Modelling and Simulation in Engineering / 2012 / Article / Tab 3

Research Article

A New Optimization via Simulation Approach for Dynamic Facility Layout Problem with Budget Constraints

Table 3

The computational results with significant level 99% with 𝑁 = 3 0 .

𝑇 Problem numberBudgetAverage probabilitiesNRBest solutionBest solution by Sahin et al. [26]% Dev.Average time

5P3310.887166576451577086βˆ’0.1110.27
20.96111357970457970400.79
30.92564457749357749302.76
P3410.958814551951571846βˆ’3.480.86
20.9952559139572396βˆ’2.320.15
30.9009103556359570,537βˆ’2.496.39
P3510.8387899566291579113βˆ’2.2155.76
20.8735264556438579406βˆ’3.9616.37
30.887166566301574225βˆ’1.3810.28
P3610.98245557872572964βˆ’2.630.32
20.97318554936578631βˆ’4.090.49
30.926244545506569880βˆ’4.282.7
P3710.922450552347559934βˆ’1.353.08
20.956815551905559078βˆ’1.280.92
30.937929555069559506βˆ’0.791.81
P3810.98884544879569457βˆ’4.320.23
20.94126559640567166βˆ’1.331.62
30.8689310546839567749βˆ’3.6819.2
P3910.8817199569470569470012.33
20.784367405705215705210417.85
30.937430563648569382βˆ’1.011.84
P4010.9923556582579411βˆ’3.940.19
20.92742565906586310βˆ’3.482.63
30.941326560792577719βˆ’2.931.61

10P4110.92913911337431171634βˆ’3.232.88
20.986411556471172520βˆ’1.440.32
30.91985411290681171500βˆ’3.623.96
P4210.94752111666131174896βˆ’0.711.52
20.9661111375781175998βˆ’3.270.77
30.94572211628381177009βˆ’1.21.62
P4310.9223501169208116920803.63
20.873926011796601179660019.01
30.886716711346771164129βˆ’2.5312.23
P4410.90858011405981151468βˆ’0.945.81
20.78546462115287411528740471.72
30.91237011220061147234βˆ’2.25.11
P4510.9703911148611127044βˆ’1.080.65
20.85845311418811141881033.09
30.878122511284721129703βˆ’0.1116.44
P4610.876224011320991146000βˆ’1.2117.55
20.78676149115469111546910448.88
30.858344911450441145858βˆ’0.0732.75
P4710.7788585121057312105730626.71
20.9444231210573121057301.7
30.89371321210573121057309.62
P4810.77868389119904811891540.83612.37
20.87227811528961201885βˆ’4.0820.3
30.90031051181360118136007.68

Average0.9076864858596870759βˆ’1.5863.02