Research Article  Open Access
WanRu Wang, LianKun Sun, BinBin Shen, "A Hybrid Event Trigger Mechanism and TimeDelay Partitioning Are Applied to EventDriven Control Systems", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 6724083, 14 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6724083
A Hybrid Event Trigger Mechanism and TimeDelay Partitioning Are Applied to EventDriven Control Systems
Abstract
This paper proposes an idea of using timedelay partitioning to construct a Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional (LKF) to analyse eventdriven network control systems (NCSs) with the H∞ performance. Firstly, select a mixed eventdriven mechanism, in which an adjustable absolute trigger mechanism is added to the trigger condition. Trigger term can be indicated to use a delay model. Secondly, a suitable LKF is created, which makes use of timedelay partitioning. Based on Wirtinger inequality and linear matrix inequalities (LMI), the close system with H∞ performance index level is global uniform ultimate bounded. Finally, a numerical simulation example proves the effectiveness of the proposed method.
1. Introduction
With the rapid development of computer and networked technologies, data transmission via communication networks has received considerable research attentions [1–10]. Due to the advantages of the NCSs such as data sharing, low cost, and easy maintenance, it has been widely used in the field of process control, electricity system, aircraft control systems, automobile controlling systems, etc. The traditional control system is based on timedriven, but for the NCSs with limited resources, if the control tasks are executed periodically based on fixed time points, this not only wastes limited computing and bandwidth resources but also may cause networkinduced phenomena such as network congestion, data transmission delay, and data loss. As a nonuniform scheduling mechanism, eventdriven can effectively solve the abovementioned problems, so it has become a hot research topic at present.
In eventdriven control, only when the system reaches the trigger threshold set in advance can the control instruction be executed or the information be transmitted. Therefore, eventdriven control can achieve similar or better control performance and reduce data transmission rate, thus saving the limited network bandwidth, computation, energy, and other resources in the system. As such, fruitful results based on different eventdriven schemes are made in [11–20]. The triggering threshold has a great effect on the implementation of control task [11, 12]; however, because the threshold of the static triggering mechanism is fixed, it is difficult to adjust for external interference and environmental changes. In order to overcome the above drawbacks, a dynamic eventtriggered scheme has been addressed in [13–15]. Besides that, a H∞ controller is designed in [21], in which Markov jump systems are studied based on eventtriggered considering finite time. Rahnama et al. [22] consider the effects of networkinduced time delays, signal quantization, and data loss and show L2stability and robustness for the control design. Gu et al. [23] consider an adaptive H∞ filter, which is based on event triggered to solve the problem of decentralize in NCSs. Furthermore, in [24], observerbased fuzzy controller is proposed to stabilize the NCSs under eventtriggered mechanism in [25]; the stabilization problem for nonlinear NCSs with a twoterminal eventtriggered mechanism is concerned. It is worth noting that the LKF method is mainly used in the above research, which will bring certain conservativeness to the conclusion due to the different treatment methods for cross items.
In order to reduce the conservativeness of the conclusion, the investigators bring forward two different research directions. One way is to choose a suitable LKF, and the other is to select a better scaling method in the process of dealing with the integral terms. Rich investigative achievements have been achieved by LKF picking [26–30]. In the early years, a simple LKF for fixeddelay systems was adopted. In order to make the LKF contain more system information, fixed time delay and variable delay are added to the system status in LKF [26]. Come up with the opinion of using timedelay partitioning to establish LKF [27]. More explore consequences have been generated in dealing with integral items. Use Jensen inequality to process integral items in eventdriven NCSs [31]. Seuret and Gouaisbaut [32] put forward cinequality to deal with the integral terms in the study of NCSs stability, which can introduce additional system integral terms to bring more system information. This method not only includes the information in the Jensen inequality but also adds some integral terms of the state to the system.
Motivated by the above discussions, in this paper, we focus on the H∞ performance analysis of network control system based on event trigger mechanism. The main contributions of this paper are summarized as follows. (i) Using mixed trigger mechanism to reduce network burden, that is, an adjustable parameter is added on the basis of the dynamic trigger mechanism, so as to avoid Zeno phenomenon and longterm nonsampling phenomenon. (ii) The LKF is constructed with the idea of timedelay partitioning, and a new method is used to remove the coupling between the input matrix and the output matrix. On this basis, Wirtinger inequality is used to scale down and reduce the conservativeness of the conclusion.
1.1. Notation
In this paper, () denotes that the symmetric matrix is positive (or negative). is defined as ndimensional Euclidean space. is defined as a set of real matrix, refers to the transpose of , denotes a symmetric term of a symmetric matrix, and refers to the Euclidean norm. Followed by , which is defined as . refers to the ndimensional unit matrix; refers to the dimension block matrix. The rest of the paper is adapted to the needs of the text of the adaptive dimension matrix.
2. Problem Formulation
Consider the following kind of linear time invariant system as follows:where is the state vector, is the control input, is the control output, is the control regulated output, is the square integrable disturbance input, are any matrices with adaptive dimensions. The eventtriggered communication mechanism can be described bywhere is the error between the output at the current sampling time and the output at the latest triggered time ; is a symmetric positive matrix; is the time sampling period; and and are given scalar. If , the system trigger threshold is the absolute trigger mechanism. If , the system trigger threshold is the relative trigger mechanism. If , the system trigger threshold is the mixed trigger mechanism.
Divide into subsets , i.e., , where , ; and represent the current sampling time and triggering time, respectively. For , then ; otherwise, . Define . Note that , , , and . and represent the lower and upper bounds of the time delay ():where is the controller law and control gain K.
Lemma 1. (see [12]). Given matrices , and of appropriate dimensions with satisfying , for any , the following inequality holds:
Lemma 2. (see [12]). The following two inequalities are equivalent:(a)There exists a symmetric and positivedefinite matrix satisfying(b)There exists a symmetric and positivedefinite matrix and matrix satisfying
Lemma 3. (see [12]). For a given matrix , the following inequality holds for all continuously differentiable function :where
3. Main Results
Definition 1. (see [33]). The state of the continuoustime system is GUUB, if for every , there exists a positive constant and a time satisfying . Moreover, the continuoustime system is ultimately bounded or stable if its state is GUUB
The objective of this section is to explore system (3) meeting the following requirements:(i)System (3) is globally uniformly ultimately bounded (GUUB) stability and eventually exponentially converges to the bounded region by LMI.(ii)System (3) guarantees, under zeroinitial conditions, for all nonzero and a given proper positive constant scalar .
Theorem 1. Consider the closedloop system (3) and parameters driving mechanism (2) with . Given a scalar , the close system (2) meets H∞ application if there exist matrices and U_{i} (i = 1, 2, 3, 4), matrices Z and S, with appropriate dimensions such thatwhere
Then, the closedloop system (3) based on the mixed event trigger mechanism (2) achieves GUUB. When t ⟶ ∞, the system state exponentially converges to the bounded area:
Proof. Using the delay partitioning method to construct a suitable LKF for the paper,where
Taking the time derivative of (12) yields can be divided into and . We only discuss in this paper. The process of is similar to that of h_{2} and . Based on Lemma 3, can be transformed as follows:According to Lemma 3, the integral term and can be transformed as follows:So, , where :To make closedloop system (3) meet the H∞ applications, we can concludeThrough Schur supplement for (18), we can obtainMultiplying left by Λ and right by Λ^{T}, we havewhereLet , and (18) can be rewritten as follows:Applying Lemma 1, we can obtainCombining (20) and (22) can lead towhereThrough Lemma 2 and Schur complement to (24), we can obtainSo, we can obtain thatand we can concludeApplying comparison lemma [34] to (26),where .
We consider the following situations by category.(i)If, we can conclude :(ii)If , we can conclude :(iii)If , we can conclude :(iv)If , we can conclude :Define and union (30)–(33) can lead:Accordingly, LKF can lead . If , we can obtainand we delimitAccordingly, (34) and (35) can lead:Meanwhile, if , accordingly, (36) can lead:when t ⟶ ∞, (12) exponentially converges to the bounded region:Then, we can get the closedloop system (3) is GUUB when t ⟶ ∞, ω (t) = 0 the system state exponentially converges to the bounded area. At the same time, at the zeroinitial conditions is obtained.
Remark 1. Compared with [15], this paper has three different characteristics.(1) A mixed event triggering mechanism, in which absolute trigger mechanism is added to the relative to the trigger term. (2) The concept of the timedelay partitions was applied to build a LKF. (3) The external disturbance is added to the original system and H∞ performance index can be obtained. The purpose of the three improved views is to make the system robust.
Remark 2. Another class of method is reducing the conservation of simple LKF. The augmented LKF is established, in which it contains not only the state vector but also the derivative of the state. Meanwhile, the freeweight matrix inequality is raised in the study of integral inequalities. The freeweight matrix inequality adds some freedoms to the system based on the Wirtinger inequality. Constructing a suitable LKF by combining the two methods above, the function can be selected aswhere
4. Simulation
This section provides two numerical simulation examples. The first example shows that the proposed method is effective. The second example shows the dynamic response of the system in the eventdriven mode.
Example 1. Given the following parameters,Apply Theorem 1 with h = 0.01 s, d_{M} = 0.5, and γ = 50. With the change of , the corresponding controller gain and eventdriven matrix are listed in Table 1.
δ = 0.2, α_{1} = 0, β = 0.1, α = 0.5, ε = e, and ε_{0} = 0.01

Example 2. Given δ = 0.1, h_{1} = 0.01, h_{2} = 0.15, h_{m} = 0.1, controller gain K = −0.00684, weight matrix = 2921.3, h = 0.01, and γ = 50, according to the above conditions, system (1) is stable in the eventdriven mode. x initial conditions are .
If δ = 0.1, β = 0 result is shown in following figures. According to the above set parameters in the paper, some simulation results are shown in Figure 1.
From Figure 1, we can find that the system actually works under the relative trigger mechanism. When the output error reaches a certain threshold, the system state updates and then presents a periodic update state. The length of update interval will depend on the setting of δ value.
If δ = 0, β = 0.3 result is shown in Figure 2.
From Figure 2, we can find that the actual operation of the system is under the absolute trigger mechanism, and the trigger threshold is independent of the system state. Depending on the setting of β value, it is obvious that the update time of the system is earlier and the update interval is denser.
If δ = 0.1, β = 0.3 result is shown in Figure 3.
From Figure 3, we can find that the system actually works under the mixed trigger mechanism. The trigger threshold is related not only to the system state but also to the initially set β value. We can see that the number of system updates is significantly reduced and the update interval is longer.
Through the above simulation, it can be found that different trigger mechanisms can stabilize the system, but the update time of the system state is obviously different. Among them, the hybrid trigger mechanism proposed in this paper has more effective results, which can greatly reduce the network burden and save network bandwidth compared with the other two trigger methods.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
5. Conclusion
This paper has investigated the eventdriven problem about NCSs. A mixed event trigger mechanism is introduced, which contains absolute trigger mechanism and relative trigger. The event triggering mechanism can be expressed by a timedelay model. The coupling of the system is reduced by introducing additional parameters and matrices. The sufficient condition can be obtained by LMI. By using the Wirtinger inequality method, relatively eventdriven controller can be obtained, which meets an H∞ performance index level of NCSs. Finally, two numerical simulation examples illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. In networked control systems, besides time delay, packet loss and quantization are also important factors that affect system performance. How to comprehensively consider the above two factors combined with trigger mechanism will be the focus of future work.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. Because it is a numerical simulation example, readers can get the same results as this article by using the LMI toolbox of Matlab and the theorem given in this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 61403278 and 61503280).
References
 X. M. Zhang, Q. L. Han, and X. H. Ge, “Networked control systems: a survey of trends and techniques,” IEEECAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Yan, C. Hu, H. Zhang, H. R. Karimi, X. Jiang, and M. Liu, “$H_{\infty}$ output tracking control for networked systems with adaptively adjusted eventtriggered scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2050–2058, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Xu and L. Sun, “An improved delaydependent stability analysis for markovian jump systems with interval timevaryingdelays,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 33055–33061, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Xu and L. Sun, “Synchronization control of markov jump neural networks with mixed timevarying delay and parameter uncertain based on sample point controller,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 1877–1890, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Li, H. Yan, H. Zhang, X. Zhan, and C. Huang, “Stability analysis for delayed neural networks via improved auxiliary polynomialbased functions,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 2562–2568, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Li, B. Zhang, P. Li et al., “Finitehorizon $H_{\infty}$ state estimation for periodic neural networks over fading channels,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1450–1460, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Nagamani, Y. H. Joo, and T. Radhika, “Delaydependent dissipativity criteria for markovian jump neural networks with random delays and incomplete transition probabilities,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 91, no. 56, pp. 2503–2522, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X.M. Li, Q. Zhou, P. Li, H. Li, and R. Lu, “Eventtriggered consensus control for multiagent systems against false datainjection attacks,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1856–1866, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. Ali and R. Saravanakumar, “Robust hinfinity control of uncertain systems with two additive timevarying delays,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 90202–90211, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Saravanakumar, M. S. Ali, and H. R. Karimi, “Robust h∞ control of uncertain stochastic markovian jump systems with mixed timevarying delays,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 862–872, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Shen, J. H. Park, and D. Ye, “A separated approach to control of markov jump nonlinear systems with general transition probabilities,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2010–2018, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Shen, S. Yan, and G. M. Zhang, “A new approach to eventtriggered static output feedback control of networked control systems,” ISA Transactions, vol. 65, pp. 468–474, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Peng and Q.L. Han, “On designing a novel selftriggered sampling scheme for networked control systems with data losses and communication delays,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 1239–1248, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Shen and M. Q. Shen, “Guangming zhanga: “extended eventdriven observerbased output control of networked control systems,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 86, no. 17, pp. 1639–1648, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Zhang, Z. Wang, H. Yan, F. Yang, and X. Zhou, “Adaptive eventtriggered transmission scheme and $h_{\infty}$ filtering codesign over a filtering network with switching topology,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 4296–4307, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Gu, P. Shi, and D. Yue, “An adaptive eventtriggering scheme for networked interconnected control system with stochastic uncertainty,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 236–251, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Gu, E. Tian, and J. Liu, “Adaptive eventtriggered control of a class of nonlinear networked systems,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 354, no. 9, pp. 3854–3871, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Zhou, W. Wang, H. Ma et al., “Eventtriggered fuzzy adaptive containment control for nonlinear multiagent systems with unknown boucwen hysteresis input,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Zhou, W. Wang, H. Liang et al., “Observerbased eventtriggered fuzzy adaptive bipartite containment control of multiagent systems with input quantization,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Yan, H. Zhang, X. Zhan, Z. Li, and C. Yang, “Eventbased $h_{\infty}$ fault detection for buck converter with multiplicative noises over network,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2361–2370, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Shen, F. Li, H. Yan, H. R. Karimi, and H.K. Lam, “Finitetime eventtriggered $\mathcal{h}_{\infty }$ control for ts fuzzy markov jump systems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 3122–3135, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Rahnama, M. Xia, and P. J. Antsaklis, “Passivitybased design for eventtriggered networked control systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 2755–2770, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Gu, P. Shi, D. Yue, and Z. Ding, “Decentralized adaptive eventtriggered $h_\infty$ filtering for a class of networked nonlinear interconnected systems,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1570–1579, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Qiu, K. Sun, T. Wang, and H. Gao, “Observerbased fuzzy adaptive eventtriggered control for purefeedback nonlinear systems with prescribed performance,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2152–2162, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Zhang, T. Zhao, and S. Dian, “Dynamic output feedback control for nonlinear networked control systems with a twoterminal eventtriggered mechanism,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 2537–2555, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Gu, J. Chen, and V. Kharitonov, “Stability of timedelay systems,” Birkhauser Boston, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 213–217, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 H.B. Zeng, Y. He, M. Wu, and S.P. Xiao, “Less conservative results on stability for linear systems with a timevarying delay,” Optimal Control Applications and Methods, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 670–679, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. B. Zeng, Y. He, and M. Wu, “Freematrixbased integral inequality for stability analysis of systems with timevarying delay,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 2768–2772, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Chen, J. Xia, G. Zhuang, and J. Zhao, “Improved delaydependent stabilization for a class of networked control systems with nonlinear perturbations and two delay components,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 316, pp. 1–17, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Xu and L. Sun, “Parallel distributed compensation controller design for markovian jump system with timevarying delays using bessellegendre inequality method and improved positive definite rule,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1313–1322, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Chen and J. Zhang, “Eventtriggered outputfeedback h∞ control for networked control systems with timevarying sampling,” Control Theory and Applications, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1384–1391, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Seuret and F. Gouaisbaut, “Wirtingerbased integral inequality: application to timedelay systems,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2860–2866, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Li, J. Fu, and D. Du, “An improved eventtriggered communication mechanism and L∞ control codesign for network control systems,” Information Sciences, vol. 370, pp. 743–762, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2002.
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 WanRu Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.