Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2015, Article ID 679815, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/679815
Research Article

Change of Neural Connectivity of the Red Nucleus in Patients with Striatocapsular Hemorrhage: A Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, 317-1 Daemyung Dong, Namku, Daegu 705-717, Republic of Korea

Received 27 January 2015; Revised 21 June 2015; Accepted 22 June 2015

Academic Editor: James M. Wyss

Copyright © 2015 Sung Ho Jang and Hyeok Gyu Kwon. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. R. Daube, Medical Neurosciences: An Approach to Anatomy, Pathology, and Physiology by Systems and Levels, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 1986.
  2. J. A. Downey, The Physiological Basis of Rehabilitation Medicine, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 1994.
  3. C. Habas and E. A. Cabanis, “Cortical projections to the human red nucleus: a diffusion tensor tractography study with a 1.5-T MRI machine,” Neuroradiology, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 755–762, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Habas and E. A. Cabanis, “Cortical projection to the human red nucleus: complementary results with probabilistic tractography at 3 T,” Neuroradiology, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 777–784, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Lundy-Ekman, Neuroscience: Fundamentals for Rehabilitation, Saunders Elsevier, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 4th edition, 2013.
  6. G. D. Muir and I. Q. Whishaw, “Red nucleus lesions impair overground locomotion in rats: a kinetic analysis,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1113–1122, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. T. Leonard, The Neuroscience of Human Movement, Mosby, St Louis, Mo, USA, 1998.
  8. H. G. Kuypers, “The organization of the ‘motor system’,” International Journal of Neurology, vol. 4, pp. 78–91, 1963. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. G. J. M. Kuypers, “A new look at the organization of the motor system,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 57, pp. 381–403, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Jarratt and B. Hyland, “Neuronal activity in rat red nucleus during forelimb reach-to-grasp movements,” Neuroscience, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 629–642, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Küchler, K. Fouad, O. Weinmann, M. E. Schwab, and O. Raineteau, “Red nucleus projections to distinct motor neuron pools in the rat spinal cord,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 448, no. 4, pp. 349–359, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. L. E. van Kan and M. L. Mccurdy, “Role of primate magnocellular red nucleus neurons in controlling hand preshaping during reaching to grasp,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1461–1478, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. R. Kennedy, “Corticospinal, rubrospinal and rubro-olivary projections: a unifying hypothesis,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 474–479, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Paul and D. J. Gould, “The red nucleus: past, present, and future,” Neuroanatomy, vol. 9, pp. 1–3, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. J. ten Donkelaar, “Evolution of the red nucleus and rubrospinal tract,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 9–20, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Hyland, “Neural activity related to reaching and grasping in rostral and caudal regions of rat motor cortex,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 255–269, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Belhaj-Saïf and P. D. Cheney, “Plasticity in the distribution of the red nucleus output to forearm muscles after unilateral lesions of the pyramidal tract,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 3147–3153, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. J. Z'Graggen, K. Fouad, O. Raineteau, G. A. S. Metz, M. E. Schwab, and G. L. Kartje, “Compensatory sprouting and impulse rerouting after unilateral pyramidal tract lesion in neonatal rats,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 6561–6569, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. S. Yeo and S. H. Jang, “Changes in red nucleus after pyramidal tract injury in patients with cerebral infarct,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 373–377, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. G. Lawrence and H. G. J. M. Kuypers, “The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions,” Brain, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. G. Lawrence and H. G. J. M. Kuypers, “The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey: II. The effects of lesions of the descending brain-stem pathways,” Brain, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 15–36, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H.-S. Yang, H. G. Kwon, J. H. Hong, C. P. Hong, and S. H. Jang, “The rubrospinal tract in the human brain: diffusion tensor imaging study,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 504, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J.-S. Yoo, O. L. Kim, S. H. Kim, M. S. Kim, and S. H. Jang, “Relation between cognition and neural connection from injured cingulum to brainstem cholinergic nuclei in chronic patients with traumatic brain injury,” Brain Injury, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1257–1261, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Bridge, O. Thomas, S. Jbabdi, and A. Cowey, “Changes in connectivity after visual cortical brain damage underlie altered visual function,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 1433–1444, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. E. J. Behrens, H. J. Berg, S. Jbabdi, M. F. S. Rushworth, and M. W. Woolrich, “Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain?” NeuroImage, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 144–155, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. E. J. Behrens, H. Johansen-Berg, M. W. Woolrich et al., “Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 750–757, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. G. Kwon and S. H. Jang, “Differences in neural connectivity between the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in the human brain,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 8, article 41, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Demeurisse, O. Demol, and E. Robaye, “Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia,” European Neurology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 382–389, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Brunnstrom, “Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages,” Physical Therapy, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 357–375, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. I. T. Cunha, P. A. C. Lim, H. Henson, T. Monga, H. Qureshy, and E. J. Protas, “Performance-based gait tests for acute stroke patients,” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 848–856, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Jiang, P. C. M. van Zijl, J. Kim, G. D. Pearlson, and S. Mori, “DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 106–116, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. H. Jang, “Somatotopic arrangement and location of the corticospinal tract in the brainstem of the human brain,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 553–557, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. D. Evans, Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA, 1996.
  34. A. Stadlbauer, E. Salomonowitz, G. Strunk, T. Hammen, and O. Ganslandt, “Quantitative diffusion tensor fiber tracking of age-related changes in the limbic system,” European Radiology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 130–137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. Pagani, F. Agosta, M. A. Rocca, D. Caputo, and M. Filippi, “Voxel-based analysis derived from fractional anisotropy images of white matter volume changes with aging,” NeuroImage, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 657–667, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. H. Jang, K. Kim, S. H. Kim, S. M. Son, W. H. Jang, and H. G. Kwon, “The relation between motor function of stroke patients and diffusion tensor imaging findings for the corticospinal tract,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 572, pp. 1–6, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. H. Jang, “The corticospinal tract from the viewpoint of brain rehabilitation,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 193–199, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. D. Schaechter, Z. P. Fricker, K. L. Perdue et al., “Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 3461–3474, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Lindenberg, V. Renga, L. L. Zhu, F. Betzler, D. Alsop, and G. Schlaug, “Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke,” Neurology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 280–287, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. E. B. Quinlan, L. Dodakian, J. See et al., “Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 132–145, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. M. Huisman, H. G. J. M. Kuypers, and C. A. Verburgh, “Differences in collateralization of the descending spinal pathways from red nucleus and other brain stem cell groups in cat and monkey,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 57, pp. 185–217, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. Yamada, “Diffusion tensor tractography should be used with caution,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. E14–E15, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  43. P. Fillard, M. Descoteaux, A. Goh et al., “Quantitative evaluation of 10 tractography algorithms on a realistic diffusion MR phantom,” NeuroImage, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 220–234, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus