Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2015, Article ID 591563, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/591563
Review Article

Relationship between Zinc (Zn2+) and Glutamate Receptors in the Processes Underlying Neurodegeneration

Department of Neurobiology, Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Smetna 12, 31-343 Krakow, Poland

Received 11 February 2015; Accepted 13 May 2015

Academic Editor: Aage R. Møller

Copyright © 2015 Bartłomiej Pochwat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The results from numerous studies have shown that an imbalance between particular neurotransmitters may lead to brain circuit dysfunction and development of many pathological states. The significance of glutamate pathways for the functioning of the nervous system is equivocal. On the one hand, glutamate transmission is necessary for neuroplasticity, synaptogenesis, or cell survival, but on the other hand an excessive and long-lasting increased level of glutamate in the synapse may lead to cell death. Under clinical conditions, hyperactivity of the glutamate system is associated with ischemia, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and many others. The achievement of glutamate activity in the physiological range requires efficient control by endogenous regulatory factors. Due to the fact that the free pool of ion Zn2+ is a cotransmitter in some glutamate neurons; the role of this element in the pathophysiology of a neurodegenerative diseases has been intensively studied. There is a lot of evidence for Zn2+ dyshomeostasis and glutamate system abnormalities in ischemic and neurodegenerative disorders. However, the precise interaction between Zn2+ regulative function and the glutamate system is still not fully understood. This review describes the relationship between Zn2+ and glutamate dependent signaling pathways under selected pathological central nervous system (CNS) conditions.

1. Introduction

During recent years, our knowledge about the functioning of the glutamate system and its importance for the physiology of nervous system has significantly increased. Today, the role of glutamatergic pathways is not only considered in the context of the excitability of neurons. Our understanding of the physiological role of the glutamate system is much deeper and we can provide many data showing the involvement of the glutamatergic system in the regulation of very complex processes like neuroplasticity, cell death, cell survival, and many others [13]. Additionally, these discoveries may have practical significance, because we may associate dysfunction of these pathways with the development of many debilitating disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, ischemic injury, epilepsy, schizophrenia, or depression [4]. Despite undeniable progress in our understanding of the pivotal role of glutamate system in the brain’s functioning, there are still some issues that need clarification. One of the most fascinating issues is the significance of bivalent zinc ions (Zn2+) for the suitable action of the glutamate system and its role in the physiological and pathophysiological states of the brain.

The influence of Zn2+ on the structure of the cells and biochemical processes is very complex. Zn2+ is a ubiquitous trace element in the human body and the high concentration of Zn2+ is found in the brain [5]. Within brain, Zn2+ is nonuniformly distributed and it is most abundant in the hippocampus, amygdala, cortex, and olfactory bulbs. For example, in the hippocampus, a region of the brain essential for learning and memory, Zn2+ concentrations can reach up to 300 μM in the mossy fiber boutons of neurons. Neuronal Zn2+ is partitioned into two main classes: a static and a labile Zn2+ pool [6]. Static Zn2+ pool plays an important structural function for the stability of great numbers of proteins and is a cofactor of about 300 enzymes which are engaging in the regulation of cellular processes and signal transduction pathways. It is worth mentioning that most of these processes are unspecific and apply to both nerve and other cells [7, 8]. However, Zn2+ also plays a role specific for the functioning of nerve cells. As has been shown in many studies, Zn2+ is stored in the synaptic vesicle in glutamate neurons (zincergic neurons) and released during neuronal activity into the synaptic cleft [911]. The exact amount of such release is controversial; some studies indicated that transient Zn2+ increases may reach 1–100 μM, while other studies pointed to lower (submicromolar) concentrations [12]. These uncertainties arise from the fact that measurement of actual Zn2+ levels within the synaptic cleft is difficult, given the short time in which the free ion is present in the synapse [13].

In physiological conditions, Zn2+ modulates mainly postsynaptic, ionotropic, and metabotropic receptors. When physiological conditions are disturbed Zn2+ can be a very important factor which triggers the many cellular signaling processes leading to atrophy and cell death [1417]. Based on clinical and preclinical studies, these molecular and cellular events associated with Zn2+ that have induced neurotoxicity may be linked with clinical cases of traumatic brain injury, stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurodegenerative disorders [16, 18].

The first aim of this review is the presentation of the relationship between Zn2+, glutamate receptors, and transduction signaling pathways, leading to cell death in pathological conditions. The next purpose of this paper is to discuss the above foregoing molecular and cellular processes underlying brain disorders associated with cell death.

2. The Relationship between and the Glutamate System under Physiological Conditions

As we have already mentioned, the chelatable or free Zn2+ is solely localized within synaptic vesicles in the presynaptic terminals of glutamatergic neurons [911]. The intravesicular concentration of Zn2+ is provided by the vesicular zinc transporter, ZnT-3. However, the circumstances in which Zn2+ is released during synaptic activity and the physiological importance of released Zn2+ is not yet clear. The best-known postsynaptic target for released Zn2+ is the ionotropic glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR). Zn2+ shows a different affinity to these receptors, depending on its concentration. At a relatively low nanomolar concentration (10–20 nM) Zn2+ binds to a binding site localized on the GluN2A subunit of NMDAR, which allosterically inhibits the activity of the receptor [19]. It was postulated that this interaction may be responsible for tonic inhibition of NMDARs by ambient Zn2+ levels. If the concentration of Zn2+ is higher, and when it occurs at micromolar levels (IC50 ~ 50 μm), Zn2+ binds to the GluN2B subunit of NMDAR, inhibiting NMDAR during phasic synaptic activity [20]. At a very high concentration of (10–50 μM), Zn2+ in a voltage dependent manner blocks the channel of NMDAR [21]. The recent complex study of Vergnano et al., conducted on excitatory synapses from hippocampal mossy fibers-CA3 and Schaffer collateral-CA1, showed that the profile of Zn2+ action in glutamate synapses is closely related to the pattern of presynaptic activity and release probability. The results of these studies very seriously questioned the possibility of physiological tonic inhibition of GluN2A dependency because the tested synaptic Zn2+ concentration is very low (<10 nM). These findings are also related to mossy fibers-CA3 synapses, which are the most zinc-enriched synapses in the whole brain. However, these results do not exclude the potential role of ambient Zn2+ in the pathological states associated with glutamate over excitability, although this requires further studies being conducted. The next conclusion from this research concerns the modulation of NMDAR by Zn2+ in an activity dependent manner. Vergnano et al. in 2014 [22] showed that only repetitive stimulation of presynaptic terminals with proper frequency could result in the detectable higher Zn2+ concentration in the synaptic cleft. In contrast, a single stimulus was insufficient to achieve a similar synaptic event, thus indicating very efficient mechanisms responsible for Zn2+ removal from the synaptic space. Moreover, changes in the shape of excitatory postsynaptic potentials was observed which indicate Zn2+ binding to the nanomolar sensitive place of the GluN2A subunit on NMDARs [22]. Thus, it is questionable whether a GluN2B Zn2+ sensitive binding site may play a significant role in Zn2+-dependent modulation under physiological conditions.

3. Homeostasis

Because the Zn2+ level as well as the physiological norm may induce a different form of toxicity, the mechanisms that regulate concentration of extracellular and intracellular Zn2+ must act properly. The balance between extracellular, cytosolic and Zn2+ occurring in organelles is maintained by specific or nonspecific transporters and Zn2+ binding proteins. The most important regulators of Zn2+ level between cellular compartments, organelles, and extracellular space are membranous H+-Zn2+ exchangers that belong to the ZnT family [23]. The second group of Zn2+ transporters consists of members of the ZIP protein family that allows Zn2+ transportation from extracellular space or from intracellular vesicles to the cytoplasm [24]. So far, 10 members of the ZnT family and 14 members of the ZIP protein family have been identified [24]. The third group of molecules engaging in the homeostasis of Zn2+ is metallothioneins (MTs), which are low-weight molecular protein. The major cellular function of MTs is binding metals. Because MTs have a high affinity to Zn2+, they buffer cytoplasmic Zn2+ following its influx to cytosol. Furthermore, MTs play the role of a temporal store for cellular Zn2+. In physiological conditions, the foregoing mechanisms are sufficient to maintain the concentration of Zn2+ in a nontoxic range [16, 25]. Unfortunately, during a pathological condition, when excessive glutamate transmission occurs, the Zn2+ homeostatic system may become inefficient, leading to an increased intracellular level of Zn2+ and a subsequent activation of signaling pathways associated with cell death. These hypotheses concerning potential involvement of Zn2+ have numerous confirmations in studies using imaging techniques and selective ion chelators. The results obtained in these studies allowed understanding more adequately the importance of Zn2+ in the cellular mechanisms governing cell survival and forced researchers to revise the main assumptions concerning the molecular hypothesis of calcium ions (Ca2+) dependent excitotoxicity. For many years it was thought that intracellular calcium ions (Ca2+) are the most important factors inducing ischemic cell death. Most of these findings are based on experiments using imaging technics with Ca2+ sensitive fluorescent probes or Ca2+ selective chelators. Unfortunately, in the last years, it has been shown that these probes and chelators were not sufficiently selective, because many of them bind also Zn2+; thus the interpretation of these results may raise doubts [11]. Recently, Stork and Li 2006 showed that rat hippocampal slices subjected to oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) and exposed to the cell-permeable Zn2+ chelator TPEN (low affinity for Ca2+) decreased fluorescence of low-affinity Ca2+ sensitive probe calcium green I during and after OGD. These results suggest that, at least in some circumstances, we can observe interplay between Ca2+ and Zn2+ in the induction of molecular consequences of OGD [26]. The direct involvement of Zn2+ in ischemia has been also shown in another study using TPEN. Medvedeva et al. in 2009 showed that increase in the concentration of intracellular Ca2+ in CA1 neurons in hippocampal slices observed a few minutes after OGD may be prevented by TPEN, which is a Zn2+ chelator. What is important is that the early increase in intracellular Zn2+ level is associated with mitochondrial Zn2+ uptake and depolarization, events which are engaged in neuronal cell death [27].

4. , Glutamate Receptors, and the Signaling Pathway Leading to Cell Death—An Overview

The most neurotoxic effects induced by Zn2+ are a consequence of the impairment of Zn2+ homeostasis and the following increase of the postsynaptic cellular Zn2+ level. These pathological events have been reported in models of seizure, ischemic brain injury, or traumatic brain injury [2830]. This raises a question concerning how Zn2+ can enter the cell under pathological conditions and, in turn, which signaling pathway activates it? It is well established that at least four different routes are involved in the increased Zn2+ cellular level. Two of them are, respectively, related to the Na+/Zn2+ exchanger and voltage gated calcium channels (VGCC). But the other two are associated with enhanced activity of ionotropic glutamate receptors. As has been reported in several studies, both AMPA/kainate and NMDA receptors are involved in Zn2+ entering postsynaptic terminals [3135]. It seems that GluA2-lacking AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid) receptors play a particularly important role in Zn2+ influx. These receptors are permeable for Zn2+ and Ca2+ ions, which after entering the cell activate signaling pathways involved in cell death. The significance of GluA2-lacking AMPAR in the induction of cell death of CA1 hippocampal neurons in transient global ischemia (TGI) and oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) models has been reported. Inhibition of these receptors exerted neuroprotective effects [33, 36]. GluA2-lacking AMPARs seem to be very sensitive to extracellular acidosis, which is accompanied by ischemic conditions. The increased concentration of H+ ions invokes different effects on the permeability of these molecules to Zn2+ and Ca2+. Acidosis facilitates increased Zn2+ influx through GluA2-lacking AMPARs and VGCC. By contrast, in the same conditions, Ca2+ influx is decreased [37, 38]. Furthermore, it has been found that synaptic Zn2+ in the mossy fibers inhibits kainate receptor activity. If the pH is diminished, the Zn2+ effect on kainate receptors is abolished [39, 40]. Interplay between activity of the glutamate receptors, Zn2+, and acidosis is more complex, because Zn2+ itself may change its acid-based equilibrium. In cortical neurons Zn2+ leads to intracellular acidification [41]. Moreover, diminished intracellular pH attenuates Zn2+ binding to MTs and causes an increased level of the free form of this ion, which may promote the signaling pathway responsible for cell death [11].

AMPA/kainate receptors are not the only ones involved in the neurotoxic effects induced by Zn2+. The possible role of NMDA in Zn2+-induced neurotoxicity may be biphasic. As has been shown in cortical culture neurons, in the first step, the higher level of Zn2+ released from the presynaptic terminal may inhibit postsynaptic NMDAR function by allosteric binding. Subsequently, NMDAR upregulation induced by Src kinase mediated phosphorylation has been observed [42]. Zn2+ entrance into the postsynaptic terminal and then the increasing level of this ion are the first steps on the path to cell death. However, Zn2+ influx by glutamate ionotropic receptors or VGCCs is not a necessary condition to achieve the increased toxic intracellular level of Zn2+. The results of a few studies showed that mice lacking the gene encoding ZnT-3, which is responsible for loading Zn2+ to synaptic vesicles, have an increased intracellular level of Zn2+. Furthermore, signaling pathways and cell death have also occurred. It suggests that Zn2+ toxicity might be triggered by the release of this ion from its intracellular stores [43]. Whatever the cause, intracellular free Zn2+ interacts with many intracellular proteins and activates numerous processes, which in many ways damage cell structures and ultimately lead to their death. The toxic concentration of intracellular Zn2+ is especially averse to the functioning of mitochondria. Zn2+ is taken up in mitochondria by the activation of the cation-permeable channel, which is the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter. Enhanced sequestration of Zn2+ by mitochondria is observed under excitotoxic conditions. When intramitochondrial Zn2+ accumulation is sufficiently large, the membrane potential of mitochondria is disturbed and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is enhanced (Figure 1). These cellular events are very important factors in cell death [32, 41, 44]. It is worth mentioning that Ca2+ induced mitochondrial failure takes a similar course. The accumulation of Zn2+ in mitochondria also promotes the release of proapoptotic proteins such as apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) and cytochrome c [45, 46]. Additionally, Zn2+ may impair mitochondrial function by activation of the RAS/ERK/MAPK signaling pathway. Ultimately, the activation of MAPK induces mitochondrial hyperpolarization [47]. Furthermore, mitochondria are the main target of synergistic toxic effects induced by Zn2+ and kainate in the culture of cerebral cortex neurons [45, 46].

Figure 1: Intracellular signaling pathways activated by increased intracellular level Zn2+; MT: metallothioneins; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; ROS: reactive oxygen species; NO: nitric oxide.

However, the dysfunction of mitochondria is not the only mechanism involved in Zn2+ toxic effect. Zn2+ overload observed in ischemic conditions disrupts the life processes of neurons in several different ways, including induction of oxidative stress and impairment of metabolism and, thus, production of ATP. The increase of the intracellular level of Zn2+ causes an enhanced activity of protein kinase C (PKC), which in turn activates NADPH oxidase. Hyperactivity of NAPDH determines the enhanced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [48, 49]. Furthermore, in cortical neurons, Zn2+ activates nitric oxide synthase (NOS), an essential enzyme for producing a very reactive and toxic peroxynitrite radical [48]. Zn2+ impairs metabolic processes by inhibiting glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate (GAPDH), which is the consequence of a reduction of cellular levels of NAD+ induced by Zn2+. Abolition of GAPDH metabolic function leads to a depletion of ATP and necrotic death of cells [50]. The effects of a reduced level of NAD+ are more complex on the cellular level of ATP and do not depend only on the inhibition of glycolytic enzymes. The decrease of NAD+ also inhibits activity of mitochondrial enzymes that are NAD+-dependent, such as α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase or isocitrate dehydrogenase, and necessary for respiratory cellular processes [51].

5. , Glutamate System, and Alzheimer’s Disease

Expression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is associated with several pathological features. Of particular importance in the development of this disease is its being attributed to the amyloid beta (Aβ) soluble oligomers, amyloid plaques deposit, and aggregation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) containing a hyperphosphorylated form of protein tau. Amyloid oligomers both soluble and insoluble are composed of amyloid β, about 40-amino acid long peptide produced from amyloid precursor protein (APP). However, recently, the generation of cognitive impairments is more importantly attributed to soluble Aβ oligomers than amyloid plaques or NFTs [5254]. Both accumulations of Aβ’s different forms and aggregation of NFTs lead to synaptic loss and finally neuronal death. The main signaling mechanisms that are engaged in neuronal death induced by NFTs and Aβ are mostly apoptotic [53]. Zn2+ is involved in at least three crucial events associated with the development of AD. First, Zn2+ binds to the Aβ monomer and then allows aggregation of monomers of Aβ to soluble Aβ oligomers and next to insoluble Aβ plaques. Aggregation of NFTs proceeds in a similar way. Zn2+ binds to a tau protein, allowing the production of a tau complex. Additionally, in AD, Zn2+ participates in autophagic dysfunction and deregulation of intraneuronal calcium equilibrium [8, 53, 55]. All of these events are correlated to the activation of many different signaling pathways involved in neuronal deterioration. Despite the fact that this review concerns the relationship between Zn2+, the glutamate system, and signaling pathways engaged in neurodegenerative conditions, a description of the relationship between oxidative stress, Zn2+, and AD will be omitted. We want to now focus our attention on the importance of Zn2+ in the formation of Aβ complexes and the influence of Aβ soluble oligomers on glutamate dependent signaling pathways. As we have mentioned a few times, Zn2+ is stored in synaptic vesicles of some glutamate neurons. As a result of stimulation of these neurons glutamate and Zn2+ are simultaneously released to a synaptic cleft [12, 17]. Additionally, stimulation of glutamate neurons causes the release of Aβ monomers from presynaptic terminals to a synapse. Studies conducted on hippocampal slices of rats and mice showed that an increased level of Aβ oligomers in the vicinity of the postsynaptic terminal is the final effect of simultaneously increasing levels of these molecules in the synaptic cleft. Aβ monomers are colocalized with NMDARs containing GluN2B subunits and a blockade of these receptors by nonselective NMDAR antagonist memantine, or GluN2B subunit selective antagonist ifenprodil, inhibits Aβ oligomers’ localization in postsynaptic terminals [56].

Oligomerization of Aβ was also prevented by the addition of Zn2+-biding 8-OH-quinoline (clioquinol), by the lack of Zn2+ in the synapse, and by blockade of synaptic transmission. The role of Zn2+ in these processes relies on enabling the oligomerization of Aβ monomers and targeting Aβ oligomers to NMDARs containing GluN2B subunits [56]. However, it is unclear whether both of these processes (stabilizing oligomers and targeting of postsynaptic terminals) are involved in the synaptic events that are finally involved in the formation of cognitive impairments affecting patients with AD. But recent studies performed by Bjorklund et al. in 2012 [57] may bring a solution to this question. These postmortem studies have shown significant molecular differences between patients with AD and patients who have neuropathological changes in the absence of cognitive impairment, subsequently named nondemented with Alzheimer’s neuropathology (NDAN). However, both groups of patients had higher levels of Aβ plaque and NFTs in the hippocampus compared to the control. Furthermore, soluble low molecular weight (LMW) Aβ oligomeric species were in these two groups at a similar level but significantly increased when compared to the control group. The main difference between the AD group and NDAN was the significantly higher level of LMW Aβ in the postsynaptic density (PSD) of the hippocampus of AD patients. Importantly, the level of synaptic LMW Aβ in the NDAN group was at a similar level when compared to the control. Both AD and NDAN groups had an increased level of Zn2+ in soluble fraction compared to the control, but the level of Zn2+ in AD was also significantly higher in comparison to NDAN. Vesicular Zn2+ was at a similar level in the two groups, but in the AD group the level of ZnT-3 was declined. The last distinction between AD and NDAN seems to be particularly important, because it shows a decreased level of the phosphorylated form of the cAMP response element binding (CREB) in CA3 and dentate gyrus of the hippocampus of AD patients when compared to the NDAN group [57]. The role of CREB and its active phosphorylated form in the synaptogenesis and stability of synapses and then in processes of learning and memory has been reported in many previous studies [5860]. Additionally, a decreased level of phospho-CREB and a higher level of LMW Aβ in the AD hippocampus may be associated with dysfunction and abnormalities in the glutamate system. Soluble Aβ oligomers inhibit LTP in hippocampal slices, and this effect was prevented by selective GluN2B subunit antagonists, such as ifenprodil and Ro-25-6981 [61, 62]. As mentioned earlier, ifenprodil also prevented binding soluble Aβ oligomers to the postsynaptic terminal in the presence of Zn2+ in the synaptic cleft [56]. Furthermore, Aβ oligomers in hippocampal slices enhanced glutamate transmission through extrasynaptic NMDARs containing a GluN2B subunit with concomitant activation of proapoptotic p38 mitogen-activated kinase (MAPK) and decreased phosphorylation of CREB. Selective NMDA antagonists prevented activation of MAPK and reduction of CREB phosphorylation [62]. Furthermore in their previous studies Li et al. also showed that Aβ oligomers in hippocampal neurons lead to long-term depression [63]. In other studies, Aβ oligomers activate glial α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which results in astrocytic glutamate and activation of extrasynaptic glutamate receptors. These mechanisms indicate an enhanced glutamate transmission via extrasynaptic receptors versus synaptic transmission. This finally results in glutamate excitotoxicity and subsequent cell death [64] (Figure 2). The involvement of NMDAR in pathological processes underlying AD suggests that NMDAR antagonists may be effective drugs in the treatment of AD. Unfortunately, the results obtained in clinical practice must subdue these hopes. The administration of memantine, currently approved NMDAR antagonist in AD, has some restrictions. Memantine in a few clinical trials showed little improvements of cognitive functions and mood in moderate to severe AD. However, the clinical efficacy of memantine in the treatment of mild to moderate AD is still unknown. In contrast to another NMDAR antagonist like ketamine, memantine is well-tolerated drug and the adverse effects are not too severe. Opportunities for more effective drugs to treat AD are derivatives of memantine [65]. When considering the involvement of Zn2+ in processes concerning the oligomerization of Aβ, as in both the results obtained by Bjorklund et al. in 2012 [57] and conclusions from previous studies indicating the relationship between Aβ oligomers and glutamate transmission through extrasynaptic NMDARs, it is plausible to postulate Zn2+ participation in glutamate’s excitotoxicity, which is an underlying cognitive dysfunction observed in AD. However, in order to know the precise importance of Zn2+ in glutamate dependent signaling in AD, further and more detailed studies are required. First of all, there is a lack of sufficiently clear evidence that Zn2+ plays the main role in the oligomerization of toxic Aβ soluble oligomers in the pathogenesis of AD. Several studies also showed that Cu2+ engaged in the oligomerization of Aβ. Furthermore, results obtained from in vitro studies show that Cu2+ in a specific manner stabilize Aβ oligomer structures and these, but not Zn2+, containing Aβ oligomers are toxic to neuronal cells [66]. We cannot exclude that the toxicity of Aβ oligomers during AD is the result of interplay between Cu2+ and Zn2+ availability in synapses. The next unsolved issue concerns the accumulation of Zn2+ in amyloid plaques. It is well known that increased Zn2+ binding to amyloid plaque reduces Zn2+ presence in the synaptic vesicle and then indirectly affects glutamatergic transmission. Absorption of Zn2+ by Aβ oligomers may lead to disruption of the glutamate transmission and dysregulation of ProSAP2/11 Shank3 scaffolding [67]. Briefly, in normal condition, ProSAP2/Shank3 proteins are responsible for formulating scaffold in postsynaptic density. Properly formulated ProsSAP2/Shank3 complexes play a central role in the structure of the synapse and allow for the incorporation of other key proteins in postsynaptic density. Formation of ProSAP2/Shank3 is dependent on local Zn2+ concentration and influx. As has been reported by Grabrucker and colleagues in 2014 [67], application of Aβ oligomers in rat hippocampal cultures prevented normal association of Zn2+ with ProSAP/Shank3 and significantly decreased the Zn2+ level in dendrites. These changes were accompanied by decreased levels of Shank 1 protein in PSD and decreased synapse density (Figure 2). Interestingly, Zn2+ deficiency and deficits in the normal functioning of synapses associated with the dysfunction of ProSAP/Shank protein were also observed in autism [68]. AD affects mainly the elderly, and such patients have a reduced level of the vesicular ZnT-3 transporter, which can be the next factor reducing the pool of vesicle Zn2+ [69]. When we take into account relationship between Zn2+, glutamate transmission, and AD, the situation becomes even more complicated. The proper activity of glutamate neurons in many brain regions also involved in AD phenotype is crucial factor in the equilibrium between LTP and LTD processes which underlies synaptogenesis and neuronal death or survival [70]. At molecular level, these processes are dependent on suitable level of neurotrophins and on the involvement of these proteins in synaptic activity [70]. The results obtained in many postmortem studies in AD patients indicated decreased level of neurotrophin like brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (decreased level of mRNA and pro-BDNF (precursor of BDNF) and mature BDNF) and neural growth factor (NGF) (increased level of NGF precursor (pro-NGF) and decreased level of NGF) in brain regions like basal forebrain or hippocampus whose functions are impaired in AD. As has been shown in preclinical studies the effect of Zn2+ on the expression of these proteins is varied and ambiguous [71]. On one hand, studies conducted by Corona et al. in 2010 showed that Zn2+ supplementation in AD transgenic mice significantly delays hippocampal-dependent memory deficits and diminishes both Aβ and tau pathology in the hippocampus. These changes are associated with increased expression of BDNF synthesis [72], which may confirm previously described potential of Zn2+ to BDNF maturation from pro-BDNF through activation of Zn2+-dependent matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [73]. In contrast to that, Linkous et al. in 2009 showed that Zn2+ supplementation leads to cognitive deficits in AD transgenic mice. These equivocal effects of Zn2+ supplementation on cognitive capacities observed in transgenic mice can be explained as a consequence of two different AD transgenic models used by these two research groups. Corona and colleagues used 3xTg-AD mice with AD phenotype predominantly associated with intraneuronal deposition of Aβ. Linkous and his colleagues conducted their experiments on Tg2576 and TgCRND mice manifest memory deficits related to extracellular Aβ overload [74]. These facts generate the additional questions about the role of Zn2+, neurotrophins, and development in AD. Furthermore it is very possible that binding Zn2+ to NGF molecule is required to achieve full biological properties [71]. The complexity of the relationship between Zn2+, AD, and glutamate transmission does not allow for the exclusion of all these factors involved in the development of AD during different stages of the disease. Thus, both reduced and increased concentrations of Zn2+ in AD, depending on the stage of the disease and the structure of the brain, can have positive or negative effects on the symptomatic expression of AD. The role of Zn2+ in pathophysiology of AD seems to be emphasized by the results of studies using PBT2 which is the Cu2+/Zn2+ ionophore. The mechanism of action of PBT2 involves liberation of Cu2+ and Zn2+ from complexes of Aβ. In animal models of AD administration PBT2 leads to clearance of Aβ aggregates which markedly improves cognitive function observed in behavioral tests. The potential efficacy of this compound in the treatment in AD was confirmed in Phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. In these studies the oral administration of 250 mg of PBT2 by 12 weeks was well tolerated by patients. The analysis of cerebrospinal fluid showed the decreased level of Aβ. These events were correlated with improved executive functions measured in neuropsychological test battery [75].

Figure 2: Synaptic interaction between Zn2+ and glutamate system observed in Alzheimer’s disease (AD); IGlur (ionotropic glutamate receptors); PSD: postsynaptic density; Aβ: Amyloid β; AβO: Amyloid β oligomers.

6. Conclusions

As we have tried to show in the present paper, an increased amount of evidence indicates a relationship between abnormalities in the functioning of the glutamate system and development of neurodegenerative processes. However, a precise molecular set of causes leading to the dysfunction of glutamate pathways is still insufficiently understood. The results obtained in many studies indicate at least a mutual relationship between Zn2+ level fluctuations in nerve cells and structural and functional dysfunction of glutamate neurons containing Zn2+. The involvement of Zn2+ in the oxidative stress processes observed in ischemic neurons is well established and is related to enhanced activity of glutamate transmission. Furthermore, studies concerning the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease showed that Zn2+ is engaged in many ways to the potentiation of toxic effects invoked by glutamate. Importantly, some results obtained from different models are corroborated in postmortem studies. Despite the undoubted successes in the understanding of Zn2+ important role in the functioning of many aspects of the glutamate system, a global perspective still remains lacking. For example, both Alzheimer’s disease and brain injury caused by ischemia may have their own time course. Thus, further studies concerning the pathological role of Zn2+ caused/induced by glutamate toxicity should attempt to explain the precise role of Zn2+ in different stages of these disorders.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science “POMOST” Program (POMOST/2012-6/12), which was cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (Innovative Economy Operational Program 2007–2013) and the statutory funds of the Institute of Pharmacology PAS.

References

  1. G. E. Hardingham and H. Bading, “Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 682–696, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. P. Parsons and L. A. Raymond, “Extrasynaptic NMDA receptor involvement in central nervous system disorders,” Neuron, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 279–293, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Paoletti, C. Bellone, and Q. Zhou, “NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 383–400, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. P. Mattson, “Glutamate and neurotrophic factors in neuronal plasticity and disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1144, pp. 97–112, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. J. Frederickson, J.-Y. Koh, and A. I. Bush, “The neurobiology of zinc in health and disease,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 449–462, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. L. Que, D. W. Domaille, and C. J. Chang, “Metals in neurobiology: probing their chemistry and biology with molecular imaging,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1517–1549, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Takeda, “Movement of zinc and its functional significance in the brain,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 137–148, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Szewczyk, “Zinc homeostasis and neurodegenerative disorders,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 5, article 33, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. J. Frederickson and D. W. Moncrieff, “Zinc-containing neurons,” Biological Signals, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 127–139, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. J. Frederickson, S. W. Suh, D. Silva, C. J. Frederickson, and R. B. Thompson, “Importance of zinc in the central nervous system: The zinc-containing neuron,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 130, no. 5, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. L. Sensi, P. Paoletti, A. I. Bush, and I. Sekler, “Zinc in the physiology and pathology of the CNS,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 780–791, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. L. Sensi, P. Paoletti, J.-Y. Koh, E. Aizenman, A. I. Bush, and M. Hershfinkel, “The neurophysiology and pathology of brain zinc,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 45, pp. 16076–16085, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. K. Hurst, D. Wang, R. B. Thompson, and C. A. Fierke, “Carbonic anhydrase II-based metal ion sensing: advances and new perspectives,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Proteins and Proteomics, vol. 1804, no. 2, pp. 393–403, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Besser, E. Chorin, I. Sekler et al., “Synaptically released zinc triggers metabotropic signaling via a zinc-sensing receptor in the hippocampus,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2890–2901, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. G. Smart, A. M. Hosie, and P. S. Miller, “Zn2+ ions: modulators of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic activity,” Neuroscientist, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 432–442, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Granzotto and S. L. Sensi, “Intracellular zinc is a critical intermediate in the excitotoxic cascade,” Neurobiology of Disease, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. P. Paoletti, A. M. Vergnano, B. Barbour, and M. Casado, “Zinc at glutamatergic synapses,” Neuroscience, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 126–136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. R. Morris and C. W. Levenson, “Ion channels and zinc: mechanisms of neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration,” Journal of Toxicology, vol. 2012, Article ID 785647, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Paoletti, F. Perin-Dureau, A. Fayyazuddin, A. le Goff, I. Callebaut, and J. Neyton, “Molecular organization of a zinc binding N-terminal modulatory domain in a NMDA receptor subunit,” Neuron, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 911–925, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Rachline, F. Perin-Dureau, A. Le Goff, J. Neyton, and P. Paoletti, “The micromolar zinc-binding domain on the NMDA receptor subunit NR2B,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 308–317, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Paoletti, P. Ascher, and J. Neyton, “High-affinity zinc inhibition of NMDA NR1-NR2A receptors,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 5711–5725, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. M. Vergnano, N. Rebola, L. P. Savtchenko et al., “Zinc dynamics and action at excitatory synapses,” Neuron, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1101–1114, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Huang and S. Tepaamorndech, “The SLC30 family of zinc transporters-a review of current understanding of their biological and pathophysiological roles,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 34, no. 2-3, pp. 548–560, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. J. Cousins, J. P. Liuzzi, and L. A. Lichten, “Mammalian zinc transport, trafficking, and signals,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 34, pp. 24085–24089, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Krezel, Q. Hao, and W. Maret, “The zinc/thiolate redox biochemistry of metallothionein and the control of zinc ion fluctuations in cell signaling,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 463, no. 2, pp. 188–200, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. J. Stork and Y. V. Li, “Intracellular zinc elevation measured with a ‘calcium-specific’ indicator during ischemia and reperfusion in rat hippocampus: a question on calcium overload,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 41, pp. 10430–10437, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y. V. Medvedeva, B. Lin, C. W. Shuttleworth, and J. H. Weiss, “Intracellular Zn2+ accumulation contributes to synaptic failure, mitochondrial depolarization, and cell death in an acute slice oxygen-glucose deprivation model of ischemia,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1105–1114, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J.-Y. Koh, S. W. Suh, B. J. Gwag, Y. Y. He, C. Y. Hsu, and D. W. Choi, “The role of zinc in selective neuronal death after transient global cerebral ischemia,” Science, vol. 272, no. 5264, pp. 1013–1016, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. W. Shuttleworth and J. H. Weiss, “Zinc: new clues to diverse roles in brain ischemia,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 480–486, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. A. Aras and E. Aizenman, “Redox regulation of intracellular zinc: molecular signaling in the life and death of neurons,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 2249–2263, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. H. Weiss and S. L. Sensi, “Ca2+-Zn2+ permeable AMPA or kainate receptors: possible key factors in selective neurodegeneration,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 365–371, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. L. Sensi, H. Z. Yin, S. G. Carriedo, S. S. Rao, and J. H. Weiss, “Preferential Zn2+ influx through Ca2+-permeable AMPA/kainate channels triggers prolonged mitochondrial superoxide production,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 2414–2419, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. Z. Yin, S. L. Sensi, S. G. Carriedo, and J. H. Weiss, “Dendritic localization of Ca2+-permeable AMPA/kainate channels in hippocampal pyramidal neurons,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 409, no. 2, pp. 250–260, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. R. Martínez-Galán, C. Díaz, and J. M. Juiz, “Histochemical localization of neurons with zinc-permeable AMPA/kainate channels in rat brain slices,” Brain Research, vol. 963, no. 1-2, pp. 156–164, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. L. Sensi, L. M. T. Canzoniero, S. P. Yu et al., “Measurement of intracellular free zinc in living cortical neurons: routes of entry,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 24, pp. 9554–9564, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K.-M. Noh, H. Yokota, T. Mashiko, P. E. Castillo, R. S. Zukin, and M. V. L. Bennett, “Blockade of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors protects hippocampal neurons against global schemia-induced death,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 34, pp. 12230–12235, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. A. Kerchner, L. M. T. Canzoniero, S. P. Yu, C. Ling, and D. W. Choi, “Zn2+ current is mediated by voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and enhanced by extracellular acidity in mouse cortical neurones,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 528, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. F. Traynelis and S. G. Cull-Candy, “Proton inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in cerebellar neurons,” Nature, vol. 345, no. 6273, pp. 347–350, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. D. Mott, M. Benveniste, and R. J. Dingledine, “pH-dependent inhibition of kainate receptors by zinc,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1659–1671, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. V. Frazzini, I. G. Rapposelli, C. Corona, E. Rockabrand, L. M. T. Canzoniero, and S. L. Sensi, “Mild acidosis enhances AMPA receptor-mediated intracellular zinc mobilization in cortical neurons,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 7-8, pp. 356–361, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. E. Dineley, J. B. Brocard, and I. J. Reynolds, “Elevated intracellular zinc and altered proton homeostasis in forebrain neurons,” Neuroscience, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 439–449, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. P. Manzerra, M. M. Behrens, L. M. T. Canzoniero et al., “Zinc induces a Src family kinase-mediated up-regulation of NMDA receptor activity and excitotoxicity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 20, pp. 11055–11061, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Y. Lee, T. B. Cole, R. D. Palmiter, and J. Y. Koh, “Accumulation of zinc in degenerating hippocampal neurons of ZnT-3-null mice after seizures: evidence against synaptic vesicle origin,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 11, article RC79, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. L. Sensi, H. Z. Yin, and J. H. Weiss, “AMPA/kainate receptor-triggered Zn2+ entry into cortical neurons induces mitochondrial Zn2+ uptake and persistent mitochondrial dysfunction,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 3813–3818, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Jiang, P. G. Sullivan, S. L. Sensi, O. Steward, and J. H. Weiss, “Zn2+ induces permeability transition pore opening and release of pro-apoptotic peptides from neuronal mitochondria,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 50, pp. 47524–47529, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. E. Bossy-Wetzel, M. V. Talantova, W. D. Lee et al., “Crosstalk between nitric oxide and zinc pathways to neuronal cell death involving mitochondrial dysfunction and p38-activated K+ channels,” Neuron, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 351–365, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. K. He and E. Aizenman, “ERK signaling leads to mitochondrial dysfunction in extracellular zinc-induced neurotoxicity,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 452–461, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Y.-H. Kim and J.-Y. Koh, “The role of NADPH oxidase and neuronal nitric oxide synthase in zinc-induced poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation and cell death in cortical culture,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 407–418, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K.-M. Noh, Y. H. Kim, and J.-Y. Koh, “Mediation by membrane protein kinase C of zinc-induced oxidative neuronal injury in mouse cortical cultures,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1609–1616, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. T. Sheline, M. M. Behrens, and D. W. Choi, “Zinc-induced cortical neuronal death: contribution of energy failure attributable to loss of NAD+ and inhibition of glycolysis,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 3139–3146, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Lemire, R. Mailloux, and V. D. Appanna, “Zinc toxicity alters mitochondrial metabolism and leads to decreased ATP production in hepatocytes,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 175–182, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Y. Yuan, F. Niu, Y. Liu, and N. Lu, “Zinc and its effects on oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 923–928, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. C. McCord and E. Aizenman, “The role of intracellular zinc release in aging, oxidative stress, and Alzheimer's disease,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 6, article 77, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. W. Danysz and C. G. Parsons, “Alzheimer's disease, β-amyloid, glutamate, NMDA receptors and memantine—searching for the connections,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 324–352, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. T. J. A. Craddock, J. A. Tuszynski, D. Chopra et al., “The zinc dyshomeostasis hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e33552, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. Deshpande, H. Kawai, R. Metherate, C. G. Glabe, and J. Busciglio, “A role for synaptic zinc in activity-dependent aβ oligomer formation and accumulation at excitatory synapses,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 4004–4015, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. N. L. Bjorklund, L. C. Reese, V.-M. Sadagoparamanujam, V. Ghirardi, R. L. Woltjer, and G. Taglialatela, “Absence of amyloid β oligomers at the postsynapse and regulated synaptic Zn2+ in cognitively intact aged individuals with Alzheimer's disease neuropathology,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 7, no. 1, article 23, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. E. R. Kandel, “The molecular biology of memory: CAMP, PKA, CRE, CREB-1, CREB-2, and CPEB,” Molecular Brain, vol. 5, no. 1, article 14, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. Middei, A. Spalloni, P. Longone et al., “CREB selectively controls learning-induced structural remodeling of neurons,” Learning and Memory, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 330–336, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. H.-L. Gao, H. Xu, N. Xin, W. Zheng, Z.-H. Chi, and Z.-Y. Wang, “Disruption of the CaMKII/CREB signaling is associated with zinc deficiency-induced learning and memory impairments,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 584–591, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. Tu, S. Okamoto, S. A. Lipton, and H. Xu, “Oligomeric Aβ-induced synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 9, article 48, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. S. Li, M. Jin, T. Koeglsperger, N. E. Shepardson, G. M. Shankar, and D. J. Selkoe, “Soluble a β oligomers inhibit long-term potentiation through a mechanism involving excessive activation of extrasynaptic NR2B-containing NMDA receptors,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 18, pp. 6627–6638, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. S. Li, S. Hong, N. E. Shepardson, D. M. Walsh, G. M. Shankar, and D. Selkoe, “Soluble oligomers of amyloid β protein facilitate hippocampal long-term depression by disrupting neuronal glutamate uptake,” Neuron, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 788–801, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. Talantova, S. Sanz-Blasco, X. Zhang et al., “Aβ induces astrocytic glutamate release, extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activation, and synaptic loss,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 27, pp. E2518–E2527, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. D. Olivares, V. K. Deshpande, Y. Shi et al., “N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists and memantine treatment for alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and parkinson's disease,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 746–758, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. A. K. Sharma, S. T. Pavlova, J. Kim, and L. M. Mirica, “The effect of Cu2+ and Zn2+ on the Aβ42 peptide aggregation and cellular toxicity,” Metallomics, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1529–1536, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. A. M. Grabrucker, M. J. Schmeisser, P. T. Udvardi et al., “Amyloid beta protein-induced zinc sequestration leads to synaptic loss via dysregulation of the ProSAP2/Shank3 scaffold,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 6, no. 1, article 65, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. M. Grabrucker, “A role for synaptic zinc in ProSAP/Shank PSD scaffold malformation in autism spectrum disorders,” Developmental Neurobiology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 136–146, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. N. Beyer, D. T. R. Coulson, S. Heggarty et al., “ZnT3 mRNA levels are reduced in Alzheimer's disease post-mortem brain,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 4, no. 1, article 53, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. T. E. Bartlett and Y. T. Wang, “The intersections of NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity and cell survival,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 74, pp. 59–68, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. Travaglia, A. Pietropaolo, D. La Mendola, V. G. Nicoletti, and E. Rizzarelli, “The inorganic perspectives of neurotrophins and Alzheimer's disease,” The Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 111, pp. 130–137, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. Corona, F. Masciopinto, E. Silvestri et al., “Dietary zinc supplementation of 3xTg-AD mice increases BDNF levels and prevents cognitive deficits as well as mitochondrial dysfunction,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 1, no. 28, p. e91, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. H. Jung, M.-H. Park, S.-Y. Choi, and J.-Y. Koh, “Activation of the Trk signaling pathway by extracellular zinc. Role of metalloproteinases,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 12, pp. 11995–12001, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. D. H. Linkous, P. A. Adlard, P. B. Wanschura, K. M. Conko, and J. M. Flinn, “The effects of enhanced zinc on spatial memory and plaque formation in transgenic mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 565–579, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. N. G. Faux, C. W. Ritchie, A. Gunn et al., “PBT2 rapidly improves cognition in Alzheimer's Disease: additional phase II analyses,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 509–516, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus