Corrigendum to “Efficacy and Interindividual Variability in Motor-Cortex Plasticity following Anodal tDCS and Paired-Associative Stimulation”

Figure 4

Individual response patterns of all subjects for (a) anodal tDCS and (b) PAS separated according to the defined cut-off ranges of >100%, >110%, and >150% relative to baseline MEP values (set as 100%). Responders () are depicted with grey coloured fields and nonresponders (NR) with white fields. (c) Grouped presentation of responders to both stimulation types (17%, dark grey), to PAS only (28%, light grey), or to anodal tDCS only (7%, intermediate grey) and nonresponders (48%, white) for the >150% cut-off range relative to baseline MEP values (set as 100%).

(a) Anodal tDCS

(b) PAS

(c) Combined overview (150% cut-off range)