|
Author/organization | Years | Technical characteristics | Dataset | MOTA↑(%) | MOTP↑(%) | IDs↓ |
|
Shuoyuan Xu/Cranfield University | 2018 | JPDA applied to UAV [34] | TUD PETS | 56.3 32.7 | — | — |
Bićanić/University of Zagreb | 2019 | Combined with JIPDA and appearance-based tracker [35] | 3DMOT2015 | 55.9 | 64.0 | 486 |
Anton Andriyenk/TU Darmstadt | 2011 | Formulate MOT as minimization of a continuous energy function [38] | terrace2 | 88.1 | 78.1 | 11 |
TUD | 60.5 | 65.8 | 7 |
PETS | 81.4 | 76.1 | 15 |
ped1-c2 | 48.0 | 75.5 | 4 |
Anton Milan/TU Darmstadt | 2014 | Formulate MOT as minimization of a continuous energy function [39] | PETS-S2L1 | 90.6 | 80.2 | 11 |
PETS-S2L2 | 56.9 | 59.4 | 73 |
PETS-S2L3 | 45.4 | 64.6 | 27 |
2016 | Discrete-continuous energy function minimization [40] | Datasets1 | 56.3 | 66.0 | 42 |
Guoyu Zuo/Beijing University of Technology | 2018 | MDP object tracking method [41] | PETS-S2L1 | 88.1 | 68.7 | 5 |
Jianbing Shen/Beijing Institute of Technology | 2018 | Choose the best among small trajectories [42] | TUD-Crossing | 60.2 | 77.2 | 32 |
PETS09-S2L2 | 21.3 | 70.7 | 251 |
Songhao Zhu/Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications | 2016 | Hierarchical association MOT trajectory generation method [43] | Datasets2 | — | — | 25 |
Ali Taalimi/University of Tennessee | 2017 | Novel hierarchical approach, network flow [44] | MOT2015 | 33.9 | 71.4 | 12.1 |
Junying Liu/Beihang University | 2018 | Hierarchical MOT [45] | PETS-S2L1 | 91.04 | 87.85 | 18 |
PETS-S2L2 | 52.83 | 79.54 | 265 |
ETH | 67.09 | 81.05 | 85 |
KITTI | 72.89 | 90.61 | 119 |
Hongbin Liu/Shandong University | 2018 | Hierarchical data association using main-part and spatial-temporal feature models [46] | CAVIAR | 88.6 | 89.4 | 3 |
Parking Lot | 76.2 | 73.9 | 34 |
MOT15 | 17.5 | 70.9 | 683 |
Weigang Lu/Jiangnan University | 2019 | Hierarchical network flows [47] | MOT16 | 68.2 | 60.2 | 953 |
|