Neural Plasticity

Neural Plasticity / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Brain and Behavior Plasticity: From Fundamental Science to Health Outcomes

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 302878 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/302878

Age-Related Reduced Somatosensory Gating Is Associated with Altered Alpha Frequency Desynchronization

Academic Editor: Aage R. Møller
Received15 Dec 2014
Revised24 Feb 2015
Accepted24 Feb 2015
Published31 Aug 2015

Abstract

Sensory gating (SG), referring to an attenuated neural response to the second identical stimulus, is considered as preattentive processing in the central nervous system to filter redundant sensory inputs. Insufficient somatosensory SG has been found in the aged adults, particularly in the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII). However, it remains unclear which variables leading to the age-related somatosensory SG decline. There has been evidence showing a relationship between brain oscillations and cortical evoked excitability. Thus, this study used whole-head magnetoencephalography to record responses to paired-pulse electrical stimulation to the left median nerve in healthy young and elderly participants to test whether insufficient stimulus 1- (S1-) induced event-related desynchronization (ERD) contributes to a less-suppressed stimulus 2- (S2-) evoked response. Our analysis revealed that the minimum norm estimates showed age-related reduction of SG in the bilateral SII regions. Spectral power analysis showed that the elderly demonstrated significantly reduced alpha ERD in the contralateral SII (SIIc). Moreover, it was striking to note that lower S1-induced alpha ERD was associated with higher S2-evoked amplitudes in the SIIc among the aged adults. Conclusively, our findings suggest that age-related decline of somatosensory SG is partially attributed to the altered S1-induced oscillatory activity.

1. Introduction

Despite the continuous attention to the age-related changes in the higher hierarchical cognitive function, recent imaging studies have shown that the early-phase perceptual process, for example, cortical inhibition or sensory gating (SG), is also modulated by aging [17]. Most importantly, this cortical disinhibition has been linked to the aberrant neuropsychological or behavioral performance [5, 8, 9].

Compelling evidence shows that electrical stimulation to the median nerve elicits synchronous cortical reactivity in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) and bilateral secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) [1014]. By using paired-pulse electrical stimulation, in which two stimulus pulses in close succession are presented, it has been extensively applied to study the functional integrity of cortical inhibition or excitability in various clinical disorders, such as schizophrenia [15], traumatic brain injury [16], complex regional pain syndrome [17], dystonia [18], migraine [19], and aging [3, 5]. Quantitatively, SG is measured as the amplitude ratio of stimulus 2-evoked responses over stimulus 1-evoked responses (S2/S1) [20]. A larger S2/S1 ratio is indicative of reduced cortical inhibition. With this technique, one previous event-related potential (ERP) study has revealed an age-associated SG defect in the human SI [5]. Very recently, our magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study by applying equivalent current dipole (ECD) modeling has demonstrated that the neurophysiological responses of the SII are particularly vulnerable to aging in terms of cortical SG [2].

In addition to phase-locked evoked responses, non-phase-locked brain oscillations might be implicated in the basic somatosensory perceptual processing [21]. Cortical oscillation is considered to reflect the excitability of thalamocortical systems and can be modulated by exogenous or endogenous events [22]. Event-related desynchronization (ERD) represents a decrease in synchronization of a specific frequency in relation to the activation of the somatosensory system [2325]. Previous studies have reported significant alpha and/or beta ERD in the SI [2629] and SII [3032] following electrical or laser stimulation among the young healthy adults. However, it still remains unclear whether the somatosensory ERD is affected by physiological aging.

Although previous literature has demonstrated reduced somatosensory SG as a function of age, the possible contributing factors or variables are obscure. An association between oscillatory activity and cortical excitability in the sensorimotor cortex has been shown [31, 33, 34]. Here, we were intrigued to examine whether S1-induced ERD activity serves as a possible factor to account for the age-related alterations in the S2-evoked excitability.

Specifically, this MEG study aimed (1) to investigate the effects of aging on somatosensory cortical alpha and beta ERD induced by median nerve stimulation and (2) to determine the relation between S1-induced ERD and S2-evoked responses. Our working hypothesis was that the elderly might demonstrate reduced somatosensory SG and ERD magnitude. Finally, we predicted that a less-suppressed S2-evoked activity in the aged adults might be associated with deficient S1-induced ERD.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Eighteen young (mean years) and fifteen elderly (mean years) healthy male volunteers participated in this study. All subjects were right-handed with no history of neurological or psychiatric disorders. The majority of these participants were from our previous research project [2]. The Institutional Review Board of the Taipei Veterans General Hospital approved the protocol, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

2.2. Paradigm

The left median nerve was stimulated at the wrist with 0.2 ms constant-current square-wave pulses by an electrical stimulator (Konstantstrom Stimulator, Schwind, Erlangen, Germany). Stimulus intensity was set at 20% above the motor threshold for eliciting a visible twitch of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (young = 4.4 ± 0.1 mA, elderly = 4.6 ± 0.1 mA; ; unpaired two-tailed t-test). Stimuli were delivered in pairs with an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 0.5 s and an interpair interval of 8 s. The ISI of ~0.5 s allowed us to simultaneously examine the whole somatosensory system, including SI and bilateral SII areas [2, 15, 31]. Subjects were asked to ignore the stimulation and focus on a silent video, in which way we could examine the preattentive responses without contamination by anticipation effects.

2.3. MEG Recordings

The cortical magnetic fields were recorded with whole-head 306-channel MEG (Vectorview, Elekta Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland). The data from planar gradiometers of this device, which detect the largest signal directly above the activated cerebral areas [35], were analyzed. The coil locations in relation to the anatomical landmarks (left preauricular point, right preauricular point, and nasion) were determined with a 3D digitizer.

The MEG signals were digitized at a sampling rate of 500 Hz, with an online bandpass of  Hz. An interval of 0.5 s, including a prestimulus baseline of 0.1 s, was evaluated. Epochs contaminated by prominent electrooculogram signals (>300 μV) and MEG artifacts (>3000 fT/cm) were automatically excluded from averaging. At least 100 artifact-free evoked S1 and S2 responses were averaged online.

2.4. Source Estimation

The averaged data were offline filtered with a bandpass of  Hz and a 100 ms baseline correction. We applied a distributed minimum norm estimate (MNE) source modeling to reconstruct evoked responses and identified three regions of interest (ROIs): SI and contralateral (SIIc) and ipsilateral (SIIi) secondary somatosensory cortex.

The modeling of the cortical spatiotemporal dynamics of somatosensory evoked responses was obtained with Brainstorm [36]. The segmentation of head tissues from individual T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, GE Discovery MR 750 3T with TR 9.4 ms, TE 4 ms, recording matrix 256_256 pixels, field of view 256 mm, slice thickness 1 mm) volume data was obtained with BrainVisa (http://brainvisa.info/). The representation of folded cortical surface was used to resolve the forward problem by applying an overlapping-sphere model, which derives the strength of a set of electric dipoles located at the cortical surface [37]. For each participant, cortically constrained source imaging was performed using the depth-weighted MNE [38, 39] model of Brainstorm, with default parameter settings, over a set of ~7500 elementary current dipoles distributed over the individual cortical envelope. The individual source maps were geometrically registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) brain template (Colin27) using Brainstorm’s multilinear registration technique, with default parameters.

The MNE source maps were obtained for each participant and each stimulus condition and group-averaged onto the aligned cortical surface of the Colin27 brain template. Based on the grand-averaged waveform time series and cortical activation, a cluster of 30 vertices corresponding to 4-5 cm2 was manually selected to define each ROI.

The time-resolved magnitude of each elementary source was normalized to its fluctuations over baseline, yielding a set of -scored time series at each cortical location [40, 41]. The -score values were rectified to detect absolute magnitude changes above baseline levels, and peak responses to S1 and S2 of each ROI were extracted for subsequent analysis. The degree of SG was quantified as the ratio of the strength of S2 divided by S1.

2.5. Spectral Analysis

Each raw single trial in the selected ROIs was analyzed by using Morlet wavelet-based time-frequency approach in Brainstorm software. Epochs of 2.5 s duration with 1.0 s preceding S1 and 1.0 s following S2 were created. Due to the longer peak latency of ERS (~ ≧0.7 s) [23, 25] and our design of 0.5 s ISI, this study specifically focused on the S1-induced ERD responses.

In the ERD computation, the alpha (8 to 13 Hz) and beta (14 to 30 Hz) bands which exhibited the most reduced activity (0.0 s to 0.5 s following S1) were identified. The averaged baseline power density (−0.9 s to −0.5 s before S1) was calculated after the -score correction. We selected peak amplitudes of the most reactive frequency bands (2 Hz) [25] of alpha and beta rhythms and compared them with respect to the baseline power level in each individual.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All the data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Prior to the statistical analysis, all variables were normal distributed as indicated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (). The effects of age on SG and ERD were calculated by independent -test. The relationship between S1-induced ERD and S2-evoked responses was evaluated by Pearson’s correlation coefficients. All the analyses were performed with the SPSS statistical package (version 13.0). values of <0.05 were set as the significant threshold.

3. Results

3.1. Somatosensory SG

Figure 1(a) shows the butterfly plot of somatosensory evoked responses to S1 in one young participant. The prominent P35m of SI was followed by the longer latency responses in the SII regions. The upper panel of Figure 1(b) exhibits the MNE source reconstruction of the selected latencies of 34 ms, 90 ms, and 122 ms. The SI responses were generated in the postcentral wall of central fissure and the SII responses were generated in the upper bank of the Sylvian fissure in the parietal operculum. The lower panel of Figure 1(b) demonstrates the source strength as a function of time in these three ROIs of the same subject. The S2-evoked responses (blue trace) were smaller than S1-evoked responses (red trace).

SG ratios were calculated from each individual and compared between groups. The statistical results show significant higher SG ratios of SIIc () and SIIi () in the elderly group compared to the younger group (Figure 2).

3.2. Somatosensory ERD

Due to the obvious between-group differences in the bilateral SII regions, we then concentrated on the effects of aging on S1-induced ERD reactivity in these neural substrates. Figure 3 displays the grand-averaged time-frequency representations of alpha (Figure 3(a)) and beta (Figure 3(b)) rhythms over the time interval of 1.0 s before S1 and 1.0 s after S2 in SIIc and SIIi. The plots below each spectral representation exhibit the grand-averaged temporal dynamics of the most reactive frequency ranges (2 Hz) in terms of alpha and beta oscillations. The white squares show the most prominent S1-induced ERD reactivity.

Table 1 lists the averaged ERD-reactive frequency for alpha and beta rhythms. There were no significant differences between young and elderly participants regarding the ERD-reactive frequencies.


RegionAlphaBeta
YoungElderlyYoungElderly

SIIc11.3 0.2411.4 0.2419.0 0.8219.1 0.87
SIIi10.9 0.8311.0 0.3517.7 0.6917.9 0.63

Figure 4 shows the mean peak values of alpha and beta ERD with respect to the baseline power. Compared to the younger subjects, the elderly exhibited significantly reduced amplitude of alpha ERD in SIIc (). We did not find significant between-group differences in terms of alpha ERD in SIIi and beta ERD in bilateral SII regions.

3.3. Correlation between S1-Induced ERD and S2-Evoked Responses

Given the pronounced reduction of alpha ERD in the elderly adults, we then tested whether S1-induced oscillatory responses influence the performance of S2-evoked reactivity. Lower S1-induced alpha ERD was associated with higher S2-evoked amplitude in SIIc (, ) among the elderly participants, as shown in Figure 5.

4. Discussion

To obtain insight into the age-related alterations of cortical inhibition in the human somatosensory system, we applied paired-pulse electrical stimulation to the left median nerve, and our results revealed several important findings. Firstly, by using MNE source modeling, the elderly demonstrated reduced SG in bilateral SII regions, replicating our previous ECD results. Secondly, based on the time-frequency approach, we found age-related reduction of alpha ERD amplitude in the SIIc. Lastly, higher S2-evoked responses were associated with reduced S1-induced alpha ERD amplitudes among the elderly participants, especially in the SIIc area. A higher S2-evoked response could be regarded as poor suppression to repetitive stimuli.

The present MNE data demonstrated higher SG ratios of bilateral SII areas in the elderly adults compared to the younger participants, which is consistent with our previous results [2]. These findings highlight somatosensory SG as a prominent manifestation during the late-age stage, particularly in the higher-order SII neural substrates. By calculating the number of dendritic spines and synaptic density, it has been reported that the association areas are more vulnerable to aging processing compared to the primary sensory cortices [42]. Moreover, one functional magnetic resonance imaging study with dynamic causal modeling has delineated that somatosensory information conveyed in hierarchy but in parallel from thalamus to both SI and SII [43]. This observation supported our notion that SII might be independently affected by aging processes.

By using short stimulus onset asynchrony (i.e., 30 ms), one previous ERP report has shown age-associated decline of SG in the SI. The reduction of cortical inhibition also correlated with impairment of two-point discrimination performance in the aged participants [5]. Although the early somatosensory evoked response, N20m, has been proven to recover to the saturated amplitude with an ISI of less than 100 ms [44, 45], our selection of ISI of 500 ms allowed us to examine P35m of SI and SII simultaneously [15]. Most importantly, a recent MEG study has revealed a superior signal-to-noise ratio for P35m at an ISI of 500 ms than other tested conditions, which lent support to the rationale of our design [29]. Collectively, our results of age-related somatosensory cortical disinhibition were in favor of inhibition deficit hypothesis in aging brains [6, 7, 4649].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first MEG study to investigate the effects of aging on spectral power changes in somatosensory alpha and beta oscillations. Our results demonstrated that the elderly showed reduced alpha ERD power in the SIIc. This significant finding particularly specific to alpha component indicated that this frequency band is strongly related to the function of the somatosensory cortex and has an apparent influence on information processing of the human brain [50]. The spontaneous alpha oscillatory activity could be replaced by a desynchronized activity following exogenous stimuli, such as median nerve stimulation [51]. In the present research, the desynchronized alpha rhythms might shift their role from idling activity to the processing of sensory inputs, likely through the mechanisms of changes in the local neural interactions [25, 52]. From this standpoint, we speculated that attenuation of alpha ERD in the aged adults was likely due to the age-associated decline of somatosensory information processing. One might argue that alpha ERD could be modulated by stimulus intensity [28]. However, due to the similar electric stimulus intensity provided to the young and elderly groups (4.4 ± 0.1 mA versus 4.6 ± 0.1 mA), the age-related cortical power differences are unlikely to be a consequence of differential stimulus condition.

The underlying mechanisms regarding the association between event-induced neural oscillations and event-evoked responses remain unclear. Previous studies have independently investigated stimulus-induced ERD or stimulus-evoked activity by using paired-pulse somatosensory stimulation [17, 29, 53, 54]. Our present research attempted to relate S1-induced suppression of alpha rhythm to S2-evoked cortical excitability. It is conceptualized that more alpha suppression refers to better functioning of information processes; on the other hand, an increased response to the second stimulation within paired-pulse paradigms indicates an insufficient gating ability. We found that more S1-induced desynchronization of alpha oscillation, especially in SIIc, was associated with less S2-evoked amplitude of evoked response in the older adults. This observation suggests that oscillatory activities could, to some extent, account for the age-related decline of somatosensory SG.

Up to the present, it is extremely unclear why the association between S1-induced alpha ERD and S2-evoked amplitude was observed only in the SIIc region. One possible account is that, compared to the SIIc, SIIi signals usually showed poorer signal-to-noise ratios. Another interpretation is from the neuroanatomical and functional neuroimaging evidence. It has been suggested that SIIc and SIIi receive parallel projections from thalamus [43], which accounts for the reason that bilateral SII regions were venerable to aging, whereas the SI was relatively preserved. However, the mechanisms of ERD generation are more complicated by which reciprocal interactions between thalamus and somatosensory cortices are involved. In the present study, the observed association between S1-indiced ERD and S2-evoked amplitude was restricted in the SII area. This finding did not imply that unilateral decreased S1-induced ERD modulated bilateral S2-evoked excitability. Here, we proposed a relation between age-related somatosensory induced and evoked responses, particularly in the SIIc region. It merits further investigation to determine other mechanisms underlying the age-related reduction of somatosensory SG.

Various neurophysiological studies have supported the argument that GABAergic inhibitory dysfunction is involved in physiological aging [55, 56]. For example, it has been shown that the age-related GABAergic degradation in the hippocampus was due to a selective loss of GABAergic interneurons [57, 58]. In humans, by intravenous injection of scopolamine, a cholinergic antagonist, the participants exhibited increased amplitudes of P50m during repetitive auditory inputs [59]. Moreover, the inhibition of somatosensory activation, particularly P35m in SI and bilateral SII regions, was modulated by GABAergic agonist lorazepam [60], suggesting the GABAergic regulation is related to inhibitory processing. Although our investigation at a system level was unable to verify the molecular mechanisms in terms of age-related defects of alpha ERD and SG, the current data extended the previous findings to highlight GABAergic alternations in human somatosensory information processing.

5. Conclusions

By using MEG and paired-pulse electrical stimulation to examine the time-frequency characteristics of somatosensory cortical processing, our results revealed age-related decline of SG and alpha ERD. Notably, an association between neural oscillations and evoked cortical excitability was found in the SIIc region, which indicated that lower S1-induced alpha ERD may be related to higher S2-evoked amplitude (insufficient gating). Taken together, these results suggest that the age-related decrease of somatosensory SG is related to the altered oscillatory activity. This paired-pulse protocol may also serve as an objective measure to assess the effects of training or intervention on somatosensory functioning in terms of cortical neural filtering ability in rehabilitation settings.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Chia-Hsiung Cheng and Pei-Ying S. Chan contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the participation of all the subjects in this study. This work was supported by National Science Council (NSC-102-2628-B-010-008-MY3, NSC-102-2811-B-010-047), Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST-104-2314-B-182-001-MY2), and Healthy Aging Research Center at Chang Gung University (EMRPD1D0291, CMRPD1B0331).

References

  1. S. Brodoehl, C. Klingner, K. Stieglitz, and O. W. Witte, “Age-related changes in the somatosensory processing of tactile stimulation-An fMRI study,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 238, no. 1, pp. 259–264, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C.-H. Cheng and Y.-Y. Lin, “Aging-related decline in somatosensory inhibition of the human cerebral cortex,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 145–152, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. David-Jürgens and H. R. Dinse, “Effects of aging on paired-pulse behavior of rat somatosensory cortical neurons,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1208–1216, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Gröschel, J. M. Sohns, C. Schmidt-Samoa et al., “Effects of age on negative BOLD signal changes in the primary somatosensory cortex,” NeuroImage, vol. 71, pp. 10–18, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Lenz, M. Tegenthoff, K. Kohlhaas et al., “Increased excitability of somatosensory cortex in aged humans is associated with impaired tactile acuity,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1811–1816, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C.-H. Cheng and Y.-Y. Lin, “The effects of aging on lifetime of auditory sensory memory in humans,” Biological Psychology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 306–312, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C.-H. Cheng, P.-N. Wang, W.-Y. Hsu, and Y.-Y. Lin, “Inadequate inhibition of redundant auditory inputs in Alzheimer's disease: an MEG study,” Biological Psychology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 365–373, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Kalisch, P. Ragert, P. Schwenkreis, H. R. Dinse, and M. Tegenthoff, “Impaired tactile acuity in old age is accompanied by enlarged hand representations in somatosensory cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1530–1538, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Thomas, I. vom Berg, A. Rupp et al., “P50 gating deficit in Alzheimer dementia correlates to frontal neuropsychological function,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 416–424, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. Forss, M. Hietanen, O. Salonen, and R. Hari, “Modified activation of somatosensory cortical network in patients with right-hemisphere stroke,” Brain, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 1889–1899, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Hari, K. Reinikainen, E. Kaukoranta et al., “Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in man,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 254–263, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y.-Y. Lin, Y.-H. Shih, J.-T. Chen et al., “Differential effects of stimulus intensity on peripheral and neuromagnetic cortical responses to median nerve stimulation,” NeuroImage, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 909–917, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y.-Y. Lin, C. Simões, N. Forss, and R. Hari, “Differential effects of muscle contraction from various body parts on neuromagnetic somatosensory responses,” NeuroImage, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 334–340, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Torquati, V. Pizzella, S. D. Penna et al., “‘Gating’ effects of simultaneous peripheral electrical stimulations on human secondary somatosensory cortex: a whole-head MEG study,” NeuroImage, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1704–1713, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. J. Thoma, F. M. Hanlon, M. Huang et al., “Impaired secondary somatosensory gating in patients with schizophrenia,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 189–199, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M.-C. Ding, Q. Wang, E. H. Lo, and G. B. Stanley, “Cortical excitation and inhibition following focal traumatic brain injury,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 40, pp. 14085–14094, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Lenz, O. Höffken, P. Stude et al., “Bilateral somatosensory cortex disinhibition in complex regional pain syndrome type I,” Neurology, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 1096–1101, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Tamura, M. Matsuhashi, P. Lin et al., “Impaired intracortical inhibition in the primary somatosensory cortex in focal hand dystonia,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 558–565, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Valeriani, S. Rinalduzzi, and F. Vigevano, “Multilevel somatosensory system disinhibition in children with migraine,” Pain, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 137–144, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. N. Boutros and A. Belger, “Midlatency evoked potentials attenuation and augmentation reflect different aspects of sensory gating,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 917–922, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. Hari and R. Salmelin, “Human cortical oscillations: a neuromagnetic view through the skull,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Steriade and R. R. Llinas, “The functional states of the thalamus and the associated neuronal interplay,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 649–742, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. Neuper and G. Pfurtscheller, “Event-related dynamics of cortical rhythms: frequency-specific features and functional correlates,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 41–58, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. Pfurtscheller and A. Aranibar, “Evaluation of event-related desynchronization (ERD) preceding and following voluntary self-paced movement,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 138–146, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Pfurtscheller and F. H. L. da Silva, “Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1842–1857, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Hirata, A. Kato, M. Taniguchi et al., “Frequency-dependent spatial distribution of human somatosensory evoked neuromagnetic fields,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 73–76, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. V. V. Nikouline, K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, H. Wikström et al., “Dynamics of mu-rhythm suppression caused by median nerve stimulation: a magnetoencephalographic study in human subjects,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 294, no. 3, pp. 163–166, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Stancák, J. Svoboda, R. Rachmanová, J. Vrána, J. Králík, and J. Tintera, “Desynchronization of cortical rhythms following cutaneous stimulation: effects of stimulus repetition and intensity, and of the size of corpus callosum,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1936–1947, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. M. Stevenson, F. Wang, M. J. Brookes, J. M. Zumer, S. T. Francis, and P. G. Morris, “Paired pulse depression in the somatosensory cortex: associations between MEG and BOLD fMRI,” NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2722–2732, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. D. Penna, K. Torquati, V. Pizzella et al., “Temporal dynamics of alpha and beta rhythms in human SI and SII after galvanic median nerve stimulation. A MEG study,” NeuroImage, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1438–1446, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Ploner, J. Gross, L. Timmermann, B. Pollok, and A. Schnitzler, “Oscillatory activity reflects the excitability of the human somatosensory system,” NeuroImage, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1231–1236, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Ohara, N. E. Crone, N. Weiss, and F. A. Lenz, “Attention to a painful cutaneous laser stimulus modulates electrocorticographic event-related desynchronization in humans,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 115, no. 7, pp. 1641–1652, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. Chen, B. Corwell, and M. Hallett, “Modulation of motor cortex excitability by median nerve and digit stimulation,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. M. Rossini, M. T. Desiato, F. Lavaroni, and M. D. Caramia, “Brain excitability and electroencephalographic activation: non-invasive evaluation in healthy humans via transcranial magnetic stimulation,” Brain Research, vol. 567, no. 1, pp. 111–119, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. J. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and O. V. Lounasmaa, “Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 413–497, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Tadel, S. Baillet, J. C. Mosher, D. Pantazis, and R. M. Leahy, “Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2011, Article ID 879716, 13 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. X. Huang, J. C. Mosher, and R. M. Leahy, “A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 423–440, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Baillet, J. C. Mosher, and R. M. Leahy, “Electromagnetic brain mapping,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 14–30, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. S. Hamalainen and R. J. Ilmoniemi, “Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates,” Medical & Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C.-H. Cheng, S. Baillet, F.-J. Hsiao, and Y.-Y. Lin, “Effects of aging on neuromagnetic mismatch responses to pitch changes,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 544, pp. 20–24, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Gross, S. Baillet, G. R. Barnes et al., “Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research,” NeuroImage, vol. 65, pp. 349–363, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. B. M. Uylings and J. M. de Brabander, “Neuronal changes in normal human aging and Alzheimer's disease,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 268–276, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Liang, A. Mouraux, and G. D. Iannetti, “Parallel processing of nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory information in the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices: evidence from dynamic causal modeling of functional magnetic resonance imaging data,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 24, pp. 8976–8985, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. Hamada, S. Otsuka, T. Okamoto, and R. Suzuki, “The profile of the recovery cycle in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex: a magnetoencephalography study,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. 1787–1793, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Hoshiyama and R. Kakigi, “Two evoked responses with different recovery functions in the primary somatosensory cortex in humans,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 1334–1342, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Alain and D. L. Woods, “Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 507–519, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Gazzaley, J. W. Cooney, J. Rissman, and M. D'Esposito, “Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1298–1300, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. P. A. Reuter-Lorenz and D. C. Park, “Human neuroscience and the aging mind: a new look at old problems,” Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 405–415, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C.-H. Cheng, S. Baillet, F.-J. Hsiao, and Y.-Y. Lin, “Effects of aging on the neuromagnetic mismatch detection to speech sounds,” Biological Psychology, vol. 104, pp. 48–55, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. W. Klimesch, P. Sauseng, and S. Hanslmayr, “EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 63–88, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. M. Sherman and R. W. Guillery, “Functional organization of thalamocortical relays,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 1367–1395, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  52. G. Pfurtscheller, “Induced oscillations in the alpha band: functional meaning,” Epilepsia, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2–8, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  53. S. M. Arnfred, A. C. N. Chen, D. N. Eder, B. Y. Glenthøj, and R. P. Hemmingsen, “A mixed modality paradigm for recording somatosensory and auditory P50 gating,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 105, no. 1-2, pp. 79–86, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. Dockstader, W. Gaetz, D. Cheyne, and R. Tannock, “Abnormal neural reactivity to unpredictable sensory events in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 376–383, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. G. Leventhal, Y. Wang, M. Pu, Y. Zhou, and Y. Ma, “GABA and its agonists improved visual cortical function in senescent monkeys,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5620, pp. 812–815, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. Wehr and A. M. Zador, “Synaptic mechanisms of forward suppression in rat auditory cortex,” Neuron, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 437–445, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. C. M. Hernandez, D. A. Gearhart, V. Parikh et al., “Comparison of galantamine and donepezil for effects on nerve growth factor, cholinergic markers, and memory performance in aged rats,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 316, no. 2, pp. 679–694, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. A. Barnes, J. Meltzer, F. Houston, G. Orr, K. McGann, and G. L. Wenk, “Chronic treatment of old rats with donepezil or galantamine: effects on memory, hippocampal plasticity and nicotinic receptors,” Neuroscience, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. E. Pekkonen, J. Hirvonen, I. P. Jääskeläinen, S. Kaakkola, and J. Huttunen, “Auditory sensory memory and the cholinergic system: implications for Alzheimer's disease,” NeuroImage, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 376–382, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. Huttunen, E. Pekkonen, R. Kivisaari, T. Autti, and S. Kähkönen, “Modulation of somatosensory evoked fields from SI and SII by acute GABAA-agonism and paired-pulse stimulation,” NeuroImage, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 427–434, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Chia-Hsiung Cheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1047 Views | 505 Downloads | 25 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.