Additive In Vitro Antiplasmodial Effect of N-Alkyl and
N-Benzyl-1,10-Phenanthroline Derivatives and Cysteine Protease Inhibitor E64

Wijayanti, Mahardika Agus; Sholikhah, Eti Nurwening; Hadanu, Ruslin; Jumina, Jumina; Supargiyono, Supargiyono; Mustofa, Mustofa

doi:https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/540786

Malaria Research and Treatment

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 | Article ID 540786 | https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/540786

Additive In Vitro Antiplasmodial Effect of N-Alkyl and N-Benzyl-1,10-Phenanthroline Derivatives and Cysteine Protease Inhibitor E64

Mahardika Agus Wijayanti,^1,2Eti Nurwening Sholikhah,^2,3Ruslin Hadanu,⁴Jumina Jumina,⁴Supargiyono Supargiyono,^1,2and Mustofa Mustofa^2,3

Academic Editor: Polrat Wilairatana

Received28 Jan 2010

Revised13 Apr 2010

Accepted10 May 2010

Published22 Jun 2010

Abstract

Potential new targets for antimalarial chemotherapy include parasite proteases, which are required for several cellular functions during the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Four new derivatives of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline have been synthesized. Those are (1)-N-methyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium sulfate, (1)-N-ethyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium sulfate, (1)-N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium chloride, and (1)-N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium iodide. Those compounds had potential antiplasmodial activity with IC₅₀ values from 260.42 to 465.38 nM. Cysteine proteinase inhibitor E64 was used to investigate the mechanism of action of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives. A modified fixed-ratio isobologram method was used to study the in vitro interactions between the new compounds with either E64 or chloroquine. The interaction between N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives and E64 was additive as well as their interactions with chloroquine were also additive. Antimalarial mechanism of chloroquine is mainly on the inhibition of hemozoin formation. As the interaction of chloroquine and E64 was additive, the results indicated that these new compounds had a mechanism of action by inhibiting Plasmodium proteases.

1. Introduction

The erythrocytic life cycle of Plasmodium, which is responsible for all clinical manifestations of malaria, begins when free merozoites invade erythrocytes. The intraerythrocytic parasites develop from small ring-stage organisms to larger, more metabolically active trophozoites and then to multinucleated schizonts. The erythrocytic cycle is completed when mature schizonts rupture erythrocytes, releasing numerous invasive merozoites. Proteases appear to be required for cleavage of red blood cell ankyrin to facilitate host cell rupture and subsequent reinvasion of erythrocytes by merozoites, and for the degradation of hemoglobin ingested by intraerythrocytic trophozoites [1, 2].

Extensive evidence suggest that the degradation of hemoglobin is necessary for the growth of erythrocytic malaria parasite, apparently to provide free amino acids for parasite protein synthesis [3, 4]. In P. falciparum, hemoglobin degradation occurs predominantly in trophozoites and early schizonts, the stages at which the parasites are most metabolically active. Trophozoite ingest erythrocyte cytoplasm and transport it to a large central food vacuole. In the food vacuole, intact heme is released from hemoglobin to form the major component of malarial hemozoin pigment [5]. The food vacuole appears to be the site of action of a number of existing antimalarials and also offers opportunities for therapies directed against new targets. Antimalarial drugs such as chloroquine and primaquine appear to act by preventing hemozoin formation. Other drugs, such as vinyl sulfones, act by preventing globin hydrolysis [6].

Hemoglobin degradation within the parasite is an ordered process involving at least three proteinases. Aspartic proteinase plasmepsin-I, is responsible for the initial cleavage of the hemoglobin tetramer at the hinge position, the Phe33-Leu34 bond in the -globin chain. A second aspartic proteinase, plasmepsin-II, has also been identified and may have a role in the cleavage of denatured hemoglobin. Falcipain, a cysteine proteinase, is implicated in the cleavage of peptides from the denatured hemoglobin. The amino acids resulting from this process are presumably used by the parasite. Inhibitors of both cysteine and aspartic proteases have antimalarial effects [7, 8].

Halofantrine was an effective drug against chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum. The disadvantages of this drug were its variation in bioavailability and the side effect of ventricular arhythmia. To overcome those disadvantages, Yapi et al. [9] synthesized diaza-analogs of phenanthrene by substituting the two nitrogen atoms in the phenanthrene skeleton, and the 1,10-phenanthroline skeleton is the most active compound in vitro on both chloroquine-resistant (FcB1) and chloroquine-sensitive (Nigerian) strain with an IC₅₀ of about 0.13 M. Mustofa et al. [10] synthesized four new derivatives of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline: (1)-N-methyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium sulfate, (1)-N-ethyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium sulfate, (1)-N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium chloride, and (1)-N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium iodide. The in vitro antiplasmodial activity of those new compounds showed that four derivatives are active against P. falciparum FCR3 and D10 strains with an IC₅₀ of 0.13–0.79 M while the in vivo antiplasmodial activity against P. berghei in Swiss mice has an ED₅₀ of 2.08–50.93 mg/kg [11, 12]. The activity of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives on hemozoin formation inhibitory activity is lower than that of chloroquine [13]. The mechanism of action of halofantrine has been identified as at hemoglobin degradation, and the interaction between halofantrine and proteinase inhibitor Ro40-4388 and E64 are antagonistic [7]. Based on these results, further study was done to investigate the mechanism of action of those new compounds on the protease enzymes of P. falciparum FCR3 in vitro.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Molecules Tested

Four derivatives of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1-10-phenanthroline were evaluated for their mechanism in inhibiting P. falciparum proteases in vitro. The four derivatives of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1-10-phenanthroline have been synthesized by Mustofa et al. [14] and Hadanu et al. [15]. Identification of the compounds was carried out by means of infrared (IR) spectroscopy, proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H-NMR) spectroscopy, carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C-NMR) spectroscopy and mass spectroscopy (MS). Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) of these 1,0-phenanthroline derivatives was also investigated. On the basis of the QSAR studies, there was a correlation between antiplasmodial activity and electronic parameters as represented by a linear function of activity versus atomic net charge of certain atoms on the 1,0-phenanthroline skeleton especially N-1 atom. Each molecule was different at the substituent on nitrogen atom in position 1 of the 1,10-phenanthroline skeleton (Figure 1). Cysteine proteinase, transepoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido-(4-guanido)-butane (E-64) was purchased from Sigma and chloroquine diphosphate was obtained from Konimex-Indonesia. In this study, the mechanism of action of those compounds on the inhibition of P. falciparum protease in vitro was evaluated.

(a)

(b)

(c)

2.2. Parasite Cultivation

P. falciparum FCR3 was continuously cultured and maintained by standard methods [16] with type O erythrocytes suspended in complete culture medium (pH 7.3), which consisted of filtered sterilized RPMI 1640 solution supplemented with 500 mg of gentamycin, 2 g of sodium bicarbonate, 6.2 g of HEPES per liter, and 10% type-O human serum. Incubation was in a candle jar at 37C under an atmosphere of 5% CO₂. The level of parasitemia in the culture was kept between 2–5% with 5% hematocrit. Parasite synchrony was maintained by serial treatments with 5% sorbitol.

2.3. In Vitro Antiplasmodial Activity

Drug sensitivity assay was carried out in 96-well microtitration plates. In vitro antiplasmodial activity was determined as described by Contreras et al. [17] and Lebbad [18]. Drugs were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and prediluted with serum-free medium. Dose response assay was carried out to obtain the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of the individual drugs. Microplate was preincubated with 100 uL of serially diluted test drugs. Ring stage-infected erythrocytes (100 L per well with 3% hematocrit and 2% parasitemia) were incubated in triplicate with twofold serial dilution of each drug for 72 hours. Each experiment was performed in duplicate separate experiment. Parasitemia was measured microscopically on thin smear stained with 5% Giemsa. The number of parasitized red cells was counted in approximately 1,000 red cells and divided by 10 to calculate the percentage (%) of parasitized cells. Red cells infected with any stages of Plasmodium were counted as infected red cells. Growth inhibition was expressed as percent parasitemia compared with untreated control. Drug IC₅₀ value was calculated from the log of the drug concentration-response relationship.

2.4. In Vitro Drug Combination Assay

Analysis of the combination effects of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives with protease inhibitor E64, and interaction with chloroquine were determined by a modified fixed-ratio isobologram method [7, 8, 19]. In vitro antiplasmodial activity of each compound was determined before drug combination assay. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC; FIC = IC₅₀ of drug in the combination/IC₅₀ of drug when tested alone) of each drug was calculated and plotted as an isobologram. The isobologram analysis evaluates the nature of interaction of two drugs, that is, drug A and drug B required to produce a defined single-agent effect (e.g., IC₅₀), when used as single agents, are placed on the x and y axes in a two-coordinate plot, corresponding to (, 0) and (0, ), respectively. The line connecting these two points is the line of additivity. The concentrations of the two drugs used in combination to provide the same effect, denoted as (, ), are placed in the same plot. Synergy, additivity, and antagonism are indicated when (, ) is located below (concave line), a straight line and above (convex line), respectively. Combination Index (CI), similar to isobologram analysis, provides qualitative information on the nature of drug interaction, and CI, a numerical value calculated as described below, also provides quantitative measure of the extent of drug interaction. Drug combinations of either N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10- phenanthroline derivatives and E64 or chloroquine were expressed as the sum of the fractional inhibitory concentration (Σ FIC) or combination index (CI), according to method of Zhao et al. [20] and are the concentrations of drug A and drug B used in combination to achieve x% drug effect. and are the concentrations for single agents to achieve the same effect. FIC values were defined as synergism (<0.5), antagonism (>4), and additive (unity) [21].

Drug concentrations for these assay were 0–1,300 nM for N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives; 0–3,000 nM and 0–38.75 nM for E64 and chloroquine, respectively. Each combination was serially diluted and processed as for the sensitivity assay, therefore allowing IC₅₀ to be calculated. To validate the effect, the activity of chloroquine in combination with E64 was assayed as a positive control. Layout of drug combination assay in 96-well plate is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Layout of a combination experiment in a 96-well plate with the concentration ratios of drug A and drug B prepared as six solutions. When plates were prepared as described in the text, clear wells serve as aquadest, dot black wells serve as a parasite control (no drug, 0% growth inhibition), and wells labeled 1 to 6 serve as drug wells for six drug combination solution, in triplicate, with the wells in row F holding the lowest drug concentration. Both 96-well plates were prepared similarly, with row F₂ representing solutions 4 to 6 in the second 96-well plate. Drug A was (1)-N-alkyl and (1)-N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives, drug B was either E64 or chloroquine.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. In Vitro Sensitivity of the Parasites to Antimalarial Drugs and Proteinase Inhibitor

The IC₅₀ data for all N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives tested, chloroquine diphosphate and E64 against P. falciparum FCR3 are shown in Table 1. The ability of chloroquine to inhibit parasite growth was shown to be more potent than that of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1-10 phenanthroline derivatives. Chloroquine diphosphate was used to identify the sensitivity of P. falciparum FCR3. As the IC₅₀ was 24.28 ± 3.15 nM, therefore P. falciparum FCR3 used in this study was sensitive against chloroquine.

3.2. Interaction between N-Alkyl and N-Benzyl-1-10 Phenanthroline Derivatives and E64

Isobolograms for N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1-10 phenanthroline derivatives-proteinase inhibitor E64 are shown in Figure 3. The combination between N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1-10 phenanthroline derivatives and E64 against the FCR3 isolate demonstrated additive antimalarial effect.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

The isobologram describing the cooperative inhibition of parasite growth by N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1-10 phenanthroline derivatives and proteinase inhibitor E64 showed a slightly concave line and on the line of additivity, indicating an additive effect. The combination index (CI) values ranged from 0.89 ± 0.18 to 1.07 ± 0.18 (Table 2). Thus, the interactions between (1)-N-methyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium sulfate; (1)-N-ethyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium sulfate; (1)-N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium chloride, and (1)-N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthrolinium iodide with E64 were additive.

3.3. Interaction between N-Alkyl and N-Benzyl-1-10 Phenanthroline Derivatives and Chloroquine

Isobolograms for N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1-10 phenanthroline derivatives and chloroquine are shown in Figure 4. The interaction of those compounds against FCR3 isolate were additive with CI values ranging from 0.89 ± 0.18 to 1.07 ± 0.18 (Table 2). Chloroquine and protease inhibitor E64 in this study interacted additivily against P. falciparum with CI value 1.17 ± 0.19. The isobologram describing the additive inhibition of parasite growth by N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1-10 phenanthroline derivatives and chloroquine showed slightly convex line.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

E64 is an irreversible cysteine protease inhibitor that inhibit Plasmodium growth at the trophozoite stage, causing accumulation of undegraded hemoglobin in the food vacuole. Additivity of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives and cysteine protease inhibitor E64 has been proposed for those new compounds. This inhibition has an effect on the source of amino acids needed for Plasmodium growth.

The observations of an additive effect between chloroquine and cysteine protease inhibitor E64 or N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives would lead to both reduction of hemozoin and inhibition of cysteine proteases, such as those involved in host cell invasion by merozoites [2]. Mungthin et al. [7] observed an antagonism between cysteine protease inhibitor E64 and chloroquine, amodiaquine, quinine, mefloquine, and halofantrine. This different result could be caused by the different criteria used to interpret CI value. They used criteria of CI of less than, equal to, and more than 1 to indicate synergy, additive, and antagonism, respectively.

The IC₅₀ of protease inhibitor E64 was 836 ± 13 nM. This result indicated that E64 inhibited the Plasmodium protease enzymes. Similar study conducted by Mungthin et al. [7], showed the IC₅₀ of E64 against chloroquine-resistant isolate P. falciparum K1 and chloroquine-sensitive isolate P. falciparum HB3 of 8,932 ± 744 nM and 9,65 ± 1,677 nM, respectively. The effect of cysteine protease inhibitor E64 against chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum W2 and chloroquine-sensitive P. falciparum D6 was also performed by Semenov et al. [8] and the IC₅₀ values are about 8,000 nM. The IC₅₀ of E64 on our study was much lower than the previous studies and this could be due to the differences in P. falciparum isolates used for assay. Based on those studies it showed that the effect of protease inhibitor E64 is not influenced by the chloroquine sensitivity of P. falciparum.

Based on this study we concluded that the interaction between N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives and E64 was additive as well as their interaction with chloroquine. This result is different from the previous study by Mungthin et al. [7] that showed an antagonistic interaction between halofantrine and proteinase inhibitor E64. 1,10-Phenanthroline derivatives have phenanthrene skeleton with substitution of two nitrogen atoms and alkylation’s or benzylation on N-1 atom. Different structures between phenanthroline and 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives seem to contribute to the different mechanisms of action of those compounds.

Combination drug regimens for the treatment of malaria often achieve a therapeutic efficacy greater than that achieved with monotherapy. Other benefits may include decreased toxicity, delay, or prevention of drug resistance development, and favorable effects of synergistic drug interaction [22]. N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenantroline derivatives and protease inhibitor E64 appear to act cooperatively to inhibit hemoglobin degradation and merozoites reinvasion. Based on this study it may be appropriate to use combinations of such inhibitors to treat malaria. This study has only identified the mechanism of action of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives on P. falciparum FCR3, further studies should be performed with other chloroquine-resistant and -sensitive isolates in order to obtain more comprehensive information concerning the mechanism of action of these phenanthroline compounds.

Acknowledgments

The paper was funded by Integrated Excellent Research from Ministry of Research & Technology and Postgraduate Research Grant from Ministry of National Education, Indonesian Government. The authors are grateful to PT Konimex Indonesia for providing the chloroquine diphosphate used in these test. Thanks also to Rumbiwati and Purwono for laboratory assistance.

References

P. J. Rosenthal, “Proteases of malaria parasites: new targets for chemotherapy,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
D. C. Greenbaum, A. Baruch, M. Grainger et al., “A role for the protease falcipain 1 in host cell invasion by the human malaria parasite,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5600, pp. 2002–2006, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. McKerrow, E. Sun, P. J. Rosenthal, and J. Bouvier, “The proteases and pathogenicity of parasitic protozoa,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 47, pp. 821–853, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Rosenthal and S. R. Meshnick, “Hemoglobin catabolism and iron utilization by malaria parasites,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. G. Slater, “Malaria pigment,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 362–365, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Rosenthal, “Review: antimalarial drug discovery: old and new approaches,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 206, no. 21, pp. 3735–3744, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mungthin, P. G. Bray, R. G. Ridley, and S. A. Ward, “Central role of hemoglobin degradation in mechanisms of action of 4-aminoquinolines, quinoline methanols, and phenanthrene methanols,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2973–2977, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Semenov, J. E. Olson, and P. J. Rosenthal, “Antimalarial synergy of cysteine and aspartic protease inhibitors,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2254–2258, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
A. D. Yapi, M. Mustofa, A. Valentin et al., “New potential antimalarial agents: synthesis and biological activities of original diaza-analogs of phenanthrene,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1886–1889, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
Mustofa, A. D. Yapi, A. Valentin, and I. Tahir, “In vitro antiplasmodial activity of 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives and its quantitative stucture-activity relationship,” Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
E. N. Sholikhah, Supargiyono, Jumina et al., “In vitro antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxicity of newly synthesized N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1072–1077, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Wijayanti, E. N. Sholikhah, I. Tahir et al., “Antiplasmodial activity and acute toxicity of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives in mouse malaria model,” Journal of Health Science, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 794–799, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Wijayanti, E. N. Sholikhah, I. Tahir et al., “Heme polymerization inhibition activity (HPIA) of N-alkyl and N-benzyl-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives as antimalaria,” in Proceeding of International Conference on Chemical Science (ICCS '07), 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
Mustofa, Jumina, M. A. Wijayanti, I. Tahir, and E. N. Sholikhah, “Development of new 1,10-phenantroline derivatives as antimalaria,” Final Report, The Integrated Excellent Research from Ministry of Research and Technology, Indonesia, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Hadanu, S. Mastje, Jumina et al., “Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis (QSAR) of antimalarial 1,10-phenantroline derivatives compounds,” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 72–77, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Trager and J. B. Jensen, “Human malaria parasites in continuous culture,” Science, vol. 193, no. 4254, pp. 673–675, 1976.
View at: Google Scholar
C. E. Contreras, M. A. Rivas, J. Domínguez et al., “Stage-specific activity of potential antimalarial compounds measured in vitro by flow cytometry in comparison to optical microscopy and hypoxanthine uptake,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 179–184, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Lebbad, “Estimation of the percentage of erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium falciparum in a thin blood film,” in Methos in Malaria Research, Manassas, Va, USA, ATCC, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Wiesner, D. Henschker, D. B. Hutchinson, E. Beck, and H. Jomaa, “In vitro and Min vivo synergy of fosmidomycin, a novel antimalarial drug, with clindamycin,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2889–2894, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhao, M. G. Wientjes, and J. L.-S. Au, “Evaluation of combination chemotherapy: integration of nonlinear regression, curve shift, isobologram, and combination index analyses,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 7994–8004, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Pattanapanyasat, K. Kotipun, K. Yongvanitchit et al., “Effects of hydroxypyridinone iron chelators in combination with antimalarial drugs on the in vitro growth of Plasmodium falciparum,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 64–69, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. L. Fivelman, I. S. Adagu, and D. C. Warhurst, “Modified fixed-ratio isobologram method for studying in vitro interactions between atovaquone and proguanil or dihydroartemisinin against drug-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 4097–4102, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2010 Mahardika Agus Wijayanti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1275

Downloads

794

Citations