Table 4: Included articles rating according to the PEDro scale [25].

#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#10#11Score

Articles on motor rehabilitationRasova et al. (2005) [26]6/11
Ibrahim et al. (2011) [28]6/11
Tomassini et al. (2012) [20]N/A5/11
Bonzano et al. (2014) [29]8/11
Prosperini et al. (2014) [30]8/11
Rasova et al. (2015) [31]4/11

Articles on cognitive rehabilitationPenner and Kappos (2006) [32]N/A4/11
Sastre-Garriga et al. (2011) [33]N/A5/11
Chiaravalloti et al. (2012) [34]10/11
Ernst et al. (2012) [35]5/11
Filippi et al. (2012) [36]9/11
Leavitt et al. (2012) [39]10/11
Cerasa et al. (2013) [37]10/11
Parisi et al. (2014) [38]9/11
Bonavita et al. (2015) [40]7/11
De Giglio et al. (2015) [41]7/11

N/A: data not available.
Criterion 1: specified eligibility criteria.
Criterion 2: randomized allocation.
Criterion 3: concealed allocation.
Criterion 4: similarity between groups at baseline.
Criterion 5: blinding of subjects.
Criterion 6: blinding of therapists.
Criterion 7: blinding of assessors.
Criterion 8: outcome measures obtained from at least 85% of initially allocated subjects.
Criterion 9: all received treatment, or key outcome, was analyzed by “intention-to-treat.”
Criterion 10: between-group statistical comparison.
Criterion 11: both point and variability measures provided.