Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 9814179, 23 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9814179
Research Article

Service Oriented Integration of Distributed Heterogeneous IT Systems in Production Engineering Using Information Standards and Linked Data

1Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Production Engineering, Brinellvägen 68, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden
2Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Mechatronics Division, Brinellvägen 83, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Navid Shariat Zadeh; es.htk@zsdivan

Received 1 September 2016; Revised 18 November 2016; Accepted 5 December 2016; Published 19 March 2017

Academic Editor: Feng Xiao

Copyright © 2017 Navid Shariat Zadeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Törngren, A. Qamar, M. Biehl, F. Loiret, and J. El-khoury, “Integrating viewpoints in the development of mechatronic products,” Mechatronics, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 745–762, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. N. Ide and J. Pustejovsky, “What does interoperability mean, anyway? Toward an operational definition of interoperability,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Global Interoperability for Language Resources (ICGL '10), Hong Kong, 2010, http://www.cs.vassar.edu/~ide/papers/ICGL10.pdf.
  3. N. Shariatzadeh, Manufacturing process specification [Licentiate thesis], Department of Industrial Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2014.
  4. N. Shariatzadeh, L. Lindberg, and G. Sivard, “Rapid production changes through the coordination of factory layout models and activities,” Journal of Applied Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2, article no. 126, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Sivard, “Digital factory building blocks,” project within FFI Sustainable production technology, http://www.vinnova.se/PageFiles/751290057/2009-00996_publikrapport_EN.pdf.
  6. T. Kjellberg, A. Von Euler-Chelpin, M. Hedlind, M. Lundgren, G. Sivard, and D. Chen, “The machine tool model—a core part of the digital factory,” CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 425–428, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Hedlind, Model driven process planning for machining [Ph.D. thesis], KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Production Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, 2013.
  8. Y. Li, M. Hedlind, and T. Kjellberg, “Implementation of kinematic mechanism data exchange based on STEP,” in Proceedings of the CIRP 7th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, September 2011, https://www.academia.edu/24270742/IMPLEMENTATION_OF_KINEMATIC_MECHANISM_DATA_EXCHANGE_BASED_ON_STEP.
  9. A. von Euler-Chelpin, Information modelling for the manufacturing system life cycle [Ph.D. thesis], Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Stockholm, Sweden, 2008.
  10. P. Falkman, J. Nielsen, B. Lennartson, and A. von Euler-Chelpin, “Generation of STEP AP214 models from discrete event systems for process planning and control,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 113–126, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. ISO 10303:242, “Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation- and exchange—part 242: managed model-based 3D engineering,” I. TS 184/SC4184, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  12. ISO 10303-214, “Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange—part 214: application protocol: core data for automotive mechanical design processes,” TS 184/SC4184, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  13. ISO 10303:214, “Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation- and exchange—ARM index,” I. TS 184/SC4184, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  14. ISO 10303:214, “Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation- and exchange—AIM index,” I. TS 184/SC4184, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  15. ISO, ISO 10303-239 ISO/TC184/SC4: ISO 10303-239: Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 239: Application Protocol: Product Life Cycle Support, I. TS 184/SC4184, 2nd edition, 2012.
  16. “ISO 10303-41 Industrial automation systems and integration-product data representation and exchange—part 41: integrated generic resource: Fundamentals of product description and support,” Geneva: I. TS 184/SC4184, 2005.
  17. N. Shariatzadeh, G. Sivard, and L. Lindberg, “An approach for manufacturing process representation in product lifecycle management,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 572, pp. 239–244, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. OSLC Core Specification Workgroup, “OSLC core specification version 2.0,” Technical report: Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  19. OASIS OSLC, 2015, http://www.oasis-oslc.org/.
  20. A. Ryman, Ryman A. Linked Data, RDF, and OSLC Resource Shapes: Define REST API Contracts for RDF Resource Representations, 2015.
  21. T. Berners-Lee, “Linked data design issues,” December 2009, https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
  22. OSLC core, 2016, https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/oslc-core/trunk/specs/oslc-core.html.
  23. Open-services.net. OSLC Primer—Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration, 2015, http://open-services.net/resources/tutorials/oslc-primer/.
  24. ISO, ISO 10303-21: Industrial Automation Systems and Integration-Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 21: Implementation Methods: Clear Text Encoding of the Exchange Structure, International Standards Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2002.
  25. “OASIS PLCS TC, DEXLIB for PLCS, Review,” 2016 http://www.plcs.org/plcslib/plcslib/sys/dex_index_base.html.
  26. OASIS PLCS TC, “Templates,” 2016, http://www.plcs.org/plcslib/plcslib/sys/template_index_base.html.
  27. OASIS PLCS TC, Reference data library, http://www.plcs.org/plcslib/plcslib/sys/refdata_index_base.html.
  28. ISO 10303-41: Industrial Automation Systems and Integration-Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 41: Integrated Generic Resource: Fundamentals of Product Description and Support, International Standards Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  29. “OSLC Product Definition 1.1.,” http://open-services.net/specifications/product-definition-1.1/.
  30. I. Ishaq, D. Carels, G. Teklemariam et al., “IETF standardization in the field of the internet of things (IoT): a survey,” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 235–287, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. W. Yang and X. Xu, “Modelling machine tool data in support of STEP-NC based manufacturing,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 745–763, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. ISO/CD 15531-1(2010), Industrial Automation System and Integration—Industrial Manufacturing Management Data: Part 1: General Overview, ISO/TC184/SC4/JWG8 N228: ISO/CD 15531-1, 2004.
  33. ISO, ISO/CD 15531-43, ISO/TC184/SC4/JWG8 N228: ISO/CD 15531-43: Industrial Automation System and Integration-Manufacturing Management Data Exchange: Part 43: Manufacturing Flow Management Data: Data Model for Flow Monitoring and Manufacturing Data, ISO, Geneve, Switzerland, 2006.
  34. “ISO/CD 15531-44, ISO/TC184/SC4/JWG8 N228: ISO/CD 15531-44: Industrial automation system and integration—Manufacturing management data exchange: Part 44: Information modelling for shop floor data acquisition,” 2010.
  35. A. Euler-Chelpin, Information modelling for the manufacturing system life cycle [Ph.D. thesis], Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, 2008.
  36. ISO, “Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange—part 22: implementation methods: standard data access interface,” ISO 10303-22, International Standards Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  37. ISO 10303-27 Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 27: Implementation Methods: Java TM Programming Language Binding to the Standard Data Access Interface with Internet/Intranet Extensions, International Standards Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
  38. Y.-T. T. Lee, “A Journey in standard development: the core manufacturing simulation data (CMSD) information model,” Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, vol. 120, pp. 270–279, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. ISA, “ISA95: Enterprise-control system integration, part 1: models and terminology,” ISA Standard ANSI/ISA-95-2010, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  40. N. Shariatzadeh, L. Lindberg, and G. Sivard, “Rapid production changes through the coordination of factory layout models and activities,” Journal of Applied Mechanical Engineering, vol. 2, article 126, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. P. Fettke and P. Loos, Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, IGI Global, Saarbrucken, Germany, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. “Using the Structured Analysis and Design technique (SADT) in simulation conceptual modelling,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, A. Tolk, S. Y. Diallo, I. O. Ryzhov, L. Yilmaz, S. Buckley, and J. A. Miller, Eds., 2014.
  43. G. Sivard, N. Shariatzadeh, and L. Lindberg, “Engineering innovation factory,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology DET, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. IFC 2x3, buildingSMART international, 2011, http://www.buildingsmart.com.
  45. IFC 2x3 ISO/PAS 16739,” buildingSMART international, 2011 http://www.buildingsmart.com.
  46. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Research Concept Vehicle (RCV), https://www.itrl.kth.se/research/itrl-labs/rcv-1.476469.
  47. N. Shariatzadeh, G. Sivard, and D. Chen, “Software evaluation criteria for rapid factory layout planning, design and simulation,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 3, pp. 299–304, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. N. Shariatzadeh, G. Sivard G, and M. Hedlind M, “Material flow data representation and integration based on STEP,” Internetworking Indonesia Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2013, http://www.internetworkingindonesia.org/Issues/Vol5-No1-B-2013/iij_vol5_no1_b_2013_shariatzadeh.pdf. View at Google Scholar
  49. B. Rick, ActiveX LabVIEW Advanced Programming Techniques, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2001, http://www.uni-miskolc.hu/~amper/progs/labview/manual%20-%20labview%20advanced%20programming%20techniques%20%28bitter%20et%20al%29.pdf.