Clinical Study
Exploiting Interlimb Arm and Leg Connections for Walking Rehabilitation: A Training Intervention in Stroke
Table 2
Single-subject analysis.
| Measure | Number of participants (out of 19) with significant changes after training |
| Strength | | LA plantarflexion | 10 | LA SOL | 10 | MA plantarflexion | 10 | MA SOL | 8 | LA dorsiflexion | 11 | LA TA | 7 | MA dorsiflexion | 12 | MA TA | 11 | LA grip | 14 | LA FCR | 7 | MA grip | 17 | MA FCR | 8 | Walking bEMG modulation index | | MA SOL | 13 | MA TA | 9 | LA SOL | 10 | LA TA | 12 | MA FCR | 12 | MA PD | 11 | LA FCR | 13 | LA PD | 12 | Walking kinematics | | LA ankle | 9 | LA knee | 9 | MA ankle | 10 | MA knee | 11 | Walking parameters | | LA stride duration | 8 | MA stride duration | 9 | LA stance duration | 11 | MA stance duration | 10 | LA swing duration | 14 | MA swing duration | 10 | LA stride frequency | 8 | MA stride frequency | 8 | Walking cutaneous reflex modulation index | | MA SOL | 13 | MA TA | 10 | LA SOL | 13 | LA TA | 12 | MA FCR | 13 | MA PD | 12 | LA FCR | 9 | LA PD | 12 |
|
|
MA, more affected; LA, less affected; SOL, soleus; TA, tibialis anterior; FCR, flexor carpi radialis; PD, posterior deltoid; bEMG, background electromyography.
|