Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2018, Article ID 2782804, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2782804
Research Article

Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reshapes Resting-State Brain Networks: A Magnetoencephalography Assessment

1San Camillo Hospital IRCCS, Venice, Italy
2NeXT: Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Giovanni Pellegrino; moc.liamg@onirgellepinnavoig

Received 4 May 2017; Revised 11 September 2017; Accepted 2 October 2017; Published 11 January 2018

Academic Editor: Dario Farina

Copyright © 2018 Giovanni Pellegrino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. U. Ziemann, W. Paulus, M. A. Nitsche et al., “Consensus: motor cortex plasticity protocols,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 164–182, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. V. Di Lazzaro, F. Ranieri, P. Profice et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on the excitability of corticospinal axons of the human cerebral cortex,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 641–643, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Ranieri, M. V. Podda, E. Riccardi et al., “Modulation of LTP at rat hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses by direct current stimulation,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1868–1880, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. A. Nitsche, L. G. Cohen, E. M. Wassermann et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 206–223, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Poreisz, K. Boros, A. Antal, and W. Paulus, “Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 72, no. 4–6, pp. 208–214, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. C. Ruff, G. Ugazio, and E. Fehr, “Changing social norm compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation,” Science, vol. 342, no. 6157, pp. 482–484, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. R. Brunoni, M. A. Nitsche, N. Bolognini et al., “Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 175–195, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Assenza, C. Campana, F. Assenza et al., “Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in adults with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a sham controlled study,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 333–335, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. V. Di Lazzaro, M. Dileone, F. Capone et al., “Immediate and late modulation of interhemipheric imbalance with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation in acute stroke,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 841–848, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Di Pino, G. Pellegrino, G. Assenza et al., “Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 597–608, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Di Pino, G. Pellegrino, F. Capone, and V. Di Lazzaro, “Human cerebral cortex metaplasticity and stroke recovery,” Austin Journal of Cerebrovascular Disease & Stroke, vol. 1, no. 2, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Nitsche and W. Paulus, “Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 527, no. 3, pp. 633–639, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. N. Lang, M. A. Nitsche, M. Dileone et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on I-wave activity in humans,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 2802–2810, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. J. Stagg, V. Bachtiar, and H. Johansen-Berg, “The role of GABA in human motor learning,” Current Biology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 480–484, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Notturno, L. Marzetti, V. Pizzella, A. Uncini, and F. Zappasodi, “Local and remote effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the electrical activity of the motor cortical network,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2220–2232, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Lang, H. R. Siebner, N. S. Ward et al., “How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain?” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 495–504, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. J. Stagg and M. A. Nitsche, “Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation,” The Neuroscientist, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 37–53, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. S. Herrmann, S. Rach, T. Neuling, and D. Strüber, “Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. D. Fox, R. L. Buckner, H. Liu, M. M. Chakravarty, A. M. Lozano, and A. Pascual-Leone, “Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 41, pp. E4367–E4375, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. von Ellenrieder, G. Pellegrino, T. Hedrich et al., “Detection and magnetic source imaging of fast oscillations (40–160 Hz) recorded with magnetoencephalography in focal epilepsy patients,” Brain Topography, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 218–231, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Pellegrino, A. Machado, N. von Ellenrieder et al., “Hemodynamic response to interictal epileptiform discharges addressed by personalized EEG-fNIRS recordings,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 10, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Pellegrino, T. Hedrich, R. Chowdhury et al., “Source localization of the seizure onset zone from ictal EEG/MEG data,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 2528–2546, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Hedrich, G. Pellegrino, E. Kobayashi, J. M. Lina, and C. Grova, “Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG,” NeuroImage, vol. 157, pp. 531–544, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. A. Chowdhury, G. Pellegrino, Ü. Aydin et al., “Reproducibility of EEG-MEG fusion source analysis of interictal spikes: Relevance in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy,” Human Brain Mapping, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. R. C. Oldfield, “The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–113, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E. Hoddes, V. Zarcone, H. Smythe, R. Phillips, and W. C. Dement, “Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach,” Psychophysiology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 431–436, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. F. Tadel, S. Baillet, J. C. Mosher, D. Pantazis, and R. M. Leahy, “Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2011, Article ID 879716, 13 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Taulu and J. Simola, “Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1759–1768, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Tesche, M. A. Uusitalo, R. J. Ilmoniemi, M. Huotilainen, M. Kajola, and O. Salonen, “Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources,” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 189–200, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. M. Dale, B. Fischl, and M. I. Sereno, “Cortical surface-based analysis: I. segmentation and surface reconstruction,” NeuroImage, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 179–194, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Gramfort, T. Papadopoulo, E. Olivi, and M. Clerc, “OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics,” Biomedical Engineering Online, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 45, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J.-P. Lachaux, E. Rodriguez, J. Martinerie, and F. J. Varela, “Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 194–208, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Aydore, D. Pantazis, and R. M. Leahy, “A note on the phase locking value and its properties,” NeuroImage, vol. 74, pp. 231–244, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. Raffin, G. Pellegrino, V. di Lazzaro, A. Thielscher, and H. R. Siebner, “Bringing transcranial mapping into shape: sulcus-aligned mapping captures motor somatotopy in human primary motor hand area,” NeuroImage, vol. 120, pp. 164–175, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Mazziotta, A. Toga, A. Evans et al., “A four-dimensional probabilistic atlas of the human brain,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 401–430, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. K. J. Worsley, J. E. Taylor, F. Carbonell et al., “SurfStat: a Matlab toolbox for the statistical analysis of univariate and multivariate surface and volumetric data using linear mixed effects models and random field theory,” NeuroImage, vol. 47, article S102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. C. Destrieux, B. Fischl, A. Dale, and E. Halgren, “Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature,” NeuroImage, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Tombini, G. Pellegrino, P. Pasqualetti et al., “Mobile phone emissions modulate brain excitability in patients with focal epilepsy,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 448–454, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. Assenza, G. Pellegrino, M. Tombini, G. di Pino, and V. di Lazzaro, “Wakefulness delta waves increase after cortical plasticity induction,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1221–1227, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. Vecchio, M. Tombini, P. Buffo et al., “Mobile phone emission increases inter-hemispheric functional coupling of electroencephalographic alpha rhythms in epileptic patients,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 164–171, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. Pellegrino, M. Tombini, G. Curcio et al., “Slow activity in focal epilepsy during sleep and wakefulness,” Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 200–208, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. M. Maran, T. Grent, and P. J. Uhlhaas, “Electrophysiological insights into connectivity anomalies in schizophrenia: a systematic review,” Neuropsychiatric Electrophysiology, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 6, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. P. J. Uhlhaas and W. Singer, “Neuronal dynamics and neuropsychiatric disorders: toward a translational paradigm for dysfunctional large-scale networks,” Neuron, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 963–980, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. K. M. Larsen, G. Pellegrino, M. R. Birknow et al., “22q11. 2 deletion syndrome is associated with impaired auditory steady-state gamma response,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, article sbx058, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. G. Pellegrino, L. Tomasevic, M. Tombini et al., “Inter-hemispheric coupling changes associate with motor improvements after robotic stroke rehabilitation,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 497–510, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. G. Di Pino, C. Porcaro, M. Tombini et al., “A neurally-interfaced hand prosthesis tuned inter-hemispheric communication,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 407–418, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Tombini, G. Pellegrino, F. Zappasodi et al., “Complex visual hallucinations after occipital extrastriate ischemic stroke,” Cortex, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 774–777, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. N. Accornero, M. Capozza, L. Pieroni, S. Pro, L. Davi, and O. Mecarelli, “EEG mean frequency changes in healthy subjects during prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 1367–1375, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. T. W. Boonstra, S. Nikolin, A. C. Meisener, D. M. Martin, and C. K. Loo, “Change in mean frequency of resting-state electroencephalography after transcranial direct current stimulation,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 270, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Choe, B. A. Coffman, D. T. Bergstedt, M. D. Ziegler, and M. E. Phillips, “Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates neuronal activity and learning in pilot training,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 34, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. E. Hoy, N. W. Bailey, S. L. Arnold, and P. B. Fitzgerald, “The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on gamma activity and working memory in schizophrenia,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. L. Mangia, M. Pirini, and A. Cappello, “Transcranial direct current stimulation and power spectral parameters: a tDCS/EEG co-registration study,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 601, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. Miller, B. Berger, and P. Sauseng, “Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases frontal-midline theta activity in the human EEG: a preliminary investigation of non-invasive stimulation,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 588, pp. 114–119, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. G. F. Spitoni, R. L. Cimmino, C. Bozzacchi, L. Pizzamiglio, and F. di Russo, “Modulation of spontaneous alpha brain rhythms using low-intensity transcranial direct-current stimulation,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 529, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. Thibaut, C. Russo, L. Morales-Quezada et al., “Neural signature of tDCS, tPCS and their combination: comparing the effects on neural plasticity,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 637, pp. 207–214, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. G. Pfurtscheller and F. L. Da Silva, “Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1842–1857, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. F. L. da Silva, “EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience,” Neuron, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1112–1128, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. G. Assenza, F. Zappasodi, P. Pasqualetti, F. Vernieri, and F. Tecchio, “A contralesional EEG power increase mediated by interhemispheric disconnection provides negative prognosis in acute stroke,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 177–188, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. N. Lang, M. A. Nitsche, W. Paulus, J. C. Rothwell, and R. N. Lemon, “Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 156, no. 4, pp. 439–443, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. K. Boros, C. Poreisz, A. Münchau, W. Paulus, and M. A. Nitsche, “Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1292–1300, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. R. Polanía, W. Paulus, and M. A. Nitsche, “Modulating cortico-striatal and thalamo-cortical functional connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 2499–2508, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. B. W. Vines, D. G. Nair, and G. Schlaug, “Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation,” Neuroreport, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 671–674, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. Kunze, A. Hunold, J. Haueisen, V. Jirsa, and A. Spiegler, “Transcranial direct current stimulation changes resting state functional connectivity: a large-scale brain network modeling study,” NeuroImage, vol. 140, pp. 174–187, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. R. Lindenberg, M. M. Sieg, M. Meinzer, L. Nachtigall, and A. Flöel, “Neural correlates of unihemispheric and bihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in healthy young adults,” NeuroImage, vol. 140, pp. 141–149, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. F. Vecchio, M. C. Pellicciari, F. Miraglia, D. Brignani, C. Miniussi, and P. M. Rossini, “Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the functional coupling of the sensorimotor cortical network,” NeuroImage, vol. 140, pp. 50–56, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. Mancini, D. Brignani, S. Conforto, P. Mauri, C. Miniussi, and M. C. Pellicciari, “Assessing cortical synchronization during transcranial direct current stimulation: a graph-theoretical analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 140, pp. 57–65, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. V. Di Lazzaro, G. Pellegrino, G. di Pino et al., “Val66Met BDNF gene polymorphism influences human motor cortex plasticity in acute stroke,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 92–96, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. G. Di Pino, G. Pellegrino, F. Capone et al., “Val66Met BDNF polymorphism implies a different way to recover from stroke rather than a worse overall recoverability,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. V. Di Lazzaro, G. Pellegrino, G. di Pino et al., “Human motor cortex functional changes in acute stroke: gender effects,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 10, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. F. Giambattistelli, L. Tomasevic, G. Pellegrino et al., “The spontaneous fluctuation of the excitability of a single node modulates the internodes connectivity: a TMS-EEG study,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1740–1749, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. R. Dubbioso, G. Pellegrino, A. Antenora et al., “The effect of cerebellar degeneration on human sensori-motor plasticity,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1144–1150, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. D. Landi, S. Vollaro, G. Pellegrino et al., “Oral fingolimod reduces glutamate-mediated intracortical excitability in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 165–169, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus