulation Model

It is possible to generate an artificial road profile from a stochastic representation. This stochastic process can be described in terms of the Power Spectral Density of vertical displacements obtained through the Fourier Transform of the autocorrelation function.

The road profile is introduced in the dynamic model by means of its Laplace transform :which can be expressed in the polar form

The modulus of the Laplace Transform can be written in relation to the Power Spectral Density (PSD) function, denoted as , as

The geometry of the road profile can be simulated if the PSD is known. Several power spectral density approximations of longitudinal road profiles can be found in the literature [15]. In this work, we have used the “displacement Power Spectral Density.” For this PSD, the ISO 8608:2016 [16] recommends the use of the so-called straight line fitting, which uses a two-parameter spectrum to describe a road profile, and readswhere is the PSD of vertical displacements, is the spatial frequency, while and are the parameters and their values are established in the standard ISO 8608 in order to facilitate the comparison between different road roughness profiles.

The value of the Power Spectral Density function, assuming a continuous road profile, for a defined value of spatial frequency and within a frequency band is defined aswhere is the mean square value of the component of the signal for the spatial frequency , cantered within a frequency band [17].

Following [18], the road profile can be simulated from a simple harmonic function:where is number of samples (), is length of road profile, is sampling interval of the length, is discretized frequency interval (1/), is reference spatial frequency (0.1 cycles/m) [16], is spatial variable for the ride ranging from 0 to , and is random phase angle uniformly distributed within the 0-2 range.

Equations relating the PSD with the IRI value of a road profile can be found in the literature [19]. However, in order to achieve more accurate and consistent results, we have developed our own expression. For this reason, we have performed a number of simulations (2.500) followed by a function fitting. As a result, the following expression was obtained:

#### 5. Accumulated Fatigue Damage Indicator

Once the previous models are defined, we need to determine the fatigue failure of the pavement. For this purpose, the accumulated fatigue damage indicator is presented.

Miner [20] expressed mathematically the concept of fatigue damage by means of the formulawhich quantifies the total accumulated fatigue damage that is reached when different loads are repeatedly applied in different proportions, where is the actual number of cycles of each load and is the total number of cycles needed to reach the fatigue failure when only load is applied.

The ratio between the actual number of cycles and the total number of cycles that produces failure can be used as an indicator of the accumulated fatigue damage caused by one single load repeatedly applied.

For a given type of hot-mix asphalt, as well as a given load, the maximum number of cycles can be obtained using a strain-based fatigue law. The strain-based fatigue law of a hot-mix asphalt pavement can be expressed aswhere is the number of load cycles to failure, is the reference strain, which quantifies the structural elastic deformation caused by one single load, and and are coefficients that depend on the hot-mix asphalt type.

According to [7], the accumulated fatigue damage indicator () and its dynamic counterpart () can be written aswhere is the time, is the project lifetime, is the nondimensional time (), and is the dynamic loading counterpart of the equivalent project traffic .

In order to calculate the accumulated fatigue damage indicator, taking into account the dynamic loads, the reference strain () of the asphaltic layers must be determined. A Multilayer Elastic Model based on Burmister’s theory [9] was developed for this purpose. As an example, the reference strain of the pavement section T3121, taken from the Spanish standard 6.1-IC [21], was calculated with a dual axle configuration. Figure 1 presents the distribution of the reference strain using the dual axle defined in Figure 2.

#### 6. The DMSA Software

DMSA is an acronym for Dynamic & Maintenance Simulation App. This is a tool that was designed and implemented by the authors in the context of the project entitled Impact of Preventive Maintenance on Flexible Pavement Service Life, financed by the European Investment Bank Institute (EIB Institute) under the STAREBEI Programme in 2017. This software was developed at the request of the European Investment Bank (EIB), whose engineering department wanted a specific tool to evaluate the sustainability of the projects submitted in applications for financing.

The formulation is based on some theoretical concepts that were presented by the authors in previous papers [7] and on the research work developed during the realization of the above-mentioned STAREBEI project. A comprehensive description of the rationale and the details of the mathematical model underlying the software implementation can be found in [22].

DMSA was designed to calculate the time evolution of both the roughness of the road profile and the accumulated fatigue damage of the asphalt along the project lifetime. These indicators are essential to assess how the comfort and safety of the road and the structural integrity of the asphalt evolution over time. The simulation can take into account a maintenance scenario defined by the user. This feature allows for comparing different options at the time of designing or selecting the most convenient conservation strategy for a pavement. Obviously, this helps to take more rational and well-founded decisions at this level, considering both the technical and the economic effects in the long term.

The main DMSA window is shown in Figure 3. The application is very user-friendly, what makes the introduction of the required data and the launching of the simulation process almost self-explanatory. The required data can be introduced interactively at the execution time or loaded from a plain text file. Most of the required data are parameters commonly used in road engineering to define the pavement characteristics (number of upper asphalt layers and lower granular layers on top of the subgrade, alongside with their corresponding thicknesses, Young’s moduli, and Poisson’s ratios), the static loads exerted by the vehicles (pressure of the wheels of the standard axle and radius of their corresponding footprints), and the fatigue deterioration model of the asphalt. On the other hand, the model requires the predicted evolution of the traffic intensity over time (in number of equivalent axles per year). And, finally, it is optional to define a maintenance scenario. In this case, the user can choose the dates throughout the project lifetime when renewal actions are set to be carried out in order to reduce the IRI to suitable values. Alternatively, the user can enable an automatic mode in which the surface renewal actions are set to be performed whenever the IRI exceeds a certain threshold.

#### 7. Application Example

Finally, an application example is analyzed with DMSA to evaluate the impact of preventive maintenance in the pavement service life. In this sample case, the authors analyzed a pavement section from catalog of the Spanish Standard 6.1-IC [21]. More details of the section and the different parameters needed for the computation are presented in Appendix A.

First, we analyzed the behavior of the section in a scenario without any maintenance along the pavement lifetime.

In Figure 4, the time evolution of the IRI is shown. As can be observed, when the pavement section reaches its end of project lifetime, the IRI value is close to 15 m/km. At this level of roughness, user comfort and safety can be compromised [23].

Figure 5 plots the evolution in time of the accumulated fatigue damage taking into account the dynamic axle load effects. It is clear that this pavement section, under the traffic and weather conditions considered, reaches the fatigue failure before the project lifetime if no maintenance strategy is defined. Therefore, a complete rehabilitation of the pavement must be carried out at time t=28 years.

As the road surface profile deteriorates over time, the IRI increases, as seen in Figure 4. An increase in the pavement roughness will lead to an increase of the dynamic effects and this will lead to a dramatic fall in the service life of the pavement. In order to avoid this scenario, a maintenance strategy can be defined. Maintenance should focus on keeping the roughness, measured with the IRI, below a suitable value. This will decrease the dynamic effects and therefore the pavement lifetime will be increased.

DMSA allows the user to choose between a manual and an automatic maintenance strategy mode. In the latter, the user must define a threshold value of the IRI at which the maintenance needs to be applied. In the manual maintenance strategy, the user defines the date (year and month) at which each action takes place. These two modes let the user simulate and analyze different maintenance scenarios, such us unplanned actions. Moreover, it is possible to make a combination of manual and automatic strategies. In both modes, the user needs to set the IRI value after the maintenance action is applied, and DMSA lets the user compare the effects that the maintenance has on the pavement lifetime compared with the scenario without maintenance.

In this example, two different maintenance strategies are carried out: Maintenance 1 and 2. In Maintenance 1, an automatic maintenance mode is chosen, while in Maintenance 2, the manual mode is selected.

Maintenance Strategy 1. This strategy consists of keeping the IRI value below the threshold of 4.5m/km. A priori, the number of renewal actions is unknown. DMSA will set automatically an action when the IRI value reaches a value higher than 4.5 m/km. After each action, the IRI after the renewal action is set to 1.5m/km. In this kind of strategy, the user wants to limit the IRI and therefore the dynamic effects. After running DMSA, the user obtains Figures 6 and 7 and the following two renewal actions:

(i) First Action: year 12, month 12 with an IRI after the renewal action of 1.5 m/km

(ii) Second Action: year 25, month 10 with an IRI value after the renewal action of 1.5 m/km.

In Figure 7, the time evolution of the accumulated fatigue damage along its lifetime is plotted. If we compare it with the scenario without maintenance, the reader can note that the maintenance strategy significantly increases the pavement lifetime, as the fatigue failure is not reached in the project lifetime. This is motivated to the acceptable range of IRI over time, since the user defines the maximum value that it can reach.

Figure 6 plots the evolution in time of IRI. Note the effect that the two renewal actions have on the IRI.

Maintenance Strategy 2. In this maintenance strategy, three punctual renewal actions are manually chosen to be performed along the pavement service life. This kind of strategy can be more proper of a scenario in which the user knows a priori the number of renewal actions and wants to distribute them along the pavement service life. In this example, we have decided to apply three maintenance actions. Since the project service lifetime is 30 years, we have located each action every approximately 7 years, which seems to be more rational than to choose more unbalanced periods. The actions are

(i) First Action: year 7, month 7 with an IRI after the renewal action of 1.5 m/km

(ii) Second Action: year 15, month 6 with an IRI after the renewal action of 1.5 m/km

(iii) Third Action: year 22, month 8 with an IRI value after actuation of 1.5 m/km.

In Figure 9, the time evolution of the accumulated fatigue damage is plotted along its lifetime. Again, the fatigue failure is reached after the project service lifetime. Figure 8 shows the evolution in time of the IRI. Note that now we have three actions and the maximum value of IRI is not limited.

This strategy keeps the IRI in lower values in comparison to the previous maintenance strategy; however, one more maintenance renewal action is required. Table 1 presents a comparison between the results for the three scenarios. The fatigue damage reached at the end of the service lifetime (30 years) and the maximum IRI obtained are shown.

 No Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Strategy 1 Maintenance Strategy 2 181,83 % 66,48 % 65,43 % max IRI 18,74 m/km 4,5 m/km 3 m/km

Note that Maintenance Strategy 2 obtains better results in terms of fatigue damage and maximum IRI. Also, a lower value of IRI will increase user comfort and safety. On the other hand, it requires one more action, which may lead to traffic interruption and other user costs.

In this example case, the user should select the strategy that fits better with the maintenance policy; that is, in this case, choose between one that keeps the pavement in lower condition with less maintenance actions and other that improves the pavement condition executing one more renewal action.

#### 8. Conclusions

The results obtained in this work confirm the need of taking into account the dynamic loads in pavement design and the importance of carrying out adequate preventive conservation strategies. These actions keep the IRI, and consequently the DLA, at low values, thus increasing the lifetime of the road.

In this work, an expression modeling the relationship between IRI and the PSD of an artificial road profile is presented.

Real maintenance strategies can be simulated with DMSA. Also, the effects of these maintenance strategies on the pavement’s ride quality and structural integrity can be analyzed. This study shows that there could be substantial differences in the service lifetime of a flexible pavement depending on the maintenance strategy being applied. Our simulations show that a decrease of the IRI implies a decrease of the DLA factor, what increases the pavement lifetime. The DMSA software was developed for being used by the EIB as an evaluation tool for projects. The DMSA software will be public release in the near future. DMSA can be used as a design, evaluation, and maintenance planning tool for road promoters.

#### A. Sample Case Data

This appendix contains all the input data used to run in DMSA the sample case.

##### A.1. Layer Characteristics

A T3121 pavement section from the Spanish standard 6.1-IC [21] was used for this sample case. This section is recommended for traffic up to 200 heavy vehicles per day. The properties of each layer conforming section T3121 are(i)Asphaltic layer:(a)Layer thickness 16 cm(b)Young’s modulus 6000 MPa(c)Poisson’s ratio 0.33(ii)Granular unbound layer:(a)Layer thickness 15 cm(b)Young’s modulus 500 MPa(c)Poisson’s ratio 0.35(iii)Granular unbound layer:(a)Layer thickness 25 cm(b)Young’s modulus 300 MPa(c)Poisson’s ratio 0.35(iv)Subgrade:(a)Layer thickness (b)Young’s modulus 200 MPa(c)Poisson’s ratio 0.35.

The strain-based fatigue model of the hot-mix asphalt layers of this pavement follows equation (12) with and .

##### A.2. Heavy Vehicle Characteristics

The heavy axle used for the sample case is a dual axle, with a 3.25 tons () load per wheel modeled as a uniform circular load of radius 11.37 cm. Figure 10 presents all these data, adding the wheel separation of this axle.

With respect to the suspension type, the parameters of the QHV-AS (Quarter Heavy Vehicle with Air Spring suspension) has been used for the sample case. This model and its respective parameter values can be consulted in [7].

##### A.3. Pavement Deterioration Model Parameters

The Pavement Deterioration Model parameters of the sample case are(i)Environmental coefficient, = 0.08(ii)Structural Number modified Coefficient for subgrade strength, = 6.1978(iii)Initial roughness, = 1.5 m/km(iv)Project design life period, = 30 years.

##### A.4. Traffic

DMSA application has been designed for operating with number of axles per year of service as measure of traffic during the service lifetime of the studied pavement. For the sample case, the traffic is presented in Table 2.

 YEAR TRAFFIC YEAR TRAFFIC 1 34,952 16 54,455 2 36,001 17 56,088 3 37,081 18 57,771 4 38,193 19 59,504 5 39,339 20 61,289 6 40,519 21 63,128 7 41,735 22 65,022 8 42,987 23 66,972 9 44,277 24 68,982 10 45,605 25 71,051 11 46,973 26 73,183 12 48,382 27 75,378 13 49,834 28 77,639 14 51,329 29 79,969 15 52,869 30 82,368

#### Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

In this paper, we present the final results of the research project “Impact of Preventive Maintenance on Flexible Pavement Service Life,” submitted to the STAREBEI Programme of the EIB Institute by the end of 2016. The objectives and some preliminary results of this project were presented (oral communication only) in the Knowledge Programme 2017 event that took place on March 7, 2017, at the headquarters of the EIB Institute in Luxembourg, alongside other proposals that were approved in the same call.

#### Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

#### Acknowledgments

This work has been primarily supported by the European Investment Bank (EIB) Institute through a STAREBEI grant awarded to the Fundación de la Ingeniería Civil de Galicia. Partial support has also been provided by FEDER funds of the European Union, by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish Government through grant #DPI2015-68431-R, by the Secretaría Xeral de Universidades of the Xunta de Galicia through grant GRC2014/039, by the Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria of the Xunta de Galicia through a grant awarded to the University of A Coruña, and by research fellowships of the University of A Coruña and the Fundación de la Ingeniería Civil de Galicica.

#### References

1. J. L. McAdam, Remarks on the Present System of Roadmaking, Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown, London, UK, 1822.
2. Anon, “The AASHO road test, report 5, pavement research,” Highway Research Board, Special Report 61E, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
3. Anon, “The AASHO road test, report 6, special studies,” Highway Research Board, Special Report 61F, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
4. D. Cebon, Handbook of Vehicle-Road Interaction, Swets & Zeirlinger, Netherlands, 1999.
5. L. E. Davis, Dynamic Wheel Loads from Heavy Vehicles, Queensland Roads, 2010.
6. Anon, “EU road surfaces: economic and safety impact of the lack of regular road maintenance, european parliament, directorate general for internal policies (2014),” 2018, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2014/529059/IPOL_STU(2014)529059_EN.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
7. F. Navarrina, L. Ramírez, J. París et al., “A comprehensive model for the fatigue analysis of flexible pavements considering the effects of dynamic axle loads,” Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2524, pp. 110–118, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
8. T. D. Gillespie, M. W. Sayers, and L. Segel, “Calibration of response-type road roughness measuring systems, NCHRP report 228,” Transport Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
9. D. M. Burmister, “The general theory of stresses and displacements in layered systems,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 296–302, 1945. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
10. M. W. Sayers, T. D. Gillespie, and C. A. V. Queiroz, “The international road roughness experiment: establishing correlation and calibration standard for measurement,” Tech. Rep. 45, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
11. M. W. Sayers, T. D. Gillespie, and W. D. O. Paterson, “Guidelines for the conduct and calibration of road roughness measurements,” Tech. Rep. 46, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
12. ASTM E1926-08(2015), Standard Practice for Computing International Roughness Index of Roads from Longitudinal Profile Measurements, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015.
13. T. D. Gillespie, M. W. Sayers, and L. Segel, “Calibration of response-type road roughness measuring systems,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 28, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
14. W. D. O. Paterson and B. Attoh-Okine, “Summary models of paved road deterioration based on HDM-III,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
15. P. Andrén, “Power spectral density approximations of longitudinal road profiles,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, vol. 40, no. 1-3, pp. 2–14, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
16. Anon, “Mechanical vibration - road surface profiles - reporting of measured data, ISO 8608:2016(E),” International Organization for Standardization, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
17. J. S. Bendat and A. G. Piersol, Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet
18. M. Agostinacchio, D. Ciampa, and S. Olita, “The vibrations induced by surface irregularities in road pavements - a Matlab® approach,” European Transport Research Review, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 267–275, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
19. S. Misaghi, Impact of Truck Suspension and Road Roughness on Loads Exerted to pavements [MSc Thesis Dissertation], University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA, 2011.
20. M. A. Miner, “Cumulative damage in fatigue,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 159–164, 1945. View at: Google Scholar
21. Anon, Norma 6.1-IC “Secciones de Firme” de la Instrucción de Carreteras, Dirección General de Carreteras, Centro de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Fomento, 2003.
22. M. Ruiz, L. Ramírez, F. Navarrina, M. Aymerich, and D. López-Navarrete, “Impact of preventive maintenance on flexible pavement service life,” Mathematical Model and Sample Results, STAREBEI Project, Report No. 2, A Coruña, Spain, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
23. L. Sun, Z. Zhang, and J. Ruth, “Modeling indirect statistics of surface roughness,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Manuel Ruiz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.