Fractional Mathematical Modelling and Optimal Control Problems of Differential Equations
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Chunyan Wang, Haibin Chen, Haitao Che, "An SDP Method for Copositivity of Partially Symmetric Tensors", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 5894518, 8 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5894518
An SDP Method for Copositivity of Partially Symmetric Tensors
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of detecting the copositivity of partially symmetric rectangular tensors. We first propose a semidefinite relaxation algorithm for detecting the copositivity of partially symmetric rectangular tensors. Then, the convergence of the proposed algorithm is given, and it shows that we can always catch the copositivity of given partially symmetric tensors. Several preliminary numerical results confirm our theoretical findings.
1. Introduction
Let be a real th order dimensional rectangular tensor, where for , , , and . If the entries of the tensor are invariant under any permutation of and , is called a partially symmetric tensor. For the sake of simplicity, let be the set of all partially symmetric rectangular tensors with order and dimension . By the relationship between partially symmetric tensors and homogeneous polynomials, we always use the following notation:
By this notation, we know that is strictly copositive if and only if
Particularly, if and , then it reduces to the copositivity of symmetric tensors [1–10].
The copositive tensor has attracted many researches’ attention since it plays an important role in polynomial optimization [11], hypergraph theory [1], vacuum stability of a general scalar potential [12], tensor complementarity problem [13, 14], tensor eigenvalue complementarity problem [15, 16], and so on [17–37]. Kannike proved the vacuum stability conditions for more complicated potentials with the help of the copositive tensor [12]. Ling et al. [16] proposed that the tensor generalized eigenvalue complementarity problem is solvable and has one solution at least under assumptions that the related square tensor is strictly copositive. During the process of application, a challenging problem is how to detect the copositivity of tensors numerically.
Recently, several numerical algorithms are proposed to check the copositivity of symmetric tensors. To the best of our knowledge, the first numerical algorithm was proposed by Chen et al. in [2], where the algorithm is based on the representation of the multivariate form in barycentric coordinates with respect to the standard simplex. Then, by a suitable convex subcone of a copositive tensor cone, an updated numerical algorithm for copositivity of tensors was proposed in [1]. It must be pointed out that the methods of [1, 2] can only capture strictly copositive tensors and noncopositive tensors. To overcome this drawback, in [38], Li et al. proposed an SDP relaxation algorithm to test the copositivity of higherorder tensors. Very recently, Nie et al. gave a complete semidefinite relaxation algorithm for detecting the copositivity of a matrix or tensor [39]. If the potential tensor is copositive, the algorithm can get a certificate for the copositivity. Otherwise, the algorithm can get a point that refutes the copositivity. Furthermore, it is showed that the detection can be done by solving a finite number of semidefinite relaxations for all matrices and tensors.
For the copositivity of partially symmetric tensors, Gu et al. gave the first two spectral properties in [40], and some necessary or sufficient conditions for a real partially symmetric rectangular tensor to be copositive are further established. Moreover, an equivalent notion of strictly copositive rectangular tensors is presented [40]. In [41], Wang et al. extended the simplicial partition method for symmetric tensors to check the copositivity of partially symmetric tensors. However, as we discussed above, it can only capture all strictly copositive rectangular tensors or noncopositive rectangular tensors. When the input tensor is copositive but not strictly copositive, the algorithm may not stop in general. To solve this, motivated by the algorithm of [38, 39], we propose a new algorithm to check the copositivity of partially symmetric tensors in this paper.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some preliminaries on polynomials. In Section 3, we formulate the potential problem as a proper polynomial optimization problem which can be efficiently solved by Lasserretype semidefinite relaxations. Then, a numerical method is proposed to check whether a given partially symmetric tensor is copositive or not, and the convergence of this algorithm is established. Several numerical experiments are listed in Section 4, and final remarks are given in Section 5.
2. Preliminaries
Let be the ring of the polynomial with variables . Let denote the vector space of polynomials with degree at most . The degree of a polynomial is denoted as deg (). Denote as the vector of all entries which equals one. A polynomial is called SOS if there exist such that . Denote by the set of all SOS polynomials. For , let . Then, for any polynomial , it can be denoted by , and denotes its sequence of coefficients in the monomial basis of . For matrix , its transpose is denoted by . For a symmetric matrix means is positive semidefinite. More details about polynomial optimization can be seen in [42–45].
For , , and denote . For , denotes the smallest integer that is not smaller than . If the subset satisfies that and , then is called ideal. For a polynomial tuple , the ideal generated by is defined such that
The th truncation ideal generated by is
For complex and real algebraic varieties of polynomial tuple , define
The quadratic module generated by is (denote )
For , where is the space of real vectors indexed by , define
For a polynomial , the th localizing matrix of is the symmetric matrix satisfyingfor all with , , where denotes the coefficient vector of the polynomial . When is the moment matrix Let be a polynomial tuple; its localizing matrix is defined such that
3. The SDP Algorithm for Copositivity of Partially Symmetric Tensors
In this section, we establish an equivalent condition for the copositivity of partially symmetric tensors. Then, the concerned problem can be reformulated as a polynomial optimization problem. To continue, recall that a partially symmetric tensor is strictly copositive if and only ifwhich is equivalent with the following optimization problem:
Clearly, tensor is strictly copositive if and only if . Problem (11) can be solved by classical Lasserre relaxations [46]. Since the objection function is continuous and the feasible region is compact, problem (11) always has a solution. Without loss of generality, assume is one of the solutions of (11); then, it satisfies the following KKTconditions with :
By (12), we obtain that , , and
Combining this with the fact that , we consider the following optimization problem:
It is clear to see that problems (11) and (14) are equivalent in the sense that they have the same optimal solution. To solve (14), we introduce the following notations:
So, the problem of (14) can be rewritten such that
By the Lasserretype semidefinite relaxations of (16), consider the semidefinite programwhere , with . It is obvious that the feasible set is compact, and the Archimedean condition holds. Thus, the asymptotic convergence of (17) is always guaranteed. Moreover, is copositive if for some , and is a monotonically decreasing sequence, with the decreasing of order , i.e.,
Now, we present an algorithm to check the copositivity of a given partially symmetric rectangular tensor (Algorithm 1).

The following theorem shows the convergence of Algorithm 1 for any partially symmetric tensor.
Theorem 1. Suppose is a partially symmetric tensor. Then, the following properties hold:(i)For all , problem (16) is feasible and achieves its optimal value for all sufficiently large(ii)For all , problem (19) has an optimizer if it is feasible(iii)If is copositive, Algorithm 1 must stop with when is sufficiently large(iv)If is not copositive, Algorithm 1 must stop with for almost all when is sufficiently large
Proof. (i)Since the feasible set of (11) is compact, it must have a minimizer . On the contrary, is a feasible point for (16), which implies that the semidefinite relaxation (17) is always feasible. Since , let ; then, it holds that . We now show that the feasible set of (17) is compact as follows. First of all, we have Then, ; since , . Furthermore, for all , the th diagonal entry of is nonnegative, which implies that Take in the following analysis. By the same argument as (21) and repeating times, we can show that for all . By the definition of , we know that the diagonal entries are precisely , . Since , all the entries of must be between −1 and 1. So, is bounded, and the feasible set of (17) is compact. Hence, the optimal value can always be achieved. In the following, we will show that for all sufficiently large. By direct computation, the optimization (16) is equivalent with the following problem: For simplicity, denote Corresponding Lasserre’s relaxations for (22) are For , where , any feasible solution of (17) is also a feasible solution of (24), so Next, we show that the set of polynomials is Archimedean, i.e., there exists such that the inequality defines a compact set in . Let and ; we have So, is Archimedean by Theorem 3.3 of [47]; we know that when is sufficiently large. Hence, when all values are sufficiently large.(ii)The proof is the same with (i).(iii)Clearly, is copositive if and only if . By item (i), for all big enough. Therefore, if is copositive, we must have for all large enough.(iv)If is not copositive, then . By (i), there exists such that for all . Hence, for all , problem (19) is equivalent with the following problem:It is th Lasserre’s relaxation for the polynomial optimizationThe feasible region of (29) is clearly compact. When is arbitrary, (29) has a unique optimizer . Hence, for almost all , is the unique optimizer. For notation convenience, denote by the optimizer of (19) with the relaxation order . Let . By Corollary 3.5 of [48] or Theorem 3.3 of [49], the sequence must converge to . Since , we must have when is sufficiently large.
4. Numerical Examples
In this section, we give several numerical examples to show the efficiency of Algorithm 1. Let denote the set of all permutations of , and let when . All experiments are done in Matlab2014b on a desktop computer with Intel (R) Core (TM)i76500 CPU @ 2.50 GHz 2.60 GHz and 16 GB of RAM.
Example 1. Suppose that is given byThe corresponding polynomial for tensor isBy Algorithm 1, we know that with , , which implies that rectangular tensor is copositive.
Example 2. Suppose that with entries such thatThe corresponding polynomial of isBy Algorithm 1, we obtain that with optimal solution , which implies that is copositive but not strictly copositive.
Example 3. Suppose that is given bySo, the corresponding polynomial of is thatwhere . By Algorithm 1, we have with , , which implies that the rectangular tensor is copositive.
Example 4. Suppose that is given byThe corresponding polynomial of the partially symmetric rectangular tensor iswhere . By Algorithm 1, we know that with , , which implies that the rectangular tensor is not copositive.
Example 5. Suppose is a tensor with entries such thatThe corresponding polynomial of the partially symmetric rectangular tensor iswhere . By Algorithm 1, we know that with , , which implies that the rectangular tensor is strictly copositive.
5. Conclusions
In this paper, based on Lasserre’s hierarchy of semidefinite relaxations, we propose a new criterion to judge whether a given partially symmetric rectangular tensor is copositive or not. The convergence for the proposed algorithm is established. Furthermore, numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is effective when the input rectangular tensor has lower dimension and orders, and it is difficult for the case with higher order or higher dimension. We will continue to study this problem in the future.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Authors’ Contributions
Each author contributed equally to this paper and read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (11601261), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2019MA022), and Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (Grant no. J14LI52).
References
 H. Chen, Z.H. Huang, and L. Qi, “Copositive tensor detection and its applications in physics and hypergraphs,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 133–158, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chen, Z.H. Huang, and L. Qi, “Copositivity detection of tensors: theory and algorithm,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 746–761, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Qi, “Eigenvalues of a real supersymmetric tensor,” Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1302–1324, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Qi, “Symmetric nonnegative tensors and copositive tensors,” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 439, no. 1, pp. 228–238, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, L. Caccetta, and G. Zhou, “Convergence analysis of a block improvement method for polynomial optimization over unit spheres,” Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1059–1076, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, W. Liu, L. Caccetta, and G. Zhou, “Parameter selection for nonnegative l1 matrix/tensor sparse decomposition,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 423–426, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, K. Zhang, and H. Sun, “Criteria for strong Htensors,” Frontiers of Mathematics in China, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 577–592, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Zhang and Y. Wang, “An Htensor based iterative scheme for identifying the positive definiteness of multivariate homogeneous forms,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 305, pp. 1–10, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Zhang, H. Chen, H. Chen, and P. Zhao, “A potential reduction method for tensor complementarity problems,” Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 429–443, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Zhou, G. Wang, L. Qi, and M. Alqahtani, “A fast algorithm for the spectral radii of weakly reducible nonnegative tensors,” Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, vol. 25, no. 2, p. e2134, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Peña, J. C. Vera, and L. F. Zuluaga, “Completely positive reformulations for polynomial optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 405–431, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Kannike, “Vacuum stability of a general scalar potential of a few fields,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, p. 324, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chen, L. Qi, and Y. Song, “Column sufficient tensors and tensor complementarity problems,” Frontiers of Mathematics in China, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 255–276, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chen and Y. Wang, “On computing minimal Heigenvalue of signstructured tensors,” Frontiers of Mathematics in China, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1289–1302, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Fan, J. Nie, and A. Zhou, “Tensor eigenvalue complementarity problems,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 507–539, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Ling, H. He, and L. Qi, “On the cone eigenvalue complementarity problem for higherorder tensors,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 143–168, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Chen, X. Zhang, G. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “A twogrid finite element method for nonlinear parabolic integrodifferential equations,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 2010–2023, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Chen, W. Liu, and C. Bi, “A twogrid characteristic finite volume element method for semilinear advectiondominated diffusion equations,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1543–1562, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Chen and X. Zhao, “A posteriori error estimate for finite volume element method of the parabolic equations,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 259–275, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Chen, K. Li, Y. Chen, and Y. Huang, “Twogrid finite element methods combined with CrankNicolson scheme for nonlinear Sobolev equations,” Advances in Computational Mathematics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 611–630, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Chen, H. Liu, X. Zheng et al., “A twogrid MMOC finite element method for nonlinear variableorder timefractional mobile/immobile advectionCdiffusion equations,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 2771–2783, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Chen, L. Qi, L. Caccetta, and G. Zhou, “Birkhoffvon Neumann theorem and decomposition for doubly stochastic tensors,” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 583, pp. 119–133, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chen, L. Qi, Y. Wang, and G. Zhou, “Further results on sumofsquares tensors,” Optimization Methods and Software, pp. 1–17, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Chen, Y. Wang, and G. Zhou, “Highorder sumofsquares structured tensors: theory and applications,” Frontiers of Mathematics in China, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 255–284, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Dong and H. Chen, “Geometry of the copositive tensor cone and its dual,” AsiaPacific Journal of Operational Researcch, vol. 380, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. He, X. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Wu, and Y. Cui, “A singular fractional kelvinvoigt model involving a nonlinear operator and their convergence properties,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2019, p. 112, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. He, X. Zhang, L. Liu, and Y. Wu, “Existence and nonexistence of radial solutions of the Dirichlet problem for a class of general kHessian equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 475–492, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Wang, H. Chen, and Y. Wang, “A new Ceigenvalue interval for piezoelectrictype tensors,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 100, p. 106035, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, L. Liu, and Y. Wu, “Multiple positive solutions of a singular fractional differential equation with negatively perturbed term,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 55, no. 34, pp. 1263–1274, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, Y. Wu, and L. Caccetta, “Nonlocal fractional order differential equations with changingsign singular perturbation,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 39, no. 21, pp. 6543–6552, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Wu, and Y. Cui, “A sufficient and necessary condition of existence of blowup radial solutions for a kHessian equation with a nonlinear operator,” Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, vol. 25, pp. 126–143, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, J. Xu, J. Jiang, Y. Wu, and Y. Cui, “The convergence analysis and uniqueness of blowup solutions for a Dirichlet problem of the general kHessian equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 102, p. 106124, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, J. Jiang, Y. Wu, and Y. Cui, “The existence and nonexistence of entire large solutions for a quasilinear Schrödinger elliptic system by dual approach,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 100, p. 106018, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, J. Jiang, Y. Wu, and Y. Cui, “Existence and asymptotic properties of solutions for a nonlinear Schrödinger elliptic equation from geophysical fluid flows,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 90, pp. 229–237, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Wu, and Y. Cui, “The existence and nonexistence of entire large solutions for a quasilinear Schrödinger elliptic system by dual approach,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 464, no. 2, pp. 1089–1106, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, L. Liu, Y. Wu, and Y. Cui, “Existence of infinitely solutions for a modified nonlinear Schrodinger equation via dual approach,” Electron. J. Differential Equations, vol. 2147, pp. 1–15, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, Y. Wu, and Y. Cui, “Existence and nonexistence of blowup solutions for a Schrödinger equation involving a nonlinear operator,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 82, pp. 85–91, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Li, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z.H. Huang, and L. Qi, “Test of copositive tensors,” Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 881–891, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Nie, Z. Yang, and X. Zhang, “A complete semidefinite algorithm for detecting copositive matrices and tensors,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2902–2921, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Gu, W. Wu, and W. Wu, “Partially symmetric nonnegative rectangular tensors and copositive rectangular tensors,” Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 775–789, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Wang, and G. Zhou, “On copositiveness identification of partially symmetric rectangular tensors,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 372, p. 112678, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Lasserre, Moments, Positive Polynomials and Their Applications, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 2009.
 J. Lasserre, Introduction to Polynomial and Semialgebraic Optimization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2015.
 M. Laurent, “Optimization over polynomials: selected topics,” in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Laurent, “Sums of squares, moment matrices and optimization over polynomials,” Emerging Applications of Algebraic Geometry, vol. 149, pp. 157–270, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 J. B. Lasserre, “Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 796–817, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Nie, “Tight relaxations for polynomial optimization and Lagrange multiplier expressions,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 178, no. 12, pp. 1–37, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Schweighofer, “Optimization of polynomials on compact semialgebraic sets,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 805–825, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Nie, “Polynomial optimization with real varieties,” SIAM Journal On Optimization, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1634–1646, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Chunyan Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.