Research Article
Classification on Digital Pathological Images of Breast Cancer Based on Deep Features of Different Levels
Table 9
Image-level accuracy and patient-level accuracy evaluation results at different magnifications (/%).
| Accuracy | Strategy | Magnifications | 40× | 100× | 200× | 400× |
| Image-level | Sliding | 84.19 ± 2.27 | 83.80 ± 2.60 | 86.48 ± 2.80 | 83.93 ± 3.93 | Random | 82.54 ± 2.81 | 84.41 ± 1.53 | 86.72 ± 2.77 | 82.74 ± 3.16 | Sliding + Random | 84.50 ± 1.26 | 84.70 ± 1.25 | 86.95 ± 1.52 | 83.25 ± 2.47 | Sliding + class Balance Random | 85.04 ± 0.87 | 85.66 ± 1.07 | 86.97 ± 0.77 | 84.29 ± 2.36 | Patient-level | Sliding | 85.70 ± 1.90 | 83.93 ± 2.12 | 87.73 ± 3.32 | 83.70 ± 4.04 | Random | 83.73 ± 1.76 | 84.46 ± 2.52 | 88.31 ± 2.47 | 82.75 ± 3.35 | Sliding + Random | 86.05 ± 2.17 | 86.03 ± 1.92 | 88.18 ± 3.31 | 83.31 ± 2.43 | Sliding + Class Balance Random | 86.06 ± 1.62 | 86.29 ± 2.85 | 88.69 ± 4.17 | 83.57 ± 5.04 |
|
|
The optimal value of the evaluation result has been bolded.
|