Modelling and Simulation in Engineering

Modelling and Simulation in Engineering / 2007 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2007 |Article ID 027521 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/27521

B. Azzouz, M. Ben Hassen, F. Sakli, "Generation of Length Distribution, Length Diagram, Fibrogram, and Statistical Characteristics by Weight of Cotton Blends", Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, vol. 2007, Article ID 027521, 13 pages, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/27521

Generation of Length Distribution, Length Diagram, Fibrogram, and Statistical Characteristics by Weight of Cotton Blends

Academic Editor: F. Gao
Received01 Aug 2007
Accepted12 Dec 2007
Published28 Feb 2008

Abstract

The textile fibre mixture as a multicomponent blend of variable fibres imposes regarding the proper method to predict the characteristics of the final blend. The length diagram and the fibrogram of cotton are generated. Then the length distribution, the length diagram, and the fibrogram of a blend of different categories of cotton are determined. The length distributions by weight of five different categories of cotton (Egyptian, USA (Pima), Brazilian, USA (Upland), and Uzbekistani) are measured by AFIS. From these distributions, the length distribution, the length diagram, and the fibrogram by weight of four binary blends are expressed. The length parameters of these cotton blends are calculated and their variations are plotted against the mass fraction x of one component in the blend .These calculated parameters are compared to those of real blends. Finally, the selection of the optimal blends using the linear programming method, based on the hypothesis that the cotton blend parameters vary linearly in function of the components rations, is proved insufficient.

References

  1. K. L. Hertel, “A method of fiber-length analysis using the fibrograph,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 510–525, 1940. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. B. Landstreet, “The fibrogram: its concept and use in measuring cotton fiber length,” Textile Bulletin, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 54–57, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. S. Krowicki, J. M. Hemstreet, and K. E. Duckett, “Different approach to generating the fibrogram from fiber-length-array data—part I: theory,” Journal of the Textile Institute. Part 1, vol. 88, no. 1, part 1, pp. 1–4, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. S. Krowicki, J. M. Hemstreet, and K. E. Duckett, “A different approach to generating the fibrogram from fiber-length-array data—part II: application,” Journal of the Textile Institute. Part 1, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  5. R. S. Krowicki and K. E. Duckett, “An examination of the fibrogram,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 200–204, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. I. Zeidman, S. K. Batra, and P. E. Sasser, “Determining short fiber content in cotton—part I: some theoretical fundamentals,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. I. Zeidman, S. K. Batra, and P. E. Sasser, “Determining short fiber content in cotton—part II: measures of SFC from HVI data—statistical models,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Zeidman and P. S. Sawhney, “Influence of fiber length distribution on strength efficiency of fibers in yarn,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 216–220, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Cui, T. A. Calamari, Jr., and M. W. Suh, “Theoritical and practical aspects of fiber length comparisons of various cottons,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 467–472, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. E. Elmoghazy and Y. Gowayed, “Theory and practice of cotton fiber selection—part I: fiber selection techniques and bale picking algorithms,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. E. El Mogahzy and Y. Gowayed, “Theory and practice of cotton fiber selection—part II: sources of cotton mix variability and critical factors affecting it,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 75–84, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. E. El Mogahzy, “Optimizing cotton blend costs with respect to quality using HVI fiber properties and linear programming—part 1: fundamentals and advanced techniques of linear programming,” Textile Research Journal, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1992. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2007 B. Azzouz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views134
Downloads2560
Citations

Related articles