Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
Volume 2011, Article ID 537464, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/537464
Research Article

A Preconditioned Method for Rotating Flows at Arbitrary Mach Number

Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Department, The University of Toledo, 2801 W. Bancroft Street, MS 312, Toledo, OH 43606, USA

Received 17 April 2011; Accepted 25 July 2011

Academic Editor: Antonio Munjiza

Copyright © 2011 Chunhua Sheng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. J. Chorin, “A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–26, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. R. Briley, H. McDonald, and S. J. Shamroth, “A low Mach number euler formulation and application to time iterative LBI schemes,” AIAA Journal, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1467–1469, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Choi and C. L. Merkle, “Application of time–iterative schemes to incompressible flow,” AIAA Journal, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1518–1524, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Choi and C. L. Merkle, “The application of preconditioning in viscous flows,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 207–223, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Turkel, “Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible and low speed compressible equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 277–298, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. van Leer, W. T. Lee, and P. L. Roe, “Characteristic time-stepping or local preconditioning of the euler equations,” Tech. Rep. 91-1552, AIAA, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. M. Weiss and W. A. Smith, “Preconditioning applied to variable and constant density flows,” AIAA Journal, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2050–2057, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. M. Weiss, J. P. Maruszewski, and W. A. Smith, “Implicit solution of preconditioned Navier-Stokes equations using algebraic multigrid,” AIAA Journal, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Turkel, “Review of preconditioning methods for fluid dynamics,” Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 1–3, pp. 257–284, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. R. Briley, L. K. Taylor, and D. L. Whitfield, “High-resolution viscous flow simulations at arbitrary Mach number,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 79–105, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. X. Wang, C. Sheng, and J. Chen, “Numerical study of preconditioned algorithm for ratational flows,” Tech. Rep. 2005-5126, AIAA, Toronto, Canada, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  12. C. Sheng and X. Wang, “A global preconditioning method for low mach number viscous flows in rotating machinery,” in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, vol. 6, pp. 1555–1564, Barcelona, Spain, May 2006.
  13. R. Vichnevetsky and J. B. Bowles, Fourier Analysis of Numerical Approximations of Hyperbolic Equations, Society for Industrial Mathematics, 1982.
  14. D. Shoe and C. J. Knight, “Computation of 3D viscous flows in rotating turbomachinery blades,” Tech. Rep. 89–0323, AIAA, Reno, Nev, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. P. Chen, A. R. Ghosh, D. Sreenivas, and D. L. Whitfield, “Comparison of computations using navier–stokes equations in rotating and fixed coordinates for flow through turbomachinery,” Tech. Rep. 97–0878, AIAA, Reno, Nev, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. T. Batina, “Implicit flux–split euler schemes for unsteady aerodynamic analysis involving unstructured dynamic meshes,” Tech. Rep. 90–0936, AIAA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  17. W. K. Anderson, “Grid generation and flow solution method for euler equations on unstructured grids,” NASA Technical Report TM 4295, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  18. W. K. Anderson, R. D. Rausch, and D. L. Bonhaus, “Implicit/multigrid algorithms for incompressible turbulent flows on unstructured grids,” Tech. Rep. 95–1740, AIAA, June 1995. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. G. Hyams, An investigation of parallel implicit solution algorithms for incompressible flows on unstructured topologies, Ph.D. Dissertation, Mississippi State University, May 2000.
  20. W. J. Coirier, “An adaptively–refined, cartesian, cell–based scheme for the euler and navier–stokes equations,” NASA Technical Memorandum 106754, NASA Lewis Research Center, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  21. P. Spalart and S. Allmaras, “A one–equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows,” Tech. Rep. 92–0439, AIAA, January 1991. View at Google Scholar
  22. P. R. Spalart and M. Shur, “On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 297–302, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  23. W. W. Liou and T. H. Shih, “Transonic turbulence flow predictions with new two–equation turbulence models,” Tech. Rep., Institute for Computational Mechanics in Propulsion, January 1996. View at Google Scholar
  24. D. C. Wilcon, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Insdustries, La Cañada, Calif, , USA, 1994.
  25. T. J. Coakley, “Turbulence modeling methods for the compressible navier–stokes equations,” Tech. Rep. 83–1693, AIAA, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  26. C. Sheng and X. Wang, “Characteristic variable boundary conditions for arbitrary Mach number algorithm in rotating frame,” in Proceedings of the 16th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Fla, USA, June 2003.
  27. N. C. Groves, T. T. Huang, and M. S. Chang, “Geometric characteristics of DARPA SUBOFF models,” Tech. Rep. DTRC/SHD-1298-01, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  28. R. F. Roddy, “Investigation of the stability and control characteristics of several configurations of the DARPA SUBOFF model,” Tech. Rep. DTRC/SHD-1298-08, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  29. T. T. Huang, H. L. Liu, N. C. Groves, T. J. Forlini, J. N. Blanton, and S. Gowing, “Measurements of flows over an axisymmetric body with various appendages in a wind tunnel: the DARPA SUBOFF experimental program,” in Proceedings of the 19th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, pp. 321–346, 1992.
  30. C. J. Chesnakas and S. D. Jessup, “Cavitation and 3–D LDV tip–flowfield measurements of propeller 5168,” Tech. Rep. CRDKNSWC/HD–1460–02, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, May 1998. View at Google Scholar
  31. F. X. Caradonna and C. Tung, “Experimental and analytical studies of a model helicopter rotor in hover,” Vertica, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 149–161, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  32. K. G. Winter, J .C. Rotta, and K. G. Smith, “Studies of the turbulent boundary layer on a waisted body of revolution in subsonic and supersonic flow,” Technical Report 68215, Royal Aircraft Establishment, 1968. View at Google Scholar