Advanced Intelligent Fuzzy Systems Modeling Technologies for Smart CitiesView this Special Issue
Review Article | Open Access
Wuyuan Zhou, Deng Chen, "Emerging Patent Landscape for Gene Therapy as a Potential Cure for COVID-19", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2021, Article ID 6630419, 6 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6630419
Emerging Patent Landscape for Gene Therapy as a Potential Cure for COVID-19
There is still a lack of effective therapies for treating SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, as doubts remain whether antibodies provide sufficient immunity for COVID-19, and the safety of vaccines under development needs further study. The treatment of coronavirus from the perspective of RNA interference-based gene therapy offers a more direct approach to combating viral genes in addition to traditional drugs and vaccines and is likely to have a promising future. In this paper, an analysis of the emerging patent landscape was given on gene therapies for coronavirus under development, highlighting patent applications' basic status, geographical distribution, time-series analysis of new inventors, and ranking of patent applicants. Relevant patents were also reviewed and summarized to provide ideas for the control of the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Efforts to develop drugs and vaccines for COVID-19 have mostly targeted important targets early in the viral life cycle and have been hampered by limited knowledge of the molecular details of SARS-CoV-2 . There are still many unknowns with this new virus as research studies deepen, including the extent to which the presence of antibodies offers protection against future infections . Effective vaccines have been developed, but too late to affect the first wave of this pandemic . Many scientists believe that therapies are still needed regardless of vaccine as they argue that vaccines rarely provide full protection from disease . Border restrictions and internal travel restrictions are unlikely to delay spread unless more than 99% effective .
So, antibodies and therapies would be valuable for the suffering patients, especially the elderly. However, there is still a lack of effective therapies for treating SARS-CoV-2-infected patients . Furthermore, predicting drug performance in COVID-19 is difficult, and many therapeutic candidates may fail to demonstrate efficacy or have safety problems . The field of gene therapy has made a quantum leap forward in recent years, while research studies focused on treating genetically defective diseases [8, 9]. Gene therapy uses vector-based siRNAs or dsRNAs targeting different genes of coronaviruses to inhibit virus gene expression and thereafter to inhibit replication of the virus . RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics have demonstrated a broad potential with numerous proof-of-concept studies in animal models and multiple clinical trials [11, 12]. Currently, there are six RNA-based treatments in clinical and preclinical trials among 319 treatments and 237 vaccines according to FasterCures, Milken Institute (Table 1), while no literature systematically discusses the treatment of coronavirus from the perspective of gene therapy. There is a strong positive relationship between science quality and patents , and the patent system has been regarded as a critical factor in promoting innovation in clinical medicine. This paper analyzes the global patent situation of gene therapy for coronavirus based on the Reporting Items for Patent Landscapes (RIPL) to provide ideas for future research on the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 .
2. Subjects and Methods
Section 1 of this paper introduces the technical background and novelty of this study, Section 2 describes the subjects and methods, Section 3 gives a review of the existing literature, Section 4 presents the results, and Section 5 summarizes the paper and provides an outlook.
To provide a patent landscape and to identify technologies that use gene therapy to coronavirus diseases, we performed a search in the Derwent Innovation (DI) database. The search strategy is based on the combination of International Patent Classification (IPC), DWPI Manual Codes (MC), and keywords. The topics of “gene therapy” and “coronavirus” were searched in “classification number, title, abstract, and claims.” The classification numbers for gene therapy were IPC (A61K 48/00), MC (B14-S03A or B14-S03B or B14-S03C or B14-S03D or C14-S03 or C14-S03 or C14-S03A or C14-S03B or C14-S03C), and keywords (“gene therapy” or “gene therapeu”). The classification numbers for coronaviruses were IPC (A61K 39/215 or C07K 141/165 or C12N 151/50), MC (B14-A02B5 or C14-A02B5), and keywords (coronavir or “corona virus” or “COVID-19” or “SARS-CoV” or “MERS-CoV” or “nCoV” or HcoV or “atypical pneumonia” or “severe acute respiratory syndrome”).
3. Review of Current Literature
After the SARS outbreak in 2003, researchers applied for a large number of RNAi vaccine-related patents, in which the design of siRNAs mainly targeted PI4KB, N protein gene, M protein gene, RdRp, ORF3a gene, and M, N, and E genes. Gene delivery vectors were also the focus of research, including plasmid, adenovirus vector, AAV vectors, recombinant RV vector, polymeric nanoparticle, lipid nanoparticle (LNP), eukaryotic expression vector pCMV-Myc, cationic polymers, peptides, hyaluronic acid conjugates, and multiblock copolymers (Table 2).
Note. Listing items include the virus and the targeting gene, mechanism, and gene delivery vectors.
Researchers are also developing gene therapy drugs based on the RNAi mechanism in the wake of the MERS outbreak. Four miRNA and five siRNA molecules targeting the ORF1ab gene of MERS-CoV were confirmed to cause a decrease in viral activity . In addition to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated siRNAs were used to treat the Makona outbreak strain of Ebola virus-infected animals, resulting in milder clinical features and full recovery, which successfully demonstrated the efficacy of siRNA against the Ebola virus in a nonhuman primate . These studies demonstrate the potential of gene therapy in antiviral therapy.
Although there have been many articles and patents reporting on RNAi-based gene therapy for SARS, only a few studies have explored its application to SARS-CoV-2. N protein and nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 may play an important role in suppressing RNAi to overcome the host defense in cells [17, 18]. Two patents reported COVID-19 antisense RNA multivalent vaccine and dsRNA vaccine targeting SARS-CoV-2 ORF1ab, 3′ UTR, and S, E, M, or N genome region (CN111330003A and CN111321142A). Two new siRNAs aiming at the conserved regions of the SARS-CoV-2 gene were developed, and both had a noticeable inhibition effect on the SARS-CoV-2 gene (CN111139241A and CN111139242A). Hangzhou Yongchengrui Biotechnology reported an siRNA that interferes with expression of the COVID-19 gene and comprises the dsRNA sequence with silencing S gene or RDRP gene function (CN111518809A). ProQR Therapeutics reported a viral vector expressing an antisense oligonucleotide, which modulates the function of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), allowing the skip of at least exon 3 from the CD274 pre-mRNA that encodes the PD-L1 protein (WO2020201144A1).
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Global Patent Status
As of August 12, 2020, a total of 192 INPADOC patent families were retrieved. Derwent Data Analyzer (DDA) was used to analyze patent data from 1993 to 2019 to provide comparative information on coronavirus gene therapy patents, focusing on annual trends in the field, geographical distribution, and major applicants. As there is a time lag of 18 months between the priority date and the date of publication, the 2019–2020 figures are for references only, which include a total of 20 SARS-Cov-2-related gene therapy patents as of November 11, 2020.
4.2. Patent Application Trends
Research and patenting activities on coronaviruses have been closely linked to related outbreaks. The annual distribution of global patent applications shows that there were very few patent applications before 2002. In 2003, the outbreak of SARS triggered a rapid increase in global patent applications. However, the number gradually declined after 2005 due to the eradication of SARS epidemic by conventional medicine. From 2013 to 2015, the MERS epidemic stimulated global research with a small increase in patent applications (Figure 1).
The time-series analysis of new inventors gives an idea of the activity and market importance of the field of technology. The grey and blue bars in Figure 1 indicate the number of new and existing inventors, respectively, in a given year. The figure shows that there was an explosion of new inventors entering coronavirus gene therapy in 2003–2005. After 2005, the patenting activities were more active than before 2003, but the activity of existing inventors was rarely sustained. This lack of sustainability of technology development activities for coronavirus gene therapy is consistent with disease outbreaks and demise.
4.3. Patent Country/Location Distribution
In terms of geographical distribution, the patents are mainly from the US, China, Japan, and Korea, accounting for 84% of the world’s total patents. The US ranks first in the world in terms of the number of patents, far ahead of other countries, accounting for 50% of the world’s total patents, which matches the position of the US as a major gene therapy country. As epidemic-stricken countries, China and the Republic of Korea have relatively muscular scientific research strength, so they follow the US in terms of patent application volume. Japan, as a neighboring country of China and the Republic of Korea, also has a larger patent application volume (Figure 2).
An analysis of the global patent layout shows that patents were basically filed in their own countries. The reason is simple: under PCT Article 21, the international publication of the international application by the International Bureau shall be effected promptly after the expiration of 18 months from the priority date of that application. After the outbreaks were quickly brought under control, most PCT applications did not see a market.
Further, a legal status analysis revealed that among the 192 INPADOC families retrieved, only 33 were live, 5 indeterminate, while 154 dead, implicating that innovation in the field is rapid, with new technologies rapidly phasing out old ones that have lost their value.
4.4. Top Organizations and Inventors Worldwide
To understand who was in the coronavirus gene therapy industry, we analyzed main organizations in patent applications (Figure 3). The top 10 patent holders are mainly from China, the US, and France. The main organizations in the field are the French National Centre for Scientific Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Pasteur Institute, followed by the US Department of Health and Human Services. The overall few patent applications, which occurred to top inventors too (Figure 4), reflect the relatively low level of technical activity in the field.
4.5. Gene Delivery Vectors
Gene therapy works by introducing a new or modified gene into the body to help treat a disease. Several gene delivery vectors were used in gene therapy, including plasmid transfection, electroporation, liposomes, cationic polymer nanoparticles, and viral vectors, which can be divided into adenovirus (AV), adeno-associated virus (AAV), lentivirus (LV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and retrovirus (RV) . An analysis of the number of vector-related applications in coronavirus gene therapy patents revealed that plasmid, AV, and RV vectors had the most significant number of applications.
On the other hand, recombinant AAVs (rAAVs) are the leading platform for in vivo delivery of gene therapies , which was evidenced by the top three most cited patents in this field (Figure 5) being related to a chimpanzee nucleic acid sequence useful for generating chimpanzee adenoviral vectors as vaccine carriers (WO2005071093A2), a recombinant alphavirus particle gene vector (US6376236B1), and an oligonucleotide-core carrier composition (US20090053169A1).
Due to the time lag between patent filing and publication, many developed medical technologies have not been published and, therefore, could not be included in the scope of this study. However, at present, the global distribution of patents presented in this study shows that the US and China have the leading number of patents and are technologically more advanced and were able to develop novel therapies to curb the pandemic. Research centers and pharmaceutical companies in the US, France, and China should join forces and draw inspiration from past research experiences to accelerate the development of effective therapies.
In summary, with patterns of past patent activities providing lessons for current research, we outline a scenario of the current trends in coronavirus gene therapy through analysis of the patent landscape of the field, demonstrating the potential for gene therapy to be used against COVID-19. We expect that the six existing RNAi therapies will be successful in clinical trials and will soon be available for the effective treatment of SARS-CoV-2, and this patent landscape will help defeat the COVID-19 pandemic. It may also be a great opportunity to promote the development of gene therapy.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 61976192) and the Zhejiang Soft Science Research Program (2019C35070).
- D. E. Gordon, G. M. Jang, M Bouhaddou et al., “A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing,” Nature, vol. 583, no. 7816, pp. 459–468, 2020.
- H. Ledford, “What the immune response to the coronavirus says about the prospects for a vaccine,” Nature, vol. 585, no. 7823, pp. 20-21, 2020.
- F. Amanat and F. Krammer, “SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: status report,” Immunity, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 583–589, 2020.
- S. Gandon, M. J. Mackinnon, S. Nee, and A. F. Read, “Imperfect vaccines and the evolution of pathogen virulence,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6865, pp. 751–756, 2001.
- N. M. Ferguson, D. A. T. Cummings, C. Fraser, J. C. Cajka, P. C. Cooley, and D. S. Burke, “Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic,” Nature, vol. 442, no. 7101, pp. 448–452, 2006.
- Y. Dong, T. Dai, Y. Wei et al., “A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates,” Signal Transduction and Target Therapy, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 237, 2020.
- M. Slaoui, S. E. Greene, and J. Woodcock, “Bridging the gap at warp speed-delivering options for preventing and treating covid-19,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 383, no. 20, pp. 1899–1901, 2020.
- F. S. Collins and S. Gottlieb, “The next phase of human gene-therapy oversight,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 379, no. 15, pp. 1393–1395, 2018.
- R. Goswami, G. Subramanian, L. Silayeva et al., “Gene therapy leaves a vicious cycle,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 9, p. 297, 2019.
- D. Wang, P. W. L. Tai, and G. Gao, “Adeno-associated virus vector as a platform for gene therapy delivery,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 358–378, 2019.
- D. Bumcrot, M. Manoharan, V. Koteliansky, and D. W. Y. Sah, “RNAi therapeutics: a potential new class of pharmaceutical drugs,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 711–719, 2006.
- R. Kole, A. R. Krainer, and S. Altman, “RNA therapeutics: beyond RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotides,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 125–140, 2012.
- F. Poege, D. Harhoff, F. Gaessler et al., “Science quality and the value of inventions,” Science Advances, vol. 5, no. 12, Article ID eaay7323, 2019.
- J. A. Smith, Z. Arshad, A. Trippe, G. S. Collins, D. A. Brindley, and A. J. Carr, “The reporting items for patent landscapes statement,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1043–1047, 2018.
- S. M. Nur, M. A. Hasan, M. A. Amin, M. Hossain, and T. Sharmin, “Design of potential RNAi (miRNA and siRNA) molecules for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) gene silencing by computational method,” Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 257–265, 2015.
- E. P. Thi, C. E. Mire, A. C. H. Lee et al., “Lipid nanoparticle siRNA treatment of Ebola-virus-Makona-infected nonhuman primates,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7552, pp. 362–365, 2015.
- J. Mu, J. Xu, L. Zhang et al., “SARS-CoV-2-encoded nucleocapsid protein acts as a viral suppressor of RNA interference in cells,” Science China Life Sciences, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1–4, 2020.
- Z. Chang, L. A. Babiuk, and J. Hu, “Therapeutic and prophylactic potential of small interfering RNAs against severe acute respiratory syndrome,” BioDrugs, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2007.
Copyright © 2021 Wuyuan Zhou and Deng Chen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.