Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Modelling and Simulation in Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 7842402, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7842402
Research Article

Qualitative Reasoning for Quantitative Simulation

Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Mehmet Fatih Hocaoğlu; moc.liamg@fmulgoacoh

Received 11 May 2017; Revised 5 August 2017; Accepted 5 September 2017; Published 1 January 2018

Academic Editor: Luis Carlos Rabelo

Copyright © 2018 Mehmet Fatih Hocaoğlu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Kuipers, “Qualitative simulation,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 289–338, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. B. Kuipers, Qualitative Reasoning: Modeling and Simulation with Incomplete Knowledge, MIT Press, New York, NY, YSA, 1994.
  3. J. De Kleer and J. S. Brown, “A qualitative physics based on confluences,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 1-3, pp. 7–83, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. K. D. Forbus, “Qualitative process theory,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 1-3, pp. 85–168, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Muzy, R. Jammalamadaka, B. P. Zeigler, and J. J. Nutaro, “The Activity-tracking paradigm in discrete-event modeling and simulation: The case of spatially continuous distributed systems,” Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International, vol. 5, no. 87, pp. 449–464, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. F. M. Hocaoğlu, Agent Based Simulation: Lecturer Notes, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2014.
  7. R. Ingalls, D. Morrice, and A. Whinston, “Interval time clock implementation for qualitative event graphs,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 574–580, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. Leow-Sehwail and R. Ingalls, “Qualitative Discrete Event Simulation,” in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 648–653, Orlando, FL, USA, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Leow-Sehwail and R. G. Ingalls, “Estimating the probability of an event execution in Qualitative Discrete Event Simulation,” in Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference - (WSC 2010), pp. 1133–1144, Baltimore, MD, USA, December 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Zeigler and S. Chi, “Symbolic discrete event system specification,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 1428–1443, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. R. G. Ingalls, D. J. Morrice, and A. B. Whinston, “The implementation of temporal intervals in qualitative simulation graphs,” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 215–240, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. G. Garani and G. K. Adam, “Qualitative Modelling of Manufacturing Machinery,” in Proceedings of the IECON 2006 - 32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics, pp. 3591–3596, Paris, France, November 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. F. M. Hocaoğlu, “A Comparison between Qualitative Simulation and Traditional Simulation?: Bridging the Conceptual Gap,” in AI, Simulation Planning in High Autonomy Systems-AIS2002, Lisbon, Portugal, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. J. Murray-Smith, Continuous System Simulation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, 1995.
  15. T. Eldabi, Z. Irani, R. J. Paul, and P. E. Love, “Quantitative and qualitative decision‐making methods in simulation modelling,” Management Decision, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 64–73, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Bucklew, Introduction to Rare Event Simulation, Springer, S. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis, USA, 2004.
  17. J. Nutaro, P. T. Kuruganti, V. Protopopescu, and M. Shankar, “The split system approach to managing time in simulations of hybrid systems having continuous and discrete event components,” Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International, vol. 3, no. 88, pp. 281–298, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar