Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2018, Article ID 2062346, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2062346
Research Article

Identification of Binding Partners of Deafness-Related Protein PDZD7

1Shenzhen Research Institute of Shandong University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518057, China
2Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cells and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China
3Co-Innovation Center of Cell Biology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zhigang Xu; nc.ude.uds@gzux and Yanfei Wang; nc.ude.uds@fy_gnaw

Received 2 December 2017; Revised 24 January 2018; Accepted 14 February 2018; Published 28 March 2018

Academic Editor: Renjie Chai

Copyright © 2018 Haibo Du et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

PDZD7 is an important deafness gene, whose mutations are associated with syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss. PDZD7 contains multiple PDZ domains that are essential for organizing various proteins into protein complex. Several PDZD7-binding proteins have been identified, including usherin, ADGRV1, whirlin, harmonin, SANS, and MYO7A, all belonging to USH proteins. Here, we report the identification of novel PDZD7-binding partners through yeast two-hybrid screening using the first two PDZ domains of PDZD7 as bait. Eleven proteins were identified, most of which have not been reported as PDZD7-binding partners before. Among the identified proteins, ADGRV1, gelsolin, and β-catenin have been shown to play important roles in hearing, whereas the functions of other proteins in the inner ear remain elusive. We confirmed the expression of one candidate PDZD7-binding protein, CADM1, in the mouse inner ear and evaluated the auditory function of Cadm1 knockout mice by performing auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurement. Unexpectedly, Cadm1 knockout mice show normal hearing threshold, which might be explained by the possible compensation by its homologs that are also expressed in the inner ear. Taken together, our work identified several novel PDZD7-binding proteins, which will help us to further understand the role of PDZD7 in hearing transduction.

1. Introduction

Usher syndrome (USH) is the most frequent form of inherited sensory deaf-blindness that is characterized by hearing loss and vision defect [1, 2]. According to the severity of hearing loss as well as the presence or absence of balancing problems, USH is clinically classified into three subtypes, namely, USH1, USH2, and USH3, with USH1 as the most severe one. At present, ten genes have been associated with USH, including MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, PCDH15, USH1G, CIB2, USH2A, ADGRV1, WHRN, and CLRN-1 [315]. Mutations of USH genes are also responsible for nonsyndromic hearing loss. USH proteins have been shown to interact with one another and form multiprotein complexes and play important roles in the development, maintenance, and function of stereocilia and synapses in the inner ear sensory hair cells [16].

Recently, PDZD7 was suggested to be a USH modifier and a contributor to digenic USH [17]. Meanwhile, mutations in human PDZD7 gene are also associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss DFNB57 [1820]. Similar to harmonin (USH1C) and whirlin (USH2D), full-length PDZD7 contains three PDZ domains, a harmonin-N like (HNL) domain, and a proline-rich (PR) region. Shorter PDZD7 isoforms containing the first two PDZ domains were also detected in the inner ear [17, 18, 21]. In mice, loss of PDZD7 was shown to result in stereocilia disorganization as well as mechanotransduction deficits [21].

As a PDZ domain-containing scaffold protein, PDZD7 plays important roles in organizing protein complex. PDZD7 has been shown to bind the three known USH2 proteins usherin (USH2A), ADGRV1 (USH2C), and whirlin (USH2D), forming the so-called ankle-link complex at the ankle region of hair cell stereocilia [17, 2123]. In Pdzd7 knockout mice, the localization of the three USH2 proteins at the ankle links was interrupted, suggesting that PDZD7 plays a pivotal role in organizing the ankle-link complex [21]. Moreover, PDZD7 was also shown to interact with USH1 proteins MYO7A (USH1B), harmonin (USH1C), and SANS (USH1G) [18, 24, 25].

At present, little is known about other non-USH PDZD7-binding partners. In the present work, yeast two-hybrid screening was performed using the first two PDZ domains as bait to identify new PDZD7-binding partners that are expressed in the inner ear. Identification of PDZD7-binding proteins will help us to further understand the role of PDZD7 in hearing transduction.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. DNA Constructs

Mouse cDNA encoding PDZD7 short isoform (amino acids 1–557) was inserted into pBD-GAL4 Cam vector (Stratagene) to express the bait protein for yeast two-hybrid screen. The same cDNA was inserted into pmCherry-N1 or pMYC-C2 (modified pEGFP-C2 with EGFP-coding sequence replaced by Myc-coding sequence) to express PDZD7-mCherry or Myc-PDZD7 fusion protein. Full-length cDNAs encoding mouse β-catenin and CADM1, as well as cDNA encoding chicken AMOT (amino acids 311–910), were inserted into pEGFP-C2 to express EGFP-fusion proteins.

2.2. Yeast Two-Hybrid Screen

The yeast two-hybrid screen was performed as previously described [2628]. Briefly, yeast strain AH109 (Clontech) was sequentially transformed with the bait plasmid and a chicken cochlear cDNA library in the HybriZAP two-hybrid vector [29]. A total of 2.4 × 106 transformants were screened using HIS3 as the primary reporter gene with the presence of 2.5 mM of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT). The positive colonies were further examined using two other reporter genes ADE2 and lacZ. The prey vectors in triple-positive yeast colonies were recovered, and the sequence of cDNA inserts was determined by sequencing.

2.3. Colocalization Assay

COS-7 cells were grown on gelatin-coated glass cover slips and transfected with vectors that express target proteins fused to EGFP or mCherry. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 15 minutes, then permeabilized and blocked with PBT1 (0.1% Triton X-100, 1% BSA, 5% heat-inactivated donkey serum in PBS, pH 7.3) for 30 minutes. For nuclei staining, cells were incubated with DAPI (Gen-View Scientific Inc.) for 15 minutes, then mounted in glycerol/PBS (1 : 1). The subcellular localization of target proteins was examined with a confocal microscope (LSM 700, Zeiss).

2.4. Coimmunoprecipitation (co-IP) and Western Blot

HEK293T cells were transfected with vectors that express target proteins fused to EGFP or Myc epitope. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer consisting of 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris at pH 7.5, 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF, and 1x protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). After centrifugation at 4°C, the supernatant was incubated with immobilized anti-Myc antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. number E6654) at 4°C for 2 hours. Immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), then transferred to PVDF membrane. After blocking in PBS containing 5% BSA and 0.1% Tween-20, the membrane was incubated with anti-Myc (Abmart, Cat. number M20002) or anti-GFP (Abmart, Cat. number M20004) antibody at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Bio-Rad, Cat. number 170-6516) at room temperature for an hour. The signals were detected with the ECL system (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA).

2.5. Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA of different tissues was extracted using RNeasy Micro Kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription (RT) was carried out at 42°C for 1 hour in a 20 μl reaction mixture containing 1 μg of total RNA, 10 pmol of oligo-dT, and 200 units of SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the cDNA as template with the following primers: Cadm1: forward primer CGA CAT GGC GAG TGC TGT, reverse primer CCG AAT GAG CCT TTC CCA CT (986 bp); Cadm2: forward primer GGC TGC TTC AAA AAG TAA AGT CA, reverse primer GCT GCT AAC GGT GAA GGT CT (523 bp); Cadm3: forward primer GCC AAG TCC CTT GTC ACT GT, reverse primer CGC CTT CTG CGT TGA TGA TG (799 bp); Cadm4: forward primer TGA AGG ACG AGC GAT TCC AG, reverse primer GTC AGC ACC AGA GTG TCT CC (517 bp); Necl5: forward primer TCA CCC TCC TGG ACG AAT CT, reverse primer TGA CAA CGT GGA ATT CGG CA (871 bp); and β-actin: forward primer CTC CAT CCT GGC CTC GCT GT, reverse primer GCT GTC ACC TTC ACC GTT CC (268 bp). To obtain the optimal sensitivity and specificity, cycle lengths for different PCR reaction sets were adjusted between 23 and 38 cycles, and annealing temperatures were adjusted between 56 and 64°C. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on agarose gel.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (Q-PCR)

Q-PCR was carried out using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ system (Perfect Real Time, Takara) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification and detection were run in a Sequence Detection System SLA-3296 (Bio-Rad) in triplicate with an initial cycle of 95°C for 10 seconds followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 20 seconds. Negative control samples (without template) were processed in the same way. The specificity of the amplifications was verified by melting curve analysis. The sequences of primers are as follows: Cadm1: forward primer GTG ATC CAG CTC CTG AAC CC, reverse primer CGT GTA GAG CTG GCA GAA GT and β-actin: forward primer CTC CAT CCT GGC CTC GCT GT, reverse primer GCT GTC ACC TTC ACC GTT CC. Relative quantization of Cadm1 expression normalized to β-actin was calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCT method.

2.7. X-Gal Staining of Mouse Inner Ear

Mouse inner ear temporal bones were dissected and fixed with 4% PFA containing 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, and 0.02% NP-40 at 4°C overnight. After rinsing three times with washing buffer (0.1 M PBS, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% NP-40, and 0.01% sodium deoxycholate), the samples were incubated with staining buffer (0.1 M PBS, 5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], 5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6], 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mg/ml X-gal, and 0.01% NP-40) at 37°C overnight. The samples were washed three times with PBS, then the basilar membranes together with the modiolus were dissected out and imaged with a light microscope (Nikon YS100, Japan).

2.8. Animal Maintenance and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Measurement

Cadm1 knockout mice (number RBRC04063) were obtained from RIKEN BioResource Center. Generation and characterization of Cadm1 knockout mice have been described elsewhere [30, 31]. All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong University School of Life Sciences and conducted accordingly. For ABR measurement, mice were anesthetized with 5% chloral hydrate (0.5 ml/100 g body weight). Electrodes were inserted subcutaneously at the vertex, pinna, and near the tail. A RZ6 workstation and BioSig software (Tucker Davis Technologies Inc.) were used for the stimulus generation, presentation, ABR acquisition, and data management. Specific acoustic stimuli were generated using high-frequency transducers, and ABR thresholds were obtained by reducing the stimulus intensity in 10 dB SPL steps to identify the lowest intensity at which all ABR waves were detectable. For noise exposure, mice were exposed to 2–8 kHz noise at 96 dB SPL (Crown, CD i1000) for 2 hours, and ABR thresholds were measured preexposure and at various postexposure time points. For each genotype, at least three animals were used, and data were shown as means ± standard errors. Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis, and was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Potential PDZD7-Binding Partners through Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening

In order to identify new PDZD7-binding partners, we performed yeast two-hybrid screening of a chicken cochlear cDNA library using PDZD7 short isoform as bait. This isoform contains the first two PDZ domains of PDZD7. Around thirty positive clones were obtained that activate all the three reporter genes, representing eleven candidate PDZD7-binding proteins (Table 1). Among the proteins identified, ADGRV1 (USH2C) is a known PDZD7-binding partner, whereas the interactions between PDZD7 and the other proteins have not been reported. The most frequently encountered two proteins are β-catenin and ADGRV1, both of which contain a type I PDZ-binding interface (PBI) at their C-termini. Six candidate PDZD7-binding proteins (gelsolin, TRIM35, CADM1, AMOT, Golgin45, and Numb) contain a type II PBI at their C-termini. Three candidates (KCTD10, CCDC27, and TRIP11) do not have a predictable C-terminal PBI.

Table 1: Potential PDZD7-binding partners identified from yeast two-hybrid screening. Fragment containing the first two PDZ domains of PDZD7 was used as bait to screen a chicken cochlear cDNA library.

Three candidate proteins β-catenin, AMOT, and CADM1 were picked to test the specificity of the interactions by introducing the bait plasmid and prey plasmids back to the reporter yeast strain AH109. Gal4 BD-PDZD7, Gal4 AD-β-catenin, Gal4 AD-AMOT, or Gal4 AD-CADM1 alone did not activate the reporter gene HIS3. However, when Gal4 BD-PDZD7 was present, Gal4 AD-β-catenin, Gal4 AD-AMOT, or Gal4 AD-CADM1 activated HIS3 expression, suggesting that these proteins specifically interact with PDZD7 (Figures 1(a)1(c)).

Figure 1: Verification of protein interactions by performing yeast two-hybrid experiments. AH109 yeast cells containing either Gal4 BD/Gal4 AD, Gal4 BD-PDZD7/Gal4 AD, Gal4 BD/Gal4 AD-β-catenin, Gal4 BD/Gal4 AD-AMOT, Gal4 BD/Gal4 AD-CADM1, Gal4 BD-PDZD7/Gal4 AD-β-catenin, Gal4 BD-PDZD7/Gal4 AD-AMOT, or Gal4 BD-PDZD7/Gal4 AD-CADM1 were plated on nonselective (−Leu/Trp) and selective (−Leu/Trp/His) plates with the presence of 2.5 mM 3-AT and incubated at 30°C for 3 days.
3.2. PDZD7 Colocalizes with β-Catenin, AMOT, and CADM1 When Overexpressed in COS-7 Cells

Next, we examined the subcellular localization of PDZD7 in the presence of these candidate binding partners in cultured cells. When overexpressed in COS-7 cells, PDZD7-mCherry localized in the cytoplasm as well as on the plasma membrane (Figure 2(a)), whereas EGFP-β-catenin mainly localized in the nuclei in a punctate pattern (Figure 2(b)). Noticeably, when expressed together with EGFP-β-catenin, PDZD7-mCherry translocated into the nuclei and colocalized with EGFP-β-catenin (Figure 2(c)), in consistent with the potential interaction between these two proteins.

Figure 2: Colocalization of PDZD7 with β-catenin in COS-7 cells. Expression vectors were transfected into COS-7 cells, and the subcellular localization of target proteins was determined using confocal microscopy. (a) PDZD7-mCherry localized in the cytoplasm as well as on the plasma membrane. (b) EGFP-β-catenin mainly localized in the nuclei in a punctate pattern. (c) When expressed together, PDZD7-mCherry colocalized with EGFP-β-catenin in the nuclei. Scale bar: 10 μm.

Colocalization was also observed between PDZD7 with AMOT and CADM1. EGFP-AMOT localized as perinuclear aggregates in transfected COS-7 cells (Figure 3(a)). When coexpressed, PDZD7-mCherry colocalized with EGFP-AMOT (Figure 3(b)). Similarly, PDZD7-mCherry colocalized with EGFP-CADM1 in the cytoplasm (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Taken together, the colocalization results are consistent with the yeast two-hybrid results, confirming that β-catenin, AMOT, and CADM1 are PDZD7-binding partners.

Figure 3: Colocalization of PDZD7 with AMOT in COS-7 cells. Expression vectors were transfected into COS-7 cells, and the subcellular localization of target proteins was determined using confocal microscopy. (a) EGFP-AMOT localized as perinuclear aggregates when expressed alone in COS-7 cells. (b) When expressed together, PDZD7-mCherry colocalized with EGFP-AMOT. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Figure 4: Interaction of PDZD7 with CADM1 in transfected cells. Expression vectors were transfected into COS-7 cells, and the subcellular localization of target proteins was determined using confocal microscopy. (a) EGFP-CADM1 localized in the cytoplasm of COS-7 cells. (b) When expressed together, PDZD7-mCherry colocalized with EGFP-CADM1. Scale bar: 10 μm. (c) Western blots showed that CADM1 was coimmunoprecipitated with PDZD7. Expression vectors were transfected into HEK293T cells to express epitope-tagged PDZD7 and CADM1 proteins, and cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation. IP indicates antibody used for immunoprecipitation, and WB indicates antibody used for detection.
3.3. Cadm1 Expression in the Mouse Inner Ear

Among the identified candidate PDZD7-binding partners, CADM1 attracted our most attention. The interaction between CADM1 and PDZD7 was further confirmed by co-IP of epitope-tagged proteins (Figures 4(c)). RT-PCR results showed that Cadm1 is highly expressed in the spiral ganglion and weakly expressed in the basilar membrane (Figure 5(a)). The expression of Cadm1 in the developing inner ear was examined by performing quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR), which showed that Cadm1 was detected in all developmental stages examined, peaking at around postnatal day 9 (P9) (Figure 6(a)).

Figure 5: Expression of Necl family members in mouse inner ear. Total RNA from postnatal day 2 (P2) mice was extracted and reverse-transcribed into cDNA, which was then used as PCR template to examine the expression of Necl family members. (a) Expression of Necl family members in basilar membrane, spiral ganglion, and vestibule of wild-type mice was examined through RT-PCR. (b) Expression of Necl family members in the inner ear of Cadm1 knockout mice was examined through RT-PCR. β-Actin was included as internal control.
Figure 6: Expression pattern of Cadm1 in mouse inner ear. (a) Expression of Cadm1 in different developmental stages of mouse inner ear examined by Q-PCR. The bar graphs show quantification of the PCR results with each value representing the mean ± standard error. (b) LacZ activity in the basilar membrane and spiral ganglion of P7 Cadm1+/+ mice. (c) LacZ activity in the basilar membrane and spiral ganglion of P7 Cadm1+/− mice. (d) Higher-magnification image from the insect of (b). (e) Higher-magnification image from the insect of (c). Scale bars, 100 μm.

The expression pattern of Cadm1 in the cochlea was further examined using a mouse model whose exon 1 of Cadm1 gene was replaced by lacZ reporter gene cassette [30, 31]. X-gal staining of P7 Cadm+/− inner ear suggested that Cadm1 is abundantly expressed in the spiral ganglion. At this stage, the expression of Cadm1 in the basilar membrane was relatively weak and mainly enriched in supporting cells (Figures 6(b)6(e)).

3.4. Cadm1 Knockout Mice Have Normal Hearing Threshold

We then evaluated the effect of Cadm1 disruption on mouse auditory function by performing ABR measurement. The result showed that hearing thresholds of 1-month-old to 4-month-old Cadm1−/− mice were comparable to those of wild-type or Cadm1+/− mice, suggesting that CADM1 is not indispensable for hearing transduction (Figure 7(a)). To investigate whether Cadm1−/− mice show increased acoustic vulnerability, we exposed P45 mice to 2–8 kHz noise at 96 dB SPL for 2 hours. ABR thresholds were measured before and after the noise exposure, which did not reveal any significant difference between Cadm1−/− and Cadm1+/− or wild-type mice (Figure 7(b)). Taken together, our results suggested that the auditory function of Cadm1−/− mice is normal.

Figure 7: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements show normal auditory function of Cadm1 knockout mice. (a) ABR thresholds of wild-type, Cadm1+/−, and Cadm1−/− mice to click stimuli were measured at different ages as indicated. (b) Wild-type, Cadm1+/−, and Cadm1−/− mice at P45 were subjected to 2–8 kHz noise at 96 dB DSL for 2 hours, and ABR thresholds were measured preexposure and at different postexposure time points as indicated. Variance bars indicate standard error. No significant differences were observed between genotypes. The numbers of animals for each group used in the experiments are indicated.

The normal hearing threshold of Cadm1 knockout mice promoted us to look for possible explanations. It has been suggested that the loss of specular protein might be compensated for by its homologous protein(s). As an immunoglobulin- (Ig-) like cell adhesion molecule (CAM), CADM1 belongs to nectin-like molecule (Necl) family, which contains five members (CADM1, CADM2, CADM3, CADM4, and Necl5) [32, 33]. We examined the expression of Necl family members in mouse inner ear by performing RT-PCR. The results showed that all members are expressed in the mouse inner ear (Figure 5(a)), whereas none of them is upregulated in Cadm1 knockout mice (Figure 5(b)).

4. Discussion

PDZD7 is an important deafness gene, whose mutations contribute to syndromic as well as nonsyndromic hearing loss [1720]. PDZD7 is a scaffold protein containing three PDZ domains, a HNL domain, and a PR region. Scaffold proteins are important for organizing multiple proteins into protein complex. At present, only a few PDZD7-binding proteins have been reported, including usherin, ADGRV1, whirlin, harmonin, SANS, and MYO7A [17, 18, 2125]. In this work, we used yeast two-hybrid screening to identify new PDZD7-binding proteins, which will help us to learn more about the role of PDZD7 in hearing transduction.

Among the potential PDZD7-binding partners identified in this work, β-catenin is the most frequently encountered one. Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays pivotal roles in development, tissue homeostasis, and so on [34]. It has been suggested that Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates proliferation of sensory precursors in the postnatal mouse cochlea [35, 36]. β-Catenin could upregulate the expression of Atoh1, a transcription factor that is critical for hair-cell differentiation [37]. Consistently, loss of β-catenin inhibited hair-cell differentiation from sensory progenitors [38], whereas forced stabilization of β-catenin in supporting cells resulted in proliferation of supporting cells and generation of hair cells [39]. Our data show that PDZD7 interacted with β-catenin and that PDZD7 translocated into the nuclei together with β-catenin in transfected cells, suggesting a potential role of PDZD7 in regulating β-catenin pathway. Further investigation is needed to fully understand the significance and the mechanism of this interaction.

Gelsolin is a calcium-activated actin-binding protein and plays important roles in F-actin severing, capping, and nucleation [40, 41]. It has been shown that gelsolin binds p55 and localizes to the tips of shorter stereocilia of outer hair cells (OHCs) [42]. In mice lacking gelsolin, stereocilia in the apex of the cochlea became long and straggly, suggesting that gelsolin is involved in the regulation of stereocilia elongation [42, 43]. Our data suggested that PDZD7 might interact with gelsolin, hence might play a role in stereocilia development and/or maintenance. Consistent with this hypothesis, OHC stereocilia disorganization has been observed in Pdzd7 knockout mice [21].

Numb is an evolutionary conserved protein with multiple functions such as asymmetric cell division control, cell fate determination, endocytosis, cell adhesion, cell migration, ubiquitination of specific substrates, and a number of signaling pathways [44]. It has been reported that Numb was expressed in rat cochlear sensory epithelium, and overexpression of Numb upregulated the expression of Atoh1 in cochlear whole mount cultures [45]. The potential interaction of PDZD7 with Numb raises the possibility that PDZD7 might regulate the function of Numb, which awaits further investigation.

Unlike ADGRV1, β-catenin, gelsolin, and Numb, the other PDZD7-binding proteins identified in the present work have not been reported to function in the inner ear. Genes encoding some of the proteins including CADM1, AMOT, Golgin45, and KCTD10 have been detected in mouse cochlea by RNA transcriptome sequencing (SHIELD, https://shield.hms.harvard.edu) [46]. Among these proteins, CADM1 attracted most our attention. CADM1 is an immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily protein that contains extracellular Ig-like domains, a single transmembrane domain, and a small intracellular C-terminal tail. CADM1 can bind either transhomophilically or transheterophilically with other nectins or Necls [47, 48]. CADM1 plays important roles in modulating synapse development and plasticity, and mutations in CADM1/Cadm1 gene have been associated with autism spectrum disorder [4951]. We show here that CADM1 interacts with PDZD7 and Cadm1 is abundantly expressed in mouse inner ear. However, our data did not reveal any auditory deficit in Cadm1 knockout mice, suggesting that CADM1 is dispensable for hearing function in mice. Alternatively, other Necl family members might compensate for the loss of CADM1 in the inner ear. Similar scenario has been observed in the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) of Cadm1 knockout mice, where the loss of CADM1 was compensated for by CADM4 [52].

In conclusion, our present work identified several novel inner ear-expressed PDZD7-binding partners, which will help us to learn more about the role of PDZD7 in hearing. Further investigation is needed to fully understand the biological significance of these interactions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by grants from the Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (JCYJ20160331174108379) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771001).

References

  1. J. A. Boughman, M. Vernon, and K. A. Shaver, “Usher syndrome: definition and estimate of prevalence from two high-risk populations,” Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 595–603, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. J. B. Keats and D. P. Corey, “The usher syndromes,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 158–166, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Well, S. Blanchard, J. Kaplan et al., “Defective myosin VIIA gene responsible for Usher syndrome type IB,” Nature, vol. 374, no. 6517, pp. 60-61, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. D. Eudy, M. D. Weston, S. Yao et al., “Mutation of a gene encoding a protein with extracellular matrix motifs in Usher syndrome type IIa,” Science, vol. 280, no. 5370, pp. 1753–1757, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Bitner-Glindzicz, B. Glaser, K. J. Lindley et al., “A recessive contiguous gene deletion causing infantile hyperinsulinism, enteropathy and deafness identifies the Usher type 1C gene,” Nature Genetics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 56–60, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Verpy, M. Leibovici, I. Zwaenepoel et al., “A defect in harmonin, a PDZ domain-containing protein expressed in the inner ear sensory hair cells, underlies Usher syndrome type 1C,” Nature Genetics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Z. M. Ahmed, S. Riazuddin, S. L. Bernstein et al., “Mutations of the protocadherin gene PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. N. Alagramam, H. Yuan, M. H. Kuehn et al., “Mutations in the novel protocadherin PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 1709–2603, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. H. Bolz, B. von Brederlow, A. Ramírez et al., “Mutation of CDH23, encoding a new member of the cadherin gene family, causes Usher syndrome type 1D,” Nature Genetics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 108–112, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. M. Bork, L. M. Peters, S. Riazuddin et al., “Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of the novel cadherin-like gene CDH23,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Joensuu, R. Hämäläinen, B. Yuan et al., “Mutations in a novel gene with transmembrane domains underlie Usher syndrome type 3,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 673–684, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Weil, A. el-Amraoui, S. Masmoudi et al., “Usher syndrome type I G (USH1G) is caused by mutations in the gene encoding SANS, a protein that associates with the USH1C protein, harmonin,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 463–471, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. D. Weston, M. W. J. Luijendijk, K. D. Humphrey, C. Möller, and W. J. Kimberling, “Mutations in the VLGR1 gene implicate G-protein signaling in the pathogenesis of Usher syndrome type II,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 357–366, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Ebermann, H. P. N. Scholl, P. Charbel Issa et al., “A novel gene for Usher syndrome type 2: mutations in the long isoform of whirlin are associated with retinitis pigmentosa and sensorineural hearing loss,” Human Genetics, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Riazuddin, I. A. Belyantseva, A. P. J. Giese et al., “Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48,” Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1265–1271, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Mathur and J. Yang, “Usher syndrome: hearing loss, retinal degeneration and associated abnormalities,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1852, no. 3, pp. 406–420, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Ebermann, J. B. Phillips, M. C. Liebau et al., “PDZD7 is a modifier of retinal disease and a contributor to digenic Usher syndrome,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 1812–1823, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Schneider, T. Märker, A. Daser et al., “Homozygous disruption of PDZD7 by reciprocal translocation in a consanguineous family: a new member of the Usher syndrome protein interactome causing congenital hearing impairment,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 655–666, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. T. Booth, H. Azaiez, K. Kahrizi et al., “PDZD7 and hearing loss: more than just a modifier,” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, vol. 167A, no. 12, pp. 2957–2965, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Vona, S. Lechno, M. A. H. Hofrichter et al., “Confirmation of PDZD7 as a nonsyndromic hearing loss gene,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. e238–e246, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Zou, T. Zheng, C. Ren et al., “Deletion of PDZD7 disrupts the Usher syndrome type 2 protein complex in cochlear hair cells and causes hearing loss in mice,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2374–2390, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Grati, J. B. Shin, M. D. Weston et al., “Localization of PDZD7 to the stereocilia ankle-link associates this scaffolding protein with the Usher syndrome protein network,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 41, pp. 14288–14293, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Q. Chen, J. Zou, Z. Shen, W. Zhang, and J. Yang, “Whirlin and PDZ domain-containing 7 (PDZD7) proteins are both required to form the quaternary protein complex associated with Usher syndrome type 2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 52, pp. 36070–36088, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. P. Morgan, J. F. Krey, M.'. Grati et al., “PDZD7-MYO7A complex identified in enriched stereocilia membranes,” eLife, vol. 5, article e18312, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Zou, Q. Chen, A. Almishaal et al., “The roles of USH1 proteins and PDZ domain-containing USH proteins in USH2 complex integrity in cochlear hair cells,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 624–636, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Nie, Y. Liu, X. Yin et al., “Plasma membrane targeting of protocadherin 15 is regulated by the golgi-associated chaperone protein PIST,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2016, Article ID 8580675, 9 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Liu, X. Zhai, B. Zhao, Y. Wang, and Z. Xu, “Cyclin I-like (CCNI2) is a cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) activator and is involved in cell cycle regulation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, article 40979, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Liu, H. Nie, C. Liu et al., “Angulin proteins ILDR1 and ILDR2 regulate alternative pre-mRNA splicing through binding to splicing factors TRA2A, TRA2B, or SRSF1,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7466, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Heller, C. A. Sheane, Z. Javed, and A. J. Hudspeth, “Molecular markers for cell types of the inner ear and candidate genes for hearing disorders,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 19, pp. 11400–11405, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. Fujita, Y. Kouroku, S. Ozeki et al., “Oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia in mice lacking RA175/TSLC1/SynCAM/IGSF4A, a cell adhesion molecule in the immunoglobulin superfamily,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 718–726, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. Fujita, Y. Tanabe, T. Hirose et al., “Loss of partitioning-defective-3/isotype-specific interacting protein (par-3/ASIP) in the elongating spermatid of RA175 (IGSF4A/SynCAM)-deficient mice,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 171, no. 6, pp. 1800–1810, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. Takai, J. Miyoshi, W. Ikeda, and H. Ogita, “Nectins and nectin-like molecules: roles in contact inhibition of cell movement and proliferation,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 603–615, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. Mandai, Y. Rikitake, M. Mori, and Y. Takai, “Nectins and nectin-like molecules in development and disease,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 112, pp. 197–231, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. Y. Logan and R. Nusse, “The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 781–810, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. Chai, B. Kuo, T. Wang et al., “Wnt signaling induces proliferation of sensory precursors in the postnatal mouse cochlea,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 21, pp. 8167–8172, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Shi, J. S. Kempfle, and A. S. B. Edge, “Wnt-responsive Lgr5-expressing stem cells are hair cell progenitors in the cochlea,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 28, pp. 9639–9648, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. Shi, Y. F. Cheng, X. L. Wang, and A. S. B. Edge, “β-catenin up-regulates Atoh1 expression in neural progenitor cells by interaction with an Atoh1 3 enhancer,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 1, pp. 392–400, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Shi, L. Hu, B. E. Jacques, J. F. Mulvaney, A. Dabdoub, and A. S. B. Edge, “β-Catenin is required for hair-cell differentiation in the cochlea,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 19, pp. 6470–6479, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. F. Shi, L. Hu, and A. S. B. Edge, “Generation of hair cells in neonatal mice by β-catenin overexpression in Lgr5-positive cochlear progenitors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 34, pp. 13851–13856, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L. Spinardi and W. Witke, “Gelsolin and diseases,” Subcellular Biochemistry, vol. 45, pp. 55–69, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. G. H. Li, P. D. Arora, Y. Chen, C. A. McCulloch, and P. Liu, “Multifunctional roles of gelsolin in health and diseases,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 999–1025, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. P. Mburu, M. R. Romero, H. Hilton et al., “Gelsolin plays a role in the actin polymerization complex of hair cell stereocilia,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 7, article e11627, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Olt, P. Mburu, S. L. Johnson et al., “The actin-binding proteins eps8 and gelsolin have complementary roles in regulating the growth and stability of mechanosensory hair bundles of mammalian cochlear outer hair cells,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 1, article e87331, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Gulino, L. Di Marcotullio, and I. Screpanti, “The multiple functions of Numb,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 316, no. 6, pp. 900–6, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. Z. Gao, F. L. Chi, Y. B. Huang, J. M. Yang, N. Cong, and W. Li, “Expression of Numb and Numb-like in the development of mammalian auditory sensory epithelium,” Neuroreport, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 49–54, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Shen, D. I. Scheffer, K. Y. Kwan, and D. P. Corey, “SHIELD: an integrative gene expression database for inner ear research,” Database, vol. 2015, article bav071, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. J. Chan, D. M. Andrews, and M. J. Smyth, “Receptors that interact with nectin and nectin-like proteins in the immunosurveillance and immunotherapy of cancer,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 246–251, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Y. Rikitake, K. Mandai, and Y. Takai, “The role of nectins in different types of cell–cell adhesion,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 125, no. 16, pp. 3713–3722, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. Zhiling, E. Fujita, Y. Tanabe, T. Yamagata, T. Momoi, and M. Y. Momoi, “Mutations in the gene encoding CADM1 are associated with autism spectrum disorder,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 377, no. 3, pp. 926–929, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. E. Fujita, H. Dai, Y. Tanabe et al., “Autism spectrum disorder is related to endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by mutations in the synaptic cell adhesion molecule, CADM1,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 1, no. 6, article e47, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. Y. Takayanagi, E. Fujita, Z. Yu et al., “Impairment of social and emotional behaviors in Cadm1-knockout mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 396, no. 3, pp. 703–708, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Y. Tanabe, E. Fujita, Y. K. Hayashi et al., “Synaptic adhesion molecules in Cadm family at the neuromuscular junction,” Cell Biology International, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 731–736, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus