Malaria Research and Treatment

Malaria Research and Treatment / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 923674 | 8 pages |

Malaria Parasite Density Estimated with White Blood Cells Count Reference Value Agrees with Density Estimated with Absolute in Children Less Than 5 Years in Central Ghana

Academic Editor: Polrat Wilairatana
Received05 Jan 2015
Accepted09 Mar 2015
Published07 Apr 2015


Introduction. The estimation of malaria parasite density using a microscope heavily relies on White Blood Cells (WBCs) counts. An assumed WBCs count of 8000/µL has been accepted as reasonably accurate in estimating malaria parasite densities due to the challenge to accurately determine WBCs count. Method. The study used 4944 pieces of laboratory data of consented participants of age group less than 5 years. The study compared parasite densities of absolute WBCs, assumed WBCs, and the WBCs reference values in Central Ghana. Ethical approvals were given by three ethics committees. Results. The mean (±SD) WBCs and geometric mean parasite density (GMPD) were 10500/µL (±4.1) and 10644/µL (95% CI 9986/µL to 11346/µL), respectively. The difference in the GMPD compared using absolute WBCs and densities of assumed WBCs was significantly lower. The difference in GMPD obtained with an assumed WBCs count and that of the WBCs reference values for the study area, 10400/µL and 9200/µL for children in different age groups, were not significant. Discussion. Significant errors could result when assumed WBCs count is used to estimate malaria parasite density in children. GMPD generated with WBCs reference values statistically agreed with density from the absolute WBCs. When obtaining absolute WBC is not possible, the reference value can be used to estimate parasite density.

1. Background

Malaria is caused by one or a combination of four species of Plasmodia and leads to over one million deaths, of which over 75% occur in African children under 5 years infected mainly with Plasmodium falciparum (Pf). Pf and Plasmodium vivax (Pv) are identified as the Plasmodium species responsible for causing the most severe form of malaria [1].

In epidemiological studies, intervention studies, and clinical trials, malaria microscopy is routinely relied upon as a primary endpoint measurement of the level of malaria infection [2]. This is expressed as parasite density and is classically defined as the number of asexual forms of parasite relative to a blood volume (e.g., microliter) [3]. In the four basic counting techniques using microscopy [3], White Blood Cells (WBCs) are relatively used in estimating Plasmodium parasitaemia by counting the number of parasites against a predetermined number of WBCs on Giemsa stained blood smears.

Complete blood counts, particularly WBCs count, can be performed with new generation automated haematology analysers [4] and/or manually using stained microscope smears and the Neubauer chamber and counters [5, 6]. Some health facilities frequently use manual convention methods to determine the complete blood counts of a patient for management as a result of a high cost of purchasing and maintaining fully automated or semiautomated haematology analyzers. Another cost burden using an automated system includes the ability to ensure prompt validation, maintenance, and implementation of rigorous quality systems. Automated machines may therefore not be the preferred choice to quantify WBCs in resource poor areas.

Due to the frequent lack of facilities in some malaria endemic countries to quantify WBCs, an assumed WBCs count of 8000/μL of blood has been accepted by World Health Organization as reasonably accurate [7] to estimate malaria parasite densities. Assumed WBCs count of blood may generate systematic errors which could produce incorrect conclusions in patient management or during clinical research that uses malaria parasite counts as an end point [3, 8].

Medical laboratories need to set relevant reference ranges for WBCs and other common laboratory parameters for clinical management of patients or during malaria clinical research [9]. Kintampo Health Research Centre has established reference values for common haematological and biochemical laboratory parameters for its study area covering an area of about 7200 km2 [10].

The team compared the geometric mean parasite densities (GMPD) calculated using absolute WBCs, assumed WBCs, and WBCs reference values of the participants enrolled in the malaria studies in middle Ghana to assess the impact of using these as malaria parasite density estimators.

2. Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The studies used for this data analysis were approved by the ethical review committees of the Ghana Health Service, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Kintampo Health Research Centre Institutional Ethics Committee, Noguchi Memorial Institute of Medical Research, and The Ghana Food and Drugs Authority. Written informed consent was sought from all mothers whose children participated in the studies.

2.2. Site Description

The data analysis was carried out on laboratory data from a study area with a profile presented by Adu-Gyasi et al., 2012 [8]. Briefly, the area is located within the forest-savannah transitional ecological zone in Ghana with perennial malaria transmission [11]. Pf is the predominating Plasmodium species while P. malariae and P. ovale are in the minority.

2.3. Description of Data Sources

The data was obtained from children under 5 years who were recruited into malarial studies carried out by Kintampo Health Research Centre between the periods of October 2008 and March 2011. In the first study, children were enrolled and followed actively every month for two years. The children were referred to the hospital for care whenever they were unwell to determine the incidence of malaria [12]. The second study which was a clinical trial was to determine the effect of providing Micronutrient Powder with or without iron on the incidence of malaria among children under three years living in a high malaria-burden area in Ghana [13].

2.4. Blood Sample Collection and Processing

In each of the studies, blood samples were collected by finger-prick into 0.5 mL microtainers containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (K2EDTA-BD, USA) from the participants on their scheduled visit days and on any other day participants visited the health facilities with illness. Samples were collected and transported according to the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) established by the Kintampo Health Research Centre. Briefly, participant’s finger was rubbed, and the tip was cleaned with disposable alcohol swab and allowed to dry. Safety lancet was used to prick and drops of blood were collected into labelled test-tubes to the required volume. Collected samples were used for full blood count analysis and for making blood smears. Examination of thick and thin smears was carried out as described by Adu-Gyasi et al., 2012 [8].

2.5. Estimation of Parasite Density

Parasite densities for all participants were calculated using assumed WBCs count of 5000/μL, 6000/μL, 8000/μL, and 10000/μL of blood. In addition, we used the WBCs reference values established for children aged less than one year (10000/μL of blood) and also for children less than five years (9200/μL) [14].

2.6. Data Entry, Cleaning, and Analyses

Data obtained from the database of the malarial studies was checked for completeness and consistency and all queries were resolved. All parasite negative blood slide results were removed before analysis. Analyses were done using STATA (version 12; Stata Corp., TX, USA) and GraphPad PRISM version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) particularly for geometric mean and intervals. Geometric means at 95% CI that did not overlap were considered significant.

3. Results

Of the 39851 results received over the study period, data of 4944 participant results were consistent and complete for the purpose of our analysis. Of the total, 50.6% (2498/4944) were males and 49.4% (2443/4944) were females.

The mean (±SD) WBCs and GMPD of the 4944 positive samples were 10500/μL (±4.1) and 10644/μL (95% CI 9986/μL to 11347/μL) of blood, respectively. There was no significant difference between the mean (SD) WBCs 10600/μL (4.0) for males and 10500/μL (±4.1) for females (). Neither was there a significant difference between the GMPD 11058/μL (95% CI 10114/μL to 12091/μL) of blood for males (Table 1) and 10217/μL (95% CI 9324/μL to 11197/μL) of blood for females (Table 2).

Absolute WBCsWBCs count of 5000/µLWBCs count of 6000/µLWBCs count of 8000/µLWBCs count of 9200/µLWBCs count of 10000/µLWBCs count of 10400/µL

Number of observations, 2498249824982498249824982498
25% percentile2040105012601680193221002184
75% percentile71645357504290057200657807150074360
Std. deviation1396557908094896126528145508158160164487
Std. error (mean)1396557908094896126528145508158160164487
Lower 95% CI of mean62775319173830051067587266383366386
Upper 95% CI of mean73734381224574660995701447624479293
Geometric mean11058559667158953102961119111639
Lower 95% CI of geo. mean1011451166139818694141023210642
Upper 95% CI of geo. mean12091612073449792112611224012730

Absolute WBCsWBCs count of 5000/µLWBCs count of 6000/µLWBCs count of 8000/µLWBCs count of 9200/µLWBCs count of 10000/µLWBCs count of 10400/µL

Number of observations, 2443244324432443244324432443
25% percentile184395711491531176119141991
75% percentile73851358664303957385659937173174600
Std. deviation158340102849123418164558189242205697213925
Std. error (mean)3204208124973329382941624328
Lower 95% CI of mean64698346104153255375636826921971988
Upper 95% CI of mean77262427705132468433786988554188962
Geometric mean1021752436292838996471048610906
Lower 95% CI of geo. mean9324478357397653880095669948
Upper 95% CI of geo. mean11197574868979196105761149511955

With an assumed WBCs count of 8000/μL, a GMPD of 8679/μL (95% CI, 8140/μL to 9253/μL) of blood was estimated (Table 3).

Absolute WBCsWBCs count of 5000/µLWBCs count of 6000/µLWBCs count of 8000/µLWBCs count of 9200/µLWBCs count of 10000/µLWBCs count of 10400/µL

Number of observations, 4944494449444944494449444944
25% percentile1947101312151620186320252106
75% percentile72777357804293657248658357156074423
Std. deviation14915291603109924146565168550183206190534
Std. error (mean)2121130315632085239726062710
Lower 95% CI of mean65459342974115654875631066859371337
Upper 95% CI of mean73776394054728663048725057880981962
Geometric mean1064454246509867999811084811282
Lower 95% CI of geo. mean998650886105814093611017510581
Upper 95% CI of geo. mean11347578369409253106411156712029

In using the WBCs reference values established among children in the study area, (10400/μL), a GMPD of 11282/μL (95% CI, 10581/μL to 12029/μL) of blood and a WBCs count of 9200/μL produced a GMPD of 9981/μL (95% CI, 9361/μL to 10641/μL) of blood.

The difference in the GMPD calculated using absolute WBCs compared to densities estimated with assumed WBCs was significantly lower for 8000/μL. However, GMPD for assumed WBCs count of 10.0 × 109/L, WBCs reference values of 10400/μL, and 9200/μL estimated a geometric mean parasite density of 10848/μL (95% CI, 10175/μL to 11567/μL), 11282/μL (95% CI, 10581/μL to 12029/μL), and 9981/μL (95% CI, 9361/μL to 10641/μL) of blood that was not significantly different from estimates obtained with the absolute WBCs (Table 3). The interval of GMPD obtained when an assumed WBCs of 8000/µL, 6000/µL and 5000/µL were used and that from absolute WBCs count did not overlap. However, the intervals of GMPD from absolute WBCs count and that obtained with assumed WBCs counts of 9200/µL, 10000/µL and 10400/µL overlapped showing no significant difference in the GMPD (Table 3).

A correlation analysis of the malaria parasite densities with the WBCs reference value and assumed WBCs compared to the absolute WBCs showed a significant level of correlation () with all the assumed WBCs count (Table 4).

VariableMeanStandard deviationMinimumMaximum

Absolute WBCs69618149152102790960
WBCs of 5000/µL3685191603101993543
WBCs of 6000/µL44221109924122392252
WBCs of 8000/µL58961146565163189669
WBCs of 9200/µL67805168550183668119
WBCs of 10000/µL73701183206203987086
WBCs of 10400/µL76649190534214146569

Absolute WBCsWBCs count of 5000/µLWBCs count of 6000/µLWBCs count of 8000/µLWBCs count of 9200/µLWBCs count of 10000/µLWBCs count of 10400/µL

Absolute WBCs1.0000
WBCs of 5000/µL0.88251.0000
WBCs of 6000/µL0.88251.00001.0000
WBCs of 8000/µL0.88251.00001.00001.0000
WBCs of 9200/µL0.88251.00001.00001.00001.0000
WBCs of 10000/µL0.88251.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000
WBCs of 10400/µL0.88251.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000

Significance level of correlation is .

4. Discussion

Malaria parasite density is necessary for patient management. This has become dominated by the convenient but inaccurate assumption of a constant WBCs count of 8000/μL of peripheral blood [3, 15] due to lack of capacity to measure patients absolute WBCs [16].

The mean WBCs count from the participants with malaria infection compares with the WBCs reference values, 10400/μL for children less than 1 year and 9200/μL for children up to 5 years [14]. The parasite densities from the WBCs reference values agree with the density obtained from using participant’s absolute WBCs.

It is agreed that the best solution in estimating parasite densities would be to use the corresponding absolute WBCs count for each age group [17]. Though there is a significant level of correlation, estimating the parasite density of Plasmodium species with the assumed WBCs count of 8000/μL of blood [7], compared to the absolute and reference value WBCs count, would mean underestimating significantly the parasite density of Plasmodium species infections for patients in the study area. Therefore, establishing regional based reference WBCs as suggested [17] to estimate parasite densities in malarial infections will be appropriate. This was evident in the fact that the geometric mean parasite density, 11282/μL (95% CI, 10581/μL to 12029/μL) and 9981/μL (95% CI, 9361/μL to 10641/μL) of blood, estimated by using the established WBCs standard values of 10,400/μL and 9200/μL of blood for children less than 1 year and up to 5 years old, respectively, overlaps with the geometric mean parasite density obtained by using the mean absolute WBCs count, 10644/μL (95% CI 9986/μL to 11347/μL) of blood, of the participants. Results obtained when an assumed WBCs count of 10000/μL of blood was used to estimate the parasite density [8] were also consistent with that from the absolute WBCs count of participants. The parasitaemia obtained by the use of the other assumed WBCs count was significantly lower (Table 3) [8].

5. Conclusions

Since lack of resources in some settings in Africa makes it difficult to estimate malaria parasite density based on actual WBCs count of patients, where available, the study recommends the use of an established WBCs reference value for a known population and where the reference value could be implied. The reference value established in Kintampo has been predicted as a malaria density estimator when compared with the absolute WBCs of participants. In environments where reference values have not been established, the study affirms the use of an assumed WBCs count of 10000/μL of blood to estimate malaria parasite density as documented [8].

Limitations of the Study

The ages of all participants were not stratified into groups. This did not make it possible to compare differences at the possible age groups less than 5 years.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Dennis Adu-Gyasi, Kwaku Poku Asante, Sabastina Amoako, David Dosoo, and Love Ankrah designed the data analysis plan, performed most of the experiments, and cowrote the paper. George Adjei and Seeba Amenga-Etego contributed to the study design, performance of experiments, and statistical analysis and helped in writing the paper. Sam Newton and Seth Owusu-Agyei designed the experiments, supervised the study, and cowrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final version of the paper.


The study team wish to thank the chiefs, opinion leaders, and elders of participating communities, Wenchi Municipal, and Tain District Health Management Team, especially those who participated in the malarial based studies in Kintampo Health Research Centre (KHRC). The authors’ appreciation also goes to the staff of Kintampo Health Research Centre who assisted in this work. Kintampo Health Research Centre is a member site of the INDEPTH Network. The study team thank Grace W. Mwangoka, Kwadwo Boateng, and Ms. Portia Amoah for their motivations towards the development of this paper.


  1. E. Tjitra, N. M. Anstey, P. Sugiarto et al., “Multidrug-resistant Plasmodium vivax associated with severe and fatal malaria: a prospective study in Papua, Indonesia,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, e128, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. P. O'Meara, M. Barcus, C. Wongsrichanalai et al., “Reader technique as a source of variability in determining malaria parasite density by microscopy,” Malaria Journal, vol. 5, article 118, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. I. Hammami, G. Nuel, and A. Garcia, “Statistical properties of parasite density estimators in Malaria,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e51987, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. van den Bossche, K. Devreese, R. Malfait et al., “Reference intervals for a complete blood count determined on different automated haematology analysers: Abx Pentra 120 Retic, Coulter Gen-S, Sysmex SE 9500, Abbott Cell Dyn 4000 and Bayer Advia 120,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 69–73, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Briggs, P. Harrison, and S. J. Machin, “Continuing developments with the automated platelet count,” International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 77–91, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. Petersen, N. T. Marbiah, L. New, and A. Gottschau, “Comparison of two methods for enumerating malaria parasites in thick blood films,” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 485–489, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  7. WHO, Basic Malaria Microscopy, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010,
  8. D. Adu-Gyasi, M. Adams, S. Amoako et al., “Estimating malaria parasite density: assumed white blood cell count of 10,000/μl of blood is appropriate measure in Central Ghana,” Malaria Journal, vol. 11, article 238, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Koram, M. Addae, J. Ocran, S. Adu-amankwah, W. Rogers, and F. Nkrumah, “Population based reference intervals for common blood haematological and biochemical parameters in the Akuapem north district,” Ghana Medical Journal, vol. 41, no. 4, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. K. Dosoo, K. Kayan, D. Adu-Gyasi et al., “Haematological and biochemical reference values for healthy adults in the middle belt of Ghana,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e36308, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Owusu-Agyei, K. P. Asante, M. Adjuik et al., “Epidemiology of malaria in the forest-savanna transitional zone of Ghana,” Malaria Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, article 220, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. P. Asante, S. Owusu-Agyei, M. Cairns et al., “Placental malaria and the risk of malaria in infants in a high malaria transmission area in Ghana: a prospective cohort study,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 208, no. 9, pp. 1504–1513, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Baiden, J. Webster, M. Tivura et al., “Accuracy of rapid tests for malaria and treatment outcomes for malaria and non-malaria cases among under-five children in rural ghana,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e34073, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Zlotkin, S. Newton, A. M. Aimone et al., “Effect of iron fortification on malaria incidence in infants and young children in Ghana: a randomized trial,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 310, no. 9, pp. 938–947, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. K. Dosoo, K. P. Asante, K. Kayan et al., “Biochemical and hematologic parameters for children in the middle belt of Ghana,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 767–773, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. M. Greenwood and J. R. M. Armstrong, “Comparison of two simple methods for determining malaria parasite density,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 186–188, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. Olliaro, A. Djimdé, C. Karema et al., “Standardised versus actual white cell counts in estimating thick film parasitaemia in African children under five,” Tropical Medicine & International Health, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 551–554, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Dennis Adu-Gyasi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

13126 Views | 938 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder