Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 8030676, 8 pages
Research Article

Traumatic Brain Injury and Substance Related Disorder: A 10-Year Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan

1Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
2Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
3Department of Neurosurgery, The No. 7 People’s Hospital of Hebei Province, Dingzhou, Hebei 073000, China
4Department of Neurosurgery, Yucheng People’s Hospital, Yucheng, Shandong 251200, China
5Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
6Department of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
7Cosmetic Applications and Management Department, Yuh-Ing Junior College of Health Care & Management, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
8Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan

Received 6 May 2016; Accepted 18 August 2016

Academic Editor: James M. Wyss

Copyright © 2016 Chieh-Hsin Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Whether traumatic brain injury (TBI) is causally related to substance related disorder (SRD) is still debatable, especially in persons with no history of mental disorders at the time of injury. This study analyzed data in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for 19,109 patients aged ≥18 years who had been diagnosed with TBI during 2000–2010. An additional 19,109 randomly selected age and gender matched patients without TBI (1 : 1 ratio) were enrolled in the control group. The relationship between TBI and SRD was estimated with Cox proportional hazard regression models. During the follow-up period, SRD developed in 340 patients in the TBI group and in 118 patients in the control group. After controlling for covariates, the overall incidence of SRD was 3.62-fold higher in the TBI group compared to the control group. Additionally, patients in the severe TBI subgroup were 9.01 times more likely to have SRD compared to controls. Notably, patients in the TBI group were prone to alcohol related disorders. The data in this study indicate that TBI is significantly associated with the subsequent risk of SRD. Physicians treating patients with TBI should be alert to this association to prevent the occurrence of adverse events.

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents complex social problems and is a major cause of mortality and permanent disability in both developing and developed countries. In the US alone, an average of 1.4 million people experienced TBI annually. Although approximately 79% (1.1 million) of these are minor injuries that could be managed at emergency departments, approximately 17% (235,000) need to be treated in hospital, and as many as (4%) 50,000 are fatal [1, 2]. In Taiwan, the estimated annual average number of TBIs is 52,000, up to 25% of which are fatal [3]. Traumatic brain injury, also known as intracranial injury, occurs when an external force traumatically impacts the head in excess of the protective capacity of the cranium [4]. A TBI can cause chronic physical disability and neurobehavioral sequelae that produce highly disruptive cognitive and behavioural changes. Survivors often have difficulties maintaining personal relationships, and their work coping skills may be even more disabling than any residual physical disabilities [5]. Growing body of evidence also indicates that a history of TBI increases the risk of future brain injuries. Multiple brain injuries obviously have long lasting negative effects on mental health and some studies have reported a high prevalence of substance related disorder (SRD) in TBI patients [610]. However, an association between TBI and the subsequent development of SRD has not been well established [1012]. That is, whether TBI itself increases SRD risk, especially in persons with no history of mental disorders at the time of injury, is unknown. Most studies of the connection between SRD and TBI have focused almost entirely on the causal relationships between the use or abuse of drugs or alcohol and TBI. Little population-based data for this association are available, and studies of the relationship between psychological problems, substance abuse, and TBI either have been contradictory or have used very small clinical samples [9, 10].

Large-scale studies of the relationship between TBI and subsequent SRD risk are rarely performed in population-based Asian cohorts. In 2011, Ilie et al. performed a telephone survey of a cross-sectional sample of 1999 Ontario, Canada, adults aged 18–93 years. Compared to subjects without a history of TBI, those with a history of TBI had higher adjusted odds of smoking and nonmedical use of cannabis and opioids. The TBI group also had higher odds of positive results in screenings for psychological distress. However, their survey results were potentially biased because they were based on self-reported data, and the response rate for the survey was only 51%. Additionally, they could not rule out the possibility that cognitive impairments affected the responses in the TBI group [13]. Therefore, this study retrospectively analyzed data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) to clarify the relationship between TBI and subsequent risk of SRD.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Sources

The NHIRD used in this population-based cohort study comprises data for 99.9% of the 23.74 million residents of Taiwan and is maintained by the national healthcare system of Taiwan [3]. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2000–2010 data contained in the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID). This database was developed by the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program and contains data for 1 million randomly selected patients. The LHID 2010 contains original claims data for 1 million beneficiaries randomly sampled during the period from January 1 to December 31, 2010. Distributions of gender, age, and insured payroll-related amounts do not significantly differ between the LHID 2010 and the original NHIRD. The large sample size of the dataset provides an opportunity to study SRD risk in patients. Diagnoses are coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, Ninth Revision (ICD-9-CM) code. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was also evaluated and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.

2.2. Subject Selection

This study analyzed 19,109 patients aged 18 years or older and diagnosed with TBI (ICD-9-CM codes 800, 803-804, and 850–854; operation codes 01.23, 01.24, 01.25, 0131, 01.39, and 02.01) during 2000–2010 [3]. To ensure accurate data, the TBI group was limited to patients who had received ≥2 TBI diagnoses during ambulatory visits or ≥1 diagnoses during inpatient care. The index date was defined as the date of the first clinical visit for TBI. Those diagnosed with any mental disorder (ICD-9-CM codes 290–319) before the index date were excluded from the TBI group. The TBI group was then divided into severe, moderate, and mild TBI subgroups. A severe TBI was defined as a TBI that received surgery during the course of inpatient treatment; a moderate TBI was defined as having hospitalized for TBI but not having undergone an operation; a mild TBI was defined as any history of head injury that did not receive inpatient treatment [14].

In this study, SRD was defined as a record of an ICD-9 code for SRD (ICD-9-CM codes 291, 292, 303.0, 303.9, 304, or 305) [15] entered by a psychiatrist and either ≥2 diagnoses of SRD in ambulatory visits or ≥1 diagnosis in inpatient care. The exclusion criterion was any diagnosis of SRD on or before the index date. SRD was further categorized as alcohol abuse (ICD-9-CM codes 291, 303.0, 303.9, and 305.0) [16] or illicit drug use (ICD-9-CM codes 292 and 304, and all 305 codes except 305.0) [16, 17].

The non-TBI group was randomly selected from the registry of beneficiaries who had no TBI-related medical claims and no history of mental disorder. Each patient in the TBI group was matched with one person in the non-TBI group by age, gender, and year of TBI diagnosis (index year); thus, 19,109 patients were enrolled in the non-TBI group. A 1 : 1 ratio of TBI to non-TBI patients was maintained to enhance the power of statistical tests and to ensure a sufficient number of SRD cases for stratified analyses. A post hoc sample size calculation was performed to determine statistical power. Based on the event rate, the power for detecting a significant association between TBI and subsequent development of SRD exceeded 99% (). Figure 1 shows a flowchart of the study procedure.

Figure 1: Flow diagram summarizing the process of enrollment. LHID: Longitudinal Health Insurance Database.
2.3. Outcome and Comorbidities

The outcome was the occurrence of SRD during the follow-up period. Both cohorts were followed up until December 31, 2010, or until a diagnosis of SRD.

Only a few clearly defined and modifiable risk factors have been defined for psychiatric disorders [18]. Some studies have used chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as an indicator of smoking status and as a proxy for lifestyle-related behaviours [14, 19]. However, most studies have focused on largely unmodifiable factors such as age and gender. Potential confounders include many factors associated with both TBI and mental disorder, including common physical comorbidities such as hypertension (ICD-9-CM codes 401–405), diabetes mellitus (ICD-9-CM code 250), hyperlipidemia (ICD-9-CM code 272), coronary artery disease (ICD-9-CM codes 410–414), congestive heart failure (ICD-9-CM code 428), COPD (ICD-9-CM codes 491, 492, 494, and 496), malignancy (ICD-9-CM codes 140–208) [18], and unhealthy lifestyle behaviours [14]. The urbanization level and income-related insurance payment amounts were used to evaluate personal socioeconomic status. The urbanization level was categorized as urban, suburban, or rural [20]. The average monthly income was categorized into three groups: low (0–NT$20,000), medium (NT$20,000–40,000), or high (more than NT$40,000) [15, 21].

The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was used to assess physical condition, that is, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, rheumatic disease, peptic ulcer disease, mild and moderate or severe liver disease, diabetes (with or without chronic complication), hemiplegia or paraplegia, renal disease, any malignancy (including lymphoma and leukemia but excluding skin malignancy), metastatic solid tumor, and AIDS/HIV. The CCI scores were then categorized into four levels: 0, 1-2, 3-4, and ≥5. Each increase in the CCI score level corresponds with a stepwise increase in cumulative mortality [22].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Chi-square test was used to compare distributions of categorical demographics and clinical characteristics between the TBI and non-TBI groups. Student’s -test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used as appropriate to compare mean age and follow-up time () between the two cohorts. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of SRD, and the differences between the curves were compared by 2-tailed log-rank test. In the TBI group, survival was calculated until hospitalization, an ambulatory visit for SRD, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2010), whichever came first. Incidence rates of SRD estimated in 1000 person-years were compared between the two cohorts. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for SRD in the TBI group when the proportional hazards assumption was satisfied. Multivariable Cox models were adjusted for age, gender, income and urbanization level, CCI score, and relevant comorbidities. A 2-tailed value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data processing and statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of TBI and Non-TBI Groups

Table 1 compares the baseline demographic characteristics and comorbidities in the two cohorts. The mean age was 42.2 ± 17.6 years in the TBI group and 42.5 ± 17.2 years in the non-TBI group. In the TBI group, 56.98% were male. The percentages of patients with the following comorbidities were significantly higher in the TBI group compared to the non-TBI group, respectively: hypertension (36.67 versus 21.92, ), diabetes mellitus (22.62 versus 12.99, ), hyperlipidemia (31.06 versus 20.83, ), coronary artery disease (6.69 versus 2.46, ), congestive heart failure (7.04 versus 3.23, ), COPD (24.41 versus 14.43, ), and malignancy (8.46 versus 5.23, ). The TBI group also had higher CCI scores. Moreover, patients in the TBI group were also more likely to qualify for insurance premium exemptions, less likely to pay high insurance premiums, and more likely to live in areas with low urbanization levels.

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients with and without traumatic brain injury.

During the follow-up period, diagnoses of SRD significantly () differed between the TBI group (1.78% (340 patients)) and the non-TBI group (0.62% (118 patients)). The TBI group also had significantly larger SRD subgroups for alcohol abuse (0.66 versus 0.13 in non-TBI, ) and illicit drug abuse (0.87 versus 0.44 in non-TBI, ).

3.2. Incidence and Risk of SRD

Table 2 stratifies the SRD incidence densities and HRs by gender, age, and comorbidity. During the follow-up period, 1.78% (340) patients in the TBI group and 0.62% (118) patients in the non-TBI group developed SRD. The overall SRD risk was 3.62 times greater in the TBI group compared to the non-TBI group (1.97 versus 0.41 per 1,000 person-years, resp.) after adjusting for age, gender, income, urbanization level, CCI, and related comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, COPD, and malignancy). The gender-specific analyses showed that, in both cohorts, the incidence of TBI was higher in men than in women (2.69 versus 0.57 per 1,000 person-years, resp., in the TBI group; 1.01 versus 0.19 per 1,000 person-years, resp., in the non-TBI group). Additionally, the SRD risk was significant in both men and women (adjusted HR = 3.69 versus 3.45, resp., ).

Table 2: Incidence and hazard ratios of substance related disorder by demographic characteristics and comorbidity among patients with or without TBI.

The incidence of SRD was consistently higher in the TBI group at different ages, and the incidence rate consistently decreased with age. Additionally, the SRD risk decreased with age, and the age-specific risk analysis showed a significantly higher SRD risk in TBI patients aged younger than 40 years compared to those aged 40 years and older (HR = 5.03 versus 1.19; for interaction <0.001). Regardless of comorbidities, SRD risk was higher in the TBI group than in the non-TBI group. The SRD risk contributed by TBI decreased in the presence of comorbidity (HR = 5.14 versus 2.59; for interaction = 0.002).

Figure 2 compares the Kaplan-Meier curves for the cumulative incidence of SRD between the TBI and non-TBI groups at the 10-year follow-up. The cumulative incidence curves for SRD in the two cohorts showed a significantly higher incidence of SRD in the TBI group compared to the non-TBI group (log-rank test ).

Figure 2: Cumulative incidence of substance related disorder among TBI (solid line) and control (dashed line) cases. TBI: traumatic brain injury.
3.3. Predictors of SRD

The Cox regression analysis results for the TBI group revealed that the major risk factors for SRD were high CCI score (adjusted HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.57–2.00). Age and female gender had a protective role for SRD in these patients (Table 3).

Table 3: Cox regression model: significant predictors of substance related disorder after TBI.
3.4. SRD and TBI Severity

Table 4 shows that SRD risk increased with severity of TBI, particularly in those with severe TBI (adjusted HR = 9.01; 95% CI = 4.97–16.33).

Table 4: Incidence and hazard ratios for substance related disorder stratified by the severity of TBI.
3.5. Incidence and Risk of SRD Subtypes

Table 5 compares incidence rates and HRs for various outcomes between the TBI and non-TBI groups. After adjusting for covariates, the TBI group had a 6.22-fold higher incidence of alcohol abuse (95% CI = 3.94–9.84) and a 2.47-fold higher incidence of illicit drug use (95% CI = 1.83–3.32).

Table 5: Incidence rates and hazard ratios of different substance related disorder risk in patients of TBI compared those without TBI.

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to perform a nationwide population-based analysis of the relationship between TBI and subsequent SRD in an Asian population. This study showed that SRD risk increases after TBI. SRD was identified in 1.78% (340) patients in the TBI group but in only 0.62% (118) patients in the non-TBI group. Overall, SRD risk was 3.62 times greater in the TBI group compared to the non-TBI group. In both genders, TBI was associated with a significantly increased risk of SRD. However, the incidence rate of post-TBI SRD decreased as age increased. Additionally, SRD risk increased with the severity of TBI. Specifically, compared to patients in the non-TBI group, SRD risk was 5.5 times higher in those with mild TBI and 6.5 times higher in those with moderate TBI. Comparisons of SRD subtypes in the TBI group further showed that alcohol abuse disorder was the leading one. Notably, patients in the TBI group were prone to suffer from alcohol abuse disorders.

Studies of the association between TBI and SRD have reported inconsistent results. A prospective survey of 939 health-maintenance organization members found that TBI survivors with no history of psychiatric disorder in the year prior to injury had an odds ratio of 4.5 for substance abuse within the 12 months after TBI. The odds ratio for substance abuse dropped to 1.4 at the third year after TBI. Prevalence rates for SRD increased from 7.3% pre-TBI to 14% at 1 year after TBI while SRD rates in matched non-TBI controls were 1.7% and 1.6% for the respective time periods [11]. Another study of 121 hospital inpatients with TBI and 133 controls by Ponsford et al. found that, in 25.4% of the TBI patients, hazardous levels of substance use were mentioned. Substance use increased and peaked by 2 years after injury. They concluded that substance use increased over time [23]. In contrast, an Australia study of sequential cohorts (aged 20–24, 40–44, and 60–64 years in wave 1) assessed TBI and SRD at baseline and 4 years later by using a survey methodology. Of the 7485 enrollees in the first wave of interviews, 89.7% were reinterviewed in the second wave of interviews. Between waves 1 and 2, 56 of the reported TBIs were mild (230.8/100000 person-years), and 44 were moderate (180.5/100000 person-years). The TBI risk was higher in males than in females and was highest in the cohort aged 20–24 years. Traffic accidents caused more moderate TBIs than mild TBIs. In wave 1 interviews, neither alcohol nor marijuana abuse is a predictor of TBI. In the second wave of interviews, TBI was not a predictor of substance related problems. However, the TBI incidence declined with age [10]. In Bombardier et al., changes in substance use from before to after TBI were investigated in 197 hospitalized adult patients. According to their data, a significant reduction in heavy drinking during the first year following TBI was reported [24].

The vast majority of TBI research has focused on the role of alcohol as a cause of TBI or risk factor for TBI rather than vice versa. However, the data analyzed in our study revealed that alcohol consumption increased after TBI and that alcohol use disorder was the most common SRD after TBI. Reports of the association between TBI and alcohol use disorder in the literature have been inconsistent. For example, a 2015 study found that a TBI group showed a higher incident rate ratio of developing alcohol use disorder (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.5) compared to the non-TBI group. The TBI group also had a higher risk of alcohol use disorder within 1 year after TBI [25]. In addition to these human studies, a rat model of TBI in Mayeux et al. showed that marked localized neuroinflammation at the TBI site was associated with post-TBI escalation of alcohol drinking [26]. In contrast, in Kreutzer et al., a comparison of self-reported alcohol use before and after TBI showed that, of the patients that were moderate-to-heavy drinkers before TBI, more than two-thirds of them reduced alcohol consumption, and approximately half of them quit drinking alcohol [27].

Although the exact mechanisms underlying the relationship between TBI and SRD are unclear, several possibilities could help explain the link between TBI and SRD. First, persistent inflammatory events caused by TBI in the nervous system result in gliosis, cerebral edema, and expression of proinflammatory cytokine. Notably, a large and growing body of literature indicates that the relationship between alcohol intake and inflammation is bidirectional; that is, alcohol causes inflammation of the brain, which induces an increase in alcohol consumption [28]. Therefore, TBI-related inflammatory events could induce an increase in alcohol intake. Thus, both TBI and long term alcohol intake promote neuroinflammatory events in the central nervous system. Alcohol intake after TBI was a kind of feed-forward mechanism wherein TBI-related inflammatory events promote alcohol intake, which further reinforces and amplifies inflammation in the nervous system. Second, substantial evidence indicates that another pathogenic cause of TBI is dysregulation of midbrain dopaminergic systems, which contributes to the chronic cognitive and behavioural sequelae associated with TBI [29]. Emerging evidence also indicates that TBI disrupts dopamine (DA) pathways. After electrical stimulation of the fore brain, experimental unilateral administration of controlled impacts to the parietal cortex of rats blunted striatal DA release and also decreased DA transporter [30, 31]. DA system hypofunction is also a major cause for the development of substance and alcohol use disorders [29, 32]. Furthermore, a frontal cortex TBI can cause an organic personality disorder tending to promote substance abuse [3335]. TBI to the frontal cortex could also increase SRD risk by introducing long term executive cognitive deficits. The frontal lobes of the brain are involved in executive functions and also have roles in predicting consequences, decision making between actions, and suppressing unacceptable psychosocial responses [36]. Losing these functions is a key element of neurobiology of substance dependence and addiction [28].

The strength of this study is the use of a large representative population-based dataset to demonstrate an association between TBI and SRD risk. The large sample size also enabled analyses stratified by the time and the severity of TBI. However, several limitations of this study are noted. First, the diagnoses of TBI and SRD were based on ICD-9-CM codes entered in patient records. Therefore, one limitation of this study is the unknown accuracy of diagnostic codes entered in the database, which depends on the performance of clinical physicians. To correct for this limitation, only TBI diagnosed by surgeons and SRD diagnosed by psychiatrists where each had at least two consensus diagnoses were included in this study. Notably, the Taiwan Bureau of National Health Insurance regularly audits medical specialists to ensure the accuracy of their insurance claim codes. Therefore, doctors and medical institutions are motivated to enter diagnostic codes accurately because they are subject to large fines for coding errors. Additionally, the NHIRD has been used for many years in various studies [2628]. A second limitation is that the TBI population is overrepresented by (often undiagnosed) substance abusers in particular, because alcohol and other illicit drugs so often are precipitating factors in the injury. So it remains possible that a large portion of the greater diagnosis is mediated by the eventual treatment seeking of patients that were substance users/abusers before injury. Third, the NHIRD does not contain details for some data that could compromise our findings, such as family history of mental disorder, marital status, personality characteristics, Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism of trauma, and the duration of loss of consciousness. Fourth, most Taiwanese people are of Chinese ethnicity; further studies are needed to determine whether our findings are applicable in other ethnic groups. Another issue is that, despite the high coverage rate of the National Health Insurance system and the low payments for health care in Taiwan, people with SRD may not seek medical care because they prefer to avoid embarrassment or legal issues. Finally, since statistical significance may not indicate clinical significance, further clinical trials are needed to examine the underlying mechanisms of TBI and SRD and to confirm their relationship.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this nationwide population-based cohort study revealed that TBI increases the risk of subsequent SRD. However, further studies are needed to collect detailed data and to explore the mechanisms underlying this association. Timely interventions may help alleviate SRD associated with brain injury.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests in the publication of this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Tai-Hsin Tsai and Yu-Feng Su contributed equally to the paper. Ying-Yi Lu and Chih-Lung Lin contributed equally to the paper.


  1. S. M. DiRusso, T. Sullivan, C. Holly, S. N. Cuff, and J. Savino, “An artificial neural network as a model for prediction of survival in trauma patients: validation for a regional trauma area,” Journal of Trauma-Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 212–223, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. A. Nakagawa, S. Ashwal, M. Mathur et al., “Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 Task Force recommendations,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2139–2155, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y.-C. Tung, H.-P. Tu, W.-C. Tsai et al., “Increased incidence of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in adult patients following traumatic brain injury: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 6, article e0129043, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. I. Maas, N. Stocchetti, and R. Bullock, “Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 728–741, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Khan, I. J. Baguley, and I. D. Cameron, “4: rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury,” Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 290–295, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. J. A. Dean and A. Sterr, “Long-term effects of mild traumatic brain injury on cognitive performance,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 30, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Wehman, P. Targett, M. West, and J. Kregel, “Productive work and employment for persons with traumatic brain injury: what have we learned after 20 years?” Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 115–127, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. J. Anstey, P. Butterworth, A. F. Jorm, H. Christensen, B. Rodgers, and T. D. Windsor, “A population survey found an association between self-reports of traumatic brain injury and increased psychiatric symptoms,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1202–1209, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. E. Jorge, R. G. Robinson, D. Moser, A. Tateno, B. Crespo-Facorro, and S. Arndt, “Major depression following traumatic brain injury,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. J. Tait, K. J. Anstey, and P. Butterworth, “Incidence of self-reported brain injury and the relationship with substance abuse: findings from a longitudinal community survey,” BMC Public Health, vol. 10, article 171, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. R. Fann, B. Burington, A. Leonetti, K. Jaffe, W. J. Katon, and R. S. Thompson, “Psychiatric illness following traumatic brain injury in an adult health maintenance organization population,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. R. Hibbard, S. Uysal, K. Kepler, J. Bogdany, and J. Silver, “Axis I psychopathology in individuals with traumatic brain injury,” Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 24–39, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Ilie, E. M. Adlaf, R. E. Mann et al., “Associations between a history of traumatic brain injuries and current cigarette smoking, substance use, and elevated psychological distress in a population sample of Canadian adults,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 32, no. 14, pp. 1130–1134, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y.-C. Chi, H.-L. Wu, C.-P. Chu, M.-C. Huang, P.-C. Lee, and Y.-Y. Chen, “Traumatic brain injury and affective disorder: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan, 2000–2010,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 191, pp. 56–61, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K.-H. Chung, C.-Y. Li, S.-Y. Kuo, T. Sithole, W.-W. Liu, and M.-H. Chung, “Risk of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic insomnia and sedative-hypnotic prescription: a nationwide population-based follow-up study,” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 543–551, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Nanchal, G. Kumar, T. Majumdar et al., “Utilization of mechanical ventilation for asthma exacerbations: analysis of a national database,” Respiratory Care, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 644–653, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. M. Mortensen, L. A. Copeland, M. J. Pugh et al., “Diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy after hospitalization for pneumonia,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L.-Y. Hu, C.-C. Shen, J.-H. Hung et al., “Risk of psychiatric disorders following symptomatic menopausal transition: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study,” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 6, Article ID e2800, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. B. Ritz, S. L. Rhodes, L. Qian, E. Schernhammer, J. H. Olsen, and S. Friis, “L-type calcium channel blockers and parkinson disease in Denmark,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 600–606, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Y. Liu, Y. T. Hung, Y. L. Chuang et al., “Incorporating development stratification of Taiwan townships into sampling design of large scale health interview survey,” Journal of Health Management, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  21. Y.-K. Lee, C.-W. Lee, M.-Y. Huang, C.-Y. Hsu, and Y.-C. Su, “Increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a nationwide cohort study,” Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, vol. 22, article 66, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A.-S. Kuan, Y.-T. Chen, C.-J. Teng, S.-J. Wang, and M.-T. Chen, “Risk of meningioma in patients with head injury: a nationwide population-based study,” Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 457–462, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Ponsford, R. Whelan-Goodinson, and A. Bahar-Fuchs, “Alcohol and drug use following traumatic brain injury: a prospective study,” Brain Injury, vol. 21, no. 13-14, pp. 1385–1392, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. H. Bombardier, N. R. Temkin, J. Machamer, and S. S. Dikmen, “The natural history of drinking and alcohol-related problems after traumatic brain injury,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 185–191, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. A. Johnson, A. Eick-Cost, V. Jeffries, K. Russell, and J. L. Otto, “Risk of alcohol use disorder or other drug use disorder among U.S. service members following traumatic brain injury, 2008–2011,” Military Medicine, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 208–215, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. P. Mayeux, S. X. Teng, P. S. Katz, N. W. Gilpin, and P. E. Molina, “Traumatic brain injury induces neuroinflammation and neuronal degeneration that is associated with escalated alcohol self-administration in rats,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 279, pp. 22–30, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. S. Kreutzer, P. H. Wehman, J. A. Harris, C. T. Burns, and H. F. Young, “Substance abuse and crime patterns among persons with traumatic brain injury referred for supported employment,” Brain Injury, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 177–187, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. T. Crews, J. Zou, and L. Qin, “Induction of innate immune genes in brain create the neurobiology of addiction,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, supplement 1, pp. S4–S12, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. W. Bales, A. K. Wagner, A. E. Kline, and C. E. Dixon, “Persistent cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: a dopamine hypothesis,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 981–1003, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. K. Wagner, J. E. Sokoloski, D. Ren et al., “Controlled cortical impact injury affects dopaminergic transmission in the rat striatum,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 457–465, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Donnemiller, C. Brenneis, J. Wissel et al., “Impaired dopaminergic neurotransmission in patients with traumatic brain injury: a SPET study using 123I-β-CIT and 123I-IBZM,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1410–1414, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. F. Koob and N. D. Volkow, “Neurocircuitry of addiction,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 217–238, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. M. Bjork and S. J. Grant, “Does traumatic brain injury increase risk for substance abuse?” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1077–1082, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. S. Beer, O. P. John, D. Scabini, and R. T. Knight, “Orbitofrontal cortex and social behavior: integrating self-monitoring and emotion-cognition interactions,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 871–879, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Franulic, E. Horta, R. Maturana, J. Scherpenisse, and C. Carbonell, “Organic personality disorder after traumatic brain injury: cognitive, anatomic and psychosocial factors. A 6 month follow-up,” Brain Injury, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 431–439, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Schoenbaum and Y. Shaham, “The role of orbitofrontal cortex in drug addiction: a review of preclinical studies,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 256–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus