Multiple Sclerosis International

Multiple Sclerosis International / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 681289 |

Mithu Storoni, Gordon T. Plant, "The Therapeutic Potential of the Ketogenic Diet in Treating Progressive Multiple Sclerosis", Multiple Sclerosis International, vol. 2015, Article ID 681289, 9 pages, 2015.

The Therapeutic Potential of the Ketogenic Diet in Treating Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Academic Editor: Francesco Patti
Received22 Sep 2015
Accepted02 Dec 2015
Published29 Dec 2015


Until recently, multiple sclerosis has been viewed as an entirely inflammatory disease without acknowledgment of the significant neurodegenerative component responsible for disease progression and disability. This perspective is being challenged by observations of a dissociation between inflammation and neurodegeneration where the neurodegenerative component may play a more significant role in disease progression. In this review, we explore the relationship between mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. We review evidence that the ketogenic diet can improve mitochondrial function and discuss the potential of the ketogenic diet in treating progressive multiple sclerosis for which no treatment currently exists.

1. Introduction

Jean-Martin Charcot’s careful clinical and pathological account of a patient with demyelinating lesions or “sclérose en plaques” in 1868 provided the world with the first clear description of multiple sclerosis (MS) [1]. Despite almost a century and a half of our acquaintance with this disease, its pathogenesis remains elusive and we continue to lack therapeutic options to treat progressive MS [2].

Eighty-five per cent of cases of MS present with recurring episodes of isolated neurological syndromes, which usually resolve with conservative management (termed relapsing and remitting or RRMS). The remaining 15% of cases present with a gradual and progressive loss of neurological function that does not recover (termed primary progressive or PPMS). Of the 85% of the cases who present with RRMS, the majority begins to suffer from progressive neurological decline after one to three decades (termed secondary progressive or SPMS) that is similar in pattern to PPMS [3, 4].

MS has traditionally been viewed as an immune-mediated inflammatory disease. An immune response is thought to be responsible for causing the spontaneously remitting relapses in RRMS. Immune cells migrate across a compromised blood brain barrier and cause the focal and disseminated inflammation typical for RRMS. The traditional view of MS as an inflammatory disease has resulted in almost all therapeutic strategies taking an immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive approach [2].

The idea of MS having a primarily inflammatory component is challenged by the observation that focal inflammation may be absent in a minority of cases of progressive MS [5]. Neurodegeneration may play a more central role in its pathogenesis [6]. As the majority of current therapeutic options for MS are based on immune therapy, there is at present no definitive therapy for progressive MS, whether primary or secondary [7].

Accumulating evidence of a dissociation between inflammation and disease progression warrants a revised perspective on the role of neurodegeneration in the pathogenesis of MS and therefore the therapeutic strategies. In this review, we explore the evidence of neurodegeneration and the players in its pathogenesis that lead us to the potential of the ketogenic diet for use as a therapy for progressive MS.

2. Is MS Primarily a Neurodegenerative Disease?

The traditional model of MS is based on an “outside-in” approach. In this model, a dysregulated immune system attacks the central nervous system. Peripheral immune cells cross a compromised blood brain barrier to enter the central nervous system and give rise to acute multifocal inflammatory lesions, which are either asymptomatic or manifest as relapses in RRMS involving a variety of neurological symptoms disseminated in time. Although RRMS is the commonest mode of MS presentation, the vast majority of patients presenting in this way enter into a progressive phase of MS (SPMS) as long as three decades after disease onset.

The duality of the inflammatory and neurodegenerative components is made salient by the observation that MS can “worsen” at exactly the same rate regardless of whether a patient started off with decades of isolated inflammatory relapses or entered directly into progressive MS. Pathophysiologically, no difference can be found between the two disease phenotypes [8, 9].

2.1. An Alternative Model of MS

Such evidence of a distinct dissociation between disease progression and inflammation has challenged the traditional “outside-in” approach. Progression in the absence of immune attacks is indicative of a separate and parallel pathogenic process. Some authors have proposed an “inside-out” model of MS where primary cellular degeneration is the initiating factor that then triggers inflammation [10]. The degeneration releases antigenic cellular matter that then invites an immune response.

2.2. Halting Inflammation Does Not Halt Disease Progression

Although there is as yet no conclusive evidence to suggest that degeneration might be the initial event that triggers the inflammation seen in MS (the age-old chicken and egg question), clinical findings support a dissociation between the two, where, at the very least, degeneration does not follow inflammation and may occur independently of inflammation. Most varieties of immune-modulating therapy that reduce and even eliminate inflammation have little bearing on the progress of MS in the very long-term, although a few of the newer immunomodulatory agents may hold greater promise [1114]. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation therapy, though highly efficacious at reducing inflammation, does not halt axonal degeneration and brain atrophy [15]. Progressive neurodegeneration and axonal atrophy in the absence of inflammation are observed in MS [16].

2.3. Harding Syndrome

There is pathological evidence in support of the theory that neurodegeneration may occur in complete isolation in MS without any evidence of preceding inflammation: foci of damage have been observed in the inner layers of the myelin sheath with the outer layers remaining intact. This starkly challenges the possibility of a T cell mediated external mechanism [17, 18]. In Harding syndrome, there is evidence that neurodegeneration precedes and then causes the neuroinflammation seen in classical MS. In this condition, the cellular degeneration occurring as a result of defective mitochondrial function may trigger an autoimmune response in those who are “immunologically primed” [19]. Although Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) is more penetrant in males, females are at greater risk of autoimmune disease and this may explain why there is a higher incidence of Harding syndrome with MS-like inflammation in females, despite involving the same mutation as LHON [20].

3. The Role of Mitochondria in Multiple Sclerosis

Whether neurodegeneration triggers inflammation or is triggered by inflammation or occurs as a parallel process, the evidence that MS involves neurodegeneration as well as neuroinflammation is ever increasing. Mitochondrial dysfunction is thought to play a central role in the neurodegenerative disease process and a growing body of evidence suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction may also be of great importance in the pathogenesis of MS [21, 22].

3.1. Mitochondrial Function May Determine the Fate of “Struggling” Axons

Axonal degeneration is a prominent feature of MS and is notably present even in the absence of local demyelination [23, 24]. Animal models suggest that mitochondrial injury may be a necessary step preceding axonal degeneration. The generation of reactive oxygen species may contribute to mitochondrial injury as the detoxification of reactive oxygen species reverses the injury and halts axonal degeneration [25].

Once chronically demyelinated, some axons degenerate while others may survive. It seems possible that mitochondrial “stealth” may determine the fate of demyelinated axons. Degenerating axons are seen to contain dysfunctional mitochondria, whereas the axons that survive demyelination contain highly functional mitochondria with increased respiratory chain activity [26, 27]. These findings mirror a recent study on glaucomatous optic neuropathy where it was observed that robust mitochondria may offer protection from neurodegeneration despite the presence of high intraocular pressures [28]. It is thought that, where axons degenerate following demyelination, they do so when energy production by mitochondria becomes inadequate. Mitochondrial function seems to determine the fate of axons under duress.

3.2. Mitochondrial Dysfunction Is Seen in “Normal Appearing” Grey Matter

Grey matter atrophy is a recognized feature of MS and the rate of atrophy is seen to increase as the RRMS stage progresses to SPMS [29]. Furthermore, neuronal atrophy can be seen to occur independently of demyelination, in areas of “normal appearing grey matter” as ascertained by immunohistochemical staining techniques and microscopy [30]. Mitochondrial function within cortical neurons in MS has been shown to be compromised. Campbell et al. (2011) used complex IV/complex II histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, laser dissection microscopy, and PCR and DNA sequencing methods to demonstrate a striking reduction in the activity of complexes II and IV within the oxidative phosphorylation chain in neurons obtained from autopsies of cases of SPMS [31].

3.3. Progressive Mitochondrial Compromise May Correlate with Reduced Recovery from Relapses

Levels of the transcriptional cofactor PGC-1a, which plays a key role in the activation of nuclear transcription factors involved in mitochondrial function, may be reduced in cortical neurons in progressive MS. Its expression was found to correlate with neuronal density [32]. Given the observation that the rate of brain atrophy increases as RRMS progresses to the SPMS, the decline in PGC-1a may suggest a parallel worsening in mitochondrial function [33]. During this stage of progression, recovery from relapses becomes progressively incomplete [34]. The progressive decline in mitochondrial function with a resulting decrease in ATP availability may plausibly cause a decline in axonal resilience, making recovery from each episode of relapse increasingly difficult.

A reduction in PGC-1a levels has also been observed in other neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer disease [35].

4. Mitochondria and Neurodegeneration

Several groups have proposed a model for neurodegeneration in which mitochondrial dysfunction is central to its pathogenesis [36, 37]. In this model, mitochondrial dysfunction precedes synaptic dysfunction, atrophy, and neuronal loss.

In an animal model of MS, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), mitochondrial injury has been shown to precede inflammation and to be the trigger for neurodegeneration [38]. Although the precise molecular pathways leading to mitochondrial damage remain unknown, oxidative damage is one possible route [39].

Early studies of antioxidant therapies in animal models of MS are showing promising results. Superoxide dismutase 2 has been shown to salvage axonal loss in EAE-related optic neuritis [40]. A synthetic antioxidant, Mito-Q, has been shown to be neuroprotective and delay disease progression in EAE, despite having no effect on inflammation, further confirming a dissociation between the two disease processes and demonstrating that neurodegeneration might be more worthy of therapeutic intervention in order to improve disease prognosis [41].

To date, one of the few available therapeutic options used in MS that may have some beneficial effects on progressive MS is Dimethyl Fumarate or DMF [42]. DMF is the only current therapy for MS that in addition to having an immunomodulatory effect is also a potent antioxidant agent. It is thought to reduce oxidative stress through the NRF-2 pathway and hence have a neuroprotective effect [43]. This neuroprotective effect has also been evident in other neurodegenerative settings [44].

5. Mitochondria as the Therapeutic Target for Progressive MS

The paucity of treatment options for progressive MS indicates an urgent need to find therapeutic targets. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegeneration suggests that targeting mitochondrial function may be a useful therapeutic strategy for progressive MS although clinical trials examining the efficacy of agents promoting mitochondrial function in non-MS diseases with known mitochondrial pathology have shown variable results. Some of this variability may stem from differences and difficulties faced with drug delivery and dosage [45].

There are a limited number of studies to date testing the efficacy of agents that target mitochondrial function in the setting of MS, but they offer considerable promise in the efficacy of mitochondria-targeted therapy. Coenzyme Q10 has antioxidant properties and forms part of the electron transport chain interacting with complex I. A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study of Coenzyme Q10 supplementation over 12 weeks in patients with relapsing and remitting MS demonstrated a reduction in IL-6 and MMP-9 levels [46]. The results of another similar trial by the same group demonstrated a reduction in depression and fatigue [47].

Mouse models of MS (EAE) are based on an immune/inflammatory model and not a degenerative model limiting the ability of the mouse model to accurately reflect the oxidative damage occurring in human MS. This may explain some inconsistencies in the results obtained from mouse model studies of MS [48, 49]. Mito-Q, an antioxidant that contains ubiquinone, has been shown to delay disease progression and reduce neuronal cell loss in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis; however, one study using a synthetic analogue of Coenzyme Q10 failed to prevent disease progression [50].

6. Glucose Hypometabolism

Some studies have suggested that there may be a bioenergetic shift taking place within neuronal metabolism prior to the onset of clinical signs of neurodegeneration, where glucose uptake and utilization become progressively reduced. This glucose hypometabolism may reflect a decline in mitochondrial function. The shift has been observed to occur long before the onset of clinical signs of neurodegeneration, suggesting the possibility that glucose hypometabolism may be the initial step leading to axonal atrophy and neuronal loss through a reduction in ATP availability [5154]. The bioenergetic shift appears to specifically affect the metabolism of glucose. No such shift is seen with ketone body metabolism [54, 55].

6.1. Glucose Hypometabolism in MS

The neurodegenerative process underlying progressive MS may also result in glucose hypometabolism. This would suggest a potential therapeutic advantage in boosting energy supply through an alternative route, such as ketone metabolism. A study that compared 47 MS patients with varying levels of fatigue and 16 healthy controls showed that the patients had reduced cerebral glucose metabolism in various regions within the brain, including the prefrontal, premotor, and supplementary motor areas and the putamen when compared to control subjects. There was an inverse correlation between degree of fatigue and glucose metabolic rate [56]. Another study on 8 MS patients and 8 gender matched healthy control subjects demonstrated lower glucose uptake in 40% of the brain compared to healthy controls [57].

Extramitochondrial metabolism increases in the presence of impaired mitochondrial metabolism of glucose. In a pilot study comparing 85 patients with relapsing and remitting MS and 54 patients with secondary progressive MS as well as 18 healthy controls, extramitochondrial glucose metabolism showed a correlation with disease progression, suggesting that impaired mitochondrial metabolism of glucose may play a significant role in disease progression in progressive MS [58].

Further molecular evidence of impaired glucose metabolism playing a role in MS is seen in the altered distribution of glucose (GLUT) and monocarboxylate transporters (MCT) within chronic lesions of MS where there is a decline in axonal GLUT3 and MCT2 expression. These changes may confer resistance to glucose entry into demyelinated axons, depriving them of adequate fuel supply resulting in glucose hypometabolism [59].

The possibility that providing the brain with an alternative source of fuel may reduce the rate of neurodegeneration is a promising avenue to explore, particularly where there remains a paucity of therapeutic options [60].

7. The Potential of Ketones to Provide an Alternative Fuel Supply

In 1967, Cahill et al. demonstrated that, during prolonged fasting, the body provides the brain with an alternative source of fuel, in the form of ketone bodies. The central nervous system is unable to use fat as a direct energy source and after prolonged carbohydrate restriction, fat is converted into ketone bodies in a process referred to as “ketogenesis.” Ketogenesis takes place primarily within the matrix of mitochondria located within the liver. Ketogenesis results in the production of the ketone bodies beta-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate, and acetone which replace glucose as the brain’s main sources of fuel [61]. Hans Krebs first made the distinction between the normal, “physiological” ketosis that is induced when following a carbohydrate-restricted diet where levels of ketones do not exceed 8 mmol/L and diabetic ketoacidosis, a complication of diabetes where ketonaemia can exceed 20 mmol/L and result in acidosis [62]. Ketone bodies can easily cross the blood brain barrier and the brain’s usage of ketone bodies increases as their concentration in the serum increases, up to a concentration of 12 mmol/L [63]. A meta-analysis of animal studies has shown that the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose decreases 9% with every 1 mmol/L increase in total plasma ketones. Ketones bypass the glycolytic pathway and directly enter the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) cycle within mitochondria, contributing to anaplerosis.

8. A Ketogenic Diet for the Neurodegenerative Component of Progressive MS

The ketogenic diet has traditionally been used for the treatment of resistant epilepsy, but it is increasingly becoming apparent that its benefits may apply to a wider spectrum of neurological disease. Although research on its use outside the realms of epilepsy is still at its infancy, the findings are promising and hold great potential for the treatment of neurodegeneration, particularly with regard to mitochondrial function.

A ketogenic diet has a favourable effect on mitochondrial function. It reduces levels of reactive oxygen species and increases ATP availability. The diet may provide neuroprotection and reduce inflammation. Ketones produced during a ketogenic diet can be used as an alternative source of fuel in the setting of impaired glucose metabolism.

9. The Effect of the Ketogenic Diet on Oxidative Stress

A ketogenic diet has been shown to reduce the generation of reactive oxygen species through its effect on uncoupling proteins. It also increases levels of antioxidant agents including catalase and glutathione through its inhibitory action on histone deacetylases and activation of the Nrf2 pathway.

9.1. The Ketogenic Diet Increases Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein Levels

The process of oxidative phosphorylation generates reactive oxygen species. The extent of reactive oxygen species generation correlates strongly with the potential difference across the inner mitochondrial membrane. Uncoupling proteins (UCPs) can reduce this potential difference by allowing the entry of protons into the mitochondrial matrix. Although this “mild” uncoupling may incur a small reduction in ATP generated through oxidative phosphorylation, its overall net effect is to enhance respiration and ATP levels through a reduction in reactive oxygen species formation and protection from apoptotic events [64]. A ketogenic diet appears to promote UCP activity, specifically the activity of UCP2, UCP4, and UCP5 with a corresponding decline in reactive oxygen species [65].

9.2. Ketones Inhibit Histone Deacetylases

The ketone beta-hydroxybutyrate has a direct, dose-dependent inhibitory activity on class I histone deacetylases (HDACs) including HDAC1, HDAC3, and HDAC4. The ketone acetoacetate has also been shown to inhibit class I and class IIa HDACs. Beta-hydroxybutyrate’s inhibition of HDAC promotes the acetylation of histone H3 lysine 9 and histone H3 lysine 14 and increases the transcription of genes regulated by FOXO3A. These include genes leading to the expression of the antioxidant enzymes mitochondrial superoxide dismutase and catalase [66].

9.3. A Ketogenic Diet Leads to the Activation of the Nrf2 Pathway

The ketogenic diet raises glutathione levels in the hippocampus of rats [67]. This is thought to occur through the Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor) pathway. When the ketogenic diet is first initiated, there is a temporary increase in oxidative stress. This may be activating Nrf2, since, a week after the temporary rise in oxidative stress, there is increased expression of Nrf2. Three weeks after the start of the diet, oxidative stress declines to below baseline levels and Nrf2 remains raised [68].

10. The Effect of the Ketogenic Diet on ATP Levels

A ketogenic diet enhances ATP production. The administration of beta-hydroxybutyrate immediately following bilateral common carotid artery ligation in a mouse model of global cerebral ischaemia preserves ATP levels [69]. Feeding mice a ketogenic diet for three weeks resulted in increased levels of ATP and the ATP/ADP ratio in the brain [70].

The improvement in ATP levels may partly be explained through the ability of the ketogenic diet to reduce oxidative stress. Although the diet may reduce reactive oxygen species generation through an increase in UCP activity, any reduction in oxidative phosphorylation incurred through UCP activity is outweighed by the enhancement of respiration and associated ATP production occurring as a result of reduced oxidative stress.

A ketogenic diet also appears to preserve ATP levels in the event of mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction, possibly through the replenishment of TCA cycle intermediates [71]. Beta-hydroxybutyrate attenuates the decrease in ATP production caused by a defect in complex I of the electron transport chain. It is thought to increase levels of the TCA intermediate succinate, which bypasses complex I when entering the TCA cycle [65, 72]. This carries considerable implications for MS, since defects in complex I within the electron transport chain have been observed in white matter lesions as well as in “normal” regions of the motor cortex [39, 73]. Ketones can also preserve ATP levels if complex II of the electron transport chain is inhibited, but this effect shows some regional specificity [74].

11. The Effect of the Ketogenic Diet on Mitochondrial Biogenesis

Mitochondrial biogenesis within the rat hippocampus and cerebellar vermis is increased by the ketogenic diet [75, 76]. Although the precise pathway for this is not known, it is thought to involve the PGC1α family of transcriptional coactivators, which promote transcription factors including NRF-1, NRF-2, and ERRα [77].

12. The Effect of the Ketogenic Diet on Inflammation

The anti-inflammatory effect of a ketogenic diet has been demonstrated in a murine model of lipopolysaccharide-induced fever [78]. In a rat model of MS, the diet suppressed the expression of inflammatory cytokines and enhanced CA1 hippocampal synaptic plasticity and long-term potentiation, which resulted in improved learning, memory, and motor ability [79]. The anti-inflammatory effect of a ketogenic diet may partly be explained through the inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome by beta-hydroxybutyrate in a manner that is independent of starvation-induced mechanisms such as AMPK, autophagy, or glycolytic inhibition. The NLRP3 inflammasome is responsible for the cleavage of procaspase-1 into caspase-1 and the activation of the cytokines IL-1β and IL-18. Its inhibition prevents IL-1β and IL-18 generation and their downstream effects [80].

13. The Neuroprotective Properties of the Ketogenic Diet

Ketone bodies play a neuroprotective role in animal models of neurodegeneration [69, 81]. ATP-sensitive potassium channels (K ATP channels) located on the cell surface of neurons stabilize neuronal excitability. Ketones promote an “open state” of these channels and confer neuronal stability [82]. K ATP channels also play a role in mitochondrial function and in cell death. The “open state” of K ATP channels located on the inner mitochondrial membrane prevents the formation of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (MPTPs) that can lead to mitochondrial swelling and cell death. Acetoacetate and beta-hydroxybutyrate have been shown to increase the threshold for calcium-induced MPTP formation [83].

14. The Regional Variation of the Effect of Ketones in the Mouse Cerebellum

Despite these seemingly positive effects on mitochondrial bioenergetics, the effects of a ketogenic diet on mitochondria within the mouse brain are not homogenous and some results appear conflicting. Although the study on the murine model of EAE demonstrated improved CA1 synaptic plasticity, in another study, on rats, although a KD prevented age-related morphological changes within the outer layer of the dentate gyrus of the cerebellum, it produced negative changes within the CA1 region [84]. In a study on rats fed a ketogenic diet for 8 weeks, antioxidant status was elevated within the hippocampus but not in the cerebral cortex and antioxidant activity was seen to be reduced within the cerebellum [85].

15. Human Studies

At present, there is a paucity of human studies on the use of ketones/the ketogenic diet in neurodegenerative disorders. There exists one recent, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study looking at the effects of ketones on a neurodegenerative phenotype in 152 participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease, which found an improvement in cognitive scores when the oral ketogenic compound AC-1202 was used over a 90-day period. This improvement was greater in patients lacking the APOE4 polymorphism [86]. Smaller studies in other neurodegenerative settings have provided similarly positive results [87].

There is evidence of glucose transporter dysfunction within axons subjected to chronic lesions in MS and studies on subjects with inherited glucose transporter dysfunction who followed the ketogenic diet have yielded positive results [59, 88, 89].

16. Conclusion

The ketogenic diet has the potential to treat the neurodegenerative component of progressive MS on the basis of the following observations obtained from in vitro and in vivo studies,(1)Neurodegeneration is thought to underlie the pathogenesis of progressive MS.(2)Mitochondrial dysfunction may result in reduced ATP availability. This may promote axonal atrophy, leading to degeneration. There is evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction within “normal appearing” grey matter and mitochondrial function appears to correlate with axonal survival.(3)According to in vitro and animal studies, the ketogenic diet increases ATP production, promotes mitochondrial biogenesis, and bypasses dysfunctional steps within the mitochondrial bioenergetic process, increases antioxidant levels and reduces oxidative damage. Since an increase in ATP and overall improvement in mitochondrial functioning correlates with axonal survival, the ketogenic diet may offer a therapeutic benefit for the neurodegenerative component of MS.These premises are largely theoretical with regard to the contextual application of the ketogenic diet in MS as there is no data currently available on the ketogenic diet from human studies on MS. Animal models of EAE do not accurately represent the underlying pathogenesis of MS, since neurodegeneration does not play a significant role in EAE. Mitochondria-targeting agents, ketones, and the ketogenic diet have however shown positive results in several models of neurodegeneration, and given the complete absence of available treatment for progressive MS, the relatively safe option of a ketogenic diet deserves further investigation in the context of progressive MS.

Despite its high fat component, the ketogenic diet is safe and even beneficial for cardiometabolic risk factors [90]. It has been in continuous use for almost a century for the treatment of epilepsy and has shown good tolerability, even in children [91]. Current ketogenic diet protocols involve a range of options, which encourages patient compliance. Where compliance may pose a challenge, mimicry of various components of the ketogenic pathway through the use of ketone analogues may offer a palatable therapeutic option [92]. Supplementation with ketones to induce ketosis has also shown an acceptable safety and tolerability profile [93].

Current treatment options in MS affect immune function and relapse rate with little effect on disease progression. They are sometimes accompanied with significant side effects including lymphopenia, multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and malignancy [7]. Consequently, it may be more favourable for some patients to pursue a relatively risk-free dietary approach that has the potential to reduce disease progression without affecting immune response. In conclusion, the ketogenic diet deserves further investigation for the purposes of treating progressive MS for which there currently exists no treatment.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. J. M. Pearce, “Historical descriptions of multiple sclerosis,” European Neurology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. H. Cross and R. T. Naismith, “Established and novel disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 275, no. 4, pp. 350–363, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. D. Lublin and S. C. Reingold, “Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey,” Neurology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 907–911, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. H. Polman, S. C. Reingold, B. Banwell et al., “Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 292–302, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. N. P. Zwemmer, J. C. J. Bot, B. Jelles, F. Barkhof, and C. H. Polman, “At the heart of primary progressive multiple sclerosis: three cases with diffuse MRI abnormalities only,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 428–430, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Lassmann, J. van Horssen, and D. Mahad, “Progressive multiple sclerosis: pathology and pathogenesis,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 647–656, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. M. Wingerchuk and J. L. Carter, “Multiple sclerosis: current and emerging disease-modifying therapies and treatment strategies,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 225–240, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Lassmann, W. Brück, and C. F. Lucchinetti, “The immunopathology of multiple sclerosis: an overview,” Brain Pathology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 210–218, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Confavreux and S. Vukusic, “Natural history of multiple sclerosis: a unifying concept,” Brain, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 606–616, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. K. Stys, G. W. Zamponi, J. van Minnen, and J. J. G. Geurts, “Will the real multiple sclerosis please stand up?” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 507–514, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Hawker, “Progressive multiple sclerosis: characteristics and management,” Neurologic Clinics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 423–434, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Hawker, P. O'Connor, M. S. Freedman et al., “Rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 460–471, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. A. Cohen, A. J. Coles, D. L. Arnold et al., “Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a as first-line treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9856, pp. 1819–1828, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. J. Coles, C. L. Twyman, D. L. Arnold et al., “Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9856, pp. 1829–1839, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Inglese, G. L. Mancardi, E. Pagani et al., “Brain tissue loss occurs after suppression of enhancement in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 643–644, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  16. C. F. Lucchinetti, R. H. Gavrilova, I. Metz et al., “Clinical and radiographic spectrum of pathologically confirmed tumefactive multiple sclerosis,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 1759–1775, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Rodriguez and B. Scheithauer, “Ultrastructure of multiple sclerosis,” Ultrastructural Pathology, vol. 18, no. 1-2, pp. 3–13, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Charil and M. Filippi, “Inflammatory demyelination and neurodegeneration in early multiple sclerosis,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 259, no. 1-2, pp. 7–15, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. K. Stys, “Multiple sclerosis: autoimmune disease or autoimmune reaction?” The Canadian Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 37, supplement 2, pp. S16–S23, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. S. Cooper and B. C. Stroehla, “The epidemiology of autoimmune diseases,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 119–125, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. E. Witte, D. J. Mahad, H. Lassmann, and J. van Horssen, “Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 179–187, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. T. Lin and M. F. Beal, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases,” Nature, vol. 443, no. 7113, pp. 787–795, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. E. T. Wood, I. Ronen, A. Techawiboonwong et al., “Investigating axonal damage in multiple sclerosis by diffusion tensor spectroscopy,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 19, pp. 6665–6669, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. D. Trapp, J. Peterson, R. M. Ransohoff, R. Rudick, S. Mörk, and L. Bö, “Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 338, no. 5, pp. 278–285, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. I. Nikić, D. Merkler, C. Sorbara et al., “A reversible form of axon damage in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 495–499, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. E. Witte, L. Bø, R. J. Rodenburg et al., “Enhanced number and activity of mitochondria in multiple sclerosis lesions,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 219, no. 2, pp. 193–204, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Kiryu-Seo, N. Ohno, G. J. Kidd, H. Komuro, and B. D. Trapp, “Demyelination increases axonal stationary mitochondrial size and the speed of axonal mitochondrial transport,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 19, pp. 6658–6666, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Lascaratos, K.-Y. Chau, H. Zhu et al., “Resistance to the most common optic neuropathy is associated with systemic mitochondrial efficiency,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 82, pp. 78–85, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. Fisher, J.-C. Lee, K. Nakamura, and R. A. Rudick, “Gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 255–265, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. Magliozzi, O. W. Howell, C. Reeves et al., “A gradient of neuronal loss and meningeal inflammation in multiple sclerosis,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 477–493, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. R. Campbell, I. Ziabreva, A. K. Reeve et al., “Mitochondrial DNA deletions and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 481–492, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. E. Witte, P. G. Nijland, J. A. R. Drexhage et al., “Reduced expression of PGC-1α partly underlies mitochondrial changes and correlates with neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis cortex,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 231–243, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Ge, R. I. Grossman, J. K. Udupa et al., “Brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Longitudinal quantitative analysis,” Radiology, vol. 214, no. 3, pp. 665–670, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. Piehl, “A changing treatment landscape for multiple sclerosis: challenges and opportunities,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 275, no. 4, pp. 364–381, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. W. Qin, V. Haroutunian, P. Katsel et al., “PGC-1α expression decreases in the Alzheimer disease brain as a function of dementia,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 352–361, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. F. Beal, B. T. Hyman, and W. Koroshetz, “Do defects in mitochondrial energy metabolism underlie the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases?” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 125–131, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. H. Swerdlow and S. M. Khan, “A ‘mitochondrial cascade hypothesis’ for sporadic Alzheimer's disease,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 8–20, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. X. Qi, A. S. Lewin, L. Sun, W. W. Hauswirth, and J. Guy, “Mitochondrial protein nitration primes neurodegeneration in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 42, pp. 31950–31962, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Dutta, J. McDonough, X. Yin et al., “Mitochondrial dysfunction as a cause of axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis patients,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 478–489, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. X. Qi, A. S. Lewin, L. Sun, W. W. Hauswirth, and J. Guy, “Suppression of mitochondrial oxidative stress provides long-term neuroprotection in experimental optic neuritis,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 681–691, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. Mao, M. Manczak, U. P. Shirendeb, and P. H. Reddy, “MitoQ, a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant, delays disease progression and alleviates pathogenesis in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mouse model of multiple sclerosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1832, no. 12, pp. 2322–2331, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Strassburger-Krogias, G. Ellrichmann, C. Krogias, P. Altmeyer, A. Chan, and R. Gold, “Fumarate treatment in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis: first results of a single-center observational study,” Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 232–238, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. R. A. Linker, D.-H. Lee, S. Ryan et al., “Fumaric acid esters exert neuroprotective effects in neuroinflammation via activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway,” Brain, vol. 134, part 3, pp. 678–692, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. Ellrichmann, E. Petrasch-Parwez, D.-H. Lee et al., “Efficacy of fumaric acid esters in the R6/2 and YAC128 models of Huntington’s disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e16172, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. D. S. Kerr, “Review of clinical trials for mitochondrial disorders: 1997–2012,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 307–319, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Sanoobar, S. Eghtesadi, A. Azimi et al., “Coenzyme Q10 supplementation ameliorates inflammatory markers in patients with multiple sclerosis: a double blind, placebo, controlled randomized clinical trial,” Nutritional Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 169–176, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Sanoobar, P. Dehghan, M. Khalili, A. Azimi, and F. Seifar, “Coenzyme Q10 as a treatment for fatigue and depression in multiple sclerosis patients: a double blind randomized clinical trial,” Nutritional Neuroscience, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. M. Fiebiger, H. Bros, T. Grobosch et al., “The antioxidant idebenone fails to prevent or attenuate chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the mouse,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 262, no. 1-2, pp. 66–71, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Schuh, I. Wimmer, S. Hametner et al., “Oxidative tissue injury in multiple sclerosis is only partly reflected in experimental disease models,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 247–266, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. L. Mosconi, “Brain glucose metabolism in the early and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. FDG-PET studies in MCI and AD,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 486–510, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. L. Mosconi, R. Mistur, R. Switalski et al., “FDG-PET changes in brain glucose metabolism from normal cognition to pathologically verified Alzheimer's disease,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 811–822, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. L. Mosconi, M. Brys, R. Switalski et al., “Maternal family history of Alzheimer's disease predisposes to reduced brain glucose metabolism,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 48, pp. 19067–19072, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. E. M. Reiman, K. Chen, G. E. Alexander et al., “Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's dementia,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 284–289, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C.-A. Castellano, S. Nugent, N. Paquet et al., “Lower brain 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake but normal 11C-acetoacetate metabolism in mild Alzheimer's disease dementia,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1343–1353, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Nugent, S. Tremblay, K. W. Chen et al., “Brain glucose and acetoacetate metabolism: a comparison of young and older adults,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1386–1395, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. U. Roelcke, L. Kappos, J. Lechner-Scott et al., “Reduced glucose metabolism in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia of multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue: a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography study,” Neurology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1566–1571, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. H. Kindred, J. J. Tuulari, M. Bucci, K. K. Kalliokoski, and T. Rudroff, “Walking speed and brain glucose uptake are uncoupled in patients with multiple sclerosis,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 9, article 84, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. W. T. Regenold, P. Phatak, M. J. Makley, R. D. Stone, and M. A. Kling, “Cerebrospinal fluid evidence of increased extra-mitochondrial glucose metabolism implicates mitochondrial dysfunction in multiple sclerosis disease progression,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 275, no. 1-2, pp. 106–112, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. P. G. Nijland, I. Michailidou, M. E. Witte et al., “Cellular distribution of glucose and monocarboxylate transporters in human brain white matter and multiple sclerosis lesions,” Glia, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1125–1141, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L. C. Costantini, L. J. Barr, J. L. Vogel, and S. T. Henderson, “Hypometabolism as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer's disease,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 9, supplement 2, article S16, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. O. E. Owen, A. P. Morgan, H. G. Kemp, J. M. Sullivan, M. G. Herrera, and G. F. Cahill Jr., “Brain metabolism during fasting,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1589–1595, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. H. A. Krebs, “The regulation of the release of ketone bodies by the liver,” Advances in Enzyme Regulation, vol. 4, pp. 339–353, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. Y. Zhang, Y. Kuang, K. Xu et al., “Ketosis proportionately spares glucose utilization in brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1307–1311, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. P. G. Sullivan, J. E. Springer, E. D. Hall, and S. W. Scheff, “Mitochondrial uncoupling as a therapeutic target following neuronal injury,” Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 353–356, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. P. G. Sullivan, N. A. Rippy, K. Dorenbos, R. C. Concepcion, A. K. Agarwal, and J. M. Rho, “The ketogenic diet increases mitochondrial uncoupling protein levels and activity,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 576–580, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. T. Shimazu, M. D. Hirschey, J. Newman et al., “Suppression of oxidative stress by β-hydroxybutyrate, an endogenous histone deacetylase inhibitor,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6116, pp. 211–214, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. G. Jarrett, J. B. Milder, L.-P. Liang, and M. Patel, “The ketogenic diet increases mitochondrial glutathione levels,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 1044–1051, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. B. Milder, L.-P. Liang, and M. Patel, “Acute oxidative stress and systemic Nrf2 activation by the ketogenic diet,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 238–244, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. M. Suzuki, M. Suzuki, K. Sato et al., “Effect of β-hydroxybutyrate, a cerebral function improving agent, on cerebral hypoxia, anoxia and ischemia in mice and rats,” Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 143–150, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. D. C. DeVivo, M. P. Leckie, J. S. Ferrendelli, and D. B. McDougal Jr., “Chronic ketosis and cerebral metabolism,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 331–337, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. S. Kovac, A. Y. Abramov, and M. C. Walker, “Energy depletion in seizures: anaplerosis as a strategy for future therapies,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 69, pp. 96–104, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. K. Tieu, C. Perier, C. Caspersen et al., “D-β-hydroxybutyrate rescues mitochondrial respiration and mitigates features of Parkinson disease,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 892–901, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. F. Lu, M. Selak, J. O'Connor et al., “Oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA and activity of mitochondrial enzymes in chronic active lesions of multiple sclerosis,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 95–103, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. D. Y. Kim, J. Vallejo, and J. M. Rho, “Ketones prevent synaptic dysfunction induced by mitochondrial respiratory complex inhibitors,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 130–141, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. K. J. Bough, J. Wetherington, B. Hassel et al., “Mitochondrial biogenesis in the anticonvulsant mechanism of the ketogenic diet,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 223–235, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. Balietti, B. Giorgetti, G. Di Stefano et al., “A ketogenic diet increases succinic dehydrogenase (SDH) activity and recovers age-related decrease in numeric density of SDH-positive mitochondria in cerebellar Purkinje cells of late-adult rats,” Micron, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 143–148, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. R. C. Scarpulla, “Metabolic control of mitochondrial biogenesis through the PGC-1 family regulatory network,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1813, no. 7, pp. 1269–1278, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. N. Dupuis, N. Curatolo, J. F. Benoist, and S. Auvin, “Ketogenic diet exhibits anti-inflammatory properties,” Epilepsia, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. e95–e98, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. D. Y. Kim, J. Hao, R. Liu, G. Turner, F.-D. Shi, and J. M. Rho, “Inflammation-mediated memory dysfunction and effects of a ketogenic diet in a murine model of multiple sclerosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID e35476, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. Y.-H. Youm, K. Y. Nguyen, R. W. Grant et al., “The ketone metabolite β-hydroxybutyrate blocks NLRP3 inflammasome—mediated inflammatory disease,” Nature Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 263–269, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. Y. Kashiwaya, T. Takeshima, N. Mori, K. Nakashima, K. Clarke, and R. L. Veech, “D-beta-hydroxybutyrate protects neurons in models of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 10, pp. 5440–5444, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. D. Y. Kim, M. G. Abdelwahab, S. H. Lee et al., “Ketones prevent oxidative impairment of hippocampal synaptic integrity through KATP channels,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0119316, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. D. Y. Kim, L. M. Davis, P. G. Sullivan et al., “Ketone bodies are protective against oxidative stress in neocortical neurons,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1316–1326, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M. Balietti, B. Giorgetti, P. Fattoretti et al., “Ketogenic diets cause opposing changes in synaptic morphology in CA1 hippocampus and dentate gyrus of late-adult rats,” Rejuvenation Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 631–640, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. D. R. Ziegler, L. C. Ribeiro, M. Hagenn et al., “Ketogenic diet increases glutathione peroxidase activity in rat hippocampus,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1793–1797, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. S. T. Henderson, J. L. Vogel, L. J. Barr, F. Garvin, J. J. Jones, and L. C. Costantini, “Study of the ketogenic agent AC-1202 in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial,” Nutrition & Metabolism, vol. 6, article 31, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. T. B. Vanitallie, C. Nonas, A. Di Rocco, K. Boyar, K. Hyams, and S. B. Heymsfield, “Treatment of Parkinson disease with diet-induced hyperketonemia: a feasibility study,” Neurology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 728–730, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  88. A. Ramm-Pettersen, K. O. Nakken, I. M. Skogseid et al., “Good outcome in patients with early dietary treatment of GLUT-1 deficiency syndrome: results from a retrospective Norwegian study,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 440–447, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. Y. Ito, H. Oguni, S. Ito, M. Oguni, and M. Osawa, “A modified Atkins diet is promising as a treatment for glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 658–663, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. F. Cicero, M. Benelli, M. Brancaleoni, G. Dainelli, D. Merlini, and R. Negri, “Middle and long-term impact of a very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet on cardiometabolic factors: a multi-center, cross-sectional, clinical study,” High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 389–394, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. A. Dressler, P. Trimmel-Schwahofer, E. Reithofer et al., “Efficacy and tolerability of the ketogenic diet in Dravet syndrome—comparison with various standard antiepileptic drug regimen,” Epilepsy Research, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 81–89, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. S. D. Hughes, M. Kanabus, G. Anderson et al., “The ketogenic diet component decanoic acid increases mitochondrial citrate synthase and complex I activity in neuronal cells,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 426–433, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. K. Clarke, K. Tchabanenko, R. Pawlosky et al., “Kinetics, safety and tolerability of (R)-3-hydroxybutyl (R)-3-hydroxybutyrate in healthy adult subjects,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 401–408, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Mithu Storoni and Gordon T. Plant. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.