Comparing the Efficacy of Excitatory Transcranial Stimulation Methods Measuring Motor Evoked Potentials

Table 1

Results of the repeated measurement ANOVAs.

Stimulation (I )	Stimulation (J )	Middle difference (I-J )	SEM	Sig.^a	95% confidence interval for the difference^a
					Upper	Lower
Sham	atDCS	−0.221*	0.039	0.001	−0.345	−0.096
	iTBS	−0.197*	0.047	0.008	−0.346	−0.048
	tRNS	−0.319*	0.098	0.045	−0.633	−0.006
atDCS	Sham	0.221*	0.039	0.001	0.096	0.345
	iTBS	0.024	0.047	1.000	−0.128	0.176
	tRNS	−0.099	0.092	1.000	−0.393	0.195
iTBS	Sham	0.197*	0.047	0.008	0.048	0.346
	atDCS	−0.024	0.047	1.000	−0.176	0.128
	tRNS	−0.123	0.109	1.000	−0.471	0.226
tRNS	Sham	0.319*	0.098	0.045	0.006	0.633
	atDCS	0.099	0.092	1.000	−0.195	0.393
	iTBS	0.123	0.109	1.000	−0.226	0.471

∗The middle differencence is on the 0.05-level significance.
^aBonferroni corrected sign.