Research Article
Magnetohydrodynamic Thin Film Flow through a Porous Stretching Sheet with the Impact of Thermal Radiation and Viscous Dissipation
Table 4
Comparison of HAM and ND solve solution.
= 0.25,
= 0.5,
= 0.2,
= 6.4,
= 0.5,
= 3.5,
= 0.8.
| | | | | | HAM | ND solve | HAM | ND solve | HAM | ND solve |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.045 721 9 | 0.045 718 8 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.5 | 0.052 695 87 | 0.052 596 44 | 0.064 868 65 | 0.064 868 47 | 0.606 868 86 | 0.606 867 99 | 1.0 | 0.071 730 28 | 0.071 729 84 | 0.134 258 92 | 0.134 257 89 | 0.686 235 35 | 0.686 235 12 | 1.5 | 0.162 572 45 | 0.162 571 96 | 0.134 575 43 | 0.134 554 84 | 0.742 782 08 | 0.742 781 93 | 2.0 | 0.337 234 52 | 0.337 134 07 | 0.132 731 74 | 0.132 721 72 | 0.776 867 07 | 0.776 856 89 | 2.5 | 0.278 375 42 | 0.278 374 78 | 0.126 932 25 | 0.126 932 18 | 1.035 200 89 | 1.035 200 56 | 3.0 | 0.351 556 17 | 0.351 454 08 | 0.118 621 51 | 0.118 621 37 | 1.044 847 06 | 1.044 846 82 | 3.5 | 0.360 926 14 | 0.360 723 02 | 0.054 304 93 | 0.054 304 66 | 1.051 488 79 | 1.051 478 65 | 4.0 | 0.517 202 49 | 0.517 062 34 | 0.055 871 03 | 0.055 870 94 | 1.058 526 06 | 1.058 525 88 | 4.5 | 0.524 530 42 | 0.524 432 05 | 0.057 471 84 | 0.057 471 72 | 1.061 174 99 | 1.061 174 58 | 5.0 | 0.534 362 76 | 0.534 260 34 | 0.063 165 89 | 0.063 165 81 | 1.062 544 47 | 1.062 544 56 | 5.5 | 0.548 134 33 | 0.548 035 12 | 0.061 417 89 | 0.061 417 49 | 1.046 048 42 | 1.045 066 83 | 6.0 | 0.512 423 52 | 0.512 424 09 | 0.059 671 22 | 0.059 680 99 | 1.006 788 69 | 1.006 487 92 | 6.5 | 0.543 545 75 | 0.543 545 14 | 0.056 754 23 | 0.056 754 01 | 0.958 425 87 | 0.958 424 84 | 7.0 | 0.555 015 96 | 0.555 014 85 | 0.052 641 63 | 0.052 641 45 | 0.962 045 72 | 0.962 045 66 | 7.5 | 0.551 920 46 | 0.551 920 13 | 0.051 719 47 | 0.051 718 24 | 0.927 408 13 | 0.927 407 99 |
|
|