Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2018, Article ID 7909684, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7909684
Review Article

How Visual Body Perception Influences Somatosensory Plasticity

1Aging and Cognition Research Group, DZNE, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
2Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
3Department of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44789 Bochum, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Esther Kuehn; ed.enzd@nheuk.rehtse

Received 1 October 2017; Revised 9 January 2018; Accepted 16 January 2018; Published 11 March 2018

Academic Editor: Michela Bassolino

Copyright © 2018 Esther Kuehn and Burkhard Pleger. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Fahle and T. Poggio, Perceptual Learning, MIT Press, Boston, 2002.
  2. E. Kuehn, J. Dinse, E. Jakobsen et al., “Body topography parcellates human sensory and motor cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 3790–3805, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. F. Glasser, T. S. Coalson, E. C. Robinson et al., “A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex,” Nature, vol. 536, no. 7615, pp. 171–178, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Sereno, “Plasticity and its limits,” Nature, vol. 435, no. 7040, pp. 288-289, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Godde, B. Stauffenberg, F. Spengler, and H. R. Dinse, “Tactile coactivation-induced changes in spatial discrimination performance,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1617–1624, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Pleger, H. R. Dinse, P. Ragert, P. Schwenkreis, J. P. Malin, and M. Tegenthoff, “Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 21, pp. 12255–12260, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Pleger, A. F. Foerster, P. Ragert et al., “Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex,” Neuron, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 643–653, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. R. Dinse, P. Ragert, B. Pleger, P. Schwenkreis, and M. Tegenthoff, “Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5629, pp. 91–94, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. R. Dinse, P. Ragert, B. Pleger, P. Schwenkreis, and M. Tegenthoff, “GABAergic mechanisms gate tactile discrimination learning,” Neuroreport, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 1747–1751, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Muret, H. R. Dinse, S. Macchione, C. Urquizar, A. Farnè, and K. T. Reilly, “Touch improvement at the hand transfers to the face,” Current Biology, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. R736–R737, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Kuehn, J. Doehler, and B. Pleger, “The influence of vision on tactile Hebbian learning,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 9069, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Hebb, The Organization of Behavior, Wiley, New York, New York, NY, USA, 1949.
  13. W. James, Psychology: Brief Course, Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1890.
  14. W. B. Levy and O. Steward, “Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus,” Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 791–797, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. D. Hawkins, T. W. Abrams, T. J. Carew, and E. R. Kandel, “A cellular mechanism of classical conditioning in Aplysia: activity-dependent amplification of presynaptic facilitation,” Science, vol. 219, no. 4583, pp. 400–405, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. B. Gustafsson, H. Wigström, W. C. Abraham, and Y. Y. Huang, “Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus using depolarizing current pulses as the conditioning stimulus to single volley synaptic potentials,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 774–780, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. C. Magee and D. Johnston, “A synaptically controlled, associative signal for Hebbian plasticity in hippocampal neurons,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5297, pp. 209–213, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Markram, J. Lubke, M. Frotscher, and B. Sakmann, “Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5297, pp. 213–215, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. L. Golding, Staff NP, and N. Spruston, “Dendritic spikes as a mechanism for cooperative long-term potentiation,” Nature, vol. 418, no. 6895, pp. 326–331, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Debanne, B. H. Gähwiler, and S. M. Thompson, “Asynchronous pre- and postsynaptic activity induces associative long-term depression in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus in vitro,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 1148–1152, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Q. Bi and M. M. Poo, “Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 10464–10472, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. Q. Bi and M. M. Poo, “Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb’s postulate revisited,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 139–166, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Kempter, W. Gerstner, and J. L. van Hemmen, “Intrinsic stabilization of output rates by spike-based Hebbian learning,” Neural Computation, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2709–2741, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Song and L. F. Abbott, “Cortical development and remapping through spike timing-dependent plasticity,” Neuron, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 339–350, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Q. Bi and H. X. Wang, “Temporal asymmetry in spike timing-dependent synaptic plasticity,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 77, no. 4-5, pp. 551–555, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. F. Abbott and S. B. Nelson, “Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, pp. 1178–1183, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. I. Zhang, H. W. Tao, C. E. Holt, W. A. Harris, and M. M. Poo, “A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses,” Nature, vol. 395, no. 6697, pp. 37–44, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. Egger, D. Feldmeyer, and B. Sakman, “Coincidence detection and changes of synaptic efficacy in spiny stellate neurons in rat barrel cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1098–1105, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Flor, T. Elbert, S. Knecht et al., “Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation,” Nature, vol. 375, no. 6531, pp. 482–484, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. R. Makin, J. Scholz, D. Henderson Slater, H. Johansen-Berg, and I. Tracey, “Reassessing cortical reorganization in the primary sensorimotor cortex following arm amputation,” Brain, vol. 138, no. 8, pp. 2140–2146, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. R. Makin, J. Scholz, N. Filippini, D. Henderson Slater, I. Tracey, and H. Johansen-Berg, “Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, p. 1570, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Kikkert, J. Kolasinski, S. Jbabdi et al., “Revealing the neural fingerprints of a missing hand,” eLife, vol. 5, article e15492, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. R. Makin, A. O. Cramer, J. Scholz et al., “Deprivation-related and use-dependent plasticity go hand in hand,” eLife, vol. 2, article e01273, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. G. Cohen, J. P. Brasil-Neto, A. Pascual-Leone, and M. Hallett, “Plasticity of cortical motor output organization following deafferentation, cerebral lesions, and skill acquisition,” Advances in Neurology, vol. 63, pp. 187–200, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  35. A. Sterr, M. M. Müller, T. Elbert, B. Rockstroh, C. Pantev, and E. Taub, “Perceptual correlates of changes in cortical representation of fingers in blind multifinger Braille readers,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 4417–4423, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  36. C. Braun, R. Schweizer, T. Elbert, N. Birbaumer, and E. Taub, “Differential activation in somatosensory cortex for different discrimination tasks,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 446–450, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  37. M. E. Diamond, M. Armstrong-James, and F. F. Ebner, “Experience-dependent plasticity in adult rat barrel cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 2082–2086, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Godde, F. Spengler, and H. R. Dinse, “Associative pairing of tactile stimulation induces somatosensory cortical reorganization in rats and humans,” Neuroreport, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 281–285, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. J. Ruben, J. Schwiemann, M. Deuschert et al., “Somatotopic organization of human secondary somatosensory cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 463–473, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. B. Pleger, C. Wilimzig, V. Nicolas et al., “A complementary role of intracortical inhibition in age-related tactile degradation and its remodelling in humans,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 27388, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. G. Parsons, W. Danysz, and G. Quack, “Memantine is a clinically well tolerated N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist—a review of preclinical data,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 735–767, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. L. Delanoy, D. L. Tucci, and P. E. Gold, “Amphetamine effects on long term potentiation in dentate granule cells,” Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 137–139, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. N. A. Puts, R. A. Edden, C. J. Evans, F. McGlone, and D. J. McGonigle, “Regionally specific human GABA concentration correlates with tactile discrimination thresholds,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 46, pp. 16556–16560, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Iacoboni, “Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 653–670, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. G. Rizzolatti and L. Craighero, “The mirror-neuron system,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 169–192, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. G. Rizzolatti, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese, “Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 661–670, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. Zaki and K. Ochsner, “The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 675–680, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. G. Buccino, F. Binkofski, G. R. Fink et al., “Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 400–404, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. G. Buccino, F. Binkofski, and L. Riggio, “The mirror neuron system and action recognition,” Brain and Language, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 370–376, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. B. Calvo-Merino, D. E. Glaser, J. Grèzes, R. E. Passingham, and P. Haggard, “Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1243–1249, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. Caspers, K. Zilles, A. R. Laird, and S. B. Eickhoff, “ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain,” NeuroImage, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1148–1167, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. E. C. Brown and M. Brüne, “The role of prediction in social neuroscience,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 6, p. 148, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. K. Friston, J. Mattout, and J. Kilner, “Action understanding and active inference,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 104, no. 1-2, pp. 137–160, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. V. Gallese, “Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 362, no. 1480, pp. 659–669, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Brass, H. Bekkering, A. Wohlschläger, and W. Prinz, “Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 124–143, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. T. Singer, B. Seymour, J. O'Doherty, H. Kaube, R. J. Dolan, and C. D. Frith, “Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5661, pp. 1157–1162, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. T. Singer, B. Seymour, J. P. O'Doherty, K. E. Stephan, R. J. Dolan, and C. D. Frith, “Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others,” Nature, vol. 439, no. 7075, pp. 466–469, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. Singer, “The past, present and future of social neuroscience: a European perspective,” NeuroImage, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 437–449, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. B. C. Bernhardt and T. Singer, “The neural basis of empathy,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. I. Bufalari, T. Aprile, A. Avenanti, F. Di Russo, and S. M. Aglioti, “Empathy for pain and touch in the human somatosensory cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2553–2561, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. Keysers, B. Wicker, V. Gazzola, J. L. Anton, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese, “A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch,” Neuron, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 335–346, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. J. Blakemore, D. Bristow, G. Bird, C. Frith, and J. Ward, “Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia,” Brain, vol. 128, no. 7, pp. 1571–1583, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. E. Kuehn, R. Trampel, K. Mueller, R. Turner, and S. Schütz-Bosbach, “Judging roughness by sight - a 7 Tesla fMRI study on responsivity of the primary somatosensory cortex during observed touch of self and others,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1882–1895, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. E. Kuehn, K. Mueller, R. Turner, and S. Schütz-Bosbach, “The functional architecture of S1 during touch observation described with 7 T fMRI,” Brain Structure & Function, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 119–140, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. Keysers, J. H. Kaas, and V. Gazzola, “Somatosensation in social perception,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 417–428, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. E. G. Jones and T. P. Powell, “Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. II. Contralateral cortical connexions,” Brain, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 717–730, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. L. Krubitzer and E. DisbrowE. Kaas JHG, “The evolution of parietal areas involved in hand use in primates,” in The Senses - Somatosensation, Vol 6, pp. 183–214, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  68. T. P. Pons, P. E. Garraghty, C. G. Cusick, and J. H. Kaas, “The somatotopic organization of area 2 in macaque monkeys,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 241, no. 4, pp. 445–466, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. Y. Iwamura, “Bilateral receptive field neurons and callosal connections in the somatosensory cortex,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 355, no. 1394, pp. 267–273, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. Y. Iwamura, A. Iriki, M. Tanaka, M. Taoka, and T. Toda, “Processing of higher order somatosensory and visual information in the intraparietal region of the postcentral gyrus,” in Somatosensory Processing - from Single Neuron to Brain Imaging, Y. Rowe MJI, Ed., pp. 101–112, Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. D. P. Friedman, E. G. Jones, and H. Burton, “Representation pattern in the second somatic sensory area of the monkey cerebral cortex,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 21–41, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. T. P. Pons and J. H. Kaas, “Corticocortical connections of area 2 of somatosensory cortex in macaque monkeys: a correlative anatomical and electrophysiological study,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 313–335, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. T. P. Pons, P. E. Garraghty, D. P. Friedman, and M. Mishkin, “Physiological evidence for serial processing in somatosensory cortex,” Science, vol. 237, no. 4813, pp. 417–420, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. P. Barbaresi, A. Minelli, and T. Manzoni, “Topographical relations between ipsilateral cortical afferents and callosal neurons in the second somatic sensory area of cats,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 343, no. 4, pp. 582–596, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. E. Disbrow, E. Litinas, G. H. Recanzone, J. Padberg, and L. Krubitzer, “Cortical connections of the second somatosensory area and the parietal ventral area in macaque monkeys,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 462, no. 4, pp. 382–399, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. M. Schaefer, B. Xu, H. Flor, and L. G. Cohen, “Effects of different viewing perspectives on somatosensory activations during observation of touch,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 2722–2730, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. E. Kuehn, P. Haggard, A. Villringer, B. Pleger, and M. Sereno, “Visually-driven maps in area 3b,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1295–1310, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. V. Gazzola and C. Keysers, “The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1239–1255, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. J. T. Kaplan and K. Meyer, “Multivariate pattern analysis reveals common neural patterns across individuals during touch observation,” NeuroImage, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 204–212, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. S. Hihara, M. Taoka, M. Tanaka, and A. Iriki, “Visual responsiveness of neurons in the secondary somatosensory area and its surrounding parietal operculum regions in awake macaque monkeys,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 4535–4550, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. W. Chan and C. I. Baker, “Seeing is not feeling: posterior parietal but not somatosensory cortex engagement during touch observation,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1468–1480, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. H. Kaas, “What, if anything, is SI? Organization of first somatosensory area of cortex,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 206–231, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. M. Taylor-Clarke, P. Jacobsen, and P. Haggard, “Keeping the world a constant size: object constancy in human touch,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 219-220, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. M. Taylor-Clarke, S. Kennett, and P. Haggard, “Persistence of visual-tactile enhancement in humans,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 354, no. 1, pp. 22–25, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. S. Kennett, M. Taylor-Clarke, and P. Haggard, “Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans,” Current Biology, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 1188–1191, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. Serino, A. Farne, M. L. Rinaldesi, P. Haggard, and E. Làdavas, “Can vision of the body ameliorate impaired somatosensory function?” Neuropsychologia, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1101–1107, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. F. Cardini, M. R. Longo, and P. Haggard, “Vision of the body modulates somatosensory intracortical inhibition,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2014–2022, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. F. Cardini, M. R. Longo, J. Driver, and P. Haggard, “Rapid enhancement of touch from non-informative vision of the hand,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1954–1960, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. A. Harris, E. Arabzadeh, C. A. Moore, and C. W. Clifford, “Noninformative vision causes adaptive changes in tactile sensitivity,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 27, pp. 7136–7140, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. R. Zopf, J. A. Harris, and M. A. Williams, “The influence of body-ownership cues on tactile sensitivity,” Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 3-4, pp. 147–154, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. S. P. Tipper, D. Lloyd, B. Shorland, C. Dancer, L. A. Howard, and F. McGlone, “Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting,” Neuroreport, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1741–1744, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. P. Haggard, “Just seeing you makes me feel better: interpersonal enhancement of touch,” Social Neuroscience, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 104–110, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. R. Thomas, C. Press, and P. Haggard, “Shared representations in body perception,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 317–330, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. A. Maravita, C. Spence, C. Sergent, and J. Driver, “Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions,” Psychological Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 350–355, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. M. R. Longo, S. Cardozo, and P. Haggard, “Visual enhancement of touch and the bodily self,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1181–1191, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. F. Pavani, C. Spence, and J. Driver, “Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves,” Psychological Science, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 353–359, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. E. L. Austen, S. Soto-Faraco, J. T. Enns, and A. Kingstone, “Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand,” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 170–181, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. M. Fiorio and P. Haggard, “Viewing the body prepares the brain for touch: effects of TMS over somatosensory cortex,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 773–777, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. B. Pleger and A. Villringer, “The human somatosensory system: from perception to decision making,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 103, pp. 76–97, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. R. Auksztulewicz, B. Spitzer, and F. Blankenburg, “Recurrent neural processing and somatosensory awareness,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 799–805, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. A. Hernández, A. Zainos, and R. Romo, “Neuronal correlates of sensory discrimination in the somatosensory cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 6191–6196, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. R. Luna, A. Hernández, C. D. Brody, and R. Romo, “Neural codes for perceptual discrimination in primary somatosensory cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1210–1219, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. R. Rossi-Pool, E. Salinas, A. Zainos et al., “Emergence of an abstract categorical code enabling the discrimination of temporally structured tactile stimuli,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 49, pp. E7966–E7975, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. M. Alvarez, A. Zainos, and R. Romo, “Decoding stimulus features in primate somatosensory cortex during perceptual categorization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 15, pp. 4773–4778, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. E. Azañón and P. Haggard, “Somatosensory processing and body representation,” Cortex, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1078–1084, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. A. Serino and P. Haggard, “Touch and the body,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 224–236, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. E. Kuehn, Open Body Maps - Primary Somatosensory Cortex Activity during Touch Observation Described with 7 Tesla fMRI. Dissertation, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 2013.
  108. I. Morrison, L. S. Löken, and H. Olausson, “The skin as a social organ,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 305–314, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. I. Morrison, M. Björnsdotter, and H. Olausson, “Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 26, pp. 9554–9562, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. I. Morrison, L. S. Löken, J. Minde et al., “Reduced C-afferent fibre density affects perceived pleasantness and empathy for touch,” Brain, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 1116–1126, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. I. Morrison, “CT afferents,” Current Biology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. R77–R78, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. I. U. Kress, L. Minati, S. Ferraro, and H. D. Critchley, “Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping,” Neuroreport, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 646–651, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. A. Gentsch, E. Panagiotopoulou, and A. Fotopoulou, “Active interpersonal touch gives rise to the social softness illusion,” Current Biology, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 2392–2397, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. V. Gazzola, M. L. Spezio, J. A. Etzel, F. Castelli, R. Adolphs, and C. Keysers, “Primary somatosensory cortex discriminates affective significance in social touch,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 25, pp. E1657–E1666, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. S. Aglioti, N. Smania, and A. Peru, “Frames of reference for mapping tactile stimuli in brain-damaged patients,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. E. Azañón and S. Soto-Faraco, “Alleviating the ‘crossed-hands’ deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 537–548, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. E. Azañón and S. Soto-Faraco, “Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events,” Current Biology, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 1267–1049, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. E. Macaluso and A. Maravita, “The representation of space near the body through touch and vision,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 782–795, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. D. I. Shore, K. Gray, E. Spry, and C. Spence, “Spatial modulation of tactile temporal order judgments,” Perception, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1251–1262, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. S. Soto-Faraco, A. Ronald, and C. Spence, “Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception,” Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1077–1094, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. S. Ionta, L. Heydrich, B. Lenggenhager et al., “Multisensory mechanisms in temporo-parietal cortex support self-location and first-person perspective,” Neuron, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 363–374, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. K. E. Overvliet, H. A. Anema, E. Brenner, H. C. Dijkerman, and J. B. Smeets, “Relative finger position influences whether you can localize tactile stimuli,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 245–255, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. P. Haggard, K. Kitadono, C. Press, and M. Taylor-Clarke, “The brain’s fingers and hands,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 94–102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. A. Gallace and C. Spence, “The cognitive and neural correlates of “tactile consciousness”: a multisensory perspective,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 370–407, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. F. T. de Vignemont, M. Tsakiris, and P. Haggard, “Body mereology,” in The Body from Inside Out, G. T. Knoblich, M. Grosjean, and M. Shiffrar, Eds., pp. 148–170, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  126. H. C. Dijkerman and E. H. de Haan, “Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action,” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 189–201, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. P. Haggard and G. Giovagnoli, “Spatial patterns in tactile perception: is there a tactile field?” Acta Psychologica, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. M. S. Beauchamp, S. Laconte, and N. Yasar, “Distributed representation of single touches in somatosensory and visual cortex,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 3163–3171, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. P. Cole and J. Paillard, “Living without touch and peripheral information about body position and movement: studies with deafferented subjects,” in The Body and the Self, L. M. Bermudez and N. Eilan, Eds., pp. 245–266, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  130. H. Buchner, C. Kauert, and I. Radermacher, “Short-term changes of finger representation at the somatosensory cortex in humans,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 57–59, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. S. C. Gandevia and C. M. Phegan, “Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 514, no. 2, pp. 609–616, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. M. Holden, J. Ventura, and J. R. Lackner, “Stabilization of posture by precision contact of the index finger,” Journal of Vestibular Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 285–301, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  133. J. J. Jeka and J. R. Lackner, “Fingertip contact influences human postural control,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 495–502, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  134. J. R. Lackner, P. DiZio, J. Jeka, F. Horak, D. Krebs, and E. Rabin, “Precision contact of the fingertip reduces postural sway of individuals with bilateral vestibular loss,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 459–466, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. J. R. Lackner, E. Rabin, and P. DiZio, “Stabilization of posture by precision touch of the index finger with rigid and flexible filaments,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 454–464, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. S. B. Bortolami, P. DiZio, E. Rabin, and J. R. Lackner, “Analysis of human postural responses to recoverable falls,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 387–404, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. S. J. Lederman and R. L. Klatzky, “Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 342–368, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. S. J. Lederman and R. L. Klatzky, “Extracting object properties through haptic exploration,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. B. B. Edin, G. Westling, and R. S. Johansson, “Independent control of human finger-tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 450, no. 1, pp. 547–564, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. E. Foeller and D. E. Feldman, “Synaptic basis for developmental plasticity in somatosensory cortex,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. D. T. Monaghan and C. W. Cotman, “Distribution of N-methyl-D-aspartate-sensitive L-[3H]glutamate-binding sites in rat brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 2909–2919, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  142. M. Bieler, K. Sieben, N. Cichon, S. Schildt, B. Röder, and I. Hanganu-Opatz, “Rate and temporal coding convey multisensory information in primary sensory cortices,” eNeuro, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. ENEURO.0037–ENEU17.2017, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. S. C. Gandevia, D. Burke, and B. B. McKeon, “Convergence in the somatosensory pathway between cutaneous afferents from the index and middle fingers in man,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 50, no. 2-3, pp. 415–425, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. J. Ruben, T. Krause, B. Taskin, F. Blankenburg, M. Moosmann, and A. Villringer, “Subarea-specific suppressive interaction in the BOLD responses to simultaneous finger stimulation in human primary somatosensory cortex: evidence for increasing rostral to-caudal convergence,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 819–826, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. A. Kraskov, N. Dancause, M. M. Quallo, S. Shepherd, and R. N. Lemon, “Corticospinal neurons in macaque ventral premotor cortex with mirror properties: a potential mechanism for action suppression?” Neuron, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 922–930, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. J.-O. Coq and C. Xerri, “Environmental enrichment alters organizational features of the forepaw representation in the primary somatosensory cortex of adult rats,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 191–204, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. J.-O. Coq and C. Xerri, “Sensorimotor experience modulates age-dependent alterations of the forepaw representation in the rat primary somatosensory cortex,” Neuroscience, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 705–715, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. C. Press, C. Heyes, P. Haggard, and M. Eimer, “Visuotactile learning and body representation: an ERP study with rubber hands and rubber objects,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 312–323, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  149. R. Adolphs, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, G. Cooper, and A. R. Damasio, “A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2683–2690, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  150. D. Pitcher, L. Garrido, V. Walsh, and B. C. Duchaine, “Transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupts the perception and embodiment of facial expressions,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 36, pp. 8929–8933, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. R. Paracampo, E. Tidoni, S. Borgomaneri, G. di Pellegrino, and A. Avenanti, “Sensorimotor network crucial for inferring amusement from smiles,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 5116–5129, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. M. J. Banissy, D. A. Sauter, J. Ward, J. E. Warren, V. Walsh, and S. K. Scott, “Suppressing sensorimotor activity modulates the discrimination of auditory emotions but not speaker identity,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 41, pp. 13552–13557, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. E. V. Friedrich, A. Sivanathan, T. Lim et al., “An effective neurofeedback intervention to improve social interactions in children with autism spectrum disorder,” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 4084–4100, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. M. Schaefer, H. J. Heinze, and M. Rotte, “Embodied empathy for tactile events: interindividual differences and vicarious somatosensory responses during touch observation,” Neuroimage, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 952–957, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. E. Palluel, J. E. Aspell, and O. Blanke, “Leg muscle vibration modulates bodily self-consciousness: integration of proprioceptive, visual, and tactile signals,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 2239–2247, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. J. E. Aspell, B. Lenggenhager, and O. Blanke, “Keeping in touch with one’s self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 8, article e6488, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. H. H. Ehrsson, B. Rosén, A. Stockselius, C. Ragnö, P. Köhler, and G. Lundborg, “Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 12, pp. 3443–3452, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. A. I. Goller, K. Richards, S. Novak, and J. Ward, “Mirror-touch synaesthesia in the phantom limbs of amputees,” Cortex, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 243–251, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. V. S. Ramachandran and D. Brang, “Sensations evoked in patients with amputation from watching an individual whose corresponding intact limb is being touched,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1281–1284, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. L. Aziz-Zadeh, T. Sheng, S. L. Liew, and H. Damasio, “Understanding otherness: the neural bases of action comprehension and pain empathy in a congenital amputee,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 811–819, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. A. Farnè, F. Pavani, F. Meneghello, and E. Làdavas, “Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand,” Brain, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 2350–2360, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  162. A. Avenanti, N. Bolognini, A. Maravita, and S. M. Aglioti, “Somatic and motor components of action simulation,” Current Biology, vol. 17, no. 24, pp. 2129–2135, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. N. Valchev, E. Tidoni, A. F. C. Hamilton, V. Gazzola, and A. Avenanti, “Primary somatosensory cortex necessary for the perception of weight from other people’s action: a continous theta-burst TMS experiment,” Neuroimage, vol. 152, pp. 195–206, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. S. Bosbach, J. Cole, W. Prinz, and G. Knoblich, “Inferring another’s expectation from action: the role of peripheral sensation,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1295–1297, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. P. O. Jacquet and A. Avenanti, “Perturbing the action observation network during perception and categorization of actions’ goals and grips: state-dependency and virtual lesion TMS effects,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 598–608, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus